Michio Kaku goes cuckoo for global warming fueled snowstorms

Dr. Kaku from cosmos magazine

Comments by Dr. Ryan N. Maue

Apparently we can throw away the meteorology textbooks, fire the forecasters at the National Weather Service, and tell universities and research labs that they have utterly failed to explain the origin of “monster snowstorms”.  Renowned theoretical physicist Dr. Michio Kaku crosses disciplinary boundaries to provide the readers of CNN.com his opinion on the recent winter weather over the Northeast and elsewhere.  However, his explanations are hand-wavy, lacking peer-reviewed foundation, and quite equivocal — yet typical of the recent media rush to blame winter weather or any weather on global warming.  However, as a theoretical physicist, Kaku needs to do a lot better and consult any weather forecaster that knows why there were snowstorms in the 1770s, 1970s, and still today.  At the AMS meeting, Dr. Trenberth highlighted the reason:  “winter”.    CNN.com article link.

From Monster Snowstorms still spell global warming, I copy a few paragraphs and get to the important one…

New York (CNN) — The weather seems to be going berserk, with more snow dumped on our beleaguered Northeastern cities in a month than in a year, paralyzing business and our lives. Records are being broken even as we speak…

Basically, snowstorms in this region arise from the collision of cold Arctic air from Canada moving south and bumping up against warm, moist air from the Gulf of Mexico, causing water vapor to condense and freeze and then form snowstorms, which travel up the Northeast corridor.

Among many factors, the amount of snow dumped is largely driven by the amount of moisture in humid air and not so much the temperature, and this seems to go against common sense.

Here’s the false dichotomy that Kaku sets up:

“There is no single smoking gun that can point us to the origin of these monster snowstorms. But we can focus our attention on two likely culprits. The first is pure chance. There are many random fluctuations in the weather due to many diverse factors (for example, last year’s weather was affected by El Niño).”

“But the second is global warming.”

Similarly, the main consequence of global warming is not warming at all but instead increasingly violent swings in the weather, with droughts and famine in one area occurring at the same time as flooding in another, and snowstorms in one region at the same time as hot spells in another.

More from Kaku:

“I saw this two weeks ago when I spoke in São Paulo, Brazil, where there were massive, lethal mudslides caused by unrelenting, pouring rain, which in turn might have been caused by increased moisture in the air. Of course, this means only that global warming is consistent with the monster storms hitting the Northeast, not that it is the only definitive factor.”

And as the Earth continues to heat, it means that there will be more moisture in the air to possibly drive more monster storms and hurricanes, simultaneously with droughts and hot spells. So we might expect more unusual, bizarre weather patterns in the future.

And unless something is done about it, get used to it.”

————

From someone of Kaku’s reputation and credibility, I am surprised to read this very basic and hand-wavy, meaning factually light, screed that is barely above high school level science.  Perhaps that was what was requested by CNN.com or whoever solicited this contribution, but come on.  Kaku sets up a false dichotomy:  it’s either random chance or it’s global warming (or I guess both).  But, then proceeds to equivocate on every major point thereafter.  To summarize, he says we need to do something about it.

Just a suggestion, if this is what the media establishment is putting out there to win over the public hearts and minds on draconian carbon taxation, then at least come up with some hardened facts.  I am happy to hear the mention of El Nino, but the transition to a very strong La Nina is likely more important on top of the other alphabet soup of atmosphere/ocean oscillations on a bunch of timescales.  It’s like the media, liberal politicians, and now television series scientists awoke out of a coma and are marveling about the drastic changes in the weather/climate all around them.  It’s snowed before, it’s flooded before, and it will again.  There is plenty of literature on storm track dynamics, extratropical cyclones, and countless broadcast meteorologists that could help a theoretical physicist out.  Heck, turn on the Weather Channel and watch the jet stream blue-worm graphic.

===============================================================

Addendum: Mike Smith at Meteorological Musings also has a good essay on the Kaku căca .

Dr. Roger Pielke Sr. has a related story here – Anthony

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

139 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mick
January 27, 2011 8:51 pm

I couldn’t resist: He have to come out of the water. He’s look like D. Suzuki… 🙂
Oh, wait!

Adrian Smits
January 27, 2011 8:57 pm

What mitchio Kaku does not seem to understand is that the atmosphere has cooled to a level where it was almost 30 years ago at the beginning of satellite recording. It is this very cooling that is causing so much of the moisture in the air to come down in the form of rain and snow. I’m sure that once we go into another El Niño dryer weather will return.of course if this la nina lasts for any significant period of time it will also lead to drier weather because the atmosphere just can’t hold as much water when it’s colder.

Doug S
January 27, 2011 8:57 pm

If there was a hot AGW believing chick that I wanted to get close to, I’d say the same kinds of things as Dr. Kaku. I wonder if the good Dr. was catin’ around in São Paulo? Then again, maybe it’s all about grant money.

January 27, 2011 9:00 pm

I these people which to make fools of themselves who am I to prevent them the opportunity. It is always dangerous for us to speak outside of our professional boundaries. Climatology is an earth science that uses mathematics, physics and chemistry. In many ways it is like my field geology, just way younger and far less mature. It is obvious Kaku is ignorant of most earth science and of history. He forfeits his right to use the title scientist.

Louis Savain
January 27, 2011 9:08 pm

Kaku never had any credibility in my book. His physics is what I call ‘Star-Trek voodoo physics’. He preaches stuff like time warps, wormholes, time travel, multiple universes, etc. He loves to ape Brian Greene, Stephen Hawking and other relativists in claiming that gravity is caused by mass curving spacetime, which curvature, in turn, affects the motion of particles. It’s all crackpottery, of course, since nothing can move in spacetime, by definition. But don’t tell that nasty little truth to Kaku because he’s liable to have an apoplectic fit.
What is it about relativists like Michio Kaku and Stephen Hawking that they still can’t figure out that nothing can move in spacetime? Yep. This is the reason that Karl Popper called spacetime “Einstein’s block universe in which nothing happens.” Source: Conjectures and Refutations. Spacetime physics is not what it’s cracked up to be.

kbray in California
January 27, 2011 9:10 pm

Shut off the Natural Gas !!!
Here are some questionable leftist anti-natural gas claims (propaganda) in this article:
http://www.propublica.org/article/natural-gas-and-coal-pollution-gap-in-doubt
Most of these articles we read now seem to include the belief of “man-made global warming” as “the truth” with no discussion. The Koolaid is everywhere!
Keep up the good work Anthony, in posting the “cool” facts!

paulc
January 27, 2011 9:13 pm

I am not really surprised. His radio broadcasts are high on arrogance and low on useful information. That said, many are entertaining.

January 27, 2011 9:17 pm

He’s also talking up the ‘supervolcano’ under Yellowstone. Looks like he’s desperate to raise his media profile. Maybe he’s angling for a raise or something?
http://amfix.blogs.cnn.com/2011/01/27/physicist-michio-kaku-on-super-volcano-all-you-can-do-is-run/

eadler
January 27, 2011 9:25 pm

I am a physicist, and the explanation seems like correct science to me. An increase in temperature means that the air can hold more water, and evaporation rates will increase . When the air holding this water cools, the moisture precipitates as rain or snow, depending on the temperature. So the distribution of precipitation in a sample of storms will go in the direction of increased rain or snowfall. It is reasonable that the amount of precipitation in extreme events would also increase.

Pamela Gray
January 27, 2011 9:32 pm

First, they bemoaned the lack of snow and loss of snowpack due to global warming. Now they bemoan getting dumped on (thus replenishing the snowpack) due to global warming. The air was too dry, now the air is too wet. The rivers were too low, now the rivers are too high, the land was too dry, now the land is too wet, the soil was too warm, now the soil is too cold, the wind was too still, now the wind is too great. I give up. It’s just too tiring to argue with stupid.

wayne
January 27, 2011 9:36 pm

Dr. Trenberth highlighted the reason: “winter”.

Glad to hear that from a climatologist. So,
when it’s real hot in July we can just say the real reason: “summer”,
assured we’re backed by one of AGW’s chief priests.
I’m so glad we finally cleared up what climate change is.

JRR Canada
January 27, 2011 9:37 pm

I wonder if he will pontificate on the dangers of dihydrogenmonoxide as well?For sure its deadly and somehow connected to climate.

richcar 1225
January 27, 2011 9:45 pm

These warm causes cold theories are a gift to skeptics. It has seriously undermined the publics belief in global warming. To see this all you have to do is read the comment section of any of these articles that publishes them.

Grey Lensman
January 27, 2011 9:49 pm

The list of mathematical constructs in science grows and grows
Spacetime does not exist
Missing Temperature does not exist
Blackholes do not exist
Dark energy does not exist
Dark matter does not exist
They are all imagined mathematical constructs built to cover the simple fact that observations do not match theory. So we see the ultimate endgame of such abuse
Warming is cooling

don penman
January 27, 2011 10:00 pm

I don’t think that there is universal agreement on both sides that the world is getting hotter it has not got warmer since 1998, there probably is universal agreement on both sides that the world has got warmer before 1998.It is possible that at the end of this decade that there could be universal agreement on both sides that the world has cooled and the last decade was just the beginning of a slow change.

Ralph
January 27, 2011 10:00 pm

>>Eadler
>>I am a physicist, and the explanation seems like correct science to me.
>>An increase in temperature means that the air can hold more water, and
>>evaporation rates will increase.
So it is this increased moisture in the atmosphere that causes more droughts, is it?
And it is the increased temperatures, that are making the normal UK winter rains fall as snow?
Tell me, what type of scientist are you?
.

pat
January 27, 2011 10:03 pm

This nonsense of global warming causing global cooling is at an end. We all suspected it was beyond silly. The atmospheric density of H2O surmised by The Warmists was far beyond the life expectancy of normal rehydration. It seemed infinite by their calculations.
And now it turns out that the H2O density was actually less.
This silly BS is over. These people are pushing another agenda.
http://pielkeclimatesci.wordpress.com/2011/01/26/comment-on-the-cbs-news-article-is-extreme-weather-a-result-of-global-warming/

Honest ABE
January 27, 2011 10:04 pm

I’ve watched Kaku’s “sci fi science” show with a bit of regularity. His solutions to problems are often either impractical or theoretical to the point of idiocy. There is an occasional gem in there, but it is usually from the people he interviews.
We need less theoretical physicists and more practical ones.

joe
January 27, 2011 10:08 pm

i hear him on George Noory quite often…

January 27, 2011 10:08 pm

The picture is very similar to a famous Norwegian painting Nøkken (The Neck), a water spirit. It lures people into drowning.

pat
January 27, 2011 10:14 pm

I took a science class from the man NASA hired to design the nuclear interstellar vehicle. A series of nuclear explosions behind a screen. You remember this, right? oh you don’t? Because the idea was just as dopey now as it was then. At the age of 19 I was incredulous that anyone could believe that was a viable system of transport.
This is surely no different.

R. de Haan
January 27, 2011 10:24 pm

Michio Kaku is a hack who has watched too many episodes of Star Trek.
He believes we need a world government to reach the point where our society becomes a Level 1 society, able to leave the planet.
In is disturbed mind there is also a level 2 and a level 3 society.
At level 3 we are immortal.
We explore our universe by sending out robots.
He believes we can reach level 1 within the next 100 years but a global nuclear war could spoil the party so we need this totalitarian concept of rule to protect ourselves from ourselves..
In his theory there is no sense of reality whatsoever..
Corruption for example is part of any doctrine. He doesn’t mention this in his concept of the future. He believes humanity is now squandering valuable resources.
Well, free trade and exchange of business concepts and idea’s is exactly what propels our civilization and what brings us to incredible levels of progress and wealth accumulation. Without that there would not be any innovation.
What Michio Kaku stands for at best is a very poor science fiction story and the best thing to do is to ignore him.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ygPK1D1BJ4&feature=player_embedded

stephan
January 27, 2011 10:26 pm

unfortunately for “adler”above the earth is now cooling (-0.1 to 0.03C)and has been for 40 days during those events in Brazil, Australia and USA so its just BS again… check out AMSU channel 5

Editor
January 27, 2011 10:29 pm

“Common sense says that it’s the freezing cold that is behind the freaky weather. But physics says otherwise.”
This is just an erroneous statement. The historical average high temperature for Central Park, New York City in January is 38 degrees F:
http://www.weather.com/weather/wxclimatology/monthly/graph/USNY0998
http://countrystudies.us/united-states/weather/new-york/new-york.htm
Through January 26th the high temperature in Central Park, New York City has only been over 38F on 6 days:
1-Jan 53
2-Jan 52
3-Jan 36
4-Jan 40
5-Jan 39
6-Jan 33
7-Jan 33
8-Jan 31
9-Jan 32
10-Jan 35
11-Jan 31
12-Jan 31
13-Jan 30
14-Jan 30
15-Jan 38
16-Jan 37
17-Jan 27
18-Jan 41
19-Jan 41
20-Jan 35
21-Jan 32
22-Jan 24
23-Jan 24
24-Jan 24
25-Jan 37
26-Jan 35
http://www.weather.gov/climate/index.php?wfo=okx
The average temperature of Central Park, New York City through January 26th has been 34.6, well below the 38 degree average and things aren’t looking good for the foreseeable future:
http://www.weather.com/weather/tenday/USNY0998
http://www.wunderground.com/US/NY/New_York.html
There may be an increase in precipitation, but what makes this winter notable is that most of that precipitation is hitting the ground frozen:
http://www.nydailynews.com/ny_local/2011/01/27/2011-01-27_new_york_snowstorm_new_january_record_set_as_19inch_snowfall_pushes_city_past_19.html
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-01-27/winter-storm-may-ease-as-new-yorkers-start-the-day-update1-.html
http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2011/01/27/us-east-coast-winter-storm.html

Gerard
January 27, 2011 10:44 pm

Similar thing in Australia with the usual gang of warmists – Flannery, Karoly etal saying that the floods we are having are caused by climate change. This is the same gang that said the drought we were having was caaused by global warming and that it was going to be the permanent weather state of affairs.
Drought = climate change
Rain = climate change
lack of snow = climate change
volumes of snow = climate change
hot = climate change
cold = climate change
I am convinced!

1 2 3 6