Former Apartheid Spy Appointed to Head UN Climate Change Effort

From the You Just Can’t Make This Stuff Up Department.

[update, yeah the headline is inaccurate, it is simply reflecting the original story headline from BIGGOVERNMENT.com ~ ctm]

Former Apartheid Spy Appointed to Head UN Climate Change Effort

by Joel B. Pollak

IMG_0233

From BIGGOVERNMENT.com

This week, Marthinus van Schalkwyk, South Africa’s tourism minister, was nominated to head the United Nations Framework on Climate Change (UNFCC). Van Schalkwyk is a former apartheid operative who bartered his way into the black majority government by helping it smear its democratic opposition. He is a statist bureaucrat who is one of the most unpopular political figures in the new South Africa. He is just right for the job.

There is no one better to put in charge of the entire political enterprise of climate change as it is collapsing amidst failed negotiations and accusations of fraud. Van Schalkwyk will be sure to hasten the end. He did the same when he took over the rump of South Africa’s National Party, the party of apartheid, and led it to crushing defeat. He gave up and joined the African National Congress (ANC) government in return for his ministry.

That was bad news for South Africans, as Van Schalkwyk encouraged other politicians to defect from the country’s leading opposition parties to join the corrupt and hegemonic  ANC. (An angry public began referring to those who crossed the floor for political favors as “crosstitutes.”) But it is good news for critics of the UN climate change bureaucracy, who now have a target who personifies everything there is to dislike about the system.

The worldwide “consensus” on climate change is unraveling amidst mounting evidence that the UN and senior scientists manipulated the data to suit their predictions of rapid warming and their prescriptions for drastic intervention in the global economy. It is, of course, true that carbon dioxide is a “greenhouse gas” that helps warm the earth; it is true that we have pumped more of it into the atmosphere since the industrial revolution.

It is also true that there is evidence of increasing average global surface temperatures over the same time period, and reason to believe that trend could continue over the next century. But it is also true that there are other factors affecting global climate, including some that reduce temperatures. And it is also true that our most sophisticated computer models cannot predict how warmer temperatures will affect our climate in the future.

That wasn’t good enough for those eager to create a sense of alarm. They projected worst-case scenarios and tried to convince the world that the potential costs of future warming far outweighed the costs of shutting down whole industries. They never explained whether climate change could actually be reversed; they did not need to, as long as they could scare people enough to avoid having to answer tough questions.

Read the rest of the article here.

HT/ a friend at Bloomberg ~ ctm

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

94 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Robert of Ottawa
March 9, 2010 3:26 pm

How did he get the job? How come a public job vacancy wasn’t posted, except perhaps in the third toilet on the right in the basement of the UN building.
Hey, I want my resume considered.

Robert of Ottawa
March 9, 2010 3:29 pm

He was nomited by the South African government? So they want to get rid of him :

Henry chance
March 9, 2010 3:45 pm

Looks like they picked a dandy. Joe Romm rants about anti science people and dis informers. They sure picked one with both characteristics. Think he ever took a science class?
He does appear to be a political zealot. Since the warmist mantra is political, he will thrive.

JinOH
March 9, 2010 3:47 pm

“I would have bet money that Algore was the man.”
Me too – fastest way to kill off this insanity.

JackStraw
March 9, 2010 3:53 pm

Swell, another one of these Maurice Strong environmental global governance drones.
Who could have predicted it?
Anyone paying attention.

Jimbo
March 9, 2010 3:56 pm

Just snow, not climate: 9 March 2010 from the BBC.
Blizzards have hit the French Mediterranean coast amid warnings of up to 20 inches of snow in Northern Spain on Tuesday.”
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/8557570.stm

Jimbo
March 9, 2010 4:00 pm

Just snow, not climate: 9 March 2010 from the BBC.
Heavy Snow in southern France causes travel problems”
“Snow in southern France has caused travel problems with many people forced to spend the night in motorway service stations.”

March 9, 2010 4:00 pm

It’s reverse psychology: give the sceptics someone so horrendously bad that they are sure to focus all their energy on this individual, thus allowing the “scientists”, to get on with their PR campaign on realclimate-wikipedia unhindered.
But can I be bothered who they appoint? No!

sagi
March 9, 2010 4:07 pm

An obvious ‘rug’, an obvious narcissist. Do not expect the truth from him.

March 9, 2010 4:10 pm

Sorry, O/T but had to share this.
George Monbiot, when asked by one of the commenters on his latest article, what it would take to persuade him that he was wrong says:
“A preponderance of evidence showing that manmade climate change isn’t happening: ie the opposite of the current situation.”
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cif-green/2010/mar/08/belief-in-climate-change-science
Good grief.

Peter Miller
March 9, 2010 4:11 pm

The proponent of an unethical failed philosophy (the Nationalist Party’s apartheid) switches allegiance to another unethical failed philosophy (the United Nations’ AGW).

wws
March 9, 2010 4:13 pm

This is as bizarre as it would be to put an ex-KKK member like Robert Byrd in the Senate – oh wait….

March 9, 2010 4:26 pm

Nominated is not the same as appointed.
Others in the running are India’s Environment Secretary (not quite a minister). See: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/environment/developmental-issues/S-Africa-India-in-race-for-UN-climate-chief-job/articleshow/5664227.cms

Gail Combs
March 9, 2010 4:33 pm

Antonio San (14:44:09) :
“….As skeptics seem to think they won the day, let’s keep in mind powerful financial interests -like Soros- are at work here and they may bring earlier radical changes and hasten their true agenda: the ruthless goons will do.
This might be an indication of things to come… beware all.”

You are correct. We here at WUWT forget CAGW is just one of three con jobs ripening at the same time and the United Nations and the World Bank have their sticky fingers in each.
First there is the world financial mess capped by the USA teetering on bankruptcy: First Obama doubled the US dollar supply – that Dodo bird has yet to come home to roost as runaway inflation. Then there is Congress’s spending spree making it “statistically impossible for the United States to pay its obligations” according to Stewart Dougherty, a specialist in inferential analysis. http://www.silverbearcafe.com/private/08.09/metastasis.html
Second there is the attempted takeover of the world food supply – a very long and involved tale that most people totally ignore.
History: http://www.opednews.com/articles/History-HACCP-and-the-Foo-by-Nicole-Johnson-090906-229.html
Food Safety Fraud http://www.foodsafetynews.com/2009/12/the-festering-fraud-behind-food-safety-reform/
Farm Wars blog: http://farmwars.info/
And CAGW completes the picture – Money, Food, and Energy – control those and you control everyone.

Bulldust
March 9, 2010 4:35 pm

So when do the “van de Merwe” jokes start?

Ed Murphy
March 9, 2010 4:36 pm

JackStraw (15:53:22) : Swell, another one of these Maurice Strong environmental global governance drones.
Who could have predicted it?
Anyone paying attention.

Let’s not leave out Edmund de Rothschild as well.

MikeC
March 9, 2010 4:39 pm

Climate Nazis… hmmmmmmm….. it rings a bit

Van Grungy
March 9, 2010 5:11 pm
Amino Acids in Meteorites
March 9, 2010 5:11 pm

Katabasis (16:10:36) :
George Monbiot is a rabid advocate. This is what rabid advocates would say. Careful he doesn’t bite you. He does bite. I’ve seen him mindlessly biting Plimer like a ravenous dog with red meat.

JackStraw
March 9, 2010 5:16 pm

>>Ed Murphy (16:36:10) :
They are all of a piece. Some of the great man’s wisdom.
http://www.unep.org/GC/GC25/Docs/Final_UNEP_speech_IEG%5B1%5D_18_feb_09.pdf
Can anyone tell me what this has to do with science?

PaulH
March 9, 2010 5:34 pm

“Crosstitute”… I’ll have to remember that one. 🙂

Al Gore's Holy Hologram
March 9, 2010 5:41 pm

Failing this they could get Dr Strangelove or even better Peter Mandelson who always has a top job no matter how unqualified or useless he is. It’s good to be connected.

King of Cool
March 9, 2010 6:27 pm

Talking of names – hot on the heels of Lord Christopher Monckton on his visit down-under came none other than Michael Oppenheimer and James Hansen to counter the Lord’s word. At whose invitation and cost I have no idea. The only difference was in the treatment by our tax funded public broadcaster, the ABC. Monckton was treated like the Romans and Jews dealing with Jesus. The other two were regaled like the Kings of Babylon.
This is a radio interview with Phillip Adams and Hansen. Adams is probably the biggest chardonnay sipping left wing idealist and smuggest commentator on the ABC:
http://www.abc.net.au/rn/latenightlive/stories/2010/2839864.htm
This is Michael Oppenheimer doing his video thing on ABC’s Big Ideas:
http://www.abc.net.au/tv/fora/stories/2010/03/08/2839591.htm
I never once heard them challenged by any reporter and both got away with murder. Hansen at least sounded as if he believed in what he was saying. Oppenheimer came over like a slick salesman. Have your sick bags ready.

March 9, 2010 6:29 pm

DirkH (14:39:52) :
Next stop Nobel.

It only hurts when I laugh.

March 9, 2010 6:56 pm

This man is no Nelson Mandela
Does that mean he is not a Communist?