Dramatic satellite images of the Ethiopian eruption

The MODIS/AQUA rapidfire website finally had a pass overhead online early this AM of the Ethiopian/Eritrean area volcanic eruption of Nabro, and I have them below. The plume stretches well over 1000 miles now. In the photo below, the Red Sea is prominent north of the volcano.

The zoomed image below the “read more” line is quite dramatic.

I have acquired and cropped the 250 meter resolution scan (thanks to all the reader tips), and the imagery is quite dramatic, and shows the eruption continues unabated:

More details on the eruption here

I’m sure we’ll have a sulfur dioxide estimate, and perhaps an ESA image of it in the next few days. It appears that we are in quite an active period of vulcanism, with several eruptions worldwide in recent weeks.

UPDATE: Reader FergalR gives us this near real-time satellite image of the SO2 plume:

Looks like a Pinatubo redux. Equatorial SO2 has a pronounced effect. The length and volume of the eruption remains to be determined.

Source: http://www.temis.nl/aviation/so2/omi/2011/06/13/omi_vcd20110613_000_srl_lr.png

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

71 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
June 14, 2011 1:16 am

This could be considered a Gore Effect:

Chile Volcano Causes Havoc
2011-06-14
Buenos Aires – A volcanic ash cloud in Chile delayed flights across South America and Australia on Monday, stranding thousands of travellers and forcing UN chief Ban Ki-moon onto an overnight bus.

Hilary Clinton have to redirect her trip due to the Nabro Eruption.
Barrack Obama had to hide tail and run from the Icelandic eruption.
Seems Ban Ki-Moon wasn’t as lucky. He got grounded due to the eruption in Chile.
Where is Gore ?

Philip Bradley
June 14, 2011 1:48 am

It really is scandalous that we spend untold billions on climate science, much of it of dubious value. Yet we know almost nothing about this volcano which could dramatically impact the climate.
The reality is we are one large volcanic eruption away from millions dying in a worldwide famine.

Patrick Davis
June 14, 2011 2:52 am

What is it now, 4 major eruptions this year? Iceland twice, Chile and now Eritrea? Quiet sun, early winters, early snow, are we hedding for a painfully obvious change in climate not at all driven by emissions of CO2 from human activities? Accoring to the Emirates operator I spoke to today, flights south to Addis Ababa are being affected. No more detail than that, and it could be inaccurate.

Keitho
Editor
June 14, 2011 3:23 am

Given the widespread lack of good governance in Africa I often wonder about the devastating impact a large volcanic event would have on the population here. At the moment much of Africa is fed by and has medical services provided through aid. In the event of a couple of poor growing seasons the ensuing famine would be appalling.
African governments generally are unable to keep their population safe even during normal times. The onset of volcanic winter would be devastating. The cooling climate added to volcanically induced crop failure will overwhelm many countries but even moreso where good governance is absent.

Patrick Davis
June 14, 2011 3:35 am

“Keith Battye says:
June 14, 2011 at 3:23 am”
As an example, people are going hungry in Ethiopia right now. This is not due to inability to produce and feed people, Ethiopia is very fertail, it is directly related to inflation and cost of living increases. People simply cannot afford to buy enough food to feed, not only themselves, but their families too. A complete change from my experiences in as little as 5 years. The Ethiopian Govn’t, the IMF and World Bank, mining companies etc seem to think buildings and roads are the answer. The people are saying “We can’t eat the buildings you are building or the asphalt you are laying.”

Patrick Davis
June 14, 2011 4:15 am

Flights are affected in the region.

June 14, 2011 4:26 am

Actually, our best guess is 1.2K for a doubling of CO2.

June 14, 2011 4:33 am

Another important point to be inferred form thePinotubo eruption is that climate science once again got a relationship backwards. While temp increases the capacity of air for water vapor, light incident on bodies of water and wet soil drive actual evaporation. Researchers accounted for the drying of air caused by cloud formation, but most of the water vapor decline was likely due to increased cloud cover over oceans reducing this heating mechanism, not the temperature change itself.

John Marshall
June 14, 2011 4:45 am

Ethiopia/Eritrea is a very active region with fascinating geology.

Patrick Davis
June 14, 2011 5:04 am

“John Marshall says:
June 14, 2011 at 4:45 am”
The Afar region, and it;s peoples, are remarkable. Proves, without doubt, humans can survie almost anywhere, even without modern technology.
Flights in to/out of region seriously disrupted in the entire region.

Simon Wood
June 14, 2011 6:25 am

steven mosher says:
June 13, 2011 at 11:51 am
cross posted
So with the volcano erupting spewing S02 into the stratosphere we should believe thusly:
1. If there is a drop in temperature that is within “normal variations” for the past millions of years, then the drop
is “explained” by “natural variation”. There is no need to look at the volcano as the source of the cooling. After all the cooling, if it occurs, will be within the range of “natural variability”. Nothing here to see, the earth cools all the time.
2. If a model successfully predicts this cooling, there is also no point to that. Chaos rules and that means we can say nothing about the trajectory that external forcings have on the system. Heck, even if the sun were to double its output we cannot predict that it will get warmer, because well, Chaos rules.

What a ridiculous argument. Nobody has ever claimed that there are no forcings on the climate system. What is claimed by sceptics is that the magnitude of the forcing attributed to anthropogenic CO2 has been grossly over-exaggerated.

Brian D
June 14, 2011 8:28 am

Here is a neat website to check out. Its an ash tracking site out of the U. of Alaska, Fairbanks.
http://puff.images.alaska.edu/index.shtml

David
June 14, 2011 10:39 am

steven mosher says:
June 13, 2011 at 11:51 am
cross posted
“Heck, even if the sun were to double its output we cannot predict that it will get warmer, because well, Chaos rules”.
Congradulations Mr Mosher on the all time strawman. Of course your entire statement was a strawman, and the poorly understood feedback mechanism, of clouds and the sun may well explain a great deal of variation in climate. In regard to the IPCC claimed 3.5 degreees warming per doubling, this is looking less and less likely all the time..

Brian D
June 14, 2011 1:01 pm

This plume never reached the stratosphere. The tropopause is defined as where the temp inversion begins at the top of the troposphere. The plume reached between 13-14 km. At that latitude, the tropopause is usually around 17-18km (around 9-10km in the high latitudes) You can check skew plots for the world at this site. Text file is easiest to read. Just set your parameters, and then click the site on the map.
http://weather.uwyo.edu/upperair/sounding.html
If you pull the charts from Abha, Saudi Arabia(OEAB), just to the north of the eruption, for around the time of the eruption, you’ll see what I’m talking about. Winds were running from the ESE at 30-40kts at the plume height (50+kts at 15km) which is why it spread so fast to the WNW.
Just came across this site. Good one to use to see if an eruption hit the stratosphere or not at the latitude its at.

Brian D
June 14, 2011 1:06 pm

Here’s a chart that someone drew up from another blog I visited. Its a pretty good reference as to where the stratosphere is in relation to latitude. It will vary some, though on a daily basis, especially in the higher latitudes.
http://i51.tinypic.com/etz1w3.png

FlyingMike
June 15, 2011 11:02 pm

See http://sacs.aeronomie.be/nrt/NRTimg/gome2_vcd_NRT_000_lr.gif for a 24-hr composite near-real-time plot of vertical column SO2.

June 16, 2011 9:52 am

http://satepsanone.nesdis.noaa.gov/pub/OMI/OMISO2/images/OMI_ME_SO2_DDC2.GIF
NABRO volcano it’s emiting A LOT of SO2!…
Or there are any error in satellite image?

Brian D
June 16, 2011 12:44 pm

Yeah, a SO2 rich volcano. Nothing into the stratosphere, though. There was another healthy eruption today.

June 16, 2011 12:54 pm
R. de Haan
June 16, 2011 2:47 pm
Eric Gisin
July 3, 2011 7:24 am

Fantastic NASA image of Nabro eruption showing lava flow. Any word on how long this eruption will last?
http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/06/29/6974738-african-volcano-spied-from-space