My town's Climate Action Protest- I get to be "zombietime"

WUWT readers may know of the famous zombietime.com where an anonymous photographer captures some of the bizarre things that happen at protests in SFO and Berkeley.  Today on the campus of Chico State University, a protest of sorts was held, I went there to take photos to document it. It was much more down to earth than some “zombietime” offerings, but it was still a bit strange and full of mixed messages.  The main message: stop a parking structure (with solar panels on it even!) and others, the secondary message was something about climate, but it isn’t clear what.

I first noticed this protest when I saw this image on Facebook advertising it:

I sent an email to organizer Dr. Mark Stemen of CSUC stating my concerns over the imagery and what it represents to some people in the community and he agreed to pass it on to the students. I’m happy to report that I didn’t see any masked faces at the event today.

That was followed by another sign on Facebook, one far more normal and inviting:

The stated objective from their Facebook page reads:

Critical Mass, Climate Action Protest

Our Objectives:

1. Two more parking structures are scheduled in the CSU, Chico Master Plan after this one is complete. We say, Never Again. Revoke both of these projects immediately.

2. Zingg [president of the CSUC campus], we offer you the stage for a public discussion about what “Campus Climate Neutrality” looks like off of paper, revoke your signature or redefine your perception of sustainability– We won’t stand for greenwashing.

* An apology for calling your students ‘uninformed voters’ would also be appropriate during this time; for democracy… & science.

3. Stop selling parking permits to students within one mile of campus. Getting these students to campus without a car will free spots for individuals that commute and need a space.

In the 2011 CSU, Chico AS Elections, 76% of students voted in OPPOSITION to this University proposed plan. The structure will cost $14,000,000 and incur 30 years of debt that will be paid for by an increase in student fees. With this semester’s tuition increased by more than 32%, this plan does not represent the interests of the students and the student vote is evidence of this realization.

The University has gone along ignoring its President’s commitment to “Campus Climate Neutrality” as well as the overwhelming student dissent and will begin construction early this August. This project supports an infrastructure that is not responding to the demands and needs for sustainable transportation. At a campus where 80% of students live within two miles, the students believe they can do better, much better.

Here’s what the event looked like as I approached on foot in downtown Chico.  Click all images below to enlarge them.

I annotated the image above to show that the protest was held next to the parking structure under construction. Some background is helpful.

For years, downtown merchants have been asking the City Council to do something about the parking situation. On certain days and hours, finding parking downtown is an exercise in futility, and you can find yourself driving in circles for several minutes trying to find an open parking space. A newspaper article in 2005 by the alternate weekly highlights the problem.

Plans were made for a new parking structure by the city, but anti-growth people launched a referendum to vote it down. Chico State decided to forge ahead on their own to solve the problem and recently got approval from the CSU trustees to build the parking structure, even though Stemen’s class had a vote and sent the trustees a letter arguing against it. The local daily newspaper praised the decision to go forward in an editorial on May 12th:

Our view: The CSU trustees were able to focus on the obvious — that Chico State University needs more parking for its students.

In Chico, where things such as election dates, disc golf and bridges over irrigation ditches become full-blown controversies, no decision is easy. That’s why it was a relief that the decision over Chico State University’s planned parking structure was made by a board in Long Beach.

The also printed a comment from CSU trustees who were surprised to get a complaint about adding more parking saying usually such plans are met with open arms by the students. But, as the newspaper editorial points out, this is Chico were getting things done that are considered normal by most of the rest of the USA turn into full-blown controversies. In this case, Professor Mark Stemen and a handful of students (who won’t be around in a few years to live with issues they protest) are driving this controversy.

If it was just a parking garage, then maybe, one might be able to argue that such protests might have a basis. But there’s a bizarre twist to this. This parking  structure is part office space and part sustainability shrine, with a 15 kilowatt solar power array (expandable) and with LEED certification.

Here’s the architectural drawing from the CSUC web page on the structure, annotations mine:

Features:

  • 15kW photovoltaic array with trellis and infrastructure to expand
  • 10 electrical vehicle charging stations
  • Heating and cooling system 15% more efficient than required
  • Water efficient fixtures
  • Drought tolerant plants
  • Low e-windows
  • Occupant sensored energy efficient lighting system
  • White interior walls and ceiling (in parking structure)
  • Open/Full capacity sign at structure entrance
  • Recycled materials used in concrete
  • Designed to LEED Silver equivalent

And here’s a video made by students highlighting some of the features:

Here we have a parking structure with solar panels, a combined office with LEED certification, and  made with recycled materials. What’s not to like? Automobiles, that’s their issue. It seems that with Eco-zealots, it is never enough.

Oh, and who’s the LEED certifcation and sustainability guru at CSUC? Why CSUC’s Dr. Mark Stemen of course, the same guy organizing opposition to the LEED certified parking structure and today’s protest.

So here’s the pictures of the protest today against this structure, others like it to follow, and somewhere in all that some protest about climate and using bicycles is mixed in. Click images to enlarge them.

The view from 2nd and Normal Street ~ 1:15 PM 9/10/2011
View of the main protest site - seems hardly "critical mass" with so few people
The sustainable band is getting warmed up, meanwhile some hippie walks barefoot on asphalt on a 100 degree F day
The band's electric organ, guitars, and PA system is pedal powered by a team of 4 stationary bike generators (Note: people make CO2 too ya know)
Getting the stink eye for taking pictures
At the other end of the parking lot, guards say "no cars allowed". Apparently they didn't get out of bed early enough to prevent some scofflaws from parking there.
~ 2PM 9/10/2011 - I thought maybe I got there too early the first time, and that's why the crowd was so thin, so I came back an hour later to see if anything had changed, after all, they say 76% of the student body was against the parking structure.
Nope, an hour later, no increase in the crowd, so I left

Later in the day, one of the protesters put this photo up on the Facebook page for the event:

"Honk if you hate parking", yeah, that'll work. Photo by Luann Manss

A couple of closing images. First, from Dr. Mark Stemen’s Facebook page. I never thought of parking and eating being linked. I guess I just don’t have my mind right…yeah, that’s it, “Cool Hand Mark” has it all figured out:

In the face of such logic, I suppose it would be pointless to point out that parked cars don’t produce CO2 (as opposed to the ones still driving around looking for a parking space) and that increased CO2 actually benefits agricultural production worldwide. As NASA says, The biosphere is booming thanks to increased CO2 [insert electrical short circuiting sounds here].

Nature’s wind today had other ideas though, and turned one of the signs posted up on the construction fence a block away into litter, only to be trampled by one of the hideous CO2 belching beasts:

Of course I’m sure some of the protestors will say I staged that photo, what with me being a “denier” and all that. But no, that’s exactly how I happened upon it. In fact, it was the first hint I was getting close to the protest, as it was the first sign I saw today one block west of the protest.

In closing, the protest was pretty mild, the students didn’t wear face masks as the poster advertised they might, protestors got to socialize, listen to some pedal powered tunes, free speech was upheld, and I had a good chuckle from it all. I hope you did too.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

113 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Paul Coppin
September 11, 2011 7:09 am

Hmmrph. should have been “seek out a comfortable…”

Steve in SC
September 11, 2011 7:13 am

In another time, going masked was a surefire way of being shot on sight. I believe there are still laws on the books that make going masked illegal. Then again if the good prof and his students want to be identified with the radical muslimic rabble, go for it as they seem to be kindred spirits. Since there is a lack of parking, that would indicate that there are way too many students and professors.

DSW
September 11, 2011 7:15 am

Just as these kids at the protest are closer to the end of the activist spectrum than most their age, Ralph’s vision of driving nonstop and never socializing is also an “edge of the spectrum” observation. Most people are more in the middle – like when I drive to the disc golf course (which is WAY more critical than any ol’ bridge over an irrigation ditch…./sarc) When I lived out in the sticks, people were very kind and friendly, especially if you needed help. It’s the big cities that are more the social wasteland (and havens of liberal thinking coincidentally)

ChE
September 11, 2011 7:16 am

We say, Never Again.

Godwin rolls over again…

TomRude
September 11, 2011 7:20 am

Funny in the poster, the “face of change” advances masked… says it all.

mobihci
September 11, 2011 8:01 am

I looked at the pics, saw a post with normal on it, and thought, yes it is!

JJ
September 11, 2011 8:07 am

“These kids need a hobby or something.”
No, they have that.
What they need is a job. Like the kids who drive to class, so they can get to their job on time, have.

harrywr2
September 11, 2011 8:09 am

Ralph says:
September 11, 2011 at 6:23 am
Compare this to my traditional European town
The Europeans who immigrated to the US apparently didn’t like traditional Europe.

tom T
September 11, 2011 8:14 am

What is wrong with them. They are complaining about the cost, didn’t they hear the President’s call for more spending to stimulate the economy, are they anti-American?

Juice
September 11, 2011 8:14 am

For years, downtown merchants have been asking the City Council to do something about the parking situation. On certain days and hours, finding parking downtown is an exercise in futility, and you can find yourself driving in circles for several minutes trying to find an open parking space.
Several minutes? Oh, you poor babies.
Try living in any big city on the east coast where attempting to park in town (not just downtown) either costs you $20 or more or requires driving around for 20-30 minutes looking for a meter that’ll cost you $4 an hour and will likely end in you getting a $25-100 parking ticket or towed.

juanita
September 11, 2011 8:22 am

Jim says,
“you guys just don’t get it
these kids are showing you a better way
not so much a protest
but more a set of proactive solutions
they will get there way as they become the leaders
of tomorrow and simply institute car-free policies
throughout all urban centers.”
So, they take up a parking area all day, make signs that tell me to “get off my ass,” and stand downtown shouting insults to passersby? They look at me and they decide “old lady, not one of us.” Well, this old lady uses her bicycle about 90 percent of the time, just to be told by a bunch of know-nothing, non-producing, trough-dwelling losers that I shouldn’t drive my car when I decide I need it?
There’s an old saying: you get more flies with honey than vinegar. These people reek too much of vinegar. Telling somebody they are wrong-stupid-bad because they exercise the freedom to choose is counterproductive, and I’m sorry, un-American. They seem to be more angry at the idea that we don’t do whatever they say than the fact that we drive cars.

juanita
September 11, 2011 8:24 am

JJ says:
“What they need is a job. Like the kids who drive to class, so they can get to their job on time, have.”
Thank you !!!

Dave Worley
September 11, 2011 8:30 am

We could take a collection for one of those pedal generators. Next time such an event happens Anthony could donate it to the College. Maybe the college could give tuition credits to students based on the amount of pedal power they generate. Park it in the new garage and kids could come to school an hour early and earn their tuition. Anthony could attach a remote monitor that would show the amount of Mah generated by these caring students.
That would be interesting.

kadaka (KD Knoebel)
September 11, 2011 9:03 am

Stop being so cynical, people! Remember the cry of activism on campus:
Young people are the answer!
Of course, it’d help matters if those in charge of the activism had a better question than:
“What shall we use for cannon fodder?”

Gary Mount
September 11, 2011 9:07 am

Using the term Climate Action reminds me of the terrorist organization from my neck of the woods called the Squamish Five of the early 1980s that named themselves as Direct Action. Things did not work out so well for them. Interestingly one members name was Hansen.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Squamish_Five

Interstellar Bill
September 11, 2011 9:19 am

I have a hard time believing that story about shining spotlights on solar panels.
1. The spotlights onlyhave 15% of their energy in the visible.
2. Only about 50% of a spotlight’s output is in the main beam that shines on the panels.
3. The panels only have about 10-15% efficiency.
I would expect the panels to produce only a few percent of the spotlight’s electricity,
far less than even a 4:1 payback would fix.

TheGoodLocust
September 11, 2011 9:31 am

I guess some people really need a “cause” and global warming is the best thing they could come up with.
I think I need to start up an organization crafting fake outrages for these sorts of people so they can’t actually do any harm.

Jeff Alberts
September 11, 2011 9:35 am

Paul Coppin says:
September 11, 2011 at 7:08 am
BAHAWAHAHA!. No, they won’t. They’ll do what every generation has done before them, once they earn MONEY. See out a a comfortable and fulfilling life centered around work and family with an occasional vacation thrown in. If they earn enough money they’ll pretty much ignore the “leaders of tomorrow”, because they can. Hindsight is 20/20… 🙂

RIMMER: Who are the other two?
LISTER: The whacked-out, crazy hippy drummer’s called Dobbin. He joined the police force in the end. Became a grand wizard in the Freemasons. The bassist is called Gazza. He was a neo-marxist, nihilistic, anarchist. He eventually joined a large insurance company and got his own parking space.

Curiousgeorge
September 11, 2011 9:37 am

Dreamers and believers? Really. I think that description fits potheads just as well.

JPeden
September 11, 2011 10:00 am

“The band’s electric organ, guitars, and PA system is pedal powered by a team of 4 stationary bike generators (Note: people make CO2 too ya know)”
Sure looks like another Ponzi scheme to me, maybe even implying an infinite regress needed only to produce the sound they want. Hey, all you Sustainable Saviors, just how many “Nationalized” Slaves will the Great Central Planners need to merely tell us exactly what we can say?
And that first image of the Grim Reaper does seem a bit “Freudian”, don’t ya think?
“No.”
I’d love to show up at these protests with a baby formula, bottle, and pacifier concession stand and some live Clowns dancing around to attract them over. But would they have to be nude?

SionedL
September 11, 2011 10:02 am

The answer here is to charge enrolled students an annual automobile on street parking fee of $500-1,000. Then we’d see how committed the students are to the cause. There are many cities, I think NYC is one, I know Florence, Italy is another, where you must have a permit to even drive a car into the city.

JPeden
September 11, 2011 10:25 am

Don’t be fooled by Climate Action’s cynical ploy! People are already so “hungry” that they’re getting fat. Now making them walk and pedal bicycles, to boot, only reeks of yet another Teaparty plot against the People! They’re going to get even more “hungry”!

Nuke Nemesis
September 11, 2011 11:15 am

On the other hand, if they do build the parking garages, they can put a weather station there.

Nuke Nemesis
September 11, 2011 11:27 am

I have always wanted to show up at these protests with a bin to collect personal electronic devices from the protesters. Those things suck up electricity (which is somehow linked to foreign oil, btw). We can save the earth one iPod and cell phone at a time if the protesters will set the example of personal sacrifice.
Notebook computers, tablets, BluRay players and Gameboys will also be accepted.

September 11, 2011 12:36 pm

As far as most (pointless) liberal protests go, that one seems rather tame and lame. I guess that’s better then having the type of typical protests that the real Zombie covers !!!

Verified by MonsterInsights