NASA: Warm Ocean Currents Cause Majority of Ice Loss from Antarctica

Breaking news from NASA and the ICEsat team, that’s their headline, not mine.

This really makes all the hype over the now discredited Steig et al. paper, which attempted to establish an air temperature warming trend as one of the possible causes for “Antarctic melting”, only to have the Mannian PCA math they used shot down in flames for smearing data from the Antarctic Peninsula all over the continent, look even weaker.

Click for a larger image or visit the video animation page here
WASHINGTON — Warm ocean currents attacking the underside of ice shelves are the dominant cause of recent ice loss from Antarctica, a new study using measurements from NASA’s Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation Satellite (ICESat) revealed.

An international team of scientists used a combination of satellite measurements and models to differentiate between the two known causes of melting ice shelves: warm ocean currents thawing the underbelly of the floating extensions of ice sheets and warm air melting them from above. The finding, published today in the journal Nature, brings scientists a step closer to providing reliable projections of future sea level rise.

The researchers concluded that 20 of the 54 ice shelves studied are being melted by warm ocean currents. Most of these are in West Antarctica, where inland glaciers flowing down to the coast and feeding into these thinning ice shelves have accelerated, draining more ice into the sea and contributing to sea-level rise. This ocean-driven thinning is responsible for the most widespread and rapid ice losses in West Antarctica, and for the majority of Antarctic ice sheet loss during the study period.

“We can lose an awful lot of ice to the sea without ever having summers warm enough to make the snow on top of the glaciers melt,” said the study’s lead author Hamish Pritchard of the British Antarctic Survey in Cambridge, United Kingdom. “The oceans can do all the work from below.”

To map the changing thickness of almost all the floating ice shelves around Antarctica, the team used a time series of 4.5 million surface height measurements taken by a laser instrument mounted on ICESat from October 2003 to October 2008. They measured how the ice shelf height changed over time and ran computer models to discard changes in ice thickness because of natural snow accumulation and compaction. The researchers also used a tide model that eliminated height changes caused by tides raising and lowering the ice shelves.

“This study demonstrates the power of space-based, laser altimetry for understanding Earth processes,” said Tom Wagner, cryosphere program scientist at NASA Headquarters in Washington.” Coupled with NASA’s portfolio of other ice sheet research using data from our GRACE mission, satellite radars and aircraft, we get a comprehensive view of ice sheet change that improves estimates of sea level rise.”

Previous studies used satellite radar data to measure the evolution of ice shelves and glaciers, but laser measurements are more precise in detecting changes in ice shelf thickness through time. This is especially true in coastal areas. Steeper slopes at the grounding line, where floating ice shelves connect with the landmass, cause problems for lower-resolution radar altimeters.

ICESat was the first satellite specifically designed to use laser altimetry to study the Earth’s polar regions. It operated from 2003 to 2009. Its successor, ICESat-2, is scheduled for launch in 2016.

“This study demonstrates the urgent need for ICESat-2 to get into space,” said Jay Zwally, ICESat project scientist at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md. “We have limited information on the changes in polar regions caused by climate change. Nothing can look at these changes like satellite measurements do.”

The new research also links the observed increase in melting that occurs on the underside of a glacier or ice shelf, called basal melt, and glacier acceleration with changes in wind patterns.

“Studies have shown Antarctic winds have changed because of changes in climate,” Pritchard said. “This has affected the strength and direction of ocean currents. As a result warm water is funnelled beneath the floating ice. These studies and our new results suggest Antarctica’s glaciers are responding rapidly to a changing climate.”

A different picture is seen on the Antarctic Peninsula, the long stretch of land pointing towards South America. The study found thinning of the largest ice shelf on the peninsula can be explained by warm summer winds directly melting the snow on the ice shelf surfaces. The patterns of widespread ocean-driven melting and summer melting on the Antarctic Peninsula can be attributed to changing wind patterns.

The study was carried out by an international team from the British Antarctic Survey, Utrecht University in Utrecht, Netherlands, the University of California in San Diego and the non-profit research institute Earth and Space Research in Corvallis, Ore.

For more information about ICESat and ICESat-2, visit:

http://icesat.gsfc.nasa.gov

==============================================================

I have the paper:

Antarctic ice-sheet loss driven by basal melting

of ice shelves

H. D. Pritchard, S. R. M. Ligtenberg, H. A. Fricker, D. G. Vaughan1, M. R. van den Broeke & L. Padman

doi:10.1038/nature10968

And I’ll be posting more on it later, for now, here is the summary:

To summarize, we find thinning attributed to ocean-driven basal melt on 20 of 54 ice shelves, with the most widespread and rapid losses (up to ~ 7m yr -1) on the coast of West Antarctica, where warm waters at depth have access to thick ice shelves via deep bathymetric troughs. There is evidence that changes in wind forcing explain both the

increased oceanic supply of warm water to thinning West Antarctic ice shelves, and the atmospheric warming on the Antarctic Peninsula that caused the loss of Larsen A and B and now dominates the thinning of Larsen C. That is to say, both processes are ultimately linked to the atmosphere. Both mechanisms imply that Antarctic ice shelves can respond rapidly to Southern Hemisphere wind patterns that vary on

timescales of years to decades.

We find that ocean-driven ice-shelf thinning is in all cases coupled with dynamic thinning of grounded tributary glaciers that together account for about 40% of Antarctic discharge and the majority of Antarctic ice-sheet mass loss2. In agreement with recent model predictions, we conclude that it is reduced buttressing from the thinning

ice shelves that is driving glacier acceleration and dynamic thinning.

This implies that the most profound contemporary changes to the ice sheets and their contribution to sea level rise can be attributed to ocean thermal forcing that is sustained over decades and may already have triggered a period of unstable glacier retreat.

And just in case people forget, the sea-ice trend in Antarctica is positive:

http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/IMAGES/seaice.anomaly.antarctic.png

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
81 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ian H
April 25, 2012 3:34 pm

I have not read the paper. However it sounds like they measured – for the first time – the rate at which floating ice was melting from below. That sounds useful. We always knew ice melted from below but it is useful to quantify that.
However what puzzles me is how they can state that the rate of melting from below is accelerating since they have just got done with measuring it for the first time. The link to changing current patterns also seems a bit of a stretch. People have been looking at these currents for … how long? How can anyone realistically say they have changed?
It looks like a good bit of experimental measurement has been sexed up with a bunch of alarming and unjustified speculative statements to make it more appealing to a political rag like science.

nc
April 25, 2012 3:35 pm

What sea level rise, and where is all that glacial ice coming from?

Mydogsgotnonose
April 25, 2012 3:38 pm

Clearly no-one has done any engineering calculation of the enthalpies involved.
The real heating will be from reduction of cloud albedo due to phytoplankton blooms.

diogenes
April 25, 2012 3:40 pm

just to say that, regardless of the scientifico/politico conclusions, that that is a beautiful picture of an unknown region of our planet.

edbarbar
April 25, 2012 3:44 pm

I suppose what they are saying is the volume of ice is less, not the surface area of ice. What’s the purpose of showing the 2D surface area when the paper is discussing the 3D volume?

April 25, 2012 3:50 pm

Well floating ice melts and contributes nothing to sea level rise. If what we are dealing with is a migrating glacier which is what they do, how does the ocean speed it up? The glaciers moving into the ocean cause sea level rise their melting just makes them less obvious.

Athelstan.
April 25, 2012 3:57 pm

Gawd sakes, whatever next – Earth discovered to be in heliocentric orbit?

Bloke down the pub
April 25, 2012 4:01 pm

The BBC tonight showed a programme of the Old Pulteney expedition to row to the magnetic pole as it was in 1996. Readers of this blog will know of this trip as it was followed on-line at the time. The thing that amused me was how they always seemed suprised when they came up against pack ice. Who would have thought it?

April 25, 2012 4:02 pm

The Russians just bored thru 4,000 meters of ice into the fresh water Lake Vostok. This 14,000 sq km lake is the size of Lake Ontario, with an average surface temperature of -50F and 50 times the ambient dissolved Oxygen of typical fresh water lakes. Please, how did human Carbon Dioxide redirect OLR to keep this lake melted ? Maybe the HEAT, the fresh WATER and the free OXYGEN all come from BELOW !
See…. http://www.thelivingmoon.com/41pegasus/02files/Lake_Vostok02.html
….and then engage “brain”.

SirCharge
April 25, 2012 4:03 pm

So sea ice cover measurably increased over the chosen time period but they used models to “prove” that the ice got thinner. Please explain how the warm currents managed to thin the ice without effecting it’s coverage.

Steve from Rockwood
April 25, 2012 4:04 pm

From NASA and published in Nature. It’s got be right. Right? With that off my chest I’ll go read it anyway.

George E. Smith;
April 25, 2012 4:06 pm

I have a simple experiment I would recommend to anyone who has doubts about how Antarctic ice sheets “melt”.
You need a stop watch, and a thermometer that includes zero deg C on its scale, and you need to find something like a mid west or similar cold lake that gets ice on it in winter. Night time is preferred to eliminate spurious “heat” sources like the sun.
So part one of the experiment requires waiting for a wind free night, with the air and water Temperature at the lake right at zero deg C, so there should be chunks of ice floating on the water.
You srtip down to your pre-natal suit, and start the stop watch as you stand alongside the lake shore.
Time how long it takes for you to freeze to death, or preferrably abandon this phase of the experiment, before that time.
Phase two of the experiment is identical to phase one, with one slight experimental difference in procedure.
Before you start the stop watch, as in phase one, go and jump in the lake.
Record the new time to expiration.
Then write a short essay, on the relative thermal conduction of air and water.
[Moderator’s Note: George, while there is a certain elegance to this experiment, don’t you think, maybe, you might have suggested that no one try this at home? -REP]

April 25, 2012 4:09 pm

“We can lose an awful lot of ice to the sea without ever having summers warm enough to make the snow on top of the glaciers melt,” said the study’s lead author Hamish Pritchard of the British Antarctic Survey in Cambridge, United Kingdom. “The oceans can do all the work from below.”
I pointed out recently that the Antarctic Peninsula warming causing glacier/floating icesheet melt claim was fraudulent, because all the warming was at night, and night time temperatures hardly ever get above zero C.
The not warm enough to melt the snow on top claim, appears to derive from this point, but otherwise not based on any data.
Snow and ice can ‘melt’ from the top when temperatures are below zero, by sublimation, and increased solar insolation (from decreased clouds) will cause increased sublimation. Perhaps they have excluded this mechanism as the cause of icesheet melt, I can’t say from Anthony’s summary above.

April 25, 2012 4:10 pm

What happened to the sticky Svensmark paper story….itv has dissapeared off WUWT current list???!!!

Paul Westhaver in a cranky mood
April 25, 2012 4:10 pm

WASHINGTON — Warm ocean currents attacking the underside of ice shelves are the dominant cause of recent ice loss from Antarctica,
“ATTACKING” for gosh sakes!!!! attacking….
Who wrote this? What an A-hole.
Besides this ATTACK has been under way for 10,000 years….The BS never ends does it?

Big D in TX
April 25, 2012 4:14 pm

Ah, now I understand! The missing heat was hiding under Antarctica, wringing its hands together and laughing to itself with all the devious intent of a silent film villain!
need I say /sarc?

bubbagyro
April 25, 2012 4:16 pm

Ice floats. If it melts, total water level stays the same. If it doesn’t melt, water level stays the same. Middle school science. What a bunch of clowns to even go there.
Maybe I will pull the ice above the glass bar trick on them, and bet it doesn’t overflow!
“C’mon—Double or Nothing, professor!”
This is one of the useful properties of water that enables life on the planet.

April 25, 2012 4:16 pm

That’s one for the history books surly? NASA in 2012 announces that they have discovered that Ice melts. (Yea of course, “and don’t call me surly”).
The usual culprits will have headlines like,
“ocean driving Antarctic ice loss”.
“Antarctic Ice Melting From Warm Water Below”.
“Warmer seas behind Antarctic ice shelf melt, study finds”
The spin on ice melting is very much on Que at the end of this this summer in the SH.
I wonder why? (hmm… scratches chin!)

Steve from Rockwood
April 25, 2012 4:20 pm

I’m not sure how going from radar to laser helps you measure the removal of the underside of the ice.

April 25, 2012 4:23 pm

And to pre-empt some of the icesheet -sea ice confusion. On the east side of the Antarctic Peninsula, where the Larsen icesheets are, you can see from the graphic below that sea ice extends far beyond the icesheets (300+ kms) even at this time year, the late Austral summer.
You can also see ice free areas along the coast, so warm ocean upwelling along the coast is certainly occuring. The question is whether it has increased.
http://nsidc.org/data/seaice_index/images/daily_images/S_bm_extent_hires.png

April 25, 2012 4:29 pm

[Moderator’s Note: George, while there is a certain elegance to this experiment, don’t you think, maybe, you might have suggested that no one try this at home? -REP]
>>>>>>>
But he did. He said go to a lake. And to jump in it.

April 25, 2012 4:35 pm

So… ocean currents have changed, bringing more warm water to the ice sheet, causing it to melt from below. Assuming that is correct:
1. Where did the warm water originate from?
2. What replaced the warm water? Presumably less warm water from somewhere else?
3. Since the warm water left where it was, and was replaced by other presumably colder water, did some area of earth experience cooling as a consequence?
4. If the volume of water melting from the ice sheet is in fact large enough to cause a measurable rise in sea level, then the obvious question is, where does that water go once it melts? Being at freezing point, it would be colder than any other water it flowed toward.
So, unless the study can show corresponding cooling to account for the change in warm water currents and the results of new cold water entering the ocean in vast quantities, all they’ve shown is…that something changed. Oh my. Like that’s never happened before.

Frank K.
April 25, 2012 4:42 pm

But…but…the antarctic sea ice extent is above average right now
http://nsidc.org/data/seaice_index/images/daily_images/S_timeseries.png
and actually the arctic sea is pretty much at the historical average
http://nsidc.org/data/seaice_index/images/daily_images/S_timeseries.png
So…uh melting…ice free arctic…global warming…abnormal…catastrophic…I just don’t get it…

Frank K.
April 25, 2012 4:44 pm

Whoops my second plot above one should be …
http://nsidc.org/data/seaice_index/images/daily_images/N_timeseries.png
Just “kissing” the historical average too. Go, baby ice, go!

Heystoopidone
April 25, 2012 4:44 pm

Thanks Anthony, a most interesting read, in a world where 70% of the surface area is water, to be precise.
Antarctica, is a rather unique continent, with it’s very own current, which flows around the continent, unlike all other continents, as this diagram clearly shows :- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Conveyor_belt.svg
So, by what mysterious mechanism are the oceans heating up again, since the initial around the world voyage of the oceanographic research vessel, the HMS Challenger, in 1873?

1 2 3 4