
Pajamas media update: There have been some developments since this was published. The short version is that a series of coincidences led Gabriel Calzada to believe a package was a bomb threat. Let’s just review what Calzada was responding to: he received an unsolicited package addressed as from a “green” company. Thermotechnic. When he called to ask about it, he was told: “It’s our response to your study [on green jobs].”
It didn’t look like, or feel like, a letter or report, so at that point Calzada got a security guard to scan it — and what was inside was a cylindrical object with wires attached. At that point, the security guard got an expert to examine it, with others in attendance. The contents were a container for diesel of some sort, and some other parts. The expert saw this as a bomb threat, based on a pattern used by, eg., ETA: “This one is a hoax bomb. The next one might not be.”
So Calzada took this as a threat based on the experts’ opinions. Remember that Calzada has been viciously attacked for having had the temerity to publish a study that questioned the economic effectiveness of “green jobs” in Spain, including having been threatened personally and professionally. It was at that point Horner wrote this piece.
Since then, especially following the controversy becoming public in the Spanish press, the company contacted Calzada; what appears to have happened is this:
- A package containing car parts was swapped for a package containing a report intended for Calzada.
- The Thermotechnic person Calzada contacted said something that was ambiguous.
- Calzada, already the subject of threats and intimidation, relied on expert opinion that it was a bomb threat.
As further information became available, it became clear it was a misunderstanding based on several coincidences. Calzada has written an open letter explaining this in detail, and now agrees there was no threat from Thermotechnic.
======================
The author of a damning study about the failure of Spain’s “green jobs” program — a story broken here at PJM — received the threatening package on Tuesday from solar energy company Thermotechnic.
June 24, 2010 – by Christopher Horner
Spain’s Dr. Gabriel Calzada — the author of a damning study concluding that Spain’s “green jobs” energy program has been a catastrophic economic failure — was mailed a dismantled bomb on Tuesday by solar energy company Thermotechnic.
Says Calzada:
Before opening it, I called [Thermotechnic] to know what was inside … they answered, it was their answer to my energy pieces.
Dr. Calzada contacted a terrorism expert to handle the package. The expert first performed a scan of the package, then opened it in front of a journalist, Dr. Calzada, and a private security expert.
The terrorism consultant said he had seen this before:
This time you receive unconnected pieces. Next time it can explode in your hands.
Dr. Calzada added:
[The terrorism expert] told me that this was a warning.
The bomb threat is just the latest intimidation Dr. Calzada has faced since releasing his report and following up with articles in Expansion (a Spanish paper similar to the Financial Times). A minister from Spain’s Socialist government called the rector of King Juan Carlos University — Dr. Calzada’s employer — seeking Calzada’s ouster. Calzada was not fired, but he was stripped of half of his classes at the university. The school then dropped its accreditation of a summer university program with which Calzada’s think tank — Instituto Juan de Mariana — was associated.
Additionally, the head of Spain’s renewable energy association and the head of its communist trade union wrote opinion pieces in top Spanish newspapers accusing Calzada of being “unpatriotic” — they did not charge him with being incorrect, but of undermining Spain by daring to write the report.
Their reasoning? If the skepticism that Calzada’s revelations prompted were to prevail in the U.S., Spanish industry would face collapse should U.S. subsidies and mandates dry up.
As I have previously reported at PJM (here and here), Spain’s “green jobs” program was repeatedly referenced by President Obama as a model for what he would like to implement in the United States. Following the release of Calzada’s report, Spain’s Socialist government has since acknowledged the debacle — both privately and publicly. This month, Spain’s government instituted massive reductions in subsidies to “renewable” energy sources.
Read the rest of the story here:
There are only two possibilities:
1. The story is wrong or a hoax, or
2. Someone at Thermotechnic is going to go to jail.
It was in the news a few weeks ago: 90 % of all green business in the EU was found to be fraudulent. But the main stream media, of course hides such news in a little corner of an inside page of their news paper
http://www.greenleft.org.au/node/42996
“…..the EU’s law enforcement agency Europol estimated up to 90% of all market volume was fraudulent in some countries.”
So you folks want the POLICE, who are employed by a government that has invested huge sums of money and political capital into going green, to accurately investigate a threat against someone who threatens all that? Umm… I don’t think that’s a good idea.
jaymam says:
June 25, 2010 at 2:35 am
‘There are only two possibilities:
1. The story is wrong or a hoax, or
2. Someone at Thermotechnic is going to go to jail.’
Someone at Thermotechnic should go to jail but will be found innocent.
@Dave Springer: “Examiner.com is about the bottom of the barrel for reliable news too. Go read about it here and think twice about using it as a source in the future.”
I take your point about the Examiner but you seem to be asking me to trust Wikipedia. Given their role in manipulating the truth on AGW, that’s a big ask.
wobble says:
June 24, 2010 at 6:59 pm
Yeah, but big oil is worse or something.
Is this what you are referring to?:
Watch the latest news video at video.foxnews.com
Maybe Thermotechnic has intentionally made a mistake in shipping…
Thermotechnic admitted they sent the threatening package? No wonder they need subsidies – they’re too stupid to function in the real world otherwise.
Enneagram, the gal that’s involved in Gore’s sex scandal won’t prosecute; she refuses to–my guess is that Gore’s “handlers” got to her and either paid her off or threatened her somehow. Considering how this whole movement’s premier spokesman is Al Gore, they have a lot at stake here and it wouldn’t surprise me in the least. We’ve noticed this about their acolytes: It’s their modus operandi.
It is really worrisome if “believers” are reaching a “tipping point” where violence begins. Is it behind so much money in play as to reach the point where one man can kill another?.
This madness must be stopped, the sooner the better up there in the first world, where this illness has become more virulent.
It seems quite strange. It seems as there would be another kind of factors in this problem, drugs perhaps?
This should serve as a pretty good evidence that the blacklist has a very specific use.
I am pretty certain that at least in hte US this would still be considered an act of criminal terrorism.
I have to at least partly agree with Nick Stokes on this one – I don’t think we’re getting an full and unbiased account.
Where are the police?
Where are Spanish the anti-terrorism magistrates?
Something’s missing here.
It seems that Thermotechnic have come up with a story that a report was supposed to be sent to Dr Calzada, but some spare parts were sent by mistake instead. When Dr Calzada phoned Thermotechnic, Thermotechnic assumed that Dr Calzada was talking about the report. So, problem solved.
All I want to see now is the report from Thermotechnic, and a photo of everything that Dr Calzada received.
Claude Harvey says:
June 25, 2010 at 12:32 am
“Histrionics aside, the numbers are straightforward. You need about 40-cents (U.S.) per kwh at the plant fence, either through subsidies or in the market, to make economic sense of a solar power plant investment. Wind power translates to about 27-cents, The average wholesale electric power rate in the U.S. is about 4-cents per kwh. It really is that simple.
The above numbers do not take into account the capital cost of backup capacity required for both solar and wind for “when the sun don’t shine and the wind don’t blow”.”
Claude, can you point me to any public public sources for the numbers you use? I would like to use them for some local rabble rousing but will need to source my data.
Thanks,
RayG
It’s just as I’ve always figured: So-called ‘green’ jobs are nought but government subsidies: They are ALL appendages of government gone bad.
They get the manna, and the rest of us are left sucking hind teat — if that.
Pretty good evidence you say hunter. Is Calzada’s name even on the ‘blacklist’?
hell man that would piss me off like a mother….. i would send it back with the parts all put together if u get my drift………lol
The EU is a corrupt organisation. It doesn’t matter what it’s doing – there is a profit in there for someone and it’s not the consumer. This is an organisation that has not had its accounts signed off for years. It supports green fuel – windmills or solar power, but to whose benefit? Certainly not the taxpayer. Like Obama, it wants to see fuel bills sky rocket. Plenty of profit for my friends.
Okay even if the package story needs verification,he did have his summer classes discredited and other classes cut. That should be checkable. And note that the head of the green E association who is also head of the communist labor union weighed in on the prof’s paper by charging him with being unpatriotic (only in a totalitarian state could criticizing the govt be deemed unpatriotic). And don’t forget spain changed its government to socialist to appease the terrorist group who blew up their train a few years ago. I think terrorists, government and green folks are one and the same in Eu and especially in Spain. I note that agw supporters among the commenters were ironically sceptical of the bomb parts story but were unmoved by the university’s sanctions. I guess this stuffis okay.
“Green Energy Company Threatens Economics Professor … with Package of Dismantled Bomb Parts”
Don’t be suckered by that headline.
Instead of calling the police about a suspicious package from Thermotechnic, Dr. Calzada calls a private security expert, a terrorism consultant, and a journalist. The package, suspected of containing a bomb, is opened in front of the four, and contains only a fuel filter and a wire, which even if connected wouldn’t explode. The owner of Thermotechnic, Pedro Gil, denies responsibility for sending the package, attributing it to either a shipment error or someone intentionally trying to cause him embarrassment.
Claude Harvey says:
June 25, 2010 at 12:32 am
Histrionics aside, the numbers are straightforward. You need about 40-cents (U.S.) per kwh at the plant fence, either through subsidies or in the market, to make economic sense of a solar power plant investment. Wind power translates to about 27-cents, The average wholesale electric power rate in the U.S. is about 4-cents per kwh. It really is that simple….
————–
Unfortunately, it’s not that simple. Does the 4-cent per kwh include the cost of pollution from the mining and burning of coal used to generate the electric power?
Wren says:
June 25, 2010 at 11:05 am
Claude Harvey says:
June 25, 2010 at 12:32 am
(…)
————–
Unfortunately, it’s not that simple. Does the 4-cent per kwh include the cost of pollution from the mining and burning of coal used to generate the electric power?
————–
…which is offset by the benefits of CO2 in growing crops, revegetating tropical forests, and making the earth a (truly) greener place to live. Besides, the effluent from coal-fired generating plants meets EPA standards; are you saying they’re not strict enough?
Btw, I’ve done more reclamation as a mining engineer re-mining old abandoned mining districts, along with upgrading the environment on deposits mined for the first time, than thousands of members of the Sierra Club put together. All mines are required to file a Mine Reclamation Plan (generally with the state’s DEQ) before the first shovelful of rock or dirt is even turned. A bond is posted that makes sure such remediation is completed once mining operations cease. In many cases, meeting the regs for reclamation requires more planning than extracting the minerals.
In the vast majority of cases, after a few years it is practically impossible for the layperson to detect that there was ever a mine in the area. However, the improved environment, with lakes, wetlands, reforested and reclaimed grazelands, are a welcome benefit. The fauna grows better with the increase in CO2, needs less water, and supports more wildlife. Hard to see a downside to all this.
I am losing my faith in republican democratic systems. Universal suffrage has resulted in utter chaos. Radicalism festers in a system where “anything goes” and where mass media marketing is used to brainwash and incite on a huge scale. I think the world now deserves monarchy or “soft conservative fascism” ala Pinochet or Franco.