Some people cite scientists saying there is a “CO2 control knob” for Earth. No doubt there is, but due to the logarithmic effect of CO2, I think of it like a fine tuning knob, not the main station tuner. That said, a new data picture is emerging of an even bigger knob and lever; a nice bright yellow one.

A few months back, I found a website from NOAA that provides an algorithm and downloadable program for spotting regime shifts in time series data. It was designed by Sergei Rodionov of the NOAA Bering Climate and Ecosystem Center for the purpose of detecting shifts in the Pacific Decadal Oscillation.
Regime shifts are defined as rapid reorganizations of ecosystems from one relatively stable state to another. In the marine environment, regimes may last for several decades and shifts often appear to be associated with changes in the climate system. In the North Pacific, climate regimes are typically described using the concept of Pacific Decadal Oscillation. Regime shifts were also found in many other variables as demonstrated in the Data section of this website (select a variable and then click “Recent trends”).
But data is data, and the program doesn’t care if it is ecosystem data, temperature data, population data, or solar data. It just looks for and identifies abrupt changes that stabilize at a new level. For example, a useful application of the program is to look for shifts in weather data, such as that caused by the PDO. Here we can clearly see the great Pacific Climate Shift of 1976/77:

Another useful application is to use it to identify station moves that result in a temperature shift. It might also be applied to proxy data, such as ice core Oxygen 18 isotope data.
But the program was developed around the PDO. What drives the PDO? Many say the sun, though there are other factors too. It follows to reason then the we might be able to look for solar regime shifts in PDO driven temperature data.
Alan of AppInSys found the same application and has done just that, and the results are quite interesting. The correlation is well aligned, and it demonstrates the solar to PDO connection quite well. I’ll let him tell his story of discovery below. – Anthony
=================================
Climate Regime Shifts
The notion that climate variations often occur in the form of ‘‘regimes’’ began to become appreciated in the 1990s. This paradigm was inspired in large part by the rapid change of the North Pacific climate around 1977 [e.g., Kerr, 1992] and the identification of other abrupt shifts in association with the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) [Mantua et al., 1997].” [http://www.beringclimate.noaa.gov/regimes/Regime_shift_algorithm.pdf]
Pacific Regime Shifts
Hare and Mantua, 2000 (“Empirical evidence for North Pacific regime shifts in 1977 and 1989”): “It is now widely accepted that a climatic regime shift transpired in the North Pacific Ocean in the winter of 1976–77. This regime shift has had far reaching consequences for the large marine ecosystems of the North Pacific. Despite the strength and scope of the changes initiated by the shift, it was 10–15 years before it was fully recognized. Subsequent research has suggested that this event was not unique in the historical record but merely the latest in a succession of climatic regime shifts. In this study, we assembled 100 environmental time series, 31 climatic and 69 biological, to determine if there is evidence for common regime signals in the 1965–1997 period of record. Our analysis reproduces previously documented features of the 1977 regime shift, and identifies a further shift in 1989 in some components of the North Pacific ecosystem. The 1989 changes were neither as pervasive as the 1977 changes nor did they signal a simple return to pre-1977 conditions.”
[http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6V7B-41FTS3S-2…]
Overland et al “North Pacific regime shifts: Definitions, issues and recent transitions”
[http://www.pmel.noaa.gov/foci/publications/2008/overN667.pdf]: “climate variables for the North Pacific display shifts near 1977, 1989 and 1998.”
The following figure from the above paper show analysis of PDO and Victoria Index using the Rodionov regime detection algorithm. A regime shift is also detected around 1947-48.

The following figure shows regime shift detection for the summer PDO, showing shifts at 1948, 1976 and 1998.
[http://www.beringclimate.noaa.gov/data/Images/PDOs_FigRegime.html]

(For detailed information on the 1976/77 climate shift,
see: http://www.appinsys.com/GlobalWarming/The1976-78ClimateShift.htm)
Regime Shift Detection in Annual Temperature Anomaly Data
The NOAA Bering Climate web site provides the algorithm for regime shift detection developed by Sergei Rodionov [http://www.beringclimate.noaa.gov/regimes/index.html]. The following analyses use the Excel VBA regime change algorithm version 3.2 from this web site.
The following figure shows the regime analysis of the HadCRUT3 annual global annual average temperature anomaly data from the Met Office Hadley Centre for 1895 to 2009 [http://hadobs.metoffice.com/hadcrut3/diagnostics/global/nh+sh/annual].
The analysis was run based on the mean using a significance level of 0.1, cut-off length of 10 and Huber weight parameter of 2 using red noise IP4 subsample size 6. Regime changes are identified in 1902, 1914, 1926, 1937, 1946, 1957, 1977, 1987, and 1997. Running the analysis based on the variance rather than the mean results in regime changes in the bold years listed above.

Regime Shift Relationship to Solar Cycle
The NASA Solar Physics web site provides the following figure showing sunspot area.
[http://solarscience.msfc.nasa.gov/SunspotCycle.shtml]

The following figure compares the Hadley (HadCrut3) monthly global average temperature (from [http://hadobs.metoffice.com/hadcrut3/diagnostics/global/nh+sh/]) overlaid with the regime change line (red line) shown previously, along with the sunspot area since 1900. The sunspot cycle is approximately 11 years. The sun’s magnetic field reverses with each sunspot cycle and thus after two sunspot cycles the magnetic field has completed a cycle – a Hale Cycle – and is back to where it started. Thus a complete magnetic sunspot cycle is approximately 22 years. The figure marks the onset of odd-numbered cycles with a vertical red line, even-numbered cycles with a green line.

From the figure above it can be seen that the regime changes correspond to the onset of solar cycles and occur when the “butterfly” is at its widest. The most significant warming regime shifts occur at the start of odd-numbered cycles (1937, 1957, 1977, 1997). Each odd-numbered cycle (red lines above) has resulted in a temperature-increase regime shift. Even-numbered cycles (green lines above) have been inconsistent, with some resulting in temperature-decrease regime shifts (1902, 1946) or minor temperature-increase shifts (1926, 1987).
An unusual one is the 1957 – 1966 cycle, which in the monthly data shown above visually looks like a temperature-increase shift in 1957 followed by a temperature-decrease shift in 1964 but the regime detection algorithm did not identify it. This is likely due to the use of annually averaged data in the regime detection algorithm.
The following figure shows the relative polarity of the Sun’s magnetic poles for recent sunspot cycles along with the solar magnetic flux [www.bu.edu/csp/nas/IHY_MagField.ppt]. The regime change periods are highlighted by the red and green boxes. Each one occurs on as the solar cycle is accelerating. The onset of an odd-numbered sunspot cycle (1977-78, 1997-98) results in the relative alignment of the Earth’s and the Sun’s magnetic fields (positive North pole on the Sun) allowing greater penetration of the geomagnetic storms into the Earth’s atmosphere. “Twenty times more solar particles cross the Earth’s leaky magnetic shield when the sun’s magnetic field is aligned with that of the Earth compared to when the two magnetic fields are oppositely directed” [http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/themis/news/themis_leaky_shield.html]

The following figure shows the longitudinally averaged solar magnetic field. This “magnetic butterfly diagram” shows that the sunspots are involved with transporting the field in its reversal. The Earth’s temperature regime shifts are indicated with the superimposed boxes – red on odd numbered solar cycles, green on even.
[http://solarphysics.livingreviews.org/open?pubNo=lrsp-2010-1&page=articlesu8.html]

The Earth’s temperature regime shift occurs as the solar magnetic field begins its reversal.
Solar Cycle 24
Solar cycle 24 is in its initial stage after getting off to a late start. An El Nino occurred in the first part of 2010. This may be the start of the next regime shift.

Climate Regime Shifts
[last update: 2010/07/04]
|
“The notion that climate variations often occur in the form of ‘‘regimes’’ began to become appreciated in the 1990s. This paradigm was inspired in large part by the rapid change of the North Pacific climate around 1977 [e.g., Kerr, 1992] and the identification of other abrupt shifts in association with the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) [Mantua et al., 1997].” [http://www.beringclimate.noaa.gov/regimes/Regime_shift_algorithm.pdf]
|
|
Pacific Regime Shifts
Hare and Mantua, 2000 (“Empirical evidence for North Pacific regime shifts in 1977 and 1989”): “It is now widely accepted that a climatic regime shift transpired in the North Pacific Ocean in the winter of 1976–77. This regime shift has had far reaching consequences for the large marine ecosystems of the North Pacific. Despite the strength and scope of the changes initiated by the shift, it was 10–15 years before it was fully recognized. Subsequent research has suggested that this event was not unique in the historical record but merely the latest in a succession of climatic regime shifts. In this study, we assembled 100 environmental time series, 31 climatic and 69 biological, to determine if there is evidence for common regime signals in the 1965–1997 period of record. Our analysis reproduces previously documented features of the 1977 regime shift, and identifies a further shift in 1989 in some components of the North Pacific ecosystem. The 1989 changes were neither as pervasive as the 1977 changes nor did they signal a simple return to pre-1977 conditions.” [http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6V7B-41FTS3S-2…]
Overland et al “North Pacific regime shifts: Definitions, issues and recent transitions” [http://www.pmel.noaa.gov/foci/publications/2008/overN667.pdf]: “climate variables for the North Pacific display shifts near 1977, 1989 and 1998.”
The following figure from the above paper show analysis of PDO and Victoria Index using the Rodionov regime detection algorithm. A regime shift is also detected around 1947-48.
The following figure shows regime shift detection for the summer PDO, showing shifts at 1948, 1976 and 1998. [http://www.beringclimate.noaa.gov/data/Images/PDOs_FigRegime.html]
(For detailed information on the 1976/77 climate shift, see: http://www.appinsys.com/GlobalWarming/The1976-78ClimateShift.htm)
|
|
Regime Shift Detection in Annual Temperature Anomaly Data
The NOAA Bering Climate web site provides the algorithm for regime shift detection developed by Sergei Rodionov [http://www.beringclimate.noaa.gov/regimes/index.html]. The following analyses use the Excel VBA regime change algorithm version 3.2 from this web site.
The following figure shows the regime analysis of the HadCRUT3 annual global annual average temperature anomaly data from the Met Office Hadley Centre for 1895 to 2009 [http://hadobs.metoffice.com/hadcrut3/diagnostics/global/nh+sh/annual].
The analysis was run based on the mean using a significance level of 0.1, cut-off length of 10 and Huber weight parameter of 2 using red noise IP4 subsample size 6. Regime changes are identified in 1902, 1914, 1926, 1937, 1946, 1957, 1977, 1987, and 1997. Running the analysis based on the variance rather than the mean results in regime changes in the bold years listed above.
|
|
Regime Shift Relationship to Solar Cycle
The NASA Solar Physics web site provides the following figure showing sunspot area. [http://solarscience.msfc.nasa.gov/SunspotCycle.shtml]
The following figure compares the Hadley (HadCrut3) monthly global average temperature (from [http://hadobs.metoffice.com/hadcrut3/diagnostics/global/nh+sh/]) overlaid with the regime change line (red line) shown previously, along with the sunspot area since 1900. The sunspot cycle is approximately 11 years. The sun’s magnetic field reverses with each sunspot cycle and thus after two sunspot cycles the magnetic field has completed a cycle – a Hale Cycle – and is back to where it started. Thus a complete magnetic sunspot cycle is approximately 22 years. The figure marks the onset of odd-numbered cycles with a vertical red line, even-numbered cycles with a green line.
From the figure above it can be seen that the regime changes correspond to the onset of solar cycles and occur when the “butterfly” is at its widest. The most significant warming regime shifts occur at the start of odd-numbered cycles (1937, 1957, 1977, 1997). Each odd-numbered cycle (red lines above) has resulted in a temperature-increase regime shift. Even-numbered cycles (green lines above) have been inconsistent, with some resulting in temperature-decrease regime shifts (1902, 1946) or minor temperature-increase shifts (1926, 1987).
An unusual one is the 1957 – 1966 cycle, which in the monthly data shown above visually looks like a temperature-increase shift in 1957 followed by a temperature-decrease shift in 1964 but the regime detection algorithm did not identify it. This is likely due to the use of annually averaged data in the regime detection algorithm.
The following figure shows the relative polarity of the Sun’s magnetic poles for recent sunspot cycles along with the solar magnetic flux [www.bu.edu/csp/nas/IHY_MagField.ppt]. The regime change periods are highlighted by the red and green boxes. Each one occurs on as the solar cycle is accelerating. The onset of an odd-numbered sunspot cycle (1977-78, 1997-98) results in the relative alignment of the Earth’s and the Sun’s magnetic fields (positive North pole on the Sun) allowing greater penetration of the geomagnetic storms into the Earth’s atmosphere. “Twenty times more solar particles cross the Earth’s leaky magnetic shield when the sun’s magnetic field is aligned with that of the Earth compared to when the two magnetic fields are oppositely directed” [http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/themis/news/themis_leaky_shield.html]
The following figure shows the longitudinally averaged solar magnetic field. This “magnetic butterfly diagram” shows that the sunspots are involved with transporting the field in its reversal. The Earth’s temperature regime shifts are indicated with the superimposed boxes – red on odd numbered solar cycles, green on even. [http://solarphysics.livingreviews.org/open?pubNo=lrsp-2010-1&page=articlesu8.html]
The Earth’s temperature regime shift occurs as the solar magnetic field begins its reversal.
|
|
Solar Cycle 24
Solar cycle 24 is in its initial stage after getting off to a late start. An El Nino occurred in the first part of 2010. This may be the start of the next regime shift.
|
Geoff Sharp says:
July 14, 2010 at 5:45 am (Edit)
Rog, the amplitude is the strength of my argument, the alignments can be measured easily which shows us how strong each result will be. Using this information the upcoming grand minimum cannot be Maunder like.
Hi Geoff. Have you got a graph of how well your method hindcasts solar cycle amplitudes?
tallbloke says:
July 14, 2010 at 6:06 am
Hi Geoff. Have you got a graph of how well your method hindcasts solar cycle amplitudes?
Hi rog, I have several. This one looks at the overall trend. It shows both isotopes involved along with the amplitude strength. Modern solar cycles via sunspot records also agree with this modulation amplitude.
http://www.landscheidt.info/images/solanki_sharp.png
@tallbloke says:
July 13, 2010 at 11:31 pm
“So far, the planetary motion theory is seeing good results on timings, but not yet on amplitudes.”
I am fine on timing, intensity and duration, for temp`s and precipitation, forecasts are currently running at 49/52 weeks correct per year, and improving.
With the comparison between SC9 and SC24, there should be a similar profile, though Rmax could be lower in C24.
Ulric Lyons says:
July 14, 2010 at 6:26 am (Edit)
@tallbloke says:
July 13, 2010 at 11:31 pm
“So far, the planetary motion theory is seeing good results on timings, but not yet on amplitudes.”
I am fine on timing, intensity and duration, for temp`s and precipitation, forecasts are currently running at 49/52 weeks correct per year, and improving.
Hi Ulric. I’m impressed. What is your forecast for Northern UK for the coming week?
I was referring specifically to solar cycle SSN amplitudes rather than Earth temp variation. I corrected the statement to refer to my progress with planetary theory rather than others too. I wouldn’t presume to speak for you or Geoff.
@Geoff Sharp says:
July 14, 2010 at 5:45 am
“Uranus, Neptune & Jupiter are together with Saturn opposite for every solar slowdown (there is one other lineup before the MWP that also works), the lineup and timing distinguishes the degree of slowdown. I am still waiting for Ulric or anyone else to disprove this.”
I did. You said sometimes it happens at the alignment but not always, and if not, then it would happen in the following cycle, or maybe the one after that. I am a precision forecaster, I have no time for such flakey business.
1. Jupiter’s magnetosphere is the largest structure in the solar system with its magnetic tail extending over 5AU or 650 million km (past the orbit of Saturn!).
2. CME’s , magnetic clouds form closed magnetic and electric circuit encompassing the sun’s surface and planetary magnetosphere.
http://solar.physics.montana.edu/REU/2008/ewolf/presentation/images/magnetic_cloud.jpg
Note: the arrows indicating direction of magnetic field and field aligned current (more about the mutual relationship can be seen here:
http://history.nasa.gov/SP-345/ch15.htm#250
An encountered magnetosphere (trough process of ‘reconnection’ ) takes energy out of such ( self-feeding ) circuit, resulting in its collapse, hence a feedback.
The helical curve illustrates a characteristic magnetic field line. Magnetic clouds may indeed be structurally simple as depicted here. Recent observations indicate that magnetic field lines of magnetic clouds do remain connected to the Sun
http://wwwppd.nrl.navy.mil/prediction/storms.html
Ulric Lyons says:
July 14, 2010 at 6:40 am
@Geoff Sharp says:
July 14, 2010 at 5:45 am
“Uranus, Neptune & Jupiter are together with Saturn opposite for every solar slowdown (there is one other lineup before the MWP that also works), the lineup and timing distinguishes the degree of slowdown. I am still waiting for Ulric or anyone else to disprove this.”
————————–
I did. You said sometimes it happens at the alignment but not always, and if not, then it would happen in the following cycle, or maybe the one after that. I am a precision forecaster, I have no time for such flakey busines
I did?
Not even close. You seem to talk and predict a lot without much substance. Show me the precision where you proved me wrong?
What you don’t understand is the planetary disturbance occurs on a different time frame to what ever controls the 11 year cycle.
Your precision on a high solar cycle 24 forecast is already busted.
Ulric Lyons says:
July 14, 2010 at 6:40 am
I did. You said sometimes it happens at the alignment but not always, and if not, then it would happen in the following cycle, or maybe the one after that. I am a precision forecaster, I have no time for such flakey business.
You are misrepresenting me. Show me where I have said the alignment affects 2 cycles after the event?
tallbloke says:
July 14, 2010 at 3:52 am
The magnetosphere of Jupiter is the biggest object in the solar system. Including the Sun. I’m surprised a world famous solar physicist wasn’t already aware of that.
I might say that the Heliospheric Current Sheet is the biggest, or perhaps the IBEX Ribbon, but lets see ho big Jupiter’s magnetosphere is seen from the Sun. It turns out to occupy something like 1/50,000 of the sky [comparable to what the Moon covers seen from Earth]. But the magnetosphere is hardly a ‘grounding point’ because it is so tenuous. The planet itself [which might serve] occupies 1/250,000,000 of the sky.
Geoff Sharp says:
July 14, 2010 at 5:45 am
Surely you must wonder why the torsional oscillation flows look to be 17 years long.
No, I don’t wonder, because the period is not 17 but 20-22 years. The only one we have a full cycle for started in 1987 and ended in 2009. The current one started in 1997. The poleward branch of the TO starts at minimum [or one year after] and the equatorial branch starts shortly after maximum and lasts until the second minimum thereafter. SO, the TO is tied to the 21-yr Hale cycle and maintains its phase. If the TO cycle was 17 years then we would have 6 cycles in a century, and only 5 Hale cycles, so the two cycles would drift relative to each other. Howard discovered the TO back in 1980 based on data from 1966 on, so we have enough data to pin down the period. “starting at the poles and taking a full 22-year Hale cycle to drift to the equator” [Howe, 2009]
vukcevic says:
July 14, 2010 at 7:04 am
Jupiter’s magnetosphere is the largest structure in the solar system with its magnetic tail extending over 5AU
By that argument, the biggest object is the shadow of Mercury…
vukcevic says:
July 14, 2010 at 7:04 am
An encountered magnetosphere (trough process of ‘reconnection’ ) takes energy out of such ( self-feeding ) circuit, resulting in its collapse, hence a feedback.
Thanks Vuk, Leif tried to steer me away from reconnections to the solar wind instead and the alternating polarities sweeping past the planets. My question is, Could such a cloud link several planets at once, and would it likely curve along the spirals in the solar wind. And for side orders, could a sudden collapse of the field actually be the cause of several new sunspots appearing in your view?
Richard Holle, excellent input. Thank you!
tallbloke says:
July 14, 2010 at 8:09 am
could a sudden collapse of the field actually be the cause of several new sunspots appearing in your view?
The field does not collapse at all. A magnetosphere extracts about 2% of the energy of the part of the cloud [or the solar wind], and the cloud is laterally thousands of time bigger than the magnetosphere, so the 2% must be divided by many thousands. You shouldn’t take Vuk’s nonsense seriously. [you have your own to tend to 🙂 ]. And again, magnetic changes cannot travel upstream in the supersonic wind.
@Geoff Sharp says:
July 14, 2010 at 7:10 am
“You are misrepresenting me.” ” You seem to talk and predict a lot without much substance.”
Oh dear! maybe you should have a chat with Gabe from climaterealists.com about my temperature forecasts, no one else even gets close.
“Show me where I have said the alignment affects 2 cycles after the event?”
SC24.com probably, I can`t be bothered to hindcast that just now, the point is any delay, be it 1 or 2 cycles is just an excuse for not finding the cause of a downturn, and blaming it on something that happened earlier. I can prove configurational correlation at a monthly definition through any year of Dalton or Maunder quite happily following temperature deviations that are all very much real time in driving our weather and hence climate, and so find any notions of delays in solar response to planetary configurations and the climatic results, quite bizarre. More importantly, I have made seminal and unique discoveries in the relationships of the Superior and Inferior Planets which makes it possible to fully define natural variation, the LIA, and tell which of the next 10 winters are cold or not, and whether we get a flood or a heat wave the last week in October.
I knew it was a good idea to take my brolly to work this morning. It was boshing down as I walked back to the station at 6.15pm.
Leif Svalgaard says:
July 14, 2010 at 8:18 am
You shouldn’t take Vuk’s nonsense seriously. [you have your own to tend to 🙂 ].
It must be like herding cats from your point of view Leif. 😉
However, I got another insight today which changes the game. I’ll be posting about it on my blog soon. It goes back to my mention that Newton and Einstein had planetary motion as a given. Now, Leif, if this solar wind of yours is strong enough to blow away anything trying to head upstream, how much does it drag does it create on planets moving at right angles to it? Over 4 billion years?
L.S (a.2)
By that argument, the biggest object is the shadow of Mercury…
Nonsense; the Earth or Venues are never eclipsed by Mercury.
http://www.practicalphysics.org/imageLibrary/jpeg500/2158.jpg
Tallbloke (a.2)
Magnetospheric reconnection is kind of ‘short circuit’ releasing huge amount of energy, still not completely understood (I look at it as electric currents short circuit).
J & S each have permanent polar aurora, meaning that they are constant load on the solar magnetic circuit.
L.S.
And again, magnetic changes cannot travel upstream in the supersonic wind.
But electromagnetic have no problem.
Q: And what is an electromagnetic wave ?
A: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/images/emwv.gif
Vuk etc. says:
July 14, 2010 at 11:56 am (Edit)
J & S each have permanent polar aurora, meaning that they are constant load on the solar magnetic circuit.
It means more than that Vuk, as I just realised. Follow the Right Hand rule and consider the back EMF.
Vuk etc. says:
July 14, 2010 at 12:11 pm
L.S.
And again, magnetic changes cannot travel upstream in the supersonic wind.
But electromagnetic have no problem.
Q: And what is an electromagnetic wave ?
A: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/images/emwv.gif
Ding Dong!
Do we get called electric universe-9/11 truthers and banished from the site now?
Vuk etc. says:
July 14, 2010 at 11:56 am (Edit)
L.S (a.2)
By that argument, the biggest object is the shadow of Mercury…
Nonsense; the Earth or Venues are never eclipsed by Mercury.
http://www.practicalphysics.org/imageLibrary/jpeg500/2158.jpg
Not only that, but Mercury moves in an orbitl plane more highly inclined to the plane of invariance than other planets. Which makes a transit of mercury pretty rare, notwithstanding it’s brief orbital period. I wonder what the alignment map taking into account the sectors near it’s nodes looks like…
Leif Svalgaard says:
July 14, 2010 at 7:40 am (Edit)
Geoff Sharp says:
July 14, 2010 at 5:45 am
Surely you must wonder why the torsional oscillation flows look to be 17 years long.
No, I don’t wonder, because the period is not 17 but 20-22 years. The only one we have a full cycle for started in 1987 and ended in 2009. The current one started in 1997. The poleward branch of the TO starts at minimum [or one year after] and the equatorial branch starts shortly after maximum and lasts until the second minimum thereafter. SO, the TO is tied to the 21-yr Hale cycle and maintains its phase. If the TO cycle was 17 years then we would have 6 cycles in a century, and only 5 Hale cycles, so the two cycles would drift relative to each other. Howard discovered the TO back in 1980 based on data from 1966 on, so we have enough data to pin down the period. “starting at the poles and taking a full 22-year Hale cycle to drift to the equator” [Howe, 2009]
Ian Wilson’s paper on the JEV alignments works on a Hale cycle. I wonder what Ulric makes of the aligments Ian says are predominant in the alternate solar cycles taking into consideration his own observations of the positive and negative effects on Earth temperature.
http://www.climatestop.com/Ian_Wilson_Syzygy.pdf
Here something for Dr. S. to tackle:
In order to continuously accumulate dark matter par-
ticles in the Sun we need the annihilation cross section
of our dark matter particles to be suppressed compared
to the size required by successful dark matter genesis
via thermal freeze-out.
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1005/1005.5102v1.pdf
Vuk, why would Leif be interested in a Star Trek script?
@tallbloke says:
July 14, 2010 at 12:48 pm
” I wonder what Ulric makes of the aligments Ian says are predominant in the alternate solar cycles taking into consideration his own observations of the positive and negative effects on Earth temperature”
I made it on my own to see the J/E/V relationship to the solar cycle before finding Desmoulins work. Ian`s news paper reports this fairly well, but does not explore the solar dipole reversal enough to realise the effect is not tidal. As for temperature forecasts, he has no idea.