One more thing to worry about – fog shortage

UPDATE: Roger Pielke Jr. alerts us to this:

Last summer the San Francisco Chronicle carried a story about research on fog and climate with a different conclusion:

The Bay Area just had its foggiest May in 50 years. And thanks to global warming, it’s about to get even foggier.

That’s the conclusion of several state researchers, whose soon-to-be-published study predicts that even with average temperatures on the rise, the mercury won’t be soaring everywhere.

“There’ll be winners and losers,” says Robert Bornstein, a meteorology professor at San Jose State University. “Global warming is warming the interior part of California, but it leads to a reverse reaction of more fog along the coast.”

The study, which will appear in the journal Climate, is the latest to argue that colder summers are indeed in store for parts of the Bay Area.

More fog is consistent with predictions of climate change. Less fog is consistent with predictions of climate change. I wonder if the same amount of fog is also “consistent with” such predictions? I bet so.

From the University of California – Berkeley via Eurekalert:

Fog has declined in past century along California’s redwood coast

Analysis of hourly airport cloud cover reports leads to surprising finding

California’s coastal fog has decreased significantly over the past 100 years, potentially endangering coast redwood trees dependent on cool, humid summers, according to a new study by University of California, Berkeley, scientists.

It is unclear whether this is part of a natural cycle of the result of human activity, but the change could affect not only the redwoods, but the entire redwood ecosystem, the scientists say.

“Since 1901, the average number of hours of fog along the coast in summer has dropped from 56 percent to 42 percent, which is a loss of about three hours per day,” said study leader James A. Johnstone, who recently received his Ph.D. from UC Berkeley’s Department of Geography before becoming a postdoctoral scholar in the campus’s Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management (ESPM). “A cool coast and warm interior is one of the defining characteristics of California’s coastal climate, but the temperature difference between the coast and interior has declined substantially in the last century, in step with the decline in summer fog.”

The loss of fog and increased temperature mean that “coast redwood and other ecosystems along the U.S. West Coast may be increasingly drought-stressed, with a summer climate of reduced fog frequency and greater evaporative demand,” said coauthor Todd E. Dawson, UC Berkeley professor of integrative biology and of ESPM. “Fog prevents water loss from redwoods in summer, and is really important for both the tree and the forest. If the fog is gone, we might not have the redwood forests we do now.”

Fog in the redwoods

The scientists’ report will be posted online during the week of Feb. 15 in advance of publication in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

The surprising result came from analysis of new records recently made available by the National Climate Data Center. The U.S. Surface Airways data come from airports around the country, which have recorded for more than 60 years hourly information such as cloud cover (cloud ceiling height), visibility, wind and temperature.

Johnstone evaluated the data from airports along the northern California coast and found two airports – Arcata and Monterey – that had consistent fog records going back to 1951. With these data, he was able to show that frequent coastal fog is almost always associated with a large temperature difference between the coast and inland areas.

Using a network of 114 temperature stations along the Pacific Coast, Johnstone and Dawson demonstrated that the coast-inland contrast has decreased substantially, not just in Northern California, but along the entire U.S. coastline from Seattle to San Diego. This change is particularly noticeable in the difference between Ukiah, a warm Coast Range site in Northern California, and Berkeley on San Francisco Bay. At the beginning of the 20th century, the daytime temperature difference between the two sites was 17 degrees Fahrenheit; today, it is just 11 degrees Fahrenheit.

The relationship between temperature gradient and fog frequency implies a 33 percent drop in fog along the coast during this time.

Greater fog frequency is connected to cooler than normal ocean waters from Alaska to Mexico and warm water from the central North Pacific to Japan. This temperature flip-flop is a well-known phenomenon called Pacific Decadal Oscillation – an El Niño-like pattern of the north Pacific that affects salmon populations along the US West Coast. The new results show that this pattern may also have substantial effects on the coastal forest landscape.

In addition, the data show that the coast gets foggier when winds blow from the north along the coast, which fits with observations that northerly winds push surface waters offshore and allow the upwelling of deep, cold, nutrient-rich water.

“This is the first data actually illustrating that upwelling along the Pacific coast and fog over the land are linked,” Johnstone said.

By pulling in data on temperature variation with elevation, Johnstone and Dawson also related their fog data with a temperature inversion that each summer traps the fog between the coast and the coastal mountains. The inversion is caused by a warm, dry, high-pressure cell that sits over Northern California in late summer, bringing hot temperatures to inland areas, including the Central Valley. If the inversion is strong, its lower boundary at about 1,200 feet keeps a lid on the cool marine layer and prevents fog from penetrating over the Coast Ranges. When it is weak, the ocean air and clouds move upward and inland, resulting in a cooler interior and a warmer, drier coast.

“The data support the idea that Northern California coastal fog has decreased in connection with a decline in the coast-inland temperature gradient and weakening of the summer temperature inversion,” Johnstone said.

“As fog decreases, the mature redwoods along the coast are not likely to die outright, but there may be less recruitment of new trees; they will look elsewhere for water, high humidity and cooler temperatures,” Dawson said. “What does that mean for the current redwood range and that of the plants and animals with them?”

Eventually, Dawson and Johnstone hope to correlate fog frequency with redwood tree ring data in order to estimate climate trends going back hundreds of years.

“While people have used tree ring data from White Mountain bristlecone pines and stumps in Mono Lake to infer climate change in California, redwoods have always been thought problematic,” Dawson said, mainly because it’s hard to determine whether the width of a tree ring reflects winter rain, summer fog, temperature, nutrient supply or other factors. “Stable isotope analyses of wood cellulose allows you to pull this data out of the tree ring.”

Dawson has established that the isotopes of oxygen in a tree reflect whether the water comes in via the leaves from fog, or via the roots from rainwater. “Redwoods live for more than 2,000 years, so they could be a very important indicator of climate patterns and change along the coast,” he said.

The new fog data will allow Dawson and Johnstone to calibrate their tree ring isotope data with actual coastal fog conditions in the past century, and then extrapolate back for 1,000 years or more to estimate climate conditions.

The work was supported by the Save the Redwoods League and the Berkeley Atmospheric Sciences Center.

================================================

Further reading: Fog in California from UCSB

http://www.geog.ucsb.edu/~joel/g110_w08/lecture_notes/california_fog/cal_coastal_fog1_sm.jpg
The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
242 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
February 16, 2010 1:14 pm

But another study predicts INCREASING fog!
‘Robert Bornstein, a meteorology professor at San Jose State University. “Global warming is warming the interior part of California, but it leads to a reverse reaction of more fog along the coast”. The study, which will appear in the journal Climate, is the latest to argue that colder summers are indeed in store for parts of the Bay Area’ (July 2009).
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/07/06/DDJT187GK9.DTL
Oh, this fog of uncertainty…
Hat tip: http://www.climategate.com
hat tip: http://www.climategate.com

Bulaman
February 16, 2010 1:15 pm

Read Richard North’s thread.. Follow the money!

February 16, 2010 1:15 pm

Save the redwoods, agenda, what agenda.
Open science is the only real science.

Lance
February 16, 2010 1:15 pm

Ya, but it was rotten fog….
actually southern alberta has had lots of fog the last couple of weeks, perhaps we can export all of it back to the coast…

George Turner
February 16, 2010 1:15 pm

Is fog a feedback?
Yikes.
New headline:
Eco-freaks fake foreceast for fogbank feedback in Fresno’s forests, finding it a forcing function and favoring fevered fines for fightened folks in Fords.

Archonix
February 16, 2010 1:20 pm

Richard North has dug up an old article from 2009 that says the fog is increasing – and that this is being caused by global warming. So global warming makes more fog and less fog if you believe some people.

jorgekafkazar
February 16, 2010 1:22 pm

O, the humidity!

StevenJames, Houston
February 16, 2010 1:24 pm

I suspect the number of deaths from car accidents will decline with the decline in fog.
I forget. Human life is not that important.

Richard Sharpe
February 16, 2010 1:34 pm
Don E
February 16, 2010 1:34 pm

Has the Valley been cooling? Maybe so in the past decade? Last summer we had record fog due to the cooler PDO.
According to that Christy study, there has been central valley warming due to agriculture and irrigation but the summers are slightly cooler. It is the summer heat that draws the fog.
Also, how do smoke particles effect fog? The California air has gotten cleaner during the past 100 years.

Patagon
February 16, 2010 1:35 pm

First, Correlation is not causation.
Second, they state that
“At the beginning of the 20th century, the daytime temperature difference between the two sites was 17 degrees Fahrenheit; today, it is just 11 degrees Fahrenheit.”
True, but all the change happened over a very short period of time in the 1920’s, so if the Redwoods have been fine for the last 90 years there is no indication of imminent catastrophe.
This is the GISTemp record for Berkley: http://tinyurl.com/ybm7k9v
This for Ukhia: http://tinyurl.com/ybopgj5
as you see nothing dramatic has happened.
Any links to the original paper? It would be interesting to check the methodology.

MrLynn
February 16, 2010 1:39 pm

“It is unclear whether this is part of a natural cycle of the result of human activity. . . ”
Typo: Second ‘of’ should be ‘or’.
/Mr Lynn

Henry chance
February 16, 2010 1:40 pm

Some things are not simple enough for idiots.
The fog “readings” are at airports. And the redwoods are at airports? Would it be a tad more scientific if “fog” was measured in the redwood forrest?
Like we read on this board. The pavement and heat sink effect also plays out at airports.

artwest
February 16, 2010 1:42 pm

Over at EU Referendum:
“Hot on the trail of the Golden-Gate scam, a readers draws my attention to an article in the San Francisco Chronicle for 6 July 2009.
The title of the piece somewhat gives the game away, as it declares: “Get ready for even foggier summers”. The opening lines of the text tell us that the Bay Area just had its foggiest May in 50 years. “And thanks to global warming, it’s about to get even foggier.”
This makes an interesting counterpoint to the article in The Daily Telegraph today, proclaiming: “Fog over San Francisco thins by a third due to climate change”.”
http://eureferendum.blogspot.com/2010/02/you-will-love-this.html

Lazarus Long
February 16, 2010 1:50 pm

“The work was supported by the Save the Redwoods League and the Berkeley Atmospheric Sciences Center.”
Quelle suprise!!!!!

Paul Vaughan
February 16, 2010 1:53 pm

It should’ve been a no-brainer that fog relates to SST – if there’s some “first” here quantitatively, it’s no more exciting than a statistical analysis intended to *dazzle* the public with the “revelation” that days are warmer than nights.
As for the fears about redwood recruitment:
We’re talking about a perennial species with a VERY LONG lifespan – a PDO cycle is a BLINK of an eye. By the logic being shoveled upon the masses, we should acutely fear the collapse of civilization due to a warm summer or cold winter.

Robin Guenier
February 16, 2010 1:56 pm

Let’s try to be serious about this: it’s very worrying. And what makes it even more worrying is last year’s warning by Robert Bornstein (meteorology professor at San Jose State University) that “Global warming is warming the interior part of California, but it leads to a reverse reaction of more fog along the coast.” This global warming is really, really bad – causing both less and more fog. Something must be done.
Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/07/06/DDJT187GK9.DTL#ixzz0fjpVxezg

Paul Vaughan
February 16, 2010 1:57 pm

crosspatch (12:12:50) “They should make up their minds … are trees thermometers or are they hygrometers?”
Don’t dare them to politically oversimplify it into false black-&-white.

Craig From Belvidere
February 16, 2010 1:58 pm

Was the statistical analysis corrected for particulates in the air? London used to have its famous pea soup fog before the particulates were reduced.

NickB.
February 16, 2010 2:03 pm

“While people have used tree ring data from White Mountain bristlecone pines and stumps in Mono Lake to infer climate change in California, redwoods have always been thought problematic,” Dawson said, mainly because it’s hard to determine whether the width of a tree ring reflects winter rain, summer fog, temperature, nutrient supply or other factors. “Stable isotope analyses of wood cellulose allows you to pull this data out of the tree ring.”
Bristlecone pines are reliable now?

AJ
February 16, 2010 2:12 pm

I also wonder about Canada’s east coast. Sable Island, a 25 mile sand bar 100 miles off the coast of Nova Scotia, shows a negative Tmin trend (-0.10C/century) and a positive Tmax trend (+1.00C/century) for the period 1900-2007.
Are foggy nights warmer than clear nights? Could this mean that the fog is trending downwards? Sable Island is one of the foggiest places on earth, with the fog being generated by the temp difference between the warm Gulf Stream and the cool Labrador Current.
It only has a population of 5 people, but there are some structures around the weather station. Maybe their heating systems have become more energy efficient over the years?
Here are some pics:
http://www.greenhorsesociety.com/Station_Met/meteorology.htm

artwest
February 16, 2010 2:13 pm

A follow-up over at EU Referendum…
For the warmists global warming causes both more and less fog!
“Hot on the trail of the Golden-Gate scam, a readers draws my attention to an article in the San Francisco Chronicle for 6 July 2009.
The title of the piece somewhat gives the game away, as it declares: “Get ready for even foggier summers”. The opening lines of the text tell us that the Bay Area just had its foggiest May in 50 years. “And thanks to global warming, it’s about to get even foggier.”
This makes an interesting counterpoint to the article in The Daily Telegraph today, proclaiming: “Fog over San Francisco thins by a third due to climate change”.”
http://eureferendum.blogspot.com/2010/02/you-will-love-this.html

February 16, 2010 2:18 pm

NickB. (14:03:12) :
Bristlecone pines are reliable now?
Of course they are!!! Scientists use them in studies all the time!!!(well, at least one I know of) Who are you going to believe? You or a SCIENTIST? (sarc)
This is probably because they need another cause and quick!!!! Money for the alarmist crowd just got a little thinner!!!
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/02/16/major-firms-pull-climate-change-alliance/
Well, they still have Dutch Shell.

Richard Wakefield
February 16, 2010 2:27 pm

Sorry, bit off topic, posted Part 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G60JKJd7gNo
My next video will be on precipitation data, but that will be a while yet.