UPDATE: Thanks to a tip from Willis Eschenbach, there’s some developing news in that story from Dr. James Hansen. The Salon interviewee and book author, Rob Reiss that I quoted, now admits he somehow conflated 40 years with 20 years, and concedes that Dr. Hansen actually said 40 years for his prediction. However, as the newest analysis shows, it doesn’t make any difference, and we still aren’t seeing the magnitude of sea level rise predicted, now 23 years into it.
See the relevant excerpt below:
Michaels also has the facts wrong about a 1988 interview of me by Bob Reiss, in which Reiss asked me to speculate on changes that might happen in New York City in 40 years assuming CO2 doubled in amount. Michaels has it as 20 years, not 40 years, with no mention of doubled CO2. Reiss verified this fact to me, but he later sent the message:
“I went back to my book and re-read the interview I had with you. I am embarrassed to say that although the book text is correct, in remembering our original conversation, during a casual phone interview with a Salon magazine reporter in 2001 I was off in years. What I asked you originally at your office window was for a prediction of what Broadway would look like in 40 years, not 20. But when I spoke to the Salon reporter 10 years later probably because I’d been watching the predictions come true, I remembered it as a 20 year question.“
Source: this update on Dr. Hansen’s personal web page at Columbia University.
In my story, below, I quoted from Reiss here in the Salon interview.
So I’m happy to make the correction for Dr. Hansen in my original article, since Mr. Reiss reports on his original error in conflating 40 years with 20 years. But let’s look at how this changes the situation with forty years versus twenty.
Per Dr. Hansen’s prediction in 1988, now in 2011, 23 years later, we’re a bit over halfway there … so the sea level rise should be about halfway up the side of Manhattan Island by now.
How’s that going? Are the predictions coming true? Let’s find out. Let’s look at the tide gauge in New York and see what it says.
Here’s the PSMSL page http://www.psmsl.org/data/obtaining/stations/12.php
You can see the terrifying surge of acceleration in the sea level due to increasing GHGs in the 20th century. Willis downloaded and plotted the data to see what the slope looked like, and then plotted a linear average line.
Here it is overlaid with the Colorado satellite data. Note the rate of rise is unchanged:
And add to that, the recent peer reviewed paper from the Journal of Coastal Research that said: “worldwide-temperature increase has not produced acceleration of global sea level over the past 100 years”
As of this update in March 2011, we’re 23 years into his prediction of the West Side Highway being underwater. From what I can measure in Google Earth, Dr. Hansen would need at least a ten foot rise in forty years to make his prediction work. See this image below from Google Earth where I placed the pointe over the West Side Highway, near the famous landmark and museum, the USS Intrepid:

The lat/lon should you wish to check yourself is: 40.764572° -73.998498°
Here’s a ground level view (via a tourist photo) so you can see the vertical distance from the roadway to the sea level on that day and tide condition. Sure looks like at least 10 feet to me.

According to the actual data, after 23 years, we’ve seen about a 2.5 inch rise. There’ s still a very long way to go to ten feet to cover the West Side Highway there.
To reach the goal he predicted in 1988, Dr. Hansen needs to motivate the sea to do his bidding, he’s gonna have to kick it in gear and use a higher octane driver if he’s going to get there. – Anthony
The original story is below:
===========================================================
The news today from the Pew Institute tells us that many Americans are backing away from the predictions of catastrophic climate change. This may be because many predictions simply haven’t come true.
Most, if not all, WUWT readers know Dr. James Hansen of GISS. He’s credited with jump starting the debate in 1988 with his now famous “sweaty” testimony before Congress in June 1988. See more about the stagecraft of that event here.

Readers might be tempted to think that I’m going to point out the discrepancies between the three different model scenarios that Dr. Hansen presented to Congress in 1988, as shown below. But these model projections are very well known. I’m talking about something else entirely.

In Dr. Hansen’s case, he’s been living the life of a scientist in the media spotlight since, giving thousands of interviews. He’s also taken on the role of activist during that time, getting himself arrested this year for obstructing a public highway.
He likely doesn’t remember this one interview he gave to a book author approximately 20 years ago, but fortunately that author recounted the interview on Salon.com. What is most interesting about this particular Hansen interview is that he dispenses with the usual models and graphs, and makes predictions about what will happen in 20 years to New York City, right in his own neighborhood. Sea level figures prominently.
Here’s the interview.
In a 2001 interview with author Rob Reiss about his upcoming book “Stormy Weather” Salon.com contributor Suzy Hansen (no apparent relation to Jim Hansen) asks some questions about his long path of research for the book. One of the questions centered around an interview of Dr. James Hansen by Reiss around 1988-1989. Red emphasis mine.
Extreme weather means more terrifying hurricanes and tornadoes and fires than we usually see. But what can we expect such conditions to do to our daily life?
While doing research 12 or 13 years ago, I met Jim Hansen, the scientist who in 1988 predicted the greenhouse effect before Congress. I went over to the window with him and looked out on Broadway in New York City and said, “If what you’re saying about the greenhouse effect is true, is anything going to look different down there in 20 years?” He looked for a while and was quiet and didn’t say anything for a couple seconds. Then he said, “Well, there will be more traffic.” I, of course, didn’t think he heard the question right. Then he explained, “The West Side Highway [which runs along the Hudson River] will be under water. And there will be tape across the windows across the street because of high winds. And the same birds won’t be there. The trees in the median strip will change.” Then he said, “There will be more police cars.” Why? “Well, you know what happens to crime when the heat goes up.”
And so far, over the last 10 years, we’ve had 10 of the hottest years on record.
Didn’t he also say that restaurants would have signs in their windows that read, “Water by request only.”
Under the greenhouse effect, extreme weather increases. Depending on where you are in terms of the hydrological cycle, you get more of whatever you’re prone to get. New York can get droughts, the droughts can get more severe and you’ll have signs in restaurants saying “Water by request only.”
When did he say this will happen?
Within 20 or 30 years. And remember we had this conversation in 1988 or 1989.
Does he still believe these things?
Yes, he still believes everything. I talked to him a few months ago and he said he wouldn’t change anything that he said then.
I’ve saved the Salon.com web page as a PDF also, here, just in case it should be deleted. So not only did Dr. Hansen make the claims in the late 1980’s, he reaffirmed his predictions again in 2001.
The scenario of the interview with Dr. Hansen looking out his window and describing the changes he envisions 20 years into the future is very plausible. As we established yesterday, Dr. Hansen’s NASA GISS office at 2880 Broadway in NYC, has a view of the Hudson River.
Here’s a Google Earth street level view of 2880 Broadway:

Using Google Earth, I can actually fly right up to (what I think is) Dr. Hansen’s window and recreate the view. (Note to anyone who worries, this info about the location is public domain information, published on the NASA GISS office website)
First let’s establish the location in traditional downlooking map style view at put Dr. Hansen’s line of sight on the image:

Here is a close in view, from further east on 112th street, just behind the GISS building looking northwest to the Hudson river. Google’s 3D buildings feature is used to recreate the buildings:

Here’s what the view from Dr. Hansen’s window at GISS looks like:

And finally, here is the view from the Hudson, looking back to the GISS building:

In the recounting of the interview by Rob Reiss, Hansen makes several claims about trees, birds, police cars, and crime. I can’t comment on those as I have no data. What I can comment on is this prediction by Dr. Hansen:
“The West Side Highway [which runs along the Hudson River] will be under water.”
As you can clearly see in the Google Earth images, the West Side Highway remains dry and open. Sea level (at which the Hudson River at that point becomes) is not encroaching on the highway. Note the date on the Google Earth timeline toolbar in the upper left. The aerial imagery was taken approximately 20 years later, on May 12th, 2008.
So much for local climate change predictions by the leading global authority on climate change.
Even if we give Dr. Hansen the benefit of 30 years, I’ll point out that satellite measured rate of change of global sea level has slowed significantly in the last few years, and is not likely to rise enough to meet Dr. Hansen’s prediction even 30 years out. See this story.
In fact using the University of Colorado interactive sea level plotting tool, we can see virtually no trend in the last 20 years:

You can reproduce it here at sealevel.colorado.edu
I wonder what Dr. Hansen thinks when he looks out that window today?

“The West Side Highway [which runs along the Hudson River] will be under water.”
The moronicity of this comment is astounding, but then so is the entire Stern report in this regard.
New Yorkers are just going to watch the water lap over the highway going “Duh, if only someone had invented concrete” ??
Enron was the primary under writer for hansen.
I want water in NYC.. Canals like venice? How romantic. I can take my love on a gondola to Avery fisher hall and hear my teen in concert.
How soon can we have these canals?
The fact is no matter how many failed predictions, model flaws, contradictions, blatant lies, institutional misrepresentations and refutations pile up millions of leftists who joined this movement do NOT care if AGW is real or not.
Their many causes hitching a ride on the AGW train must move forward.
Therefore they will not allow their leaders to be discredited with a loss of credibility and positions of power.
You see they don’t see ANY downside to “implementation”.
Exhibit A.
http://www.realclimate.org/?comments_popup=1345
“I believe there are wonderful solutions to AGW that could lead us into this world. The technology is here. It’s just a matter of implementing it.
For example, we can get greater savings AND freedom by going off the grid with solar and wind and other alt power. We can have the freedom of more choice if affordable electric cars are available (in my area, please). There is the biochar solution. With the more affordable unit ( http://www.youtube.com/user/rechar350#p/a/u/2/kRQuF4d9DBo ), nearly every farm could become more productive and save money while drawing down CO2. City garbage could be made into biochar, etc. And there are a host of other really great solutions that not only save us money, but give us greater freedom. Imagine what marvels we could come up with if more people really put their minds to it. This AGW mitigation project is not only money saving and freedom enhancing, it is spiritually uplifting, mentally and emotionally invigorating and positive.”
Years ago I went sailing near Sandusky Ohio. We passed a McDonalds that had a drive up and also boat docks in the back. I see opportunity. I am not afraid of change. In Asia a lot of housing and commerce is on the water. Awesome opportunity.
The flats in Cleveland have boat docks at the restaurnats. clear lake texas has an on water complex. landry’s. The intercoastal in florida has a lot of water accessible businesses.
To:
Roger Knights (06:32:32) :
for a question on remarks by
Patrick Davis (02:20:01) :
Roger,
I would not presume to speak for Patrick, but (I will anyway!) he may have been talking about the French Chauchat (pronounced Sho-Sho by the Yanks) light machine gun of WWI.
But, the 100,000 dead may be hyperbole.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chauchat
Regards,
Steamboat Jack
Another entry to cross off in the Apocalypse sweepstake. Plenty more predictions where that came from.
Tried to send this via “Tips and Notes”, but it was not working for me. For some reason there was no “Leave a comment box.”
Anthony, you might wish to reword the following statement as seen in the article:
“I’ll point out that satellite measurement of global sea level has slowed significantly in the last few years, and is not likely to rise enough to meet Dr. Hansen’s prediction even 30 years out.”
It appears to say that it’s the MEASUREMENT has slowed down, when I think you mean that the rate of increase in sea level has slowed down.
REPLY: Good catch, I’ve made the appropriate change. – A
The same happened in severe droughts in the west about the time that prediction was made. California had severe drought conditions in 1976-77, and again in the late 1980’s. As mentioned in the second link below, the droughts are believed to be caused by cooliing in the Pacific which reduces precipitation across the western U.S. and may have been responsible for the destruction of the Anasazi civilization in the period from 800-1300 AD. The entire western U.S. is subject to prolonged drought conditions depending on prevailing wind patterns, and the amount of moisture carried off the Pacific by those winds. In Colorado some of our heaviest precipitation comes from Gulf moisture, especially as hurricanes move inland off the gulf. In season where that moisture flow off the gulf fails we have the sort of conditions that can lead to dust bowl conditions if soil erosion by wind is not controlled by proper farm practices. Some of the classic dust bowl pictures were taken in extreme south east Colorado.
See blackblizzard picture in link below.
http://www.weru.ksu.edu/new_weru/multimedia/dustbowl/dustbowlpics.html
California drought
http://geochange.er.usgs.gov/sw/impacts/hydrology/state_fd/cawater1.html
http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2009/05/08/decoding-californias-drought-history/
=============
It was a political decision to use the French Chauchat (probably the worst machinegun ever designed. Parts were so poorly manufactured you could not swap parts from one gun to another because they were selectively assembled to get the guns to work. Meanwhile the American BAR was not issued to our own troops even though it is considered to be one of the best designs of the period (it was still in use in WWII and Korea)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chauchat
Larry
““I wonder what Dr. Hansen thinks when he looks out that window today?””
He can’t see out his window . . . he taped it over so the high winds caused by global warming wouldn’t break the glass.
Hansen is not insane, he is merely a fool.
Using google earth to reproduce the view from his office is pretty funny, but all the pics of his office building, his putative window, the front door… kinda strikes me as a little creepy.
About that graph at the top of the post: the red line was Hansen’s business-as-normal line, right? How have global CO2 emissions risen, compared to the assumptions that drove the red line?
REPLY:I can see your concern but I’m not doing anything that GISS already doesn’t do on their own web page. They give the address and directions to their office, pictures of the building, and even a description of the entrance. See the GISS web page here: http://www.giss.nasa.gov/about/visiting/ I’m simply drawing on that published info to prove a point.
It is a publicly funded institution, its not a private business or residence. Plus the details of what the build looks like and how to get there been made public by them, well before I did. If I hadn’t shown the line of sight it could be argued that “the story was fabricated, Hansen can’t see the Hudson from his office.” – Anthony
“I wonder what Dr. Hansen thinks when he looks out that window today?”
The question makes an unwarranted assumption–specifically, that Dr. Hansen thinks.
Remember that the great eco-activist Ted Danson told us about 12 years ago that we only had 10 years to clean up the oceans or all aquatic life would be gone. Correction: an actor could never come up with “aquatic”… he said “sea-life”.
Duncan,
What is creepy is that from an office perched above what was used as a comedy show backdrop, a very unfunny joke is being perpetrated on the world.
Hansen has not made one correct prediction about climate behavior, yet this government bureaucrat- who has never been seriously interviewed or challenged- is selling massive, costly and injurious policy changes to the US and the world.
The green line was the business as usual case (if I recall correctly) that involved some minor reductions in the growth of CO2 emissions (e.g., higher fuel efficiency, wind power, better heat conservation in buildings, etc.). The red line was the worse case. Hansen in 1988 did not anticipate the strong growth in Asia, particularly China. Thus, the red line is the more applicable case in hindsight despite the fact that today we do have higher energy efficiency for appliances, autos, etc. So, parts of the assumptions behind both the red and green lines are true.
As I have read, Hansen is Gore’s mentor. I have also read that Gore has quite a nice condo on or near the San Francisco waterfront, which he bought fairly recently. Is that true? If it is true then he is not a believer in Hansen’s mantra about sea level rise and warming. Only using Hansen to make money.
Is this proof that Gore knew Hansen was way out there but recognized a good money making scam. Just wondering.
Oh, any Google views of Gore’s digs?
Treaties can always be abrogated, by an act of Congress. They do not in any case supersede the Constitution.
/Mr Lynn
Hansen would be very distressed if he were looking out my window right now. With rain, ice and snow all falling at the same time I can imagine he would be disheartened. This makes it 4 days this month where snow has fallen. Snow in October is not that unusual in Minnesota, but 4 days worth is and we still have a week+ left.
Could someone please send me a little GW, I could use a bunch 😉
I’m just a mere engineer but if my theories are proved wrong I don’t thing the experiment is wrong. I think there may be a flaw in my assumptions or theories.
Of course I’ve designed over a hundred machines that actually perform the function intended.
Ecotretas (23:50:20) :
It would be great if a (sub)site would record all these predictions. Like Prince Charles, WWF, Hansens, etc, who all predict we’ll have something very bad things in x years, or so. Does anybody know of such site, or should we start a new one?
The following site does list many failed predictions and contradictory research so I presume they are keeping an update somewhere. It is updated regularly and even has an archive. The link is very useful should you get into an argument with a warmer. 🙂
http://www.c3headlines.com/predictionsforecasts/
In Hansen’s paper with this illustration he SPECIFICALLY calls Scenario A (red line) “business as usual”, which is why I used it alone in my 1998 testimony that Paul Krugman and Hansen hate so; obviously there was no major change in technology or policy between 1988 and then.
He had blown it eleven years ago, which I pointed out then.
Man! It is about time these Global Warming fruitcakes get told the truth! I was cutting the grass with my wife in June and she turned to me and said, “Ronny it is hotter than a 10 peckered billy goat! I’m pretty sure that Global Warming is here”
I love her so I told her the truth. “No honey, it’s hot because we live in the Everglades, you are 200 pounds overweight and it is high noon.”
She understood and I hope more of these polar bear loving quackers get told the same thing.
It’s hotter because you are fat!!
Ronny Tucker here!
Robert E Phalen: LOL. You have the Irish gift.
Skeptic Tank (04:31:22) :
It is the same restaurant! That is simply amazing to me. What a strange circumstance.
See http://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C1CHMI_enUS331US331&aq=2&oq=seinfeld+res&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=seinfeld+restaurant+new+york+city
Seinfeld was imaginary. Had a setting at 2880 Broadway.
Hansen’s projections were imaginary. Had a setting at 2880 Broadway.
It all fits.