From the Institute of Physics
Cold winters caused by warmer summers, research suggests
Scientists have offered up a convincing explanation for the harsh winters recently experienced in the Northern Hemisphere; increasing temperatures and melting ice in the Arctic regions creating more snowfall in the autumn months at lower latitudes.
Their findings may throw light on specific weather incidents such as the extremely harsh Florida winter of 2010 which ended up killing a host of tropical creatures, as well as the chaos-causing snow that fell on the UK in December 2010.
Published today, Friday 13 January, in IOP Publishing’s journal Environmental Research Letters, this new research suggests that the trend of increasingly cold winters over the past two decades could be explained by warmer temperatures in the autumn having a marked effect on normal weather patterns, causing temperatures to plummet in the following winter.
The strongest winter cooling trends were observed in the eastern United States, southern Canada and much of northern Eurasia, which the researchers, based at Atmospheric and Environmental Research (AER), the University of Massachusetts and the University of Alaska Fairbanks, believe cannot be entirely explained by the natural variability of the climate system.
Their results showed strong warming throughout July, August and September in the Arctic, which continued through the autumn and, according to their observational data, appeared to enhance the melting of sea ice.
This warmer atmosphere, combined with melting sea ice, allows the Arctic atmosphere to hold more moisture and increases the likelihood of precipitation over more southern areas such as Eurasia, which, in the freezing temperatures, would fall as snow. Indeed, the researchers’ observations showed that the average snow coverage in Eurasia has increased over the past two decades.
They believe the increased snow cover has an intricate effect on the Arctic Oscillation – an atmospheric pressure pattern in the mid- to high-latitudes – causing it to remain in the “negative phase”.
In the “negative phase”, high pressure resides over the Arctic region, pushing colder air into mid-latitude regions, such as the United States and northern Canada, and giving the observed colder winters.
The lead author of the study, Judah Cohen, said: “In my mind there is no doubt that the globe is getting warmer and this will favour warmer temperatures in all seasons and in all locations; however, I do think that the increasing trend in snow cover has led to regional cooling as discussed in the paper and I see no reason why this won’t continue into the near future. Also if it continues to get much warmer in the fall, precipitation that currently falls as snow will fall as rain instead, eliminating the winter cooling.”
It is also deduced that one of the main reasons conventional climate models fail to pick up on this observed winter cooling is their failure to account for the variability of snow cover, which, as demonstrated in this study, can greatly improve the accuracy of seasonal, and lengthier, forecasts.
“We show in the paper how using the snow cover in a seasonal forecast can provide a more skilful or accurate forecast. Without correctly simulating the coupling of winter climate patterns and the variability of snow fall, the models currently used by Government centres miss an important influence on winter and will therefore continue to be deficient in predicting winter weather on seasonal time scales, and even longer decadal time scales,” continued Cohen.
And now for something completely theory!
Soooo ….. a 0.5 up tick of T over 150 years warming are making more snow and then colder winters,,,,,,, Oh the humanity!!
Weather has officially become climate!
These researchers never have heard of the solar cycle, I suppose? It is known for many years that the solar cycle influences the jet stream position. The largest change in the solar spectrum over a cycle is in the high energy range, UV and beyond. That changes the temperature of the lower stratosphere (and ozone formation) mainly in the tropics which influences the poleward flow in the stratosphere. At low solar activity (as we have had in previous years), the jet stream position / clouds / rain patterns shift equatorwards. Opposite during high solar activity. That also influences the Arctic Oscillation: at low solar activity the polar highs can reach lower latitudes.
Some background:
http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/2005/2005GL024393.shtml
http://www.nwra.com/resumes/baldwin/pubs/SolarCycleStrat_TropDynamicalCoupling.pdf
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2003/09/030926070112.htm
TomRude says:
“LOL dense colder air being displaced by hot less dense air… a new physics paradigm!
To all concerned including the authors of this sad, really sad paper, recommended reading: Leroux, Dynamic Analysis of Weather and Climate” Springer-Praxis 2010 2nd edition.”
I heartily agree. Most of climate study seems to be about finding correlations and then arbitrarily choosing which is cause and which is effect. Marcel Leroux presents mechanisms that make sense. The cold air masses in the areas as described in the paper with the resultant snow falls are perfectly explained by his theory.
I see a perfect homeostatic/thermostatic mechanism at work here:
1. Arctic Ocean warms up.
2. More precip on land keeps falling as snow.
3. Snow on landmass surrounding Arctic Ocean cools air over Arctic Ocean down.
4. Cooler air over Arctic Ocean cools Arctic Ocean down again.
Weeeh! Climate Science is easy!
Any actual data? I’d like to see records of moisture content in the air at arctic locals.
I noted it froze up early on the Pacific side, and later on the Atlantic side.
I’ve noted it is reletively warm north of 80 degrees this winter, but this is largely due to wind. When it is calmer the cold air settles. When it is windy there is mixing. As in either case temperatures are well below zero, I’m not sure how the difference effects the ice cover. A lot of wind must shove the ice around, build pressure ridges, chill the floes and leads with greater “wind chill,” so that warmer might actually result in thicker ice.
Meanwhile, the real world is getting colder. http://discover.itsc.uah.edu/amsutemps/execute.csh?amsutemps
and has been suffering from a “bipolar condition” for weeks now:
http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/map/ANIM/sfctmpmer_01a.fnl.30.gif
While the highest Arctic has far above normal temperatures, Antarctica has looked more or less completely blue on the daily anomaly map for many weeks now. I guess summer never came to Antarctica this year.
1. Global Temperatures are NOT increasing see AMSU satellite data *current 0.12C” flat so no warming
2. What about Antarctica (cooling, flat, normal temps) so more snow in Buenos Aires?
3. Europe quite mild winter this year haha please explain
4. What drivel.. how this sort of stuff gets published is beyond me_
Climate scientists then go on to prove that black is white and get run over on a zebra crossing.
Has there been any parallel research done in the Antarctic, since the record levels of antarctic sea ice have mirrored the very low levels in the Arctic?
Is the relative paucity of land mass in the Southern Oceans an issue there??
Homer Simpson explains it best. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTR-xzA8xLk
LazyTeenager says:
January 16, 2012 at 12:16 pm
There is a cause and effect problem here. What exactly is the ultimate cause as distinct from a secondary cause.
The big band is the ultimate cause. Except of course for the super nova that collapsed in our parent universe to give birth to this particular universe.
Lazy Teenager is an appropriate pseudonym because my article speaks to the issue of cause/effect and proposes a possible mechanism. I stand by my charges that Lazy considers too strong because the material about Rossby Waves and other issues were in the literature decades ago.The Jet Stream and Rossby Waves were identified in the 1940s.
It seems part of the laziness in today’s climate science is a failure to review literature or put recent work in a context. It is part of the problem I have discussed when specialists study one small area of a generalist discipline. Generally, they don’t know the wider subject or the literature.
http://drtimball.com/2012/what-causes-el-nino-la-nina-ipcc-doesnt-know-but-builds-models-and-makes-projections-anyway/
Occam says, La Nina and Negative PDO Full stop.
@Tim Ball says:
January 17, 2012 at 8:55 am
I`m not sure of the mechanisms, but yes there is are very good correlations between changes in the solar wind speed and the ENSO index.
“..this new research suggests that the trend of increasingly cold winters over the past two decades..”
Now I was under the impression that GW was largely down to all the warmer winters in the mid/upper latitudes ?
So if the part of this science is correct, that snow cover effects weather more than they thought, then the opposite is true.
They also have failed to account for the warming caused by change in land use. Could it be that UHI has a bigger effect on global climate than thought. With the amount of asphalt that has been laid, I can’t see how warmers can lay this effect to negligable.
[Oldschool Browser Alert: In Internet Explorer the following climatology animations will stick on January (instead of looping through all months as they should).]
—
Snow Depth:
http://i39.tinypic.com/2yywnlh.png
Precipitable Water:
http://i52.tinypic.com/9r3pt2.png
Precipitation:
http://i42.tinypic.com/2njypw9.png
Monthly Maximum of Daily Precipitation:
http://i41.tinypic.com/34gasr7.png
Low Level Cloud Cover:
http://i52.tinypic.com/auw1s0.png
Evaporation Minus Precipitation:
http://i43.tinypic.com/2isvynb.png
Column-integrated Water Vapor Flux with their Convergence:
http://i51.tinypic.com/126fc77.png
Credit: Climatology animations have been assembled using JRA-25 Atlas [ http://ds.data.jma.go.jp/gmd/jra/atlas/eng/atlas-tope.htm ] images. JRA-25 long-term reanalysis is a collaboration of Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) & Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry (CRIEPI).
“AGW is stronger in the tropics since greater water vapour feedbacks are in effect there. So the heat credit there has to move from the equator to the poles. Hence more equator to pole circulation.”
Lazy Teenager,
And what proof do you have? If you refer to the IPPC’s own documentation, the AGW fingerprint in the tropical tropesphere is a mid level “hotspot”. This signature has failed to materialize. To put it another way, there is no warming in the tropics -either at the surface or aloft. Likewise, we have seen no amplification of the Hadley Cell. And if you remember what many Alarmists were saying a decade ago, the artic source regions would warm to such an extent that cold winters would be a thing of the past. That certainly has not come to pass. You people chase weather events like a dog chases a car.
“transfer of most of the heat is by evaporation and wind”
Computer Models and Atmospheric Circulation: A Major Failure
by Dr. Tim Ball on May 5, 2011
http://drtimball.com/2011/computer-models-and-atmospheric-circulation-a-major-failure/
–
1. Column-integrated Water Vapor Flux with their Convergence:
http://i51.tinypic.com/126fc77.png
Compare 1 with 2 & 3:
2. Near-Surface (850hPa) Wind:
http://i52.tinypic.com/nlo3dw.png
3. Near-Surface (850hPa) Wind — Polar View:
http://i54.tinypic.com/29vlc0x.png
Compare with wind-driven ocean gyres:
4. Wind-Driven Ocean Currents:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/67/Ocean_currents_1943_%28borderless%293.png
“Apart from all other reasons, the parameters of the geoid depend on the distribution of water over the planetary surface.” — N.S. Sidorenkov
The study fails to grasp the obvious:
Winter is getting worse because it’s getting colder.
There ain’t no global warming because the Earth is losing heat faster than it comes in.
Duh.