Great, just great. Don’t get me wrong, I like the LED bulbs, I have several in my house. But when we get back to basics, a tungsten light bulb doesn’t require a haz-mat squad to dispose of. It’s glass, ceramic, tungsten, some thin steel, and tin solder (if ROHS). CFL bulbs and now LED bulbs are so much more eco unfriendly and when they inevitably end up in landfills, they become a source of heavy metal. We may have gained short term energy efficiency, but the long term payback may not be worth it.
LED products billed as eco-friendly contain toxic metals, study finds
UC researchers tested holiday bulbs, traffic lights and car beams
From UC Irvine:
Those light-emitting diodes marketed as safe, environmentally preferable alternatives to traditional lightbulbs actually contain lead, arsenic and a dozen other potentially hazardous substances, according to newly published research.
“LEDs are touted as the next generation of lighting. But as we try to find better products that do not deplete energy resources or contribute to global warming, we have to be vigilant about the toxicity hazards of those marketed as replacements,” said Oladele Ogunseitan, chair of UC Irvine’s Department of Population Health & Disease Prevention.
He and fellow scientists at UCI and UC Davis crunched, leached and measured the tiny, multicolored lightbulbs sold in Christmas strands; red, yellow and green traffic lights; and automobile headlights and brake lights. Their findings? Low-intensity red lights contained up to eight times the amount of lead allowed under California law, but in general, high-intensity, brighter bulbs had more contaminants than lower ones. White bulbs copntained the least lead, but had high levels of nickel.
“We find the low-intensity red LEDs exhibit significant cancer and noncancer potentials due to the high content of arsenic and lead,” the team wrote in the January 2011 issue of Environmental Science & Technology, referring to the holiday lights. Results from the larger lighting products will be published later, but according to Ogunseitan, “it’s more of the same.”
Lead, arsenic and many additional metals discovered in the bulbs or their related parts have been linked in hundreds of studies to different cancers, neurological damage, kidney disease, hypertension, skin rashes and other illnesses. The copper used in some LEDs also poses an ecological threat to fish, rivers and lakes.
Ogunseitan said that breaking a single light and breathing fumes would not automatically cause cancer, but could be a tipping point on top of chronic exposure to another carcinogen. And – noting that lead tastes sweet – he warned that small children could be harmed if they mistake the bright lights for candy.
Risks are present in all parts of the lights and at every stage during production, use and disposal, the study found. Consumers, manufacturers and first responders to accident scenes ought to be aware of this, Ogunseitan said. When bulbs break at home, residents should sweep them up with a special broom while wearing gloves and a mask, he advised. Crews dispatched to clean up car crashes or broken traffic fixtures should don protective gear and handle the material as hazardous waste. Currently, LEDs are not classified as toxic and are disposed of in regular landfills. Ogunseitan has forwarded the study results to California and federal health regulators.
He cites LEDs as a perfect example of the need to mandate product replacement testing. The diodes are widely hailed as safer than compact fluorescent bulbs, which contain dangerous mercury. But, he said, they weren’t properly tested for potential environmental health impacts before being marketed as the preferred alternative to inefficient incandescent bulbs, now being phased out under California law. A long-planned state regulation originally set to take effect Jan. 1 would have required advance testing of such replacement products. But it was opposed by industry groups, a less stringent version was substituted, and Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger placed the law on hold days before he left office.
“I’m frustrated, but the work continues,” said Ogunseitan, a member of the state Department of Toxic Substances Control’s Green Ribbon Science Panel. He said makers of LEDs and other items could easily reduce chemical concentrations or redesign them with truly safer materials. “Every day we don’t have a law that says you cannot replace an unsafe product with another unsafe product, we’re putting people’s lives at risk,” he said. “And it’s a preventable risk.”
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
“”””” Rik Gheysens says:
February 12, 2011 at 2:18 am
I will only mention three interesting articles.
1. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-1340938/Eco-bulbs-health-hazard-babies-pregnant-women-mercury-inside.html
Read the reaction of the Department of Environment!
3. A summary of the health effects of LEDs: http://www.afssa.fr/Documents/PRES2010CPA14EN.pdf
What are the risks of the artificial light of LEDs for our health? “””””
Well if the French are worried about eye exposure to blue light; they should really love the exposure to UV that comes from CFLs when their phosphors fail.
LED replacement lamps for incandescents; have no more Luminance than do ordinary incandescents. Try looking at the filament of a non diffused Tungsten or quartz halogen Lamp, and see how you like it.
So go back to whale oil if you don’t like LEDs; but stop treating us the people like we are total idiots. It’s far more dangerous being out on the floor of a disco joint; with it’s flashing strobe lights, and 150 dBm of what substitutes for music these days.
People today put several KW of audio, into their cars to locate all the rattles in their chassis, while they drive down the road; and they seem to come through that about as stupid as before; so what’s the big deal if they light their oil pan under the car with blue LEDs
Somebody should point out that Gasoline in a car is dangerous; not to mention smoking while you gas up the car. Come to think of it, the main problem with cigarettes, is that they just don’t kill people fast enough.
By the way; French people; and most Europeans, don’t smoke anyhow do they ?
Gosh, people…. bimetal contacts themselves fail, I don’t trust them, though I don’t know how conventional traffic light signal switching stays reliable if it does.
As for different colours failing sooner or later, keep in mind the maturity of the colour technology – red LEDs came first, some of the blue or white depend on phosphors that re-emit desired wavelength. It’s a rapidly evolving technology. Then there’s variations of supplier, batch, etc.
Good point about giving redundancy with early indication of failure.
About traffic circles – they are the fad in SW BC these days, most poorly designed (too small – they should not be stuffed into an existing intersection), with confusion over protocol (some people have claimed in print that the rule is to yield to the right as usual, others to yield to traffic already in the circle). Seem more political cutesy than “traffic engineering”. They have existed for at least half a century in western Canada, albeit few locations, and worked fine as they were properly sized. In England they seem over-used – joining five road surfaces and having dual lanes in the circle, as in the west end of Cheltenham, doesn’t work IMO.
Some people design things that just work well, others don’t. For example, flashing pedestrian-operated countdown-timed lights in Richmond B.C. are confusing to drivers, whereas those in a suburb of Seattle WA are quickly grasped. (Speaking of reliability, the in-surface flashing lights fell out of favour in SW B.C. because of failure rate and repair cost. I don’t recall the gory details but note that salt is used in B.C. but not in WA state.)
BTW Charles, the title “LED Stoplights Failing in Winter” is a poor choice as it does not distinguish between LEDs and the installation of them which is the actual problem.
Peter_Dtm says
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/02/10/can-we-have-our-regular-old-light-bulbs-back-now/#comment-596794
Sorry I took so long to come back to you. My pool was 30 degrees C today, I am heating with these sheets that one puts on the roof . I have 5 sheets. The added advantage is that this cools the house…So your pool is warm and your house is cool.
I also have a solar geyser on my roof. The panels and the whole system basically works like the opposite of a radiator in your car. It saves 40% on my elctricity bill as I have free hot water, most of the time. The geyser is also on a timer switch for electricity for those days when there was no sun.
I recently visited LA (sunny California) and I was most puzzled to find that they do not seem to know these systems, or at least it is not widely in use. It is expensive to put in. However, due electricity shortage in South Africa, our (government run) electricity co. is giving subsidies if you install a solar geyser. I think that is something the US government must consider doing as well …..