From Dr. Benny Peiser at The GWPF

Network Agency Calls For Suspension Of Emission Laws For Old Coal Plants
Last winter, on several occasions, Germany escaped only just large-scale power outages. Next winter the risk of large blackouts is even greater. The culprit for the looming crisis is the single most important instrument of German energy policy: the “Renewable Energy Law.” The economic cost of a wide-scale blackout are measured in billions of Euros per day. The most important test of energy policy is now the stability of power – so far only the cost of the green energy transition has been focused upon. Because the federal government does not have the guts to start an overdue and fundamental debate about the usefulness of a 12-year-old, now totally outdated, “launch aid” called EEG, it now threatens to over-steer, with the green energy transition ending up in a crash. Fasten your seat belts. –Daniel Wetzel, Die Welt, 10 May 2012
Old coal power plants need to stay in operation or Germany’s power grid faces collapse. That is the warning of Germany’s national grid agency. Because the danger of blackouts is growing as a result of the shut-down of six nuclear power plants last year, the Federal Network Agency is proposing to suspend legal emission limits for plants. Old power stations, which are due to be shut down due to their high environmental impact, should continue to operate. “Closures of more conventional power plants are currently not feasible in Germany,” it says literally in the grid agency’s report: “Given the present and future tense situation, it is necessary to suspend closures due to the emissions reduction law.” –D. Wetzel und D. Siems, Die Welt, 10 May 2012
The German Bundesnetzagentur (Federal Network Agency) issued a press release warning that the national power grid is in serious trouble and that something needs to be done urgently. Germany’s once impeccably stable world-class power grid has been transformed and is today just one step away from being a developing-world laughing stock. This has all been accomplished in just a few short years – thanks to the country’s reckless and uncontrolled rush to renewable energies, wind and sun, all spurred on by a blind environmental movement and hysteria with respect to nuclear power. –P Gosslin, NoTricksZone, 11 May 2012
Winfried Kretschmann (Green Party), the prime minister of the state of Baden Wuerttemberg, is urging Chancellor Angela Merkel (CDU) to encourage the construction of new gas-fired power plants. Especially in southern Germany energy security is at risk, according to Kretschmann. –Nikolai Fichtner,Financial Times Deutschland, 3 May 2012,
Global-warming-related catastrophes are increasingly hitting vulnerable populations around the world, with one species in particular danger: the electricity ratepayer. Denmark, an early adopter of the global-warming mania, now requires its households to pay the developed world’s highest power prices — about 40¢ a kilowatt hour, or three to four times what North Americans pay today. Germany, whose powerhouse economy gave green developers a blank cheque, is a close second, followed by other politically correct nations such as Belgium, the headquarters of the EU, and distressed nations such as Spain. The result is chaos to the economic well-being of the EU nations. Even in rock-solid Germany, up to 15% of the populace is now believed to be in “fuel poverty.” Some 600,000 low-income Germans are now being cut off by their power companies annually, a number expected to increase as a never-ending stream of global-warming projects in the pipeline wallops customers. In the U.K., which has laboured under the most politically correct climate leadership in the world, some 12 million people are already in fuel poverty, 900,000 of them in wind-infested Scotland alone, and the U.K. has now entered a double-dip recession. –Lawrence Solomon, Financial Post, 12 May 2012
They must have taken some energy policy advice from Obama to get this far in the policy swamp. Time to reap the whirlwind.
neill says:
May 12, 2012 at 9:00 am
Something really, really bad is going to have to happen first. The Warmists are blind to the disaster they are building toward. Let’s pray that when it happens it doesn’t take the global economy down with it.
Uhhh..where have you been the last four years?
Jean Demesure says:
Maurice Strong, U.N. environmental leader and IPCC creator: “Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about?”
Please provide a reference for that!
TonyG says: @ur momisugly May 14, 2012 at 9:53 am
Please provide a reference for that!
________________________________
Maurice Strong quoted from the September 1, 1997 edition of National Review magazine.
There were similar references by him.
at the 1992 Earth Summit. … Frankly, we may get to the point where the only way of saving the world will be for industrial civilization to collapse… http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_tavistock04b.htm
Also at the opening session of the 1992 Earth Summit he said the first world
“….developed and benefited from the unsustainable patterns of production and consumption which have produced our present dilemma. It is clear that current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class — involving high meat intake, consumption of large amounts of frozen and convenience foods, use of fossil fuels, appliances, home and work-place air-conditioning, and suburban housing — are not sustainable. A shift is necessary toward lifestyles less geared to environmentally damaging consumption patterns…..”
A look at Agenda 21 show Strong is not kidding around about this. A collapse of the USA and the first world is necessary to have people accept the rearrangement of their lives. See: http://www.democratsagainstunagenda21.com/ and her video at the bottom of the page (first one)
It all sounds like a tin hat conspiracy theory until you read the documents and follow the events taking place.
Here are the actual documents.
World Bank Document on Livestock: http://www-wds.worldbank.org/servlet/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2010/01/13/000158349_20100113084444/Rendered/PDF/WPS5178.pdf
(b) To establish agricultural planning bodies at national and local levels to decide priorities, channel resources and implement programmes.
alcheson says:
RIght now there will be two mulit-billion dollar referendums on the ballot this fall to raise taxes, both sales and income and they both have a chance of passing.
Can you point me to some more info on that? I couldn’t find anything (mostly got articles about Amazon supporting a sales tax referendum, but that was from 2011)
Many Thanks, Gail!