Snow totals for Washington DC storm

The storm is over, the totals and reports are in.

click for a larger image

Here’s the lowdown on the snowfall records from the Baltimore NWS:

NOUS41 KLWX 070328 CCA

PNSLWX

DCZ001-MDZ003>007-009>011-013-014-016>018-501-502-VAZ021-025>031-036>

042-050>057-WVZ049>055-501>504-071100-

PUBLIC INFORMATION STATEMENT...CORRECTED REAGAN NATIONAL INFO

NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE BALTIMORE MD/WASHINGTON DC

1030 PM EST SAT FEB 06 2010

...PRELIMINARY SUMMARY OF TWO-DAY STORM TOTAL SNOWFALLS EXCEEDED IN

THE BALTIMORE-WASHINGTON AREA...

THE 32.4 INCH TWO-DAY STORM TOTAL SNOWFALL RECORDED TODAY AT DULLES

INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT EXCEEDS THE PREVIOUS TWO-DAY STORM RECORD OF

23.2 INCHES ON 7-8 JANUARY 1996.

THE 24.8 INCH TWO-DAY STORM TOTAL SNOWFALL ESTIMATED TODAY AT

BALTIMORE/WASHINGTON INTERNATIONAL THURGOOD MARSHALL AIRPORT EXCEEDS

THE PREVIOUS TWO-DAY STORM TOTAL SNOWFALL RECORD OF 24.4 INCHES FOR

BWI AIRPORT FROM 16-17 FEBRUARY 2003.  THIS WOULD ALSO BE THE 2ND

HIGHEST TWO-DAY STORM TOTAL ALL-TIME SNOWFALL FOR BALTIMORE RECORDS

WHICH DATE BACK TO 1871...BEING SECOND ONLY TO THE 26.3 INCHES WHICH

FELL 27-28 JANUARY 1922.

THE 17.8 INCH TWO-DAY STORM TOTAL SNOWFALL RECORDED TODAY AT RONALD

REAGAN WASHINGTON NATIONAL AIRPORT IS THE SECOND HIGHEST TWO-DAY

STORM TOTAL RECORD...SECOND ONLY TO THE 18.7 INCHES FOR NATIONAL

AIRPORT FROM 18-19 FEBRUARY 1979.  THIS WOULD ALSO BE THE 4TH

HIGHEST TWO-DAY STORM TOTAL ALL-TIME SNOWFALL FOR WASHINGTON RECORDS

WHICH DATE BACK TO 1871...BEHIND ONLY THE 27-28 JANUARY 1922

KNICKERBOCKER STORM WITH 26.0 INCHES...THE 12-13 FEBRUARY 1899 STORM

WHICH PRODUCED 19.0 INCHES...AND THE 18.7 INCHES WHICH FELL 18-19

FEBRUARY 1979.

AS WITH ANY MAJOR CLIMATE RECORD ACHIEVEMENT...THESE PRELIMINARY

RECORDS WILL BE QUALITY CONTROLLED BY NOAA'S NATIONAL CLIMATIC DATA

CENTER OVER THE NEXT SEVERAL WEEKS.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

132 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ron de Haan
February 7, 2010 7:27 am

RFK, Jr. 15 months ago: Global warming means no snow or cold in DC!
By: David Freddoso
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/RFK-79834057.html

barbarausa
February 7, 2010 7:32 am

See that VA county west of DC and just east of the tip of the WVA panhandle?
That one with all the little red thirty-somethings overlapping?
No wonder my neighbors and I are so sore today! lolol

RichieP
February 7, 2010 7:43 am

O/T
H (21:40:00) :
Thanks for the link to the Daily Mail story on the Met Office – I’m not a great conspiracy fan but this article clearly suggests that multiple government agencies colluded together, along with CRU, to prevent disclosure of embarrassing and, by any standards, important information. Whether it’s against any FOI law, I don’t know, I’m not a lawyer and no doubt that struggle will come next, perhaps with the Info Commissioner raising his hands in horror and saying there’s sadly nothing can be done about it (again). What it does show is how deeply embedded and ingrained the AGW myth is throughout our society. Getting the stain out is going to need an awful lot of thorough washing.
Orig linK
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1249035/How-Met-Office-blocked-questions-mans-role-hockey-stick-climate-row.html

Richard
February 7, 2010 7:47 am

…THESE PRELIMINARY RECORDS WILL BE QUALITY CONTROLLED BY NOAA’S NATIONAL CLIMATIC DATA CENTER OVER THE NEXT SEVERAL WEEKS
Always a little suspicious of NOAA’s “QUALITY CONTROL”. Cant trust lying, theiving “Climate Scientists” anymore.

rbateman
February 7, 2010 7:48 am

P Wilson (06:23:40) :
The pseudo religion has hedged it regardless of what happens. If its colder than average they blame Anthropogenic global warming. If its warmer than average they say it Anthropogenic global warming.

Which is why it is very important not to lose sight of the many changes they have made to their PR campaign.
For the longest time, they exclusively proclaimed AGW with forecast barbecue summers/droughts, disappearing snows/glaciers/Polar Ice, catastrophic Hurricanes and deadly rising sea levels.
The last few years, when it became painfully clear what was going on (and I assume that is what the Phil Jones erasure emails are chiefly about) the message changes to “Climate Change”. From Climate Change the newer spin of “Global Warming causes Global Cooling”.
The latest concoction is an absurdity by nature. It is deeply insulting to the commoner, to the point of boiling rage. A marketing failure no doubt spun by desperation. It worked at first, but then the damage started to roll in.
To make it work, one has to prop up ‘Xth warmest month” statements with maps that depict areas that have been modified into climate cooking insanity.
Running out of land masses to manipulate (news travelling by internet) we are down to the oceans. That game will not go on forever. Someone will find a way to debunk it, and that will throw the final shovel of dirt into the face of AGW and it’s proponents.
Cavalier & flippant quips about “Snowmageddon” will not let the deceptive out of the corner they have typecast themselves into.

David S
February 7, 2010 8:09 am

“AS WITH ANY MAJOR CLIMATE RECORD ACHIEVEMENT…THESE PRELIMINARY
RECORDS WILL BE QUALITY CONTROLLED BY NOAA’S NATIONAL CLIMATIC DATA
CENTER OVER THE NEXT SEVERAL WEEKS.”
Does “quality controlled” mean “adjusted”? If so, which way will they adjust it? Will they adjust the numbers up to 50 inches, making it the worst snowstorm in history and blame it on global warming? Or will they adjust it down to zero and say because of global warming we don’t get any snow any more?

Steve Goddard
February 7, 2010 8:12 am

RFK Jr. lamented the lack of snow in Virgina last year, and blamed it on Sarah Palin.
http://www.robertfkennedyjr.com/articles/2008_sep_Los_angeles_times.html

Ray
February 7, 2010 8:36 am

From the map… are there really that many weather stations?

John Phillips
February 7, 2010 8:39 am

“the_Butcher (06:45:31) :
OT:
Obama cancels Moon return project
President Barack Obama has cancelled the American project designed to take humans back to the Moon.”
Seems we are turning ever more inward. One thing that may jar us out of navel gazing is if the Chinese eventually establish a moon base. It would perhaps have the same effect as sputnik.

Steve Goddard
February 7, 2010 8:46 am

Obama promised to bankrupt the coal industry and Hansen wanted to shut down the Capital Power Plant.
I’m guessing that Obama’s daughters and Hansen’s grandchildren are happy to have a warm, well lit home to warm up in today.

February 7, 2010 8:48 am

“barbarausa (07:32:08) :
See that VA county west of DC and just east of the tip of the WVA panhandle?
That one with all the little red thirty-somethings overlapping?
No wonder my neighbors and I are so sore today! lolol”
Loudoun County? I’m there as well. And yes, I am quite sore.
By the way, that 17.8″ at DCA (Reagan National) is creating an angry little stir in the local weather community. Most other area reports measured at least 20″, but, of course, DCA is the *official* site, and they measure markedly less snow. Hmmm….

pat
February 7, 2010 8:52 am

homogenize the data. you easterners will all feel warmer.

Fred2
February 7, 2010 8:55 am

“My wife’s father, an old tough mountaineer used to all kinds of weather, is complaining from Central Siberia (Krasnoyarsk): while rather extremely low temperatures are not a novelty there, this winter is exceptional in that the temperatures in Krasnoyarsk are constantly below -30 deg. C, mostly about -36, and often going down to -40. This is no joke: I remember going to school while it was -40 deg. C. You spit, it hits the ground as ice!”
Mr Feht: I was in Winnipeg recently at -40C and spit does not freeze in the air before it hits the ground , it is I’ll grant, rather chilly, and if you have too much water in your whiskey it can even turn to slush while you smoke your cigarette outside. Irritating, but easy to cure with a little more warm whiskey, or going indoors.
And -40C, especially with windchill on top does result in schools being closed for cold days ( a concept akin to snow days) there, and just like snow days the kids rush out to play. (in their spacesuits, I presume.)

R. Gates
February 7, 2010 9:03 am

Meanwhile, tropospheric temps are spiking well over previous record highs. Go here:
http://discover.itsc.uah.edu/amsutemps/
And look at 14,000, 25,000, and 36,000 ft. Huge spike in Feb. temps over the already high January records (Jan. 2010 as the warmest on record)
All this and the sun is really waking up now. Irradiance going up up up, x-ray flux, m-class flare today. Wow. It will be hard to keep 2010 from being the warmest on record. What might have caused this? Hmmm…just natural variability I suppose…

RockyRoad
February 7, 2010 9:21 am

When snow hits 30 inches on a roof, it’s time to consider using manpower to clean some of it off.
Consider a 40″ snow accumulation, which should have 4 inches of contained water. A 1600 sq ft home will have a roof (with eves) of about 1800 sq ft. With water weighing 62.4 lbs/cf, 4 inches of water would apply a weigh of ~20 lb/sq ft. 1800 * 20 / 2000 = 18 short tons of water. That’s almost what a loaded semi truck carries and now that’s perched on your roof!
I doubt it will cause the roof to collapse–generally what happens is stress cracks form in plaster and paint which never go away. But you just never know, considering what structural imperfections were there to begin with, and what has happened since.
Just be dadgum careful up on the roof while clearing it!

February 7, 2010 9:32 am

R. Gates (09:03:28)
‘… the sun is really waking up now. Irradiance going up up up, x-ray flux, m-class flare today. Wow. It will be hard to keep 2010 from being the warmest on record. What might have caused this?’
Hm.
At a guess I’d say emissions of CO2 by man would be highly unlikely to have caused the sun ‘waking up’.
But perhaps you have hitherto unpublished data showing the enormous influence of terrestrial CO2 concentrations on the waking or sleeping sun?
Would sure be nice to see them.

beng
February 7, 2010 9:32 am

*******
BarryW (07:07:06) :
Here’s a new controversy for you. It seems that there are two snow totals for BWI airport 24 and 28 inches. Why? There’s more than one way to measure: at the end of the storm or hourly (and other periods).
*******
As you say, there are different ways to measure. One way & prb’ly the most consistent way is simply take a number of depth measurements in open areas after the snow stops, and avg them. I think this is the “official” number.
Another way is to accumulate snow in a rain gauge (typically 6″). When it fills, replace it w/an empty rain gauge, continuing until the snow stops. There prb’ly won’t be any melting at ground level this way, and no compaction at the bottom as in a ground-depth measurement, so this method will give higher amounts.
Even another way is to measure on an open, insulated cold surface like a roof or car. Again, this will give somewhat higher amounts.
My 35″ was measured on my roof. The ground depth is somewhat less, around 32″, so some melting/compaction occurred on the ground.
Funny about the above contour maps David Hyde posted — look at the hot air in downtown DC melting some of the snow.

Tenuc
February 7, 2010 9:34 am

Good chart here showing just how weak the northern polar vortex is at the moment. Lots of cold air spilling down across the NH, so keep those thermals handy.
http://www.cpc.noaa.gov/products/precip/CWlink/daily_ao_index/hgt.shtml

JDN
February 7, 2010 9:34 am

The controversy with the BWI measurement is that some contractor screwed up the measurements and didn’t empty the snowboard every 6 hours (sorry, I can’t remember where I read that). The new total is a reconstruction taking into account compression of the snow under its own wieght and what not. It would be nice if they publish the method. However, the surrounding stations have markedly more snow. Nobody believes the BWI result. Our neighborhood got over 2′.
Compared to the 2003 blizzard, this one is not as bad, because, we already had snow on the ground before the 2003 one struck. What gets interesting is that we may get another foot of snow on Wednesday. Just this morning, one of our local weathermen, Justin Berk, refused to say on-air what he thinks the snow total will be from the coming storm. But from the diagrams & models (including the UK MET model), we should be getting a bunch more.
Downtown Baltimore main roads are passable but not great. Many restaurants and supermarkets are open. The Eddie’s supermarket stayed open during the 2003 blizzard with no resupply for 3 days. The downtown Superfresh was also open. I had a beer & dinner at the Brewer’s Art last night during my bike ride. Special props to Potbelly’s downtown for staying open during the entire event. They didn’t even change the store hours. We’ve had massive tree damage but only one building collapse has been reported. BGE (Baltimore Gas & Electric) only has 15k customers without power as of 9 hours ago. That’s not bad.
The real story is that we are going to smash the previous record for snow during a single season. The Wednesday storm, if it drops more than 4″, will put us over the top.

Douglas DC
February 7, 2010 9:35 am

UAH only goes back 30 years or so-satillite era. Meanwhile Nino’s croaking
which warmist were hanging on to as the worst ever:
http://weather.unisys.com/surface/sst_anom.html
Also February appears to be repeating December I will bet on the ground,
that it will be cold in the west-like December.That AO’s got me worried..

A C Osborn
February 7, 2010 9:35 am

As I can’t post on Tips & Notes so sorry it’s ot
Anthony, Re
Dave McK (17:30:19) :
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/7176262/Climate-makes-money-move-in-mysterious-ways.html
“Contemplating the impenetrable maze of payments made by various ministries to the UN, the EU, banks, research institutes, teams of academics, NGOs, environmental and industrial lobby groups and “charitable foundations” – often through chains of “funding vehicles” which may give only the most nebulous idea of their purpose – we can get little idea what is the total amount of taxpayers’ money flooding out from all our different branches of officialdom.”
This Article by Christopher shows that the British Government are complicit in the IPCC Scam, they knew that the Himalayan glacier statement was wrong back in 2004.

DirkH
February 7, 2010 9:58 am

“R. Gates (09:03:28) :
[…]
What might have caused this? Hmmm…just natural variability I suppose…”
It’s the El Nino, Gates.

R. Gates
February 7, 2010 10:00 am

The negative AO has the flip-side effect of course of keeping temperatures warmer near the polar region as the cold air streams down and warm air is brought up on the backside, and with this action we could continue to see record warmth over the N. polar regions as we saw during the December negative AO event. The record tropospheric global warmth could indeed take a pause due to the negative AO event, but more likely, will only flatten, as global tropospheric warmth measures the total energy in the troposphere, the negative AO simply mixes the cold air futher south, but does not decrease the total tropospheric energy.

RichieP
February 7, 2010 10:02 am

O/T
Utah legislative panel digs its heels in against EPA’s CO2 regs; passes resolution mentioning ‘flawed climate data’, and critical of $7B ‘climate change gravy train’
http://algorelied.com/?p=3680#more-3680

Rob Erhardt
February 7, 2010 10:14 am

Things are about to get A LOT worse.
The new operational computer model guidance is showing ANOTHER
10 to 20 inches of snow, blizzard conditions, and EXTREME cold for
Washington/Baltimore this week.
Nature wins(again).