Not as bad as they thought: Coral can recover from climate change damage

From a University of Exeter press release, another inconvenient truth about our planet sure to be denounced by some who claim that global warming is irreparably damaging reef systems.

A study by the University of Exeter provides the first evidence that coral reefs can recover from the devastating effects of climate change. Published Monday 11 January in the journal PLOS One, the research shows for the first time that coral reefs located in marine reserves can recover from the impacts of global warming.

Scientists and environmentalists have warned that coral reefs may not be able to recover from the damage caused by climate change and that these unique environments could soon be lost forever. Now, this research adds weight to the argument that reducing levels of fishing is a viable way of protecting the world’s most delicate aquatic ecosystems.

Increases in ocean surface water temperatures subject coral reefs to stresses that lead quickly to mass bleaching. The problem is intensified by ocean acidification, which is also caused by increased CO2. This decreases the ability of corals to produce calcium carbonate (chalk), which is the material that reefs are made of.

Approximately 2% of the world’s coral reefs are located within marine reserves, areas of the sea that are protected against potentially-damaging human activity, like dredging and fishing.

The researchers conducted surveys of ten sites inside and outside marine reserves of the Bahamas over 2.5 years. These reefs have been severely damaged by bleaching and then by hurricane Frances in the summer of 2004. At the beginning of the study, the reefs had an average of 7% coral cover. By the end of the project, coral cover in marine protected areas had increased by an average of 19%, while reefs in non-reserve sites showed no recovery.

Professor Peter Mumby of the University of Exeter said: “Coral reefs are the largest living structures on Earth and are home to the highest biodiversity on the planet. As a result of climate change, the environment that has enabled coral reefs to thrive for hundreds of thousands of years is changing too quickly for reefs to adapt.

“In order to protect reefs in the long-term we need radical action to reduce CO2 emissions. However, our research shows that local action to reduce the effects of fishing can contribute meaningfully to the fate of reefs. The reserve allowed the number of parrotfishes to increase and because parrotfish eat seaweeds, the corals could grow freely without being swamped by weeds. As a result, reefs inside the park were showing recovery whereas those with more seaweed were not. This sort of evidence may help persuade governments to reduce the fishing of key herbivores like parrotfishes and help reefs cope with the inevitable threats posed by climate change”.

###

Professor Mumby’s research was funded by National Environment Research Council (NERC) and the Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation.

Reef facts

  • A coral reef is made up of thin layers of calcium carbonate (limestone) secreted over thousands of years by billions of tiny soft bodied animals called coral polyps.
  • Coral reefs are the world’s most diverse marine ecosystems and are home to twenty-five percent of known marine species, including 4,000 species of fish, 700 species of coral and thousands of other plants and animals.
  • Coral reefs have been on the planet for over 400 million years.
  • The largest coral reef is the Great Barrier Reef, which stretches along the northeast coast of Australia, from the northern tip of Queensland, to just north of Bundaberg. At 2,300km long, it is the largest natural feature on Earth.
  • Coral reefs occupy less than one quarter of one percent of the Earth’s marine environment, yet they are home to more than a quarter of all known fish species.
  • As well as supporting huge tourist industries, coral reefs protect shorelines from erosion and storm damage.

To download high quality reef videos by Professor Peter Mumby: www.reefvid.org

The main funding for the research came from Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation and the Natural Environment Research Council.

The Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation (www.livingoceansfoundation.org) is dedicated to conservation and restoration of living oceans and pledges to champion their preservation through research, education and a commitment to Science Without Borders®.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

135 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
r
January 12, 2010 5:54 pm

The irony of it is, I bet the researchers put sunscreen on before they go for a dive in the pristine reef.

savethesharks
January 12, 2010 6:25 pm

Rob Crawford (14:49:01) :
You are entitled to your opinion. If you actually go back and look at the content of what I was saying you will see there is much good information there.
Granted, I can and do go over the top sometimes….but that does in NO WAY negate the content.
Also….lets leave the Bush family out of this argument. You are putting words in my mouth in no way shape or form did I ever use the word demon in conjunction with them.
But that is a side issue, and now I have an assignment for YOU:
Go back and look at the CONTENT of every post I made in this thread….and if you can refute the majority of my points with FACTUAL evidence to the contrary, then I will concede I am a fanatic.
[Heh heh is being a fanatic always such a bad thing?]
If you can not, this is definitely a situation of a fanatic pot calling the ole’ kettle black.
Cheers.
Chris
Norfolk, VA, USA

latitude
January 12, 2010 6:25 pm

I wonder if we will see any reports of bleaching because of this cold.
Cold temperatures cause corals to bleach just like warm temps do.
I doubt if we’ll see any reports on it though, no one is stupid enough to go out there right now and look. And who in their right mind would try to make any money off of it by applying for a grant to study cold water bleaching!
That would take all the fun out of being a expert “coral scientist”. LOL

savethesharks
January 12, 2010 6:30 pm

vigilantfish (16:16:08) : “Sorry I was away all day and could not participate in your wonderful rants – enjoyed all your comments and could not agree more completely!”
Thank you, vigilantfish. This subject is no doubt a polarizing issue. But hell, the cream always rises.
Maybe one day we will evolve as a species to where we can maintain sustainable and scientifically-energized fishing practices, and where we don’t pollute our waterways and our oceans.
Until then….homo sapiens might as well still be swinging from the trees!
Cheers!
Chris
Norfolk, VA, USA

vigilantfish
January 12, 2010 7:01 pm

Jeremy (05:49:00) :
This video from the University of East Anglia shows a class of third year climate Research Unit students, who are clearly energized by the lecture, proof of the success of the University’s advanced teaching methods – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5qcnzwQt9vI
——-
ROTFL wonderful!

r
January 12, 2010 7:11 pm

Jeremy
: )

Jeff Alberts
January 12, 2010 7:31 pm

pby (05:32:39) :
how can reefs recover from global warming when there has been no global warming where is logic ?

Probably having a nice Brownian Motion Producer with your punctuation.

January 13, 2010 12:23 pm

If corals wouldn’t be able to recover from environmental changes, the would have already become extinct thousands of years ago, not to say millions of years. The earth system is a dynamic, always changing system, and life is adapted to that. Humans as of today are afraid of change, and most of them don’t know it beter and their opinion is quite vulnerable to research results, especially modelling. Scientist should handle those results with care, and not trying to spread panic etc. . Nobody knows whats going on, but we can be sure of a dynamically changing earth and of us humans to be able to adapt to such changes.

Laterjuju
February 9, 2010 9:29 am

For people who can read, a couple of links to peer-reviewed papers about ocean acidification… I should have appended it to the post “Oh snap! CO2 causes some ocean critters to build more shells”, but comments there are closed now… so
These are freely available…
http://go2.wordpress.com/?id=725X1342&site=agwobserver.wordpress.com&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bu-eh.org%2Fuploads%2FMain%2Fdoney_ann_rev_proof.pdf
http://go2.wordpress.com/?id=725X1342&site=agwobserver.wordpress.com&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pnas.org%2Fcontent%2F106%2F30%2F12235.full.pdf%2Bhtml
http://go2.wordpress.com/?id=725X1342&site=agwobserver.wordpress.com&url=http%3A%2F%2Fpondside.uchicago.edu%2Fecol-evol%2Ffaculty%2FPfister%2Fpdfs%2FWootton_Pfister_Forester%2520PNAS%25202008.pdf
http://go2.wordpress.com/?id=725X1342&site=agwobserver.wordpress.com&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pnas.org%2Fcontent%2F105%2F48%2F18860.full.pdf%2Bhtml
http://go2.wordpress.com/?id=725X1342&site=agwobserver.wordpress.com&url=http%3A%2F%2Fquercus.igpp.ucla.edu%2Fpublication%2Fpdf_files%2Forr_nat_05.pdf
http://media.eurekalert.org/aaasnewsroom/2008/FIL_000000000120/HoeghGuldberg%20et%20al.%202007%20complete.pdf
http://www.pnas.org/content/105/45/17442.full.pdf+html
I would be grateful to anyone able to provide me with papers showing that ocean acidification does not affect calcifying organisms… No need to remind me of the paper by Ries et al discussed in “”Oh snap! CO2 causes some ocean critters to build more shells”
Why ? Because most of you have misinterpreted this paper… Those who would like to see it will find it at :
http://geology.geoscienceworld.org/cgi/reprint/37/12/1131?ijkey=O79jdQYUdBqN2&keytype=ref&siteid=gsgeology
You don’t even need to have been a grad student to understand that even if some species may resist to ocean acidification (eg: crustaceans), most are affected as soon as CO2 levels increase…

February 9, 2010 10:50 am

Laterjuju,
I’m not an expert on corals, but as to your first requirement, yes, I can read. I can read between the lines, too.
In reading your first link, it quickly became apparent that it was written by grant hound scientists sniffing around for funding. I didn’t bother with the rest.
The CO2 alarmism gets stale after a while. Incessatly crying “Wolf!!” will do that. The whole world is starting to get tired of these fake scares.
As CO2 has risen, the temperature hasn’t, because the putative effect of CO2 on global temperature has been wildly overstated. And in this case, the buffering capacity of the oceans can easily handle much more CO2 without noticeably affecting pH.
You probably don’t think so. That’s because pH does vary. Problem is, little of the change is caused by CO2. Here, maybe this chart will help: click
See? pH varies all over the map, while CO2 remains rock steady for thousands of years. That chart trumps all the rent-seeking grant hogs you cited. Those people are unbelievable. They would sell their mothers into a Turkish prison for a juicy grant.
Also, it turns out that temperature has a much bigger effect on coral than pH does: click
Anyone who accepts the theory of natural selection must wonder why shellfish couldn’t cope with small changes in ocean pH. In fact, they can, and very easily.
As someone who raised tropical fish for many years [including aquarium clams and shrimp], I can tell you that changes in pH are the least likely factor to cause any problems. And I mean really big pH fluctuations, like from 8.5 to 6.5.
The ocean pH “acidification” claim is nonsense. Just like the numerous other CO2=CAGW claims that have been thoroughly debunked. They get debunked because CO2 has a much, much smaller effect on the planet than the AGW hypothesis claims. But the approximately $50 billion that has been poured into AGW studies over the past decade [compared with a few tens of millions for skeptical rebuttal studies] keeps scientists churning out these trumped up scare studies.
I sure hope you’re not one of them, I pay too much in taxes as it is. You can have the last word here, I’m off to read to the home page articles. But I enjoyed providing some common sense information.

1 4 5 6