Guest post by John Coleman – KUSI-TV, Weather Channel Founder

December 7, 2009
David and Goliath
The 21st century Goliath is Global Warming. It is a powerful six-legged monster. In no order of strength, those legs are:
(1) The big money climate change scientists and their powerful institutions from governmental centers to Universities,
(2) The United Nation’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change which is a Geneva-based, highly funded bureaucracy controlled by one-world government political activists,
(3) Environmentalists who seek to use threats of climate chaos to stop the use of fossil fuels and return to a simpler, more “natural”, primitive lifestyle,
(4) Government at all levels whose political leaders find dealing with global warming is their opportunity to save us all from disaster cementing their status and success,
(5) The media populated by people who love to warn us of impending disaster and give us the advice we need to cope, who believe in Al Gore and his political party and who know that “the sky is falling” is the best headline of them all,
(6) Al Gore, who uses his status as a successful former Senator and Vice President to provide a platform to promote his message of doom and gloom, a message he learned in his only college science class and must have truly believed for many years but should see now is only an empty threat.
The total financial resources and power structure behind Goliath are staggering.
Goliath now occupies Copenhagen. For the 15th time, Goliath is meeting to publicize his long list of threatened consequences if do not head his demands. The ice will melt, the coasts and islands will flood displacing millions and killing tens of thousands; the polar bears and eventually thousands of other species will die as habitats are destroyed; hurricanes will become superstorms wrecking havoc on the coastal cities killing tens of thousands; heat waves will kill more hundreds of thousands as they grip the planet; drought and heat will destroy our agriculture starving untold millions more. He tells us this is because of our carbon footprints left by our burning of fossil fuels emitting exhaust of carbon dioxide.
Fifteen thousand “delegates” are attending Goliath’s conference coming by hundreds of private jet aircraft, riding in over a thousand limos, occupying every hotel room for miles around and all living on expense accounts paid by taxpayers and stock holders. They are making speeches, politicking one another and most importantly negotiating how much the people of each of their nations will reduce their carbon footprints in coming years, having a major impact on all our lifestyles.
Meanwhile, here at home The Environmental Protection Administration, part of Goliath’s government leg, just classified carbon dioxide as a pollutant that is an endangerment to our lives. And the US Congress is working with the President on legislation known as Cap and trade that will make all of us pay taxes for our carbon footprints.
Goliath is a rich and very powerful monster. He thrives on carbon dioxide.
David is tiny and weak. He is composed of:
30 thousand scientists who sign a petition but only a few hundred of whom have the specialized education, skill and positions to do unfunded or underfunded research that debunks the carbon dioxide greenhouse claims of Goliath,
A handful of struggling policy institutes that strive to stage events to educate the public and media about the global warming myth,
The internet, a resource that is open to all on both sides to communicate and educate and organize and protest as best the skeptics can, There skeptics have established websites and blogs and posted videos, some serious and some as clever as animated musical parodies,
Talk radio with a hundred solid talk hosts who cover all aspects of the folly of global warming and reach several million people,
And a small cadre of elected officials from one or two Senators to a hand-full of members of the House of Representatives, to the President of Czech Republic and a small collection of other office holders who understand the science and are brave enough to join a minority group.
We are outmanned, poor by comparison and somewhat leaderless and disorganized.
How can David win this battle? The rocks he throws are small and his rock pile is small. Time is short before the consequences of increased government control, a scaled back and altered lifestyle and, most of all, establishment of bad science as a controlling instrument.
David has one great strength, however: Truth.
There is no significant man-made global warming, there has not been any in the past and there is no reason to fear any in the future. Carbon dioxide is a natural trace gas in the atmosphere with very limited greenhouse impact on temperatures and naturally produced CO2 greatly exceeds the CO2 produced by burning fossil fuels. There is no tipping point when the impact of CO2 sets in to cause an increased impact because of “forcing.” The bad science behind the global warming myth is based on a hypothesis that has failed.
Superman fought for “truth, justice and the American way.”
So is David. But he is no Superman. The battle goes on.
John Coleman
http://www.kusi.com/weather/colemanscorner
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

RE: The feeding trough
Just show your green credentials and come belly up to the trough.
http://www.climatechangefraud.com/the-money-trail/5834-copenhagen-climate-summit-carbon-trading-fraudsters-in-europe-pocket-5bn
“Carbon trading fraudsters may have accounted for up to 90pc of all market activity in some European countries, with criminals pocketing an estimated €5bn (£4.5bn) mainly in Britain, France, Spain, Denmark and Holland, according to Europol, the European law enforcement agency.”
I.e., only 10% of it is possibly legit. Sure, we need to expand this sort of “business” worldwide, because it will be for the “good” of the world.
What could go wrong?
Lucas Taylor (09:57:18) :
And a Tweet feature too – it’s massively increased the coverage of the Telegraph here in the UK – I forward on about 5 stories a week.
Unfortunately, it’s now a “seven-legged monster”. The seventh leg is comprised of all those who have “bet” or speculated that the Greenies have gotten, or are about to get, their way, will somehow win the political battle (which is what this is really all about, all scientific-ish appearances to the contrary notwithstanding).
Keep following the money. “Green Portfolios” are the next artificial bubble, one that has already been ridiculously inflated. There is more rotten in the state of Denmark than the new religion. The money-changers at the temple are already embroiled in fraudulent “carbon offset” sales scandals of their own, totaling in the billions– and we haven’t even begun yet.
Think the co-opting of science by the Warmest Religion was a feat? That’s nothing. It’s already being re-co-opted by Industry, including their much hated and oft-derided “Big Oil”. Shell, BP and others – all on board, ready to ride the Green Gravy Train Express.
They have their portfolios to protect now. Many do. People who don’t give a fig about the science, but just want to see an increase in their net worth, regardless how artificially induced.
OT but this letter just received from the ASA regarding UK propaganda ad:
“. . . The TV ad (a) will be investigated under CAP (Broadcast) TV Advertising Standards Code rules 4 (Political and controversial issues), 5.1.1, 5.1.2 (Misleading advertising: general), 5.2.1 (Misleading advertising: evidence), 5.2.6 (Misleading advertising: environmental claims), 6.4 (Harm and offence: personal distress), 7.4.6 (Children: distress), 7.4.7 (Children: use of scheduling restrictions) and CAP (Broadcast) TV Scheduling Code rule 4.2.3 (Treatments unsuitable for children).
The press ads (b), (c), (d) and (e) will be investigated under CAP Code clauses 3.1, 3.2 (Substantiation), 7.1 (Truthfulness), 9.1 and 9.2 (Fear and distress), 49.1 and 49.3 (Environmental Claims).
Once we have reached an initial conclusion, we will make a recommendation to the ASA Councils as to whether or not we believe the ads may breach the advertising Codes on one or more points. We will do this as soon as we can, but it is important that we follow our published procedures, and that means we will not be in a position for the Councils to make a final decision on the case until the New Year. ”
So, just about when the ad campaign is due to finish then.
Chris (01:46:19) :
what about the arktic sea ice extend?
it went down at the beginning of the copenhagen meeting.
See this link for an animation. It looks like some weather event caused the ice to pile up/recede in the Bearing Strait.
http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/CT/animate.arctic.color.0.html
I just gathered that many of you consider this a political fight. It isn’t, it is an unraveling. As I said before: I only want temperature graphs, not speeches nor rally cries. The earths atmosphere and climate is what I am interested in.
This article is full of exactly the same political nonsense that the other side uses too.
I don’t care a tad about Copenhagen, nor do I thing the UN is a one-world government. It is not even remotely a government. The UN is a teethless giant dressed up to sooth the consciense of world leaders enough to think that they are actually contributing to a United World, before they go on as usual. Mind you, whenever *real* interests will be endangered none of those so calles “united” nations will be bothered to be held by the treaties they so solemnly signed. Copenhagen won’t destroy economies because when it becomes evident that it will then other parties will be chosen in the elections of the western nations, that will disengage from the treaties. The only thing that will be destroyed then is the idea of the UN. And all the credibility of the environmental movements. A lot of you won’t be bothered by that, but I assume side effects might even be the reopening of the whale hunt or something like that. I wouldn’t be thrilled by that.
Basically, I just want to see what the climate does. It is *extermely* interesting to see if the earth actually has negative feebacks, since I think it must have those. We will know in just a few years, at most a decade.
Tenuc (10:30:48) :
Here’s the ice extent from Arctic-Roos. Observe the large error bars the put on the base average. Estimating sea-ice isn’t easy, even using satellite imagery and data.
http://arctic-roos.org/observations/satellite-data/sea-ice/ice-area-and-extent-in-arctic
What I’ve found most interesting in watching the progress of the refreeze of the Arctic is that since the summer minimum of the ice area, DMI’s graph of Arctic region temperatures has been dramatically and consistently above the 20 yr. avg. but the regrowth of the ice has barely lagged the trends for previous years. Admittedly all the sites that post on ice area or extent have been warning of data unreliability problems with the satellites, but most of the errors seem to be underestimations.
This pattern of typical ice formation in the face of untypically high temps, seems to suggest that the state of polar ice is much less dependent on temperature than has been claimed.
paul hamer (03:11:55) :
“goretith”
I think it’s “gore-lieth”
cba (13:16:52) :
As in David vs “gore-lieth?”
A couple of commenters asked for sites where they could get basic info to oppose the claims of the alarmists. Here are two:
The Skeptics Handbook: http://joannenova.com.au/global-warming/
Dr. Spencer’s GW 101: http://www.drroyspencer.com/2009/12/global-warming-skepticism-101/
Anthony, Mods, everyone,
Can we have an article on Top Ten’s to Debunk the Debunkers? Someone? I’ll have a go writing a piece myself if people email me for such. Trouble is, comments here are getting so long I can’t keep on following them, especially when I’m working on the core science “pebbles” to ensure they are running true.
H’m, five pebbles David had? There’s
(1) Mann’s hockey stick,
(2) the Yamal hockey stick,
(3) the GISS records,
(4) the CRU records, and
(5) the Ice Hockey Stick.
Didn’t know that last one? Have a look here
John Coleman is correct when he said the one thing we have on our side of this Global Warming Hoax is ‘ Truth ‘ , but there is another thing we have and that is our Strength in Numbers .
I got a chill down my spine whlle he was explaining the 6 legs of Goliath . Goliath is quite the opponent and it seems hopeless but in the same breath it really isn’t . What would it be , a few hundred thousand against 5 billion ? You gotta like the odds !
John Coleman KUUUUUUUUSI he’s the local weather guy in S.D.
Looking at the doom and gloom scenario wouldn’t you think that global warming is needed to “decrease the surplus population” that these warmist are shooting for? According to China and Canada that’s what needed, to many people they say.
BTW David when was confronted by Goliath he ran into him, no negotiation here, he just dealt with the giant and was victorious.
“Dear Mods please look out for people boosting the BNP from UK. Socialists as in National Socialist. Maggie’s ‘oxygen of publicity’ definitely applies.”
The last thing I would do is try to boost the BNP, a totally odious party. But Nick Griffin, on this particular occasion, said something I agreed with. I can understand your concern about someone having sinister intentions, but all I can say is that this was not my intent, as I’d hoped I’d made plain when I said that I never thought I’d find myself agreeing with Griffin about something.
BTW, I have found that since the breaking of Climategate, a number of people I used to have little respect for are standing up for the truth – people such as Nigel Lawson and Sarah Palin, for example. I have learnt a lesson from this: that no one is totally wrong, not even your greatest enemy. It strikes me that if the AGW team had also learnt this lesson, Climate science wouldn’t be in the mess it currently is.
Incidentally, my politics are pretty centrist.
I’ve found a 7th leg…. the one the warmists keep pulling.
Thanks, John, for a breath of fresh air.
I remember you as weatherman here in the great city of Chicago. Good to see you battling this Goliath of a scam! I’ll be sharing this with everyone I know.