Wining and Climate Change in California

Oh dear, another alarming press release from Stanford’s Noah Diffenbaugh. Apparently according to his super duper climate model, climate change is going to affect only premium wine grapes. So it appears Ripple, Franzia Box wine, and MD 20/20 are safe from climate change. Winos everywhere are rejoicing.

Diffenbaugh must not get his data from GISS, because they show the temperature as significantly higher in Napa, CA over 100 years ago and the last 7 years of data is downtrending sharply.

Source: http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/gistemp/gistemp_station.py?id=425745160030&data_set=1&num_neighbors=1

It seems the hottest annual temperature in Napa since 1900 was during the 1998 El Niño peak. Hmmm. Of course even that might be elevated a bit, since I found the USHCN station is sited next to an air conditioner vent and a large parking lot.

And in Walla Walla, Washington, another area studied, there appears to be no century scale trend in the data:

Source: http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/gistemp/gistemp_station.py?id=425727880040&data_set=1&num_neighbors=1

But what effect do observations have over the power of models and worrisome press releases sounding the alarm? Apparently none. Thank goodness we can safely exclude the last 110 years of data in favor of the model.

From Stanford UniversityGlobal warming could alter the US premium wine industry in 30 years, says Stanford study

Higher temperatures could significantly impact California and other premium winegrowing regions of the United States in the next 30 years, according to a new study led by Stanford University climate scientists.

Writing in the June 30 edition of Environmental Research Letters, the scientists report that by 2040, the amount of land suitable for cultivating premium wine grapes in high-value areas of northern California could shrink by 50 percent because of global warming. However, some cooler parts of Oregon and Washington State could see an increase in premium grape-growing acreage due to warming, according to the study.

These results come on the heels of the researchers’ 2006 climate study, which projected that as much as 81 percent of premium wine grape acreage in the U.S. could become unsuitable for some varietals by the end of the century.

“Our new study looks at climate change during the next 30 years – a timeframe over which people are actually considering the costs and benefits of making decisions on the ground,” said Noah Diffenbaugh, an assistant professor of environmental Earth system science and a center fellow at the Woods Institute for the Environment at Stanford, who co-authored both studies.

Climate change, from global to local

Most U.S. wine comes from the West Coast. California alone produces on average more than 5 million gallons per year, accounting for about 90 percent of the nation’s total wine production, according to the Wine Institute, a trade organization representing California winemakers. The institute estimated the retail value of the state’s wine industry in 2010 at $18.5 billion.

Higher temperatures could hurt California and other premium wine-growing regions of the United States by 2040, according to a new study led by Noah Diffenbaugh of Stanford University. Credit: Sascha Zubryd, Woods Institute for the Environment

The new study focused on premium wines – the 25 percent most expensive wines on the market – and how global warming could affect growing conditions in four premium wine-producing counties by 2040: Napa and Santa Barbara counties in California, Yamhill County in Oregon’s Willamette Valley and Walla Walla County in Washington’s Columbia Valley.

“We focused on these counties because their mild climates have made them major sources of high-quality grapes, and because they represent both cool and warm growing conditions,” Diffenbaugh said.

But that could change, and soon.

“There will likely be significant localized temperature changes over the next three decades,” Diffenbaugh said. “One of our motivations for the study was to identify the potential impact of those changes, and also to identify the opportunities for growers to take action and adapt.”

Climate change for lovers of fine wine

The study was based on the assumption that there will be a 23 percent increase in atmospheric greenhouse gases by 2040, which could raise the average global temperature by about 1.8 degrees Fahrenheit (1 degree Celsius) – a conservative scenario, according to Diffenbaugh. “World governments have said that to reduce the negative impacts of climate change, global warming should be limited to an increase of 1 degree Celsius,” he added.

To predict how much land area will be suitable for premium wine grape cultivation in coming decades, Diffenbaugh and his colleagues used a very high-resolution computer model that incorporated local, regional and global conditions, including factors such as coastal wind speeds and ocean temperatures. The researchers compared their simulations to actual weather data collected between 1960 and 2010 to see if their model could accurately “predict” past temperatures.

Using the climate model and the historical weather data, the researchers predicted that by 2040, all four counties are likely to experience higher average temperatures during growing seasons, along with an increase in the number of very hot days when the thermometer reaches 95 F (35 C) or above.

In the experiment, the scientists divided premium grape varieties into separate categories based on their tolerance to different temperature ranges. For example, Napa Valley – widely known for its pinot noir, cabernet sauvignon and other premium wines – has historically experienced growing seasons with an average temperature of less than 68 F (20 C) and fewer than 30 very hot days. Grapes that thrive in that climate have done well there.

According to the study, the average temperature in Napa Valley during the growing season could increase as much as 2 F (1.1 C), with the number of very hot days increasing by 10. As a result, the amount of land with historically hospitable growing conditions could shrink by half over the next three decades, the study found. In Santa Barbara County, the amount of suitable grape-growing acreage with similar climate conditions is projected to decline by more than 20 percent as temperatures rise.

“I was surprised that local temperature changes could have such a big impact on an important industry with only 1 degree Celsius of global warming.” Diffenbaugh said.

The study also predicted higher temperatures in Oregon and Washington by 2040, but with potentially different outcomes for winegrowers. Oregon’s Willamette Valley could see a slight increase in the amount of total suitable acreage and a large increase in area suitable for more valuable varieties, according to the study. But in Washington’s Columbia Valley, varietals that are sensitive to severely hot days could see a 30 percent reduction in suitable land area, the results showed.

Risky business

The researchers also looked at how much land could be available to growers who adapt to warmer conditions, such as by planting heat-tolerant vines or altering their cultivation practices. The study found that suitable acreage in Napa and Santa Barbara counties could actually be increased if growers are able to produce quality grapes that can tolerate up to 45 very hot days and average temperatures of 71 F (22 C) in the growing season. However, varieties currently grown in those conditions tend to produce considerably lower wine quality and value, the authors noted.

Winegrowers, with their knowledge of which cultivation techniques are most appropriate in a given climate, could benefit from the study’s forecasts of temperature conditions, Diffenbaugh said.

“Climate change over the next few decades is of particular relevance for the wine industry,” he said. “It’s a big investment to put plants in the ground. They’re slow to mature, and once they mature they’re productive for a long time.”

Some decisions growers make now could affect their vineyards in 30 years, he added, whether they consider the potential effects of local climate change or not. Moving a vineyard to a cooler location or planting different varietals could be costly for winegrowers, the study said. But in areas where less drastic temperature change is likely, growers may be able to maintain the quality of their grapes by using existing cultivation and winemaking techniques, Diffenbaugh said. Possible strategies include special trellis systems that shade vines, using irrigation to cool plants and adjusting fermentation processes in the winery.

“It’s risky for a grower to make decisions that consider climate change, because those decisions could be expensive and the climate may not change exactly as we expect,” Diffenbaugh said. “But there’s also risk in decisions that ignore global warming, because we’re finding that there are likely to be significant localized changes in the near term.”

“Humans are amazingly resilient, and individual growers will of course make decisions as they read the signs on the ground,” he added. “We’re trying to understand how the climate that works so well for growing great wine grapes right now might be affected by even modest global warming. We can’t know the future before it happens, but if we don’t ask the question, we may be surprised when reality unfolds.”

###

Other coauthors of the study are Michael White of Utah State University, Gregory Jones of Southern Oregon University and Moetasim Ashfaq of Oak Ridge National Laboratory, a former postdoctoral researcher at Stanford.

The study was supported in part by a National Science Foundation CAREER award to Noah Diffenbaugh.

This article was written by Sascha Zubryd, a science-writing intern at the Woods Institute for the Environment at Stanford University.

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
138 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
July 2, 2011 5:57 pm

Some people only worry about the increased CO2 in the atmosphere, while others worry about the CO2 in the wine itself:
“…Title 27: Alcohol, Tobacco Products and Firearms
CHAPTER I: ALCOHOL AND TOBACCO TAX AND TRADE BUREAU, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
SUBCHAPTER A: LIQUORS
PART 24: WINE
Subpart L: Storage, Treatment and Finishing of Wine
24.245 – Use of carbon dioxide in still wine.
The addition of carbon dioxide to (and retention in) still wine is permitted if at the time of removal for consumption or sale the still wine does not contain more than 0.392 grams of carbon dioxide per 100 milliliters of wine. However, a tolerance of not more than 0.009 grams per 100 milliliters to the maximum limitation of carbon dioxide in still wine will be allowed where the amount of carbon dioxide in excess of 0.392 grams per 100 milliliters is due to mechanical variations which can not be completely controlled under good commercial practice. A tolerance will not be allowed where it is found that the proprietor continuously or intentionally exceeds 0.392 grams of carbon dioxide per 100 milliliters of wine or where the variation results from the use of methods or equipment determined by the appropriate TTB officer not in accordance with good commercial practice. The proprietor shall determine the amount of carbon dioxide added to wine using authorized test procedures. Penalties are provided in 26 U.S.C. 5662 for any person who, whether by manner of packaging or advertising or by any other form of representation, misrepresents any still wine to be effervescent wine or a substitute for effervescent wine. (Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1331, as amended, 1381, as amended, 1407, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5041, 5367, 5662))…”

Elyseum
July 2, 2011 6:52 pm

RobertvdL The video: that tells you everything about the level of education of these people compare with Lindzen, Gray, Singer what a joke.WE now know who runs skeptical science even more funny!

LC Bennett
July 2, 2011 7:15 pm

Nice comment, Dave Wendt.
I am wondering which the AGW scientists will run out of first, money or new topics? Surely they must be reaching the point where they have exhausted one or both. Worst of all, they have put their names on research papers that, in the future, may become case studies on how not to do science.

Ian George
July 2, 2011 7:40 pm

Deadwood 05
That’s right. A station some 49 kms away gives the same temp anomalies almost lock-step with Sunnyside confirming what Doug is saying – a drop in temps.
But as he says, GISS is very unreliable depending what you look at for each station.
This is Be Bilt in Holland. This shows the ‘raw temp data’ since 1880.
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/gistemp/gistemp_station.py?id=633062600003&data_set=1&num_neighbors=1
No warming since then.
Now try De Bilt again using ‘homogenised’ data.
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/gistemp/gistemp_station.py?id=633062600003&data_set=2&num_neighbors=1
Big difference – no it’s warming.
You can then use the homogenised data link to get a superimposure by changing ‘1’ the at the end of the address to a ‘2’.
(The key to raw and homogenised is the number after ‘set=’. Replace with ‘1’ for ‘raw’ and ‘2’ for ‘homogenised’. I don’t know if this works for all stations.
I have also noticed that GISS has changed its ‘homogenised’ data back to its ‘raw data’ in some cases – it may only be where the station no longer operates.
So the big question is – does GISS use the ‘raw’ or ‘homogenised’ data to construct its global temperature record?

Nolo Contendere
July 2, 2011 8:15 pm

You can pretty much sum up what’s wrong with government subsidized science by noting that Noah Diffenbauugh got a grant for the “study”.

crosspatch
July 2, 2011 8:21 pm

A drop in average temperatures in North America is widely known. If you go to NOAA’s NCDC site here:
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/research/cag3/na.html
And check the “most recent 12-month period” (might need to scroll the pick list down) and plot starting in 1998, the trend is cooling at a rate of -0.84F / decade. That is some pretty sharp cooling. The data is current to May 2011, they won’t have June’s data until sometime around the 12th of July or so (sometimes earlier, sometimes later).

crosspatch
July 2, 2011 8:23 pm

And if you plot “annual” temperature (Jan to Dec) from 1998 to 2010 the trend is even steeper. -0.98F/decade. That is nearly a full degree per decade. That would have us in LIA conditions in about 20 years if it continues.

J. Felton
July 2, 2011 8:35 pm

Good Lord, now ” Global Warming affects grapes”?
Theyre just reaching for straws, arent they!

Doug in Seattle
July 2, 2011 9:16 pm

Ian George says:
July 2, 2011 at 7:40 pm
. . .
So the big question is – does GISS use the ‘raw’ or ‘homogenised’ data to construct its global temperature record?

The answer is – GISS uses whatever temperature gives the biggest rise in the time frame they are analyzing.
BTW, I have lived in both BC and WA, and on the east side (cold dry winters with hot dry summers) and west side (cold wet winters and cool less wet summers). The big differences I have noticed over the past 30 years are primarily due to when the seasons change. The last few years we have seen spring arrive in June rather than April. I suspect most of the annual drop can be found there, but haven’t dug that deep.

Richard Scott
July 2, 2011 9:27 pm

Like the alarmists, I think we sometimes let our biases or preconceived notions get in the way of sound thinking.
So the temp sensor at the state hospital is 9.7 feet from a window A/C unit. That’s a small unit. It’s almost 10 ft. away and A/C units don’t blow hard or with any concentration of the air flow. I doubt it has any measureable effect and that if it does it would be very small. Also, the average maximum temp for the location reported on Worldclimate.com is only above 75 degrees F for 5 months out of the year, never above 82, and in those 5 months the average minimum is always below 55. With nighttime cooling and mild max temps, I expect A/C use is minimal and it’s effect on the temp sensor is probably nil.
The pavement, well that’s another matter.

Graeme
July 2, 2011 9:29 pm

I’ve got climate models and a nintendo to run them on – so I don’t need no stinking data!!!

Chad Jessup
July 2, 2011 9:56 pm

Having been raised in one of America’s largest agriculture concerns, I concur with wineboy, the accountant, and others. A wet winter, mild spring, a summer with lots of sunshine/heat followed by an Indian Summer — then harvest the bounty.!
If the Stanford scientist presented these “findings” to an agricultural group, they would ask him, “Is this a joke?”

crosspatch
July 2, 2011 10:13 pm

The last few years we have seen spring arrive in June rather than April. I suspect most of the annual drop can be found there, but haven’t dug that deep.

According to NCDC temperature trend by season since 1998:
Winter (Dec-Feb): Trend -3.27 degF / Decade (NOTE: This includes 2011 data. Last two years have been below the 1901-2000 mean)
Spring (Mar-May): Trend -0.31 degF / Decade (NOTE: Includes 2011 data. Last three years have been above the 1901-2000 mean)
Summer (Jun-Aug): Trend 0.00 (NONE) Does not include 2011 data. Last year was above the 1901-2000 mean.
Autumn (Sep-Nov): Trend -0.52 degF / Decade (Does not include any 2011 data) Previous 4 years above 1901-2000 mean.
So the majority of the cooling has been in the Winter temperatures from December through February where temperatures have been cooling at a dramatic rate over North America.

July 2, 2011 10:26 pm

RS;
What? You’re discounting all the blazing back-radiation from the hot CO2 contained in the A/C exhaust? Whar’s yore basic fiziks larnin’, boy? Get with the pogrom! I mean, program!

CRS, Dr.P.H.
July 2, 2011 10:34 pm

Billy Liar says:
July 2, 2011 at 4:05 pm
CRS, Dr.P.H. says:
July 2, 2011 at 10:48 am
Bah!! My client, Ernest & Julio Gallo Winery… …When the climate changes, we’ll still be there, better than ever. If we can’t sell our wine, we’ll use it for biofuel.
I’ve been using it for biofuel for ages, it works beautifully! 🙂
——-
CRS Reply You should try cleaning paint brushes with it! Works every time!!

Doug in Seattle
July 2, 2011 11:07 pm

Crosspatch, is that all of North America or the NW? We don’t get the full brunt of the arctic blasts here, so our winters are still not so cold.

David Falkner
July 2, 2011 11:13 pm

Why all the hubbub about global average temperature? I mean, we are all worried about the anomaly from this average, but does anyone know what the standard deviation for that statistic is?

sunsettommy
July 2, 2011 11:33 pm

“Robert of Ottawa says:
July 2, 2011 at 3:34 pm
I thought Walla Walla was in Australia. There’s one in Washington State too?”
Yup it is there in South East Washington.I have been there a few times.

crosspatch
July 3, 2011 12:04 am

Crosspatch, is that all of North America or the NW?

Actually it is only the lower 48 of the US (CONUS).

Ian George
July 3, 2011 12:15 am

Doug,
The difference between the ‘raw’ data and the ‘homogenised’ data would account for more than 50% of the warming. The graph i like is:
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/gistemp/do_nmap.py?year_last=2011&month_last=05&sat=4&sst=1&type=anoms&mean_gen=0112&year1=1900&year2=2010&base1=1951&base2=1980&radius=1200&pol=reg
And if they are using the higher temps to compile this, then there hasn’t been a great deal of warming since 1900.

July 3, 2011 12:35 am

CRS, Dr.P.H. July 2, 2011 at 10:34 pm
Yet again I’m not clear as to what your point is on this thread. However, if Californians truly want decent wines, there is always the possibility of importing them from Australia. (even the French have in fairly recent times advertised their making of wines in the Oz style as preferred by some Europeans).
This winter here in Oz (Victoria…. so far) has been a bit savage though, and I’ve found it necessary to warm the red stuff in the microwave. Doesn’t seem to hurt it though.
Oh BTW CRS, Dr P.H. it would be nice if you would respond on that other thread to:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/07/01/cleaner-air-may-result-in-increased-solar-insolation-and-therefore-warming/#comment-693110

Admin
July 3, 2011 3:19 am

Sorry for the late hit here, but this thread is incomplete without of thorough review of all of the popular “Low end” wines.
http://bumwine.com

Grant
July 3, 2011 5:49 am

As long as there are large amounts of federal money being allocated to climate research we’ll be deconstructing this crap. Universities and colleges get about 40% of these grants (according to Thomas Sowell) so as long as the money is flowing they don’t care.
By the way, there are single wineries in Ca. that produce more than 10 million gallons a year.

Pamela Gray
July 3, 2011 6:41 am

Speaking of picking fruit. This rule of thumb works for all berries. Pick early in the morning and be done before noon. They will not only taste better but will last longer in that freshened state as you prepare them for storage or use.
I’m still looking for huckleberry wine that isn’t a cheap mixed fruit version. Am willing to pay bucks for it.