Quote of the week – the carbon munchies

Yes, but they didn’t inhale the electricity…

From globalwarming.org

Pot growers inhale 1% of U.S. electricity, exhale GHGs of 3Million cars — study

Colin Sullivan, E&E reporter

Indoor marijuana cultivation consumes enough electricity to power 2 million average-sized U.S. homes, which corresponds to about 1 percent of national power consumption, according to a study by a staff scientist at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

Researcher Evan Mills’ study notes that cannabis production has largely shifted indoors, especially in California, where medical marijuana growers use high-intensity lights usually reserved for operating rooms that are 500 times more powerful that a standard reading lamp.

Click here to read Mills’ study:

ENERGY UP IN SMOKE

THE CARBON FOOTPRINT OF INDOOR CANNABIS PRODUCTION

In California, the top-producing state, indoor cultivation is responsible for about 3% of all electricity use or 8% of household use, somewhat higher than estimates previously made for British Columbia. This corresponds to the electricity use of 1 million average California homes, greenhouse-gas emissions equal to those from 1 million average cars, and energy expenditures of $3 billion per year. Due to higher electricity prices and cleaner fuels used to make electricity, California incurs 70% of national energy costs but contributes only 20% of national CO2 emissions from indoor Cannabis cultivation.

But today, Moonbeam Governor Brown plans to sign a renewable energy mandate sure to bring on supply reliability problems.

Maybe when the potheads start complaining they can’t produce enough “medical marijuana” to satisfying the needs of the “afflicted” in California, “Moonbeam” might realize what terrible damage he’s done to the state’s number one cash crop.

Medical marijuana neon sign at a dispensary on...
Image via Wikipedia

With unreliable electricity for growlights, looks like the pot rescue of California’s economy is up in smoke.

Time to leave California, it’s just gotten too freaking weird here.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

69 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
kwik
April 12, 2011 9:25 am

But it is still a very green industry……

pat
April 12, 2011 9:27 am

Someone was paid for this study. That is a shame.

Robert M
April 12, 2011 9:38 am

California has Gov. Moonbeam, Barbie Boxer and Nancy Pelosi.
I don’t think it can get any worse…

kim
April 12, 2011 9:39 am

Sunshine shirks duty
At Gaia’s Caesarian.
Operating Room.
==========

RockyRoad
April 12, 2011 9:42 am

I left California back in 1973. I enjoyed my time there, but it was getting weird even then. My memories are fond, most people I associated with were exceptional, but it has gone downhill ever since.

jorgekafkazar
April 12, 2011 9:46 am

♪”Let it be-eee, let it beee….”♫

Scott Covert
April 12, 2011 9:50 am

Legalize Pot, guard dogs and shotguns are way cheaper than those lights. You’d think Hippies would prefer solar powered dope anyway.

John W.
April 12, 2011 9:52 am

Well. This will really harsh some mellow.
8^)

Old Grump
April 12, 2011 9:55 am

Those of us in the other 49 US states should encourage California to take this to the limit. They should take this to the ultimate for all of the no fossil fuels/nuclear ideas. We NEED a test case for all of the renewable/sustainable energy ideas. It would be difficult for the citizens, but I say it’s better to sacrifice one state than all of them. I think that when the personal electronics started to not work for lack of power the whole scheme will fall apart.
Sarcasm? Even I am not sure.

April 12, 2011 10:10 am

I don’t know what the problem is. I just showed the study to my boss, he thinks its a good marketing strategy, except he’s concerned about the consumers compliance in payments.

Dave Springer
April 12, 2011 10:10 am

Yeah, yeah, yeah…
On the other hand potheads tend to stay at home more and thus aren’t wasting fuel driving around for their entertainment. And when they do drive it’s a well known fact that they drive slower and less aggressively which also conserves fuel.
How come people like the author never think these things through all the way? Always in a hurry I guess. Maybe he needs to smoke a bowl and chill. 🙂

DJ
April 12, 2011 10:20 am

According to numbers I ran, derived from numbers I got off the internet (irrefutable, no doubt), the energy use of these operations in question represents over 102Million Kwh of electricity DAILY…and that doesn’t include independent electrical generators not on the grid.
I’m finding that really hard to believe.

Dave Springer
April 12, 2011 10:29 am

I’m a libertarian and greatly dislike Draconian laws against victimless crimes. Now I have one more reason to hate marijuana prohibition. The list was already long enough. It’s legal to make your own wine and beer for personal consumption. Pot should be the same way. I hate hypocrisy too. Alcohol and tobacco use both have far more ill effects on individuals and society both than pot ever did.
That said, potheads tend to be stay-at-home introverts and thus don’t drive as much. And when they do drive it’s well known they drive slower and less aggressively which also conserves fuel. So even with the electricity for indoor lights to grow it I’m sure that is more than offset by the consumers of the product using less transporation fuel.

Traciatim
April 12, 2011 10:32 am

Wouldn’t this be a good time to invest in companies that make LED grow lamps? Think of the lighting and air conditioning savings!

MangoChutney
April 12, 2011 10:40 am

another study gone to pot
/Mango
I don’t deny climate change, I know climate changes

April 12, 2011 10:49 am

Shut down hospitals and the rest of the pharmaceutical industry they are energy intensive too /src

John Dodds
April 12, 2011 10:53 am

Did he do an environmental impact study?
Let’s see tripling the cost of electricity to the public means no impact. It might raise the profits of the green investors though.

pk
April 12, 2011 11:00 am

hey dave:
it isn’t a victimless crime when a pot head backs a forklift into a woman and crushes her against a crane column in a machine shop.
it isn’t a victimless crime when a pothead pulls a 450ton set of freight locomotives out onto a mainline track infront of a passenger train doing 125 mph.
it isn’t a victimless crime when a pot head decides to back the gasoline tanker up on the freeway because he missed his off ramp and it burned for three days.
victimless crimes my a$$.
C

April 12, 2011 11:15 am

How about a nice place at 2200ft in the Ozark Mtns. with no floods, bird slicers or draconian laws? Lots of sparkling clean swimming holes and beautiful scenery.

Jit
April 12, 2011 11:23 am

Marijuana growers clearly haven’t heard of the “greenhouse” effect. Free heating and lighting as standard.
PK: But you are conflating two issues. It is one thing to smoke dope. It is another to smoke dope and then driver a petrol tanker. Just as is the case when drinking alcohol.

DAV
April 12, 2011 11:31 am

“they didn’t inhale the electricity…”
Then what’s making the giant sucking sound?

LarryOldtimer
April 12, 2011 11:42 am

PK, please cite specific instances of when and where those incidents you write of actually occurred. I would have to guess that you can’t do so, but police files are replete with these sorts of things happening with consumption of alcohol.

Wijnand
April 12, 2011 11:43 am

@pk 11:00am
Sorry pk but what a load of crap!
You are saying growing and using pot is a crime because some stupid people used it while opetating heavy machinery???
Ok, lets illegalize sleep-aids, hay fever medicine and alcohol too then!

Duncan
April 12, 2011 11:46 am

I am shocked!
Why would people use all that high-priced California electricity, when they could run their operations on cheap Washington State hydroelectricity?
Makes no sense. Makes me suspicious of the numbers cited.

Rational Debate
April 12, 2011 11:58 am

re post by: jorgekafkazar says: April 12, 2011 at 9:46 am
Ok, Jorge, I’ve gotta know – how did you put the musical symbols into your post??
As to the article’s implicit derogation of people with the all too prevalent quotes around “medical marijuana” and “afflicted” and so on…. I’m quite certain that they are right and there are abuses, e.g., people who don’t have medical problems getting on the system – but consider that over 25% of the american population at any one time has problems with chronic pain – and that is from many many different studies. Consider also that many of these people go under or untreated – and that is also from many different studies, and is further compounded by the stigma of ‘abuse’ causing the legal system to make proscribing sufficient pain medications extremely difficult and risky for doctors. Then further consider that there are people who simply don’t respond well to typical pain medications – either because of nasty side effects or because of a lack of sufficient pain control. That is also well documented. Lastly consider that people who are prone to substance abuse tend to find ways regardless of laws, and are a far smaller percentage of the population than those with significant pain problems. And if you are going to try to claim that abuse harms not just the abuser but their family friends, and anyone around them – well, that is true – but what is also true is that chronic pain also utterly destroys lives, and not just the person suffering with it, but also their family, friends, etc. Now, I don’t know how much marijuana helps, but I think it is pretty clear that there are a large number of people with legitimate problems that it does help, as much or more than typical pain meds or in conjunction with them when they are insufficient – cancer patients are a prime example, and it’s my understanding that roughly 25% of us will all wind up with cancer at some point in our lives.
re pk says: April 12, 2011 at 11:00 am
Pk, much of it is a victimless crime. As to your examples, they are of people who are publicly intoxicated. It doesn’t much matter if it is from alcohol, marijuana or some other substance. It is the abusers who need to be held accountable, not everyone. Criminalize dangerous behavior – e.g., operating cars or equipment while intoxicated – not use of substances in a responsible manner, e.g., at home or in ways that don’t risk others. I would bet almost anything that criminalizing marijuana use causes more deaths and harm because of the black market, higher prices, attempts to elude or evade police, etc. Not to mention cost to society for all of the people who wind up clogging up our courts and jails when they were involved in what would be, without the criminalization, victimless activities.
So make it illegal to drive or work while intoxicated, just as it is with alcohol or any other drug – and then seriously enforce those laws and seriously punish those who transgress. Don’t make use of a drug with less side effects than alcohol illegal to use at home or where others aren’t put at risk. At the very least, allow the flipping researchers to research it so perhaps they can determine what gives the beneficial aspects and that can be synthesized while avoiding the aspects that give a ‘high,’ if that is possible. Right now it is still extremely difficult to even research it (or the potential medical benefits of other illegal drugs). And while we’re at it, make it less problematic for doctors to provide sufficient pain control, and then come down hard on any doctors who are found to be actually proscribing fraudulently to abusers or dealers – but leave those alone who are just trying to sufficiently treat their patient’s pain.

1 2 3