350.org follows the Mooney directive, but will anyone care?

Hilarity from 350.org, they are following Mooney’s rant: time to act is now right now.

I guess they’ll be known as Mooneys now. Expect weepy Bill McKibben to give a melting oratory.

July 6, 2012
PHOTO CALL/MEDIA ADVISORY

Giant Ice Sculpture On National Mall to Symbolize the Melting Away of Climate Denialism

WASHINGTON–On Saturday morning, 350.org will unveil a giant sculpture on the National Mall—the word “HOAX?” carved in ice. Given the forecast for highs in the 100s, it will not last long, but organizers say that is the point: it will disappear like the arguments have from climate deniers.

For years, scientists have predicted that increased concentrations of CO2 and other greenhouse gases would lead to more intense heat waves, increased drought, massive wildfires, and more powerful storms. In June, 3,215 daily high temperature records were set; and so far this year, more than 2.1 million acres have burned in wildfires. Today was the 9th straight day in the nation’s capital that has met or exceeded 95 degrees.

News accounts estimated that half of the incoming Republican House class in 2010 denied the existence of man-made climate change. In 2010, Sen. James Inhofe (R-OK) mocked climate activist with an igloo display not far from the ice sculpture that will be unveiled tomorrow. Recent events–as well as the findings of every major scientific academy in the world–disprove the viewpoint of climate deniers in Congress.

WHAT: A 6-by-12 foot ice sculpture spelling out “HOAX?,” with the Capitol Dome in the background.

WHERE: East side of 3rd St NW, by the Capitol Reflecting Pool.

WHEN: 11AM Saturday, until the sculpture melts. (Set up time is from 10-11am)

WHO: 350.org is displaying the installation. 350.org policy director Jason Kowalski will be availalble to answer questions and do interviews.

###

Photos will be available shortly after the unveiling at www.flickr.com/350org

==============================================================

Let’s see, a 6×12 foot ice sculpture….that’s a lot of ice. Care to take bets on how long it will last? I’m thinking at least until sunset. Forecast for Washington DC tomorrow says:

High 106° Low 84° – this isn’t much different than Dr. Jim Hansen picking a hot Washington day in June 1988 to disable the air conditioning while he addressed the Senate over his global warming concerns. Props…gotta have props.

Dr. James Hansen is getting ready to testify before the Senate on what he thinks is a serious problem, global warming. The sponsor for Dr. Hansen? Senator Tim Wirth.

http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2009/05/hansen_1988_congress.jpg?w=348&h=242

Dr. James Hansen testifies on global warming, June 1988

If any of you have ever been in Washington DC during the summertime, you’ll be able to relate to this. Senator Timothy Wirth made sure that room was “steamy”. This transcript excerpt is from PBS series Frontline which aired a special in April 2007.

So it goes without saying, that if the case Dr. Hansen was to make before the Senate was so strong, why did Senator Wirth need to make use of cheap stage tricks?

Here he admits his stagecraft in his own words:

TIMOTHY WIRTH: We called the Weather Bureau and found out what historically was the hottest day of the summer. Well, it was June 6th or June 9th or whatever it was. So we scheduled the hearing that day, and bingo, it was the hottest day on record in Washington, or close to it.

DEBORAH AMOS: [on camera] Did you also alter the temperature in the hearing room that day?

TIMOTHY WIRTH: What we did is that we went in the night before and opened all the windows, I will admit, right, so that the air conditioning wasn’t working inside the room. And so when the- when the hearing occurred, there was not only bliss, which is television cameras and double figures, but it was really hot.[Shot of witnesses at hearing]

Watch the Frontline video:

UPDATE: Joe Bastardi suggests this graphic is relevant to Hansen’s 1988 testimony to illustrate how warming has stalled:

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

106 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Beale
July 7, 2012 10:33 am

From the update from 350.org, explaining that their friends in West Virginia were unhappy with the idea:
Bob Kincaid, at Coal River Mountain Watch, said: “Our work in Appalachia is hard enough as it is, since we must ever contend with the well-funded coal industry PR machine.”
Does it really take a PR machine to convince West Virginians that destroying their state’s biggest industry is a bad idea?

Greg House
July 7, 2012 12:59 pm

John Dunton-Downer says:
July 7, 2012 at 10:46 am
I see there is some contention about the C02 based on this 1909 experiment. It appears, interestingly, however, not to be a point on which skeptics are united, and I wonder why. If it is in serious doubt perhaps contemporary experiments to prove the greenhouse theory or not should be being undertaken.
========================================================
My guess is a lot of people do not know about the Wood’s experiment, others are unable or unwilling to connect the dots. And many so called skeptics are in fact skeptical only in a very limited way, that is why I prefer the technical term “warmists”.
As for contemporary experiments, recently on another thread I humbly asked warmists to present something genuine: http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/06/22/a-response-to-dr-paul-bains-use-of-denier-in-scientific-literature/ .

July 7, 2012 3:17 pm

I’m still waiting for the supporters of Earth Day to thank Mother Nature for doing what Man has been unable to do – shut off all their electricity for longer than one hour in March.
Why aren’t they posting full page ads, proclaiming how much better off mankind is, now that large cities are powerless?
Remember their early statements?
“…At 8:30 PM Saturday, some of the world’s most famous landmarks will go dark for Earth Hour 2012. From the Empire State Building to the Great Wall of China, non-essential lighting will be turned off at important locations around the globe.
Earth Hour, a global initiative led by World Wildlife Fund, encourages individuals around the world to shut off their lights on Saturday March 31 for one hour, beginning at 8:30 PM in each time zone…”
Wanting us to turn off non essential lighting, and having Washington DC going dark for several days. Strange irony there…

Olaf Koenders
July 7, 2012 7:50 pm

I may be a bit late on this, but surely they could have used the energy that froze that water a bit more sensibly, for better purposes?

1 3 4 5