Lord Oxburgh, the organisation’s director, was called in to head an internal inquiry into the leaked emails which included one infamous message referring to a “trick” to “hide the decline” in global temperatures.
The peer’s investigation cleared the scientists of malpractice. But critics claimed the report was a whitewash and Lord Oxburgh also failed to declare his involvement with Globe before he began his investigation.
Meanwhile Bob Ward, from the Grantham Institute, which works alongside Globe, praised a second inquiry by former civil servant Muir Russell, which also cleared the climate researchers.
He said it had “lifted the cloud of suspicion” and demonstrated that “the integrity of climate science is intact.”
Globe International’s work is paid for with donations from multi-millionaire backers and through partnerships with other environmental groups.
Globe also confirmed last night that it received direct funding from the Department of Energy and the Department of International Development (DfID). including a grant of £91,240 provided by DfID since the Coalition came to power last year.
More cash from DfID is filtered through the Complus Alliance – a “sustainable development communications alliance” of broadcasters based in Costa Rica which is also supported by the BBC World Service Trust, the Corporation’s independent charity,.
Complus, which was awarded DfID cash last year and in 2006, says it has an “ongoing relationship with Globe” helping it run “shadow negotiation” teams at international summits of world leaders.
A spokeswoman for Complus said: “The BBC is a founding member not a funding member. They can make in-kind contributions, like organising events, supporting logistics, sharing content.”
===============================================================
More here.
Also, Dr. Richard North of the EU Referendum has a synopsis of coverage that preceded the Telegraph’s, and there was a significant amount. But even a late awakening is better than none.
Bottom line for the BBC: no matter what, when you are involved in promoting monetarily, in kind, or in any way, the same people and organizations you report on, you can’t have any separation from conflict of interest.
The The BBC has zero credibility left in all matters climate reporting related, in my opinion.
While I had suspicions before, after reviewing these two posts on “contract” and “expenses” for the Oxburgh report at CA, followed by Bishop Hill’s “When is a contract not a contract?“, I believe now that these investigations were complete whitewashes, bought and paid for. It is just that simple.
h/t to WUWT reader and volunteer moderator “AndiC”
This is interesting:-
http://www.myreader.co.uk/msg/1210848.aspx
They are all in it together!
Patrick Davis says:
April 24, 2011 at 9:04 am
As I say now, down under, maaaaate, hi five to that! However I challenge your stance “they” do not have right of access to your home. You will be surprised “who” has statutory rights to enter your home, even ramblers in the right places, have “right” to “pass through” your home.
I don’t understand what you are trying to say by all these words and phrases in “inverted commas.”
It is a fact that in the UK the TV licencing people do not have any legal right of entry to your home. If there is sufficient evidence to suggest that a crime is taking place, then only the police, with a warrant, have legal right of entry. But simply not having a TV licence is not considered sufficient evidence for the police to invade your home to search for warm television sets.
Is “that” too “hard” for “you” to “understand” Patrick? 😉
…except the scientists were not trying to ‘…”hide the decline” in global temperatures.’ They were “hiding the decline” in a regional proxy on display in a graphic. Why can’t ‘The Telegraph’ get this basic fact straight?
Theo Goodwin says: April 24, 2011 at 10:55 am
Excellent post —Today, journalists do not understand the concept of professional integrity. What is disheartening is that the change happened so quickly and so fully.
———–
Theo, a compliment from you makes my day!
It seems that the only people fooled by the whitewashes were the participants themselves.
Not a big surprise, but the problem remains that the participants include the political elite of most western nations.
You know what they say… “Incest is best…” Hmmm wait a minute, criminals and sicko’s say that… These guys must be related. 😉
Bump:
The Telegraph is a year behind the Sunday Telegraph. Chris Booker wrote about this on 27th March 2010.
http://eureferendum.blogspot.com/2011/04/hail-msm.html
http://eureferendum.blogspot.com/2011/04/last-word.html
The real question is what prompted Jason Lewis to write this article at this time?
MAKING COMPLAINTS TO THE BBC
Do you want to complain to the BBC?
One thing to get straight from the start: – responsibility for the BBC’s editorial content within their Editorial Guidlines rests ultimately with the Director-General, as Editor-in-Chief. This may save complainants a great deal of frustration as the vast Kafka-like bureaucratic monster that the BBC has become will have you pushed from pillar to post as each department asserts that their department is not the one to deal with your complaint, and fobs you off to yet another department or the BBC’s “complaints” web page.
Having had a long experience of dealing with BBC producers and editors, I can say with some authority that complaints are routinely ignored, dismissed, or, as in the case of emails, deleted by one of their army of “screeners” who filter out all adverse comments from their boss’ Inbox.
So write a letter to this bloke, who’s supposedly running the BBC –
Mark Thompson, BBC Director-General
Broadcasting House
Portland Place
London
W1A 1AA
UK
Tel: 020 7580 4468
Fax: 020 7637 1630
Contact the BBC directly –
The BBC Trust
“Your complaint is important to us. The BBC Trust ensures BBC programmes are high quality. If you have a complaint please use this process.”
– Sir Michael Lyons, Chairman of the BBC Trust.
Re. AGW bias:
Last year, Alison Hastings said this:
“The BBC must be inclusive, consider the broad perspective, and ensure that the existence of a range of views is appropriately reflected. In addition, the new guideline extends the definition of “controversial” subjects beyond those of public policy and political or industrial controversy to include controversy within religion, science, finance, culture, ethics and other matters.”
Contact her directly –
Alison Hastings
BBC Trust Unit
180 Great Portland Street
London
W1W 5QZ
UK
Tel: 03700 100 222
Textphone: 03700 100 212
Email: Send your complaint https://www.bbc.co.uk/complaints/forms/
For the record, I have written to Alison Hastings myself about the BBC’s coverage of AGW, and I can tell you that she did not reply. Instead, I got a letter from her Correspondence Manager, Bruce Vander. He said that the Trust has no role in editorial matters, which are the domain of the BBC’s management. He said The Trust’s role is to set out the overall framework, known as the BBC’s Editorial Guidlines, which set out the values and standards that all BBC output should meet. He also pointed me to the complaints page: http://www.bbc.co.uk/complaints and said the Trust conducts regular impartiality reviews of BBC editorial content. The current impartiality review concerns science coverage, including “global warming,” and its findings are due to be published later this year.
From all that, I conclude the way to complain is firstly via the complaints page, then to the management, then finally to the Director-General himself.
The BBC will only change their behaviour on this subject if they get a regular avalanche of complaints from the public. They are an insulated, self-serving, arrogant, incestous bureaucracy which ignores the very public it proclaims itself to serve. The more you let them get away with it, the more they will get away with. If the BBC knows their biased and unfair treatment of AGW and the participants in their programs will invoke a storm of objections from viewers and listeners, they may well alter the content of their programs to make them less biased and unfair.
Also write to the BBC Complaints department –
BBC Complaints
PO Box 1922
Darlington
DL3 0UT
UK
There are three stages to the BBC Complaints process. Within 30 working days of the transmission or event you can either:
make a complaint via this website:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/complaints/handle.shtml#code
Call BBC Audience Services on 03700 100 222
(UK-wide rate charged at no more than 01/02 geographic numbers; calls may be recorded for training)
or write (as above) to BBC Complaints, PO Box 1922, Darlington DL3 0UR
There is also the BBC “Feedback” program which will accept complaints online –
http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/features/feedback/contact/
or write to –
Feedback
PO Box number 67234
London
SE1P 4AX
Tel: 03 333 444 544
feedback@bbc.co.uk
Good luck if you complain to “Feedback”. I have never got any sort of reply or airing of my complaints to “Feedback” about this issue, and I’ve been doing it for years.
You can also complain to the broadcasting regulator Ofcom http://www.ofcom.org.uk/ about editorial standards in radio and television broadcasts (but not about online items or the World Service). Ofcom takes complaints about BBC issues except impartiality, inaccuracy and some commercial issues which remain the responsibility of the BBC Trust. Visit the Ofcom website to read about its remit and how to complain.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
BBC Statement
We monitor and report in public on the complaints we receive and learn from them to improve our programmes and services.
Stage 1: What happens first when I make a complaint?
We aim to reply to you within 10 working days depending on the nature of your complaint. We also publish public responses to significant issues of wide audience concern on this website.
If we have made a mistake we will apologise and take action to stop it happening again.
If you are dissatisfied with our first response, please contact the department which replied explaining why and requesting a further response to the complaint. If you made your original complaint through this website, you will need to use our webform again. You should normally do this within 20 working days.
Stage 2: If I’m not satisfied with this second reply, what can I do next?
If you consider that the second response you received still does not address your complaint, we will advise you how to take the matter further to this next stage. You should normally do this within 20 working days
If it is about a specific item which you believe has breached BBC editorial standards and it was broadcast or published by the BBC, it will normally be referred to the Editorial Complaints Unit. The Unit will independently investigate your complaint (normally in writing), decide if it is justified and, if so, ensure that the BBC takes appropriate action in response.
Other complaints at this stage will normally be referred to management in the division responsible. For full details of the BBC’s complaints processes please visit the BBC Trust website http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/contact/complaints_appeals/appeal_trust.shtml
Stage 3: If I still think the BBC has got it wrong what can I do?
The BBC Trust ensures complaints are properly handled by the BBC and that the complaints process reflects best practice and opportunities for learning.
Within 20 working days of your response at Stage 2, you may ask the BBC Trust to consider an appeal against the finding. If the BBC Trust upholds an appeal it expects management to take account of its findings.
You can write to the BBC Trust at 180 Great Portland Street, London W1W 5QZ. Full details of the complaints and appeals processes are on the BBC Trust website.
We aim to treat every complainant with respect and in return expect equal consideration to be shown to our staff who handle complaints.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Email other BBC programs directly:
Storyville
storyville@bbc.co.uk
Broadcasting House
broadcasting.house@bbc.co.uk
Newsnight Investigations
NewsnightInvestigations@bbc.co.uk
Newsnight
newsnight@bbc.co.uk
Horizon
horizon@bbc.co.uk
Emma Jay
Producer/Director BBC Vision Productions (Horizon)
emma.jay@bbc.co.uk
The Today Program
todaycomplaints@bbc.co.uk
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
BBC apparatchiks
Commissioning Editors
The British Broadcasting Corporation
BBC White City
201 Wood Lane
London
W12 7TS
UK
http://www.bbc.co.uk/commissioning
Knowledge
George Entwistle
Controller, Knowledge Commissioning & Controller, Editorial standards (BBC Vision)
(Encompasses the new genre areas within the umbrella of Knowledge)
Emma Swain
Head of Knowledge Commissioning
emma.swain@bbc.co.uk
Emma Swain’s role is to provide creative leadership to the team of commissioning editors, supporting the indie and inhouse producers. She will not make individual commissioning decisions, and will report to George Entwistle.
Krishan Arora
Independents Executive
krishan.arora@bbc.co.uk
Krishan doesn’t commission projects, but is the liaison between independent producers and the BBC.
Mary FitzPatrick
Executive Editor Diversity
mary.fitzpatrick@bbc.co.uk
Mary is also not a commissioner, but she works with commissioners and the like, and independent production companies to improve on-screen portrayal and diversity.
Documentaries
Charlotte Moore
Commissioning Editor, Documentaries
Room 6060
BBC TV Centre
Wood Lane
London
W12 7RJ
UK
charlotte.moore@bbc.co.uk
Emma Willis
Commissioning Executive Producer
emma.willis@bbc.co.uk
Maxine Watson
Commissioning Executive Producer
maxine.watson@bbc.co.uk
Addition to comments on media ………….
In May 2007 in Australia the major media corporations formed a coalition titled Right to Know
http://static.townsvillebulletin.com.au/FreeSpeech/jointstatement.html
John Hartigan (CEO and Chairman News Ltd) in October 2007 Andrew Olle Media Lecture
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/media/john-hartigans-speech/story-e6frg996-1111114685633
Home page: http://www.australiasrighttoknow.com.au/
Speeches avail in pdf and can be sourced in left hand column.
Frankly, the story needs restating. WHERE is the outrage at being lied to! Deceived! The peoples trust abused!
Here are three details from Booker’s column from 27 March, 2010:
“What Lord Oxburgh kept quiet about, however, is that he is also a director and vice-chairman of…Globe International. The name stands for “Global Legislators Organisation for a Balanced Environment”, and it describes itself as a worldwide network to lobby governments to take more drastic action on climate change.
Globe clearly knows how to pick its men. Its UK parliamentary team also includes Elliot Morley MP, Globe’s former president… ”
OUTRAGE! please.
sHx says: April 24, 2011 at 3:16 am
“I was prepared to give the benefit of doubt to Russell and Oxburgh inquires,”
At the time of Climategate I believed these inquiries were being run by honest people who were mistaken.
That presumption was clearly wrong: at least some of the people involved in these inquires knowingly lied and/or hid their personal involvement and prior bias and to be frank it all stinks rotten like the MP’s expenses scandal.
vigilantfish says: April 24, 2011 at 7:09 pm
Theo Goodwin says: April 24, 2011 at 10:55 am
Excellent post —Today, journalists do not understand the concept of professional integrity…
Yes, I forgot, the phone hacking scandal shows the press our up to their armpits in corruption so it would be a bit of the pot calling the kettle black for them to criticise the politicians and scientific “elite”.
David. There is much less freedom in Australia. My experience there was that it was/has become akin to a dictatorship where governments/police have much more rights than individuals. They can enter your house for any reason even local council authorities, for any reason.
Anthony Watts says:
April 24, 2011 at 10:33 am
Pam I have no trouble probably your DNS provider try opendns.org I think
———————————————————————————–
It’s http://www.opendns.com/
Easy to install, I’ve used it for several years.
Ted says: “In the 1950′s and 60.s the BBC drove around our cities and towns with scanner Vans/trucks looking for people without Radio and TV licenses (My mother would panic at the sight of them)…”
…It was revealed about two years ago in a radio program and a subsequent TV program that these vans actually detected nothing. The real panic was caused by the BBC “adverts” declaring that they had the technology to detect unlicensed televisions in your house – the most memorable line being “We know where you are”. It was BBC lying propaganda, which had the sole purpose of inducing enough panic in anyone with an unlicensed television at the sight of one of these vans in their area to make them rush to the Post Office and buy a license.
What was in these vans? A wooden shelf for an oscillator (which most of the public never knew could not actually detect an unlicensed television but was used as set decoration because it looked the part), some cabling, and some fold-away chairs for “operatives” while they waited for the moment when they would spring out the back doors, clipboard in hand, and march officiously up to some unfortunate’s door to demand production of their television license. The whole thing was a massive psychological campaign of lying propaganda with a bit of street theatre thrown in so as to keep the public scared enough to keep buying television licenses.
Alexander.
“IMHO the problem is not the TV set but the lies and propaganda that are being produced and disseminated by powerful politico/business cartels with a worldwide reach.”
I totally agree and for that very reason I “chucked” the television, it would be pointless paying the licence fee and just ignoring it.
The remainder of your post does not merit further discussion, IMHO of course.
John.
Ralph says:
April 24, 2011 at 10:36 am
“Tell you what, if you can write a paper successfully explaining who created the Creator, then I can guarantee you a Nobel.”
You just proved my point! I never said a creator created it! I only said that to question the validity of darwin is a carier ender. There are many problems in Darwin theory but you can’t even hint at this or you will be axed. Just as in Climategate, the emporer (Darwin’s theory) has no clothes.
Kate
Would you do a video on all that? I think you have hit U-tube material there, if you can show how nonresponsive BBC is in its complaints departments.
We seem to need assurances from authorities, media and the like for our own takes on even the most obvious things like a whitewash. This is why whitewashes are done with impunity. This is why propaganda works so well. The majority can be convinced of oxymoronic hypotheses like the increasing cold is being caused by warming and the increasing warming is also caused by warming. The warmist scientists breathe a sigh of relief when they learn that the inquiries exonerated the AGW scientists and that even if they were to have made huge manipulations of the data, the science is sound. Those making the inquiry know that the thinking person knows they are blatant frauds, but they also know that the thinking person is in the minority. I’m not so relieved that the Telegraph now thinks it was all a whitewash because I know they already knew that from the beginning – but now they are smelling blood of a dying beast and have to position themselves to come out of it all nice and clean.
@Lucy Skywalker 6:54 am
Hi Lucy. Thanks for the idea.
The problem with the BBC is that it has become completely detached from reality on this subject, seemingly listening only to itself, its supporters in other media organisations, and fellow travelers from various pressure groups, politicians, and regulators. Trying to get any sort of dialogue with the BBC on this issue reminds me of visiting a friend’s child who had a brain disorder. It mattered not what you did or said to him, he would just ignore you and carry on playing, singing, and talking to himself until he wanted to notice you or somebody else in the room, which was quite a rare occasion as I remember him.
The BBC reminds me of that.
Would any YouTube video change anything at the BBC? I’d like to think so, but what are the chances?
Kate, that’s exactly why I thought, U-tube. Bypass the official route that is broken down. I think a lot of the MSM have detached themselves… look at the difference between, say, Monbiot and the comments after his pieces, even those that are allowed. There is a whole message needs to get out – “If you want to communicate successfully, take heed of your critics and give them air space. If you don’t, you are tampering with the lynchpin of democracy and justice, freedom of speech, and you will – eventually – pay the price, because people actually care about truth in the end.”
Lucy Skywalker @ur momisugly 11:32 am “… a lot of the MSM have detached themselves…”
…Most British media organisations are either corrupt, don’t really care about reporting the truth anymore, or are just plain scared of facing the consequences of going against the “consensus”. Look at the BBC. It’s nothing but a gigantic bureaucracy, totally incestuous, self-obsessed, and terrified of upsetting politicians, because it’s the tax-raising AGW-loving ministers that control the BBC’s purse-strings. And let’s not forget the little matter of the £800+ million black hole in the BBC’s pension fund. This is the same BBC pension fund that has massive investments in Carbon Trading firms.
The first priority of any bureaucracy is to survive, and its second priority is to expand its power and influence, and the last thing, right at the bottom of its list of priorities, is to serve the public as the public deserves and needs to be served. In the face of all that, what can a YouTube video achieve? It would be opposing the closed ranks of the entire British Establishment. It would be like fighting gravity – very brave and noble, but doomed.
Generations to come will look back on this time and laugh at us. “How could they ever have believed in that “global warming” claptrap?” they will say, regarding our generation as being possessed and damned.
About 30 years ago there was a programme (UK spelling!) broadcast by the BBC on the Horizon science series called ‘When Polar Bears Swam in the Thames’.
It was probably a bit topical then as a result of all the alarmist stuff about global cooling and the approaching new ice age.
I remember it as being well researched and evenly presented. It had little to do with what might happen any time soon in the UK. It just showed how much had changed over many thousands of years. The nearest polar bears are now on Svarlbard, north of Norway.
I am surprised it has not been shown again – the BBC could then claim to have shown how much global warming there has been and that they have known about it for years… (sarc off)
NOTE: THIS IS SPAM, AND NOW THE SUBJECT OF THIS POST
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/04/25/climate-craziness-of-the-week-greentabs-for-gasoline/
– Anthony
==============================================
Hello,
I was just on your web site today and I love it. I am also an Eco Green Company
proud owner and we both have something very unique in common. My company’s
philosophy is “Be Part Of The Solution …Not The Pollution.” I am looking
to form an alliance with a company like yours that has the same vision and
mission for our families and world for the future.
—————————————————————————————————————————-
I am not going to try to sell you anything but to see if both our companies can
work together and support each other’s business and help our neighbors and
the world at hand. I have been in business with my husband Tom for over 13
years and one of our main objectives is to introduce innovative, cost savings
Eco friendly proven products to our clients and friends. We have such an opportunity.
As business owners, we are always looking to the future and trying to capture the
opportunities that are ahead of the “TREND” and are positioned perfectly in today’s
world economy that also supports the “Eco Green” movement.
We have such an opportunity in GreenFootGlobal.com/freegas.
Getting more to the point:
——————————————————————————————————————————-
The “credibility and “reputation” of our Drive Green, Save Green product is as follows:
1. The engineering and chemistry of our product has won the “Nobel” prize.
No other company world wide can say this.
2. EnviroTabs is EPA registered.
3. EnviroTabs has a world wide “Patent”.
4. EnviroTabs reduces harmful emissions up to 85%……YES!!! 85%.
5. EnviroTabs increases your MPG up to 38%…(tremendous gas savings).
6. EnviroTabs lowers your maintenance costs
(truck oil changes are now at 40,000+ miles between oil changes)
………………..and so many more documented benefits….see the links below.
—————————————————————————————————————————–
At Greenfoot Global, our goal is to reduce the world�s dependency on fossil fuels
and also reduce emissions in at least 10% of the world�s vehicles. By using and
promoting EnviroTabs �, you can do your part to help the planet. In looking at your
web site and the great Eco service and product you offer, it seems that our
Drive Green, Save Green product complements your company’s mission and I
would ask you to consider an alliance in marketing and advertising our product.
—————————————————————————————————————————-
You will find additional info in the links below. I know that you are really busy and
taking on another opportunity may be the last thing you want to do. But if it makes
money from day one and lines up with your mission ……..then you need to take a
serious look at it. This has a world wide impact and opportunity and is ahead
of the “TREND”.
Let’s talk soon to discuss how we can form an alliance with your business today
and the other opportunities you may have tomorrow. Or you can email with your
interest and questions.
—————————————————————————————————————————-
The following are some good links & info (a small sample of what we are about):
Copy & Paste the links below if needed
1. Intro Video
2. How It works Questions & Answers (the science starts at 2.37…one of my favorites..)
3. GFG Math Class…can I make money?
4. Testimonials
5. Testimonials #2 ….You Have To See This…Real Business Owners and People
http://www.youtube.com/djkmarkets#p/u
Thank you and have a great Eco green day.
PS: Visit my website below.
Sue
Sue & Tom Gregan
http://www.GreenFootGlobal.com/freegas
412-366-4563
“See You At The Pump”
Go Green, Drive Green, Save Green, Make Green
Hello,
I was just on your web site today and I love it. I am also an Eco Green Company
proud owner and we both have something very unique in common. My company’s
philosophy is “Be Part Of The Solution …Not The Pollution.” I am looking
to form an alliance with a company like yours that has the same vision and
mission for our families and world for the future.
—————————————————————————————————————————-
I am not going to try to sell you anything but to see if both our companies can
work together and support each other’s business and help our neighbors and
the world at hand. I have been in business with my husband Tom for over 13
years and one of our main objectives is to introduce innovative, cost savings
Eco friendly proven products to our clients and friends. We have such an opportunity.
As business owners, we are always looking to the future and trying to capture the
opportunities that are ahead of the “TREND” and are positioned perfectly in today’s
world economy that also supports the “Eco Green” movement.
We have such an opportunity in GreenFootGlobal.com/freegas.
Getting more to the point:
——————————————————————————————————————————-
The “credibility and “reputation” of our Drive Green, Save Green product is as follows:
1. The engineering and chemistry of our product has won the “Nobel” prize.
No other company world wide can say this.
2. EnviroTabs is EPA registered.
3. EnviroTabs has a world wide “Patent”.
4. EnviroTabs reduces harmful emissions up to 85%……YES!!! 85%.
5. EnviroTabs increases your MPG up to 38%…(tremendous gas savings).
6. EnviroTabs lowers your maintenance costs
(truck oil changes are now at 40,000+ miles between oil changes)
………………..and so many more documented benefits….see the links below.
—————————————————————————————————————————–
At Greenfoot Global, our goal is to reduce the worlds dependency on fossil fuels
and also reduce emissions in at least 10% of the worlds vehicles. By using and
promoting EnviroTabs ®, you can do your part to help the planet. In looking at your
web site and the great Eco service and product you offer, it seems that our
Drive Green, Save Green product complements your company’s mission and I
would ask you to consider an alliance in marketing and advertising our product.
—————————————————————————————————————————-
You will find additional info in the links below. I know that you are really busy and
taking on another opportunity may be the last thing you want to do. But if it makes
money from day one and lines up with your mission ……..then you need to take a
serious look at it. This has a world wide impact and opportunity and is ahead
of the “TREND”.
Let’s talk soon to discuss how we can form an alliance with your business today
and the other opportunities you may have tomorrow. Or you can email with your
interest and questions.
—————————————————————————————————————————-
The following are some good links & info (a small sample of what we are about):
Copy & Paste the links below if needed
1. Intro Video
2. How It works Questions & Answers (the science starts at 2.37…one of my favorites..)
3. GFG Math Class…can I make money?
4. Testimonials
5. Testimonials #2 ….You Have To See This…Real Business Owners and People
http://www.youtube.com/djkmarkets#p/u
Thank you and have a great Eco green day.
PS: Visit my website below.
Sue
Sue & Tom Gregan
http://www.GreenFootGlobal.com/freegas
412-366-4563
“See You At The Pump”
Go Green, Drive Green, Save Green, Make Green