They shrink horses, don't they?

From the University of Nebraska-Lincoln . Tom Nelson quipped earlier today that he hadn’t noticed any pygmy horses near the equator where it is warmer.

Study: Evolution of earliest horses driven by climate change

New research offers evidence of rising temperatures’ effects on body size

This is an artist's reconstruction of Sifrhippus sandrae (right) touching noses with a modern Morgan horse (left) that stands about 5 feet high at the shoulders and weighs about 1,000 pounds. Sifrhippus was the size of a small house cat (about 8.5 pounds) at the beginning of the Eocene (approximately 55.8 million years ago) and is the earliest known horse. Credit: Danielle Byerley, Florida Museum of Natural History.

When Sifrhippus, the earliest known horse, first appeared in the forests of North America more than 50 million years ago, it would not have been mistaken for a Clydesdale. It weighed in at around 12 pounds — and it was destined to get much smaller over the ensuing millennia.

Sifrhippus lived during the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum, a 175,000-year interval of time some 56 million years ago in which average global temperatures rose by about 10 degrees Fahrenheit, caused by the release of vast amounts of carbon into the atmosphere and oceans.

About a third of mammal species responded with significant reduction in size during the PETM, some by as much as one-half. Sifrhippus shrank by about 30 percent to the size of a small house cat (about 8.5 pounds) in the PETM’s first 130,000 years and then rebounded to about 15 pounds in the final 45,000 years of the PETM.

Scientists have assumed that rising temperatures or high concentrations of carbon dioxide primarily caused the phenomenon in mammals during this period, and new research led by Ross Secord of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln and Jonathan Bloch of the Florida Museum of Natural History at the University of Florida in Gainesville offers new evidence of the cause-and-effect relationship between temperature and body size. Their findings also offer clues to what might happen to animals in the near future from global warming.

In a paper to be published in the Feb. 24 issue of the international journal Science, Secord, Bloch and colleagues used measurements and geochemical composition of fossil mammal teeth to document a progressive decrease in Sifrhippus‘ body size that correlates very closely to temperature change over a 130,000-year span.

Bloch, associate curator of vertebrate paleontology at the Florida Museum of Natural History, said multiple trails led to the discovery.

One was the fossils themselves, recovered from the Cabin Fork area of the southern Bighorn Basin near Worland, Wyo. Stephen Chester, then an undergraduate student at Florida, now an anthropology Ph.D. candidate at Yale and a co-author on the paper, had the task of measuring the horses’ teeth. What he found when he plotted them through time caught Bloch and Secord by surprise.

“He pointed out that the first horses in the section were much larger than those later on,” Bloch recalled. “I thought something had to be wrong, but he was right — and the pattern became more robust as we collected more fossils.”

A postdoctoral researcher in Bloch’s lab for the first year of the project, Secord performed the geochemical analysis of the oxygen isotopes in the teeth. What he found provided an even bigger surprise.

“It was absolutely startling when Ross pulled up the first oxygen isotope data,” Bloch said. “We looked at the curve and we realized that it was exactly the same pattern that we were seeing with the horse body size.

“For the first time, going back into deep time — going back tens of millions of years — we were able to show that indeed temperature was causing essentially a one-to-one shift in body size within this lineage of horse. Because it’s over a long enough time, you can argue very strongly that what you’re looking at is natural selection and evolution — that it’s actually corresponding to the shift in temperature and driving the evolution of these horses.”

Secord, who came to UNL in 2008 as an assistant professor of Earth and atmospheric sciences and curator of vertebrate paleontology at the University of Nebraska State Museum, said the finding raises important questions about how plants and animals will respond to rapid change in the not-too-distant future.

“This has implications, potentially, for what we might expect to see over the next century or two, at least with some of the climate models that are predicting that we will see warming of as much as 4 degrees Centigrade (7 degrees Fahrenheit) over the next 100 years,” he said.

Those predictions are based largely on the 40 percent increase of atmospheric carbon dioxide levels (from 280 to 392 parts per million) since the start of the Industrial Revolution in the mid-19th century.

Ornithologists, Secord said, have already started to notice that there may be a decrease in body size among birds.

“One of the issues here is that warming (during the PETM) happened much slower, over 10,000 to 20,000 years to get 10 degrees hotter, whereas now we’re expecting it to happen over a century or two,” Secord said. “So there’s a big difference in scale and one of the questions is, ‘Are we going to see the same kind of response?’ Are animals going to be able to keep up and readjust their body sizes over the next couple of centuries?”

Increased temperatures are not the only change animals will have to adapt to, Secord said. Greenhouse experiments show that increased atmospheric carbon dioxide lowers the nutritional content of plants, which he said could have been a secondary driver of dwarfism during the PETM.

###

Other co-authors on the paper are Doug M. Boyer of Brooklyn College, Aaron R. Wood of the Florida Museum of Natural History, Scott L. Wing of the Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History, Mary J. Kraus of the University of Colorado-Boulder, Francesca A. McInerny of Northwestern University, and John Krigbaum of the University of Florida.

The research was funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, with additional support from UNL.

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
124 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
February 23, 2012 7:21 pm

Ed MacAulay says:
February 23, 2012 at 5:58 pm
This is exciting!
So if humans also shrink to half size that would be about one quarter our mass.
Viola population problem solved, we could then crowd at least 28 billion people on our planet.
Another benefit of global warming. /sarc
Yeah, but it would be hard to walk up and down the stairs!

KevinK
February 23, 2012 7:24 pm

Oh, good grief………
What’s next horseometers as a “proxy” for past temperatures ? Or Paleoequinineclimatalogy…….. Can’t you just see “Dr.” Mann posing in front of a horse fossil ? How many rings does a Horse that lived in an “unchanged climate” have anyway ?
Animals of all different sizes live all over the place, with wide temperature extremes. Ever heard of the Elephant Seal ? Have you ever heard of a Shrew Seal ?
Cheers, Kevin.

February 23, 2012 7:34 pm

Animals may increase or decrease in size for all kinds of complex clusters of reasons. Sometimes an animal may adapt as a result of an “arms race” with a predator species. The increased size may help make it less of an easy target. A species may decrease in size due to lack of available resources – especially evident when species are limited to isolated zones such as islands.
While there is little doubt that climate change over geological time scales is a primary driver of evolutionary adoption, drawing a simplistic correlation between temperature and body size is so stupid that it should be embarrassing for someone with academic qualifications to assert such a claim. Worst kind of junk science here.

TG McCoy (Douglas DC)
February 23, 2012 7:37 pm

Also the warm climate of the Shetland Islands must be the reason for Shetland Ponies..

Bill Parsons
February 23, 2012 7:46 pm

One possible conclusion is… they’re wrong.
Warmer conditions generally lead to stronger individuals, and improved species health. It seems to be true of humans, anyway. Lots of recent research suggests that humans were about 2 – 3″ taller in the Middle Ages (when it was warmer), and began to decline some time after 12th century. At the onset of the Little Ice Age, various economic and environmental factors (malnutrition, plague, etc.), affected size negatively.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/27/books/robert-w-fogel-investigates-human-evolution.html?pagewanted=all

But the basic argument is rather simple: that the health and nutrition of pregnant mothers and their children contribute to the strength and longevity of the next generation. If babies are deprived of sufficient nutrition in the womb and early in life, they will be more fragile and more vulnerable to diseases later on. These weakened adults will, in turn, produce weaker offspring in a self-reinforcing spiral.
As climate began to warm again, people’s growth picked up, and today we have an increasingly well-nourished world, whose sizes are reflective of that. (Some might say it’s a bit overnourished in America.)
http://www.nytimes.com/imagepages/2011/04/27/books/27body-grfk.html?ref=books
As for horses, the loss in sized in a warming world is counterintuitive at best. Could they be missing something?

Tom Harley
February 23, 2012 7:49 pm

Of course, the birds can tell that the temp has risen a few tenths of a degree.
“Ornithologists, Secord said, have already started to notice that there may be a decrease in body size among birds.”
They must be really confused now that it’s been cooling for a few years!

February 23, 2012 7:51 pm

What the heck;
“Increased temperatures are not the only change animals will have to adapt to, Secord said. Greenhouse experiments show that increased atmospheric carbon dioxide lowers the nutritional content of plants, which he said could have been a secondary driver of dwarfism during the PETM.”
Last I have read was how increased CO2 increased bushels per acre, and now is there less nutritional value in the extra bushels?

Richard G
February 23, 2012 7:52 pm

Bill Illis says:February 23, 2012 at 5:05 pm
“Grass didn’t even evolve until 25 to 30 million years later. What was the cat-sized horse eating.”
Exactly. Animal evolution is more closely tied to plant evolution than to temperature or CO2.

Tom Harley
February 23, 2012 7:55 pm

Of course during the Roman warm period, Hannibal’s elephants were the size of horses, and the Roman horses the size of today’s donkeys (sarc)

Gixxerboy
February 23, 2012 7:56 pm

Two words: Shetland Ponies

mr.artday
February 23, 2012 7:57 pm

How about we lable Papers like this: Toilet Paper.

February 23, 2012 7:58 pm

On my page of this post there is ad for shorts. I like the one with 5 inch inseams, for two reasons. One they will keep me cooler when global warming hits, and two since I will shrink over the next 100 years, the shorts won’t be over my knees.

Mike Wryley
February 23, 2012 7:59 pm

I am amazed that you can still find seven other people who would have their names attached to such a flawed bucket of swill. Is there a University of Lincoln on another planet somewhere ?

Mike Wryley
February 23, 2012 8:00 pm

Make that University of Nebraska, Lincoln,

Gixxerboy
February 23, 2012 8:01 pm

TG McCoy, you beat me to it :-[

pochas
February 23, 2012 8:05 pm

Bill Parsons says:
February 23, 2012 at 7:46 pm
“As for horses, the loss in sized in a warming world is counterintuitive at best. Could they be missing something?”
Perhaps the tyrannosaurs couldn’t see them?

Crispin in Waterloo
February 23, 2012 8:07 pm

The native inhabitants of Tierra Del Fuego are huge. Captain Cook said they towered over him and he was 6 feet tall. They lived in a very cold climate and wore no clothes. Drawings from the era show them to be very tall. Tall, cold…..hmmm…..

February 23, 2012 8:10 pm

So in addition to everything else CO2 is a diet aid?. When this news gets out fossil fuel companies have developed a cure for obesity, surely they will share the Nobel Prize in Medicine.

DesertYote
February 23, 2012 8:15 pm

“Greenhouse experiments show that increased atmospheric carbon dioxide lowers the nutritional content of plants, …”
This piece of propaganda is actually true, sort of. The experiment is one that has been designed for students to perform. It is set up in such a way as to yield a dramatic result. The trick is that the same amount of nutrients, water and light is given to each group but that amount has been designed to be the bare minimum to support the slower growing group, the lighting also is set up to drop off quickly with height. The result is that the high CO2 plants are starved! That these so called researchers are regurgitating long debunked experiment shows that they are either completely clueless and/or deliberately deceitful.

Mac the Knife
February 23, 2012 8:16 pm

OMG!!! It’s happening NOW! Horses are shrinking in Minnesota!
Minnesota Horse Expo – miniature horse video

Juan
February 23, 2012 8:23 pm
Caleb
February 23, 2012 8:24 pm

Ed MacAulay says:
February 23, 2012 at 5:58 pm
I had the exact same thought. If humans shrink down to the size of Hobbits, the earth will have much more space, and the more the merrier!
“Phil R says:
February 23, 2012 at 7:21 pm
Yeah, but it would be hard to walk up and down the stairs!”
Hopefully we won’t evolve too fast, but even if we do, science will likely solve the great “Staircase Problem.” Of course, Warmists will say the problem can’t be solved, and we’d all be better off freezing.

wermet
February 23, 2012 8:28 pm

If I remember correctly, most of the world had a tropical climate during the Jurassic and Triassic periods. So by the logic of this paper, the dinosaurs were all small, right?

Toto
February 23, 2012 8:39 pm

Can we call this the “Myth of Sifrhippus”?

Joanie
February 23, 2012 8:48 pm

From the droning blather on Mac the Knife’s video link: “Which brings up an important point. These horses are not ponies, they are horses in miniature.” I may not know about Eocene fauna, but I know this is hogwash. Miniature horses ARE ponies, interbred with the smallest Arabians. They extensively used Shetland ponies for the early stock. Moreover, Miniatures are generally restricted in their feed and ‘sweated down” to keep them slim… otherwise they look like hairy coffee tables. They exhibit the symptoms of dwarfism that is a key factor in Shetland ponies. Hydrocephalus foals are not uncommon.
As to the size of the Eocene horses shrinking, that was all about food, nothing to do with climate. Are the tiny deer in Japan, tiny because it is so terribly hot there? Nooo…. Are Zebras now the size of Pekinese because Africa is so hot? What an embarrassing paper. ‘Phoo, what a looney’, as Black Adder would say.