From the Global Warming Policy Foundation, the questions begin, news coverage follows:
Did UK Government Keep Cold Winter Warning Secret In Run-Up To UN Climate Conference?
Press Release
London, 6 January: The Global Warming Policy Foundation has called on the House of Commons Transport Select Committee to set up a parliamentary inquiry into the winter advice the Government received by the Met Office and the renewed failure of both the Government and local authorities to prepare the UK transport system for the third severe winter in a row.
In a letter to the Chair of the Transport Committee, Louise Ellman, MP, the GWPF stresses that “Lessons have to be learned well in advance of the start of next year’s winter so that we are much better prepared if it is severe again.”
In recent days, the Met Office has stated that it apparently warned the Cabinet Office in late October that the start of the winter would be exceptionally cold. It would appear that the extreme weather warning was kept secret from the public.
According to media reports, the Cabinet Office has been unwilling to confirm whether or not it failed to pass on the Met Office warning to local and road authorities, airports and water companies.
“Not only is the lack of Government preparedness a cause for concern, but we wonder whether there may be another reason for keeping the cold warning under wraps, a motive that the Met Office and the Cabinet Office may have shared: Not to undermine the then forthcoming UN Climate Change Conference in Cancun,” said Dr Benny Peiser, the GWPF director.
It will be important to establish whether the Met Office consulted with government officials about their Cancun strategy and what effect this may have had on the handling of the ‘secret’ cold winter warning.
In light of the renewed failure to prepare the UK and its transport system for a prolonged and harsh winter, the GWPF has listed 19 questions that need to be addressed in order to avoid future debacles.
The full letter is attached below.
Louise Ellman, MP
Chair, Transport Select Committee
House of Commons
London
SW1A 0AA
5 January 2011
Dear Mrs Ellman
Transport System’s Winter Fiasco
I am writing to you on behalf of the Global Warming Policy Foundation regarding the transport system’s ill-preparedness in face of this year’s record cold winter.
The GWPF is calling on the Transport Committee to set up a parliamentary inquiry into the winter advice the Government received by the Met Office and the renewed failure of both the Government and local authorities to prepare the UK transport system for the third severe winter in a row.
This year’s winter fiasco has severely damaged the British economy – and its international reputation – as a result of the country’s ill-preparedness.
It would appear that the Met Office provided the government with contradictory winter advice and we need to find out what went wrong. Lessons have to be learned well in advance of the start of next year’s winter so that we are much better prepared if it is severe again.
Last summer, the Department of Transport carried out a study of the resilience of Britain’s transport infrastructure in the light of the two previous severe winters.
When the Quarmby Report (The Resilience of England’s Transport Systems in Winter) was published in late October, it entirely relied on the Met Office’s assurance that the chance of a severe winter and heavy snow would be relatively small and that the effect of climate change had further reduced the probability of severe winters in the UK; see also Transport chaos not an annual issue, say official report. Investment in more equipment may not be economical given rarity of British snow, says RAC Foundation chairman http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/dec/21/transport-met-office
In recent days, the Met Office has stated that it apparently changed its original advice in October and actually warned the Cabinet Office that the start of winter would be exceptionally cold. It would appear that the Met Office’s cold warning was kept secret from the public.
According to media reports, the Cabinet Office has been unwilling to confirm whether or not it failed to pass on the Met Office warning to local and road authorities, airports and water companies.
Not only is the lack of Government preparedness a cause for concern, but we wonder whether there may be another reason for keeping the cold warning under wraps, a motive that the Met Office and the Cabinet Office may have shared: Not to undermine the then forthcoming UN Climate Change Conference in Cancun.
Throughout October and November, the Met Office repeatedly pushed and published their key message in the run-up to the UN climate summit – that 2010 would probably turn out to be the hottest year on record, culminating in these Cancun-timed media reports: Cancun climate change summit: 2010 was hottest year on record http://www.telegraph.co.uk/topics/weather/8175591/Cancun-climate-change-summit-2010-was-hottest-year-on-record.html
The Met Office was represented at the UN Climate Summit in Cancun by key scientists who briefed news media about their key message; see Scientific evidence is Met Office focus at Cancun <http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/corporate/pressoffice/2010/pr20101126b.html>
It will be important to establish whether the Met Office consulted with government officials about the UK’s Cancun strategy and what effect this may have had on the handling of the ‘secret’ cold winter warning.
The transport minister Philip Hammond has asked the government’s chief scientific adviser whether the last three cold winters may signal a ‘step change’ in weather in the UK.
The Met Office appears to deny this possibility. In its submission to the Quarmby Report, the Met Office claims that the chances of a harsh winter are receding steadily. Yet, the Met Office models were contradicted by Sir David King, the former government’s chief scientific adviser, who has publicly warned that the government should plan for more cold winters in the next few years.
It is evident that Sir David King has serious doubts about the reliability of the Met Office’s computer models. This manifest contradiction is further undermining the credibility of the Met Office which makes it all the more important to properly investigate the underlying problem of its erroneous winter projections and government advice over the last three years.
In light of the renewed failure to prepare the UK and its transport system for a prolonged and harsh winter, the following questions need to be addressed in order to avoid future debacles:
1. Why did the Met Office publish on its website estimates in late October showing a 60 per cent to 80 per cent chance of warmer-than-average temperatures this winter? What was the scientific basis of this probabilistic estimate?
2. Why did the Met Office provide the government with a secret forecast about a exceptionally cold start of the winter, at the same time it was publishing an opposite forecast to the public?
3. Did the government conspire to keep the Met Office forecast secret in the run-up to the Cancun climate summit?
4. Did the Cabinet Office fail to take appropriate action in response to the forecast and inform the relevant authorities to prepare the country, to keep the highways clear, to prepare airports?
5. Why did the government let its Winter Fuel Allowance budget be used up with only a fraction of the winter gone?
6. On what scientific basis did the Met Office tell the Cabinet Office that there were early indications of an exceptionally cold start to winter?
7. Why did the Met Office confirm to the news media on 27 October that its probability map showed significant warming in the months ahead?
8. Has the late October prediction by the Met Office that this winter would be mild affected planning for this winter? If so, what is the best estimate of how much this has cost the country?
9. In 2009, the Met Office predicted a 65% chance that the winter of 2009/10 would be milder than normal. Has the Met Office subsequently explained what went wrong with its computer modelling?
10. What is the statistical and scientific basis for the Met Office’s estimate of a 1-in-20 chance of a severe winter?
11. Has the Met Office changed its view, or its calculations, following the harsh winters of 2008, 2009 and 2010?
12. Is the Met Office right to be confident that the severe winters of the last three years are not related?
13. Which severe weather alerts were issued by the Met Office and when?
14. Although the Met Office stopped sending its 3-month forecasts to the media, it would appear that this service is still available to paying customers, the Government and Local Authorities for winter planning. What was their advice, in September/October, for the start of winter 2010?
15. Has the Met Office been the subject of any complaints from its paying customers regarding the quality of its advice?
16. Is it appropriate that the chairman of the Met Office is a member, or a former member of climate pressure groups or carbon trading groups?
17. Should senior Met Office staff (technically employed by the MoD) make public comments advocating political action they see necessary to tackle climate change?
18. Has the government evaluated different meteorological service providers and has it ensured that it is using the most accurate forecaster?
19. What plans has the government to privatise the Met Office?
In view of the high level of public interest in this matter, we shall be releasing the text of this letter to the press.
I look forward to hearing from you.
Yours sincerely,
Dr Benny Peiser
— end
================================================================
Here’s some news coverage:
The Met Office knew that Britain was facing an early and exceptionally cold winter but failed to warn the public, hampering preparations for some of the coldest weather on record. In October the forecaster privately warned the Government – with whom it has a contract – that Britain was likely to face an extremely cold winter. It kept the prediction secret. Motoring organisations and passenger groups said yesterday that the delay hampered preparations for winter. – The Daily Telegraph. 4 January 2011
The Met Office has defended its decision not to make public a long-range forecast which predicted “an exceptionally cold” winter. The forecaster, which has its headquarters near Exeter’s Sowton Industrial Estate, told the Cabinet Office in October that temperatures would plunge lower than usual, and the winter would be longer than average.–Patrick Phelvin, The Exeter Express & Echo, 5 January 2011
It’s hard to know whether to laugh or cry over the latest antics of the nation’s official weather forecasters. The Met Office now claims that it briefed the Cabinet Office privately in October that the winter would be ‘exceptionally cold’. Forecast? The Met Office didn’t warn the public about the severe winter weather. It’s increasingly difficult to understand what they do to deserve our £200million a year.—Daily Mail, 4 January 2011
You couldn’t have asked for a better snapshot of the chasm that divides today’s so-called expert classes from the mass of humanity than the snow crisis of Christmas 2010. They warn us endlessly about the warming of our planet; we struggle through knee-deep snow to visit loved ones. They host million-dollar conferences on how we’ll cope with our Mediterranean future; we sleep for days in airport lounges waiting for runways to be de-iced. They pester the authorities for more funding for global-warming research; we keep an eye on our elderly neighbours who don’t have enough cash to heat their homes. –Brendan O’Neill, Spiked Online, 4 January 2011
And finally, an article from 2005 that underscores how the Met Office used to handle such news:
Forecasters are predicting that Britain could be facing one of the coldest winters in a decade. Ewen McCallum, chief meteorologist at the Met Office, said the vulnerable and elderly would be particularly at risk as temperatures fall. He said it was important to give an “amber alert” to government, fuel firms, business and the health sector. He added that the aim was for “forward planning” to “make sure that government departments and business utilities have got their act together”. —BBC News, 19 October 2005
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Mark Bowlin says:
January 6, 2011 at 9:28 am
If there’s one thing that should bring warmistas and skeptics together, it should be an end to bird mincers. Or not. Mike Haseler, please help your non-Commonwealth cousins out here…what’s a bird mincer?
Windmills
In answer to my earlier, rhetorical, question, my personal take is that they are lying now; they never knew there would be a cold winter and never told the gummint; this is the lie and, as it makes the gummint culpable, will probably cost them. No politico is going to take the fall.
As far as supporting evidence, someone ealrier pointed out that some Meto-Big Wig got stuck at the airport because of the bad weather. She wasn’t in the loop??
In the UK government agencies are not liable for things like this? Their forecast of conditions very different to what they say they knew was going to happen may have led to the deaths of its citizens, and to substantial financial loses of its citizens. There are also many foreign visitors who were stuck at airports and train stations who incurred financial and other sorts of loses. Shouldn’t the government be liable for these since their actions of a misleading forecast was premeditated?
Benny reckons
———-
This year’s winter fiasco has severely damaged the British economy – and its international reputation – as a result of the country’s ill-preparedness
———-
And this preparation would have maybe stopped the snow falling? How exactly were these preparations supposed to prevent damage to the British economy by snow?
LazyTeenager says:
January 6, 2011 at 7:12 pm
Just clearing pavement and runways would have saved a huge sum and “face” also.
No-one went shopping when they risked limbs.
Visitors to these shores had their goodwill undone when they fell off schedule on their visit.
There is more. We have been “preparing” in a 180 degree fashion. Bassackwards.
Heads should roll – more than just the scapegoats’.
Mike Haseler wrote:
“May I strongly suggest the Global Warming Policy Foundation make sure they do not forget Scotland – particularly as I believe the FOI law in Scotland is stronger than in England and even if it isn’t the Scottish Government aren’t exactly thrilled with the way the UK government, BBC (known here as EBC) and Met Office treat Scotland. ”
Members of the Welsh Assembly have often complained that even senior civil servants in London appear to be unaware that certain matters are devolved to Wales. Law is not one of them (Wales does not, unlike Scotland, have its own legal system). Nevertheless it would also be interesting to know whether or not the ministers in the Welsh Assembly knew anything about the Met Office’s warning about a cold winter.
LazyTeenager says:
January 6, 2011 at 7:12 pm
”And this preparation would have maybe stopped the snow falling? How exactly were these preparations supposed to prevent damage to the British economy by snow?”
LT, your intellectual acumen is as sluggish and immature as your handle suggests. Just one example – if the airport authorities at Heathrow had invested in more snow-clearing machines and de-icer, in the expectation of a bad winter (perhaps warned by simply reading Joe Bastardi’s forecasts), perhaps our major airport wouldn’t have been paralysed for days. There are many other examples but of course you won’t apply yourself to such exhausting mental activity – so much more comfortable to rely on the scriptures and bask in the warmth of ignorance.
Very well said Mr. Haseler, you’ve got my vote!
Perhaps a lesson can be learned from American baseball – three strikes and you’re out. Heads should roll at the top of the Met office and probably elsewhere.
The public are in fact the biggest paying customers. ;>)
A few points:
– One crucial thing missing from the GWPF letter is a question on the resilience of the country’s energy infrastructure. It has been creaking under the strain this winter already (third highest demand this winter on the system was yesterday) and we haven’t even begun decommissioning coal-fired stations in earnest yet. The forecasted peak demand for this winter was an eye-watering 4GW off target. This will in large part be due to decisions and forecasts being made on the basis of data from the likes of the Met Office.
– The quote from the Spiked article is of particular interest, because writers in Spiked have adopted a consistently sceptical stance on CAGW. They are one of the few left-leaning publications to do so.
– Mike Haseler in the comments makes a great point: Any scots reading this really should submit their own FOI requests, because Scotland has its own FOI staff who have had a history of adopting much more muscular rulings on FOI requests and appeals than the English counterpart.
In order to regain credibility as a genuine weather forcasting body, the government should sack the Chairman of the Met Office, Robert Napier, and replace him with a chairman who does not come along with pre-concieved shackles of ‘Green’ and ‘Global Warming’ dogma, which only serve to muddy the waters on genuine weather forcasting. After all, his organisation has either lied to the government or lied to the public, either one of which proved to be catastrophically expensive to the British tax payer.
There should be no hesitation in getting rid of him without delay.
Mike Haseler says:
January 6, 2011 at 8:47 am
…. and if the Global Warming Policy Foundation really wanted to stir the pudding, what better place than Scotland which has an election on May 5th.
…
…. it is quite possible that if some sceptic could be found to stand in the election then they might well get elected given the fiasco we’ve just experienced! Even if not I’d love to see the politicians faces if someone stood for lower petrol prices, more spending on the roads and an end to bird mincers!
Mike, as a fellow Scot I have to say that’s a great summary of where we are. But (as in the USA) the parties have got the political system sewn up, and there’s little hope for any democratic recompense. The only heavy-hitter in Scotland I can think of who could make mince meat (to continue on the mince theme) of the idiot politicians we now have in Scotland is Jim Sillars (ex Labour, ex SNP). He’s an informed sceptic (heard him on Radio Scotland one morning last year, when for some reason they dared to let a sceptic near a microphone), but sadly he is too smart to want to get back into party politics. He was wrong about Scotland in Europe though.
From the Daily Telegraph-
‘As the good Dr North reminds us,as recently as late October the Met Office was predicting that we should expect an “unusually dry and mild winter”. ‘
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100066366/why-did-we-slide-into-chaos-well-duh/
The exact same time they were telling the government to expect an unusually cold winter. It seems quite clear that the British public has been brazenly lied to by the Met Office.