Discoveries from the IBEX satellite show we still don't know quite a few things about the heliosphere and solar system

Voyagers 1 and 2 reached the termination shock in 2005 and 2007, respectively, taking point measurements as they left the solar system. Before IBEX, there was only data from these two points at the edge of the solar system. While exciting and valuable, the data they provided about this region raised more questions than they resolved. IBEX has filled in the entire interaction region, revealing surprising details completely unpredicted by any theories. IBEX completes one all-sky map every six months. IBEX completed the first map of the complex interactions occurring at the edge of the solar system (shown) this summer. (Credit: SwRI via Science Daily)

From the University of Chicago

Satellite reveals surprising cosmic ‘weather’ at edge of solar system

IMAGE: Image from one of the IBEX papers published in the Oct. 16, 2009, issue of Science showing a map of the ribbon of energetic neutral atoms (in green and yellow)…

The first solar system energetic particle maps show an unexpected landmark occurring at the outer edge of the solar wind bubble surrounding the solar system. Scientists published these maps, based mostly on data collected from NASA’s Interstellar Boundary Explorer satellite, in the Oct. 15 issue of Science Express, the advance online version of the journal Science.

“Nature is full of surprises, and IBEX has been lucky to discover one of those surprises,” said Priscilla Frisch, a senior scientist in astronomy & astrophysics at the University of Chicago. “The sky maps are dominated by a giant ribbon of energetic neutral atoms extending throughout the sky in an arc that is 300 degrees long.” Energetic neutral atoms form when hot solar wind ions (charged particles) steal electrons from cool interstellar neutral atoms.

IBEX was launched Oct. 19, 2008, to produce the first all-sky maps of the heliosphere, which reaches far beyond the solar system’s most distant planets. Extending more than 100 times farther than the distance from Earth to the sun, the heliosphere marks the region of outer space subjected to the sun’s particle emissions.

The new maps show how high-speed cosmic particle streams collide and mix at the edge of the heliosphere, said Frisch, who co-authored three of a set of IBEX articles appearing in this week’s Science Express. The outgoing solar wind blows at 900,000 miles an hour, crashing into a 60,000-mile-an-hour “breeze” of incoming interstellar gas.

Revealed in the IBEX data, but not predicted in the theoretical heliosphere simulations of three different research groups, was the ribbon itself, formed where the direction of the interstellar magnetic field draping over the heliosphere is perpendicular to the viewpoint of the sun.

IMAGE: Priscilla Frisch, Senior Scientist in Astronomy & Astrophysics, and member of the science team, Interstellar Boundary Explorer. Collaborating with former UChicago astronomer Thomas F. Adams, she made the first spectrum…

Energetic protons create forces as they move through the magnetic field, and when the protons are bathed in interstellar neutrals, they produce energetic neutral atoms. “We’re still trying to understand this unexpected structure, and we believe that the interstellar magnetic forces are associated with the enhanced ENA production at the ribbon,” Frisch said.

IBEX shows that energetic neutral atoms are produced toward the north pole of the ecliptic (the plane traced by the orbit of the planets around the sun), as well as toward the heliosphere tail pointed toward the constellations of Taurus and Orion. “The particle energies change between the poles and tail, but surprisingly not in the ribbon compared to adjacent locations,” Frisch said.

###

IBEX is the latest in NASA’s series of low-cost, rapidly developed Small Explorers space missions. Southwest Research Institute in San Antonio, Texas, leads and developed the mission with a team of national and international partners. NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md., manages the Explorers Program for NASA’s Science Mission Directorate in Washington.

Citations: N. A. Schwadron, M. Bzowski, G. B. Crew, M. Gruntman, H. Fahr, H. Fichtner, P. C. Frisch, H. O. Funsten, S. Fuselier, J. Heerikhuisen, V. Izmodenov, H. Kucharek, M. Lee, G. Livadiotis, D. J. McComas, E. Moebius, T. Moore, J. Mukherjee, N.V. Pogorelov, C. Prested, D. Reisenfeld, E. Roelof, G.P. Zank, “Comparison of Interstellar Boundary Explorer Observations with 3-D Global Heliospheric Models,” Science Express, Oct. 15, 2009.

H.O. Funsten, F. Allegrini, G.B. Crew, R. DeMajistre, P.C. Frisch, S.A. Fuselier, M. Gruntman, P. Janzen, D.J. McComas, E. Möbius, B. Randol, D.B. Reisenfeld, E.C. Roelof, N.A. Schwadron, “Structures and Spectral Variations of the Outer Heliosphere in IBEX Energetic Neutral Atom Maps,” Science Express, Oct. 15, 2009.

D.J. McComas, F. Allegrini1, P. Bochsler, M. Bzowski, E.R. Christian, G.B.Crew, R. DeMajistre, H. Fahr, H. Fichtner, P.C. Frisch, H.O. Funsten, S. A. Fuselier, G. Gloeckler, M. Gruntman, J. Heerikhuisen, V. Izmodenov, P.J anzen, P. Knappenberger, S. Krimigis, H. Kucharek, M. Lee, G. Livadiotis, S. Livi, R.J. MacDowall, D. Mitchell, E. Möbius, T. Moore, N.V. Pogorelov, D. Reisenfeld, E. Roelof, L. Saul, N.A. Schwadron, P.W. Valek, R. Vanderspek, P. Wurz, G.P. Zank, “Global Observations of the Interstellar Interaction from the Interstellar Boundary Explorer-IBEX”, Science Express, Oct. 15, 2009.

Related links:

Animation shows how energetic neutral atoms are made in the heliosheath when hot solar wind protons grab an electron from a cold interstellar gas atom. The ENAs can then easily travel back into the solar system, where some are collected by IBEX. Credit: NASA/GSFC http://www.swri.org/temp/ibexscience/DM/SP_draft1.mov

Solar Journey: The Significant of Our Galactic Environment for the Heliosphere and Earth, Priscilla C. Frisch, editor. http://www.springer.com/astronomy/practical+astronomy/book/978-1-4020-4397-0

IBEX Web page at Southwest Research Institute http://ibex.swri.edu/

NASA’s Interstellar Boundary Explorer mission http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/ibex/index.html

To view a video related to this research, please visit http://astro.uchicago.edu/%7Efrisch/soljourn/Hanson/AstroBioScene7Sound.mov


Here is another press release on IBEX from Boston University:

IBEX discovers that galactic magnetic fields may control the boundaries of our solar system

NASA mission reveals impact of galaxy’s magnetic fields

(Boston) – The first all-sky maps developed by NASA’s Interstellar Boundary Explorer (IBEX) spacecraft, the initial mission to examine the global interactions occurring at the edge of the solar system, suggest that the galactic magnetic fields had a far greater impact on Earth’s history than previously conceived, and the future of our planet and others may depend, in part, on how the galactic magnetic fields change with time.

“The IBEX results are truly remarkable, with emissions not resembling any of the current theories or models of this never-before-seen region,” says Dr. David J. McComas, IBEX principal investigator and assistant vice president of the Space Science and Engineering Division at Southwest Research Institute. “We expected to see small, gradual spatial variations at the interstellar boundary, some 10 billion miles away. However, IBEX is showing us a very narrow ribbon that is two to three times brighter than anything else in the sky.”

A “solar wind” of charged particles continuously travels at supersonic speeds away from the Sun in all directions. This solar wind inflates a giant bubble in interstellar space called the heliosphere — the region of space dominated by the Sun’s influence in which the Earth and other planets reside. As the solar wind travels outward, it sweeps up newly formed “pickup ions,” which arise from the ionization of neutral particles drifting in from interstellar space. IBEX measures energetic neutral atoms (ENAs) traveling at speeds of roughly half a million to two and a half million miles per hour. These ENAs are produced from the solar wind and pick-up ions in the boundary region between the heliosphere and the local interstellar medium.

The IBEX mission just completed the first global maps of these protective layers called the heliosphere through a new technique that uses neutral atoms like light to image the interactions between electrically charged and neutral atoms at the distant reaches of our Sun’s influence, far beyond the most distant planets. It is here that the solar wind, which continually emanates from the Sun at millions of miles per hour, slams into the magnetized medium of charged particles, atoms and dust that pervades the galaxy and is diverted around the system. The interaction between the solar wind and the medium of our galaxy creates a complex host of interactions, which has long fascinated scientists, and is thought to shield the majority of harmful galactic radiation that reaches Earth and fills the solar system.

“The magnetic fields of our galaxy may change the protective layers of our solar system that regulate the entry of galactic radiation, which affects Earth and poses hazards to astronauts,” says Nathan Schwadron of Boston University’s Center for Space Physics and the lead for the IBEX Science Operations Center at BU.

Each six months, the IBEX mission, which was launched on October 18, 2008, completes its global maps of the heliosphere. The first IBEX maps are strikingly different than any of the predictions, which are now forcing scientists to reconsider their basic assumptions of how the heliosphere is created.

“The most striking feature is the ribbon that appears to be controlled by the magnetic field of our galaxy,” says Schwadron.

Although scientists knew that their models would be tested by the IBEX measurements, the existence of the ribbon is “remarkable” says Geoffrey Crew, a Research Scientist at MIT and the Software Design Lead for IBEX. “It suggests that the galactic magnetic fields are much stronger and exert far greater stresses on the heliosphere than we previously believed.”

The discovery has scientists thinking carefully about how different the heliosphere could be than they expected.

“It was really surprising that the models did not generate features at all like the ribbon we observed,” says Christina Prested, a BU graduate student working on IBEX. “Understanding the ribbon in detail will require new insights into the inner workings of the interactions at the edge of our Sun’s influence in the galaxy.”

Adds Schwadron,”Any changes to our understanding of the heliosphere will also affect how we understand the astrospheres that surround other stars. The harmful radiation that leaks into the solar system from the heliosphere is present throughout the galaxy and the existence of astrospheres may be important for understanding the habitability of planets surrounding other stars.”

###

IBEX is the latest in NASA’s series of low-cost, rapidly developed Small Explorers space missions. Southwest Research Institute in San Antonio, Texas, leads and developed the mission with a team of national and international partners. NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md., manages the Explorers Program for NASA’s Science Mission Directorate in Washington.

The Center for Space Physics at Boston University carries out a wide variety of research in space physics including: space plasma physics, magnetospheric physics, ionospheric physics, atmospheric physics, and planetary and cometary atmospheric studies.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

221 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Richard Patton
October 17, 2009 9:31 pm

Paul Linsay (15:17:24) :
****
Richard Patton (13:17:08) : “This is something which really tests my political philosophy. This was funded via US taxpayer dollars which I believe is unconstitutional”
Probably OK, c.f. Thomas Jefferson funding the Lewis and Clark Expedition for both scientific and commercial purposes.
*****
Ah, yes. I had forgotten about that. I guess that it would be wise to see what the writers of the Constitution thought it meant than to open my mouth and insert foot.

Davido
October 18, 2009 12:08 am

So…models aren’t alway right….hmmm….who knew?
[REPLY – On the other hand, it’s so nice to know they’re never unusable. #B^1 ~ Evan]

Mr. Alex
October 18, 2009 12:11 am

Has anyone else noticed the gradual decline in solar wind velocity over the past 4 months? Is this normal? Solar minimum has passed it’s deepest point…
http://www.solen.info/solar/images/swind1.gif

Paul Vaughan
October 18, 2009 12:53 am

“unexpected” “surprising” “surprisingly”
“[…] than previously conceived”
“It was really surprising that the models did not generate features at all like […] observed”
Another great laugh.

James F. Evans
October 18, 2009 1:11 am

Louis Hissink (14:18:57) :
Hissink wrote: “Charged particles in motion are otherwise known as “electricity”.
These ‘surprises’ are not surprising to those of us involved with the physics of the Plasma Universe.”
From the instant post:
“…[T]he existence of the ribbon is ‘remarkable’ says Geoffrey Crew, a Research Scientist at MIT and the Software Design Lead for IBEX. ‘It suggests that the galactic magnetic fields are much stronger and exert far greater stresses on the heliosphere than we previously believed.’ ”
Yes, electric currents cause magnetic fields.
Welcome to the Plasma Universe.

October 18, 2009 5:26 am

It would be interesting and useful to see Dr. Svalgaard’s view on the subject.
Also: what the HCS role might be if any regarding the ribbon shape, considering that in the area concerned, HCS may be flattened and field aligned ?

October 18, 2009 6:27 am

rbateman (16:09:05) :
“I just wish they would make that 2nd graphic with the solar system plane shown clearly inside of it, and a spot on it where the north pole of the sun strikes it.”
Robert, this graphic may help, I had it posted in my thread elsewhere a year ago (it has been brutally dealt with without any consideration to the many contributors ), but you can find it here:
http://www.nasa.gov/images/content/255884main_STEREO_ENAs_HI.jpg
Dark brown area is approximate ‘ribbon’ location, and the observer is looking into the North pole. Carla might have a better idea of the Earth’s current location, I think it is not far out from the one shown in the graphic.
Article related to it is about a year old, but still very relevant.
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/stereo/news/invisible_frontier.html

October 18, 2009 6:30 am

vukcevic (06:27:17) :
correction: Dark brown points to the approximate ‘ribbon’ location.

rbateman
October 18, 2009 9:29 am

vukcevic (06:27:17) :
Thank you for that graphic.
It really is the originators of the report (IBEX in this case) that need to do this.

Carla
October 18, 2009 10:22 am

vukcevic (05:26:30) :
Also: what the HCS role might be if any regarding the ribbon shape, considering that in the area concerned, HCS may be flattened and field aligned ?
Good point Vuk.
High ENA flux at between 50-60 deg. North latitude. (15-30 deg long.)
http://www.ibex.swri.edu/multimedia/img/datamap2.8-5.6.jpg

James F. Evans
October 18, 2009 10:54 am

Dr. Anthony Peratt in association with the Los Alamos National Laboratory sponsors the Plasma Universe:
http://plasmascience.net/tpu/TheUniverse.html
Dr. Anthony Peratt’s curriculum vitae:
http://www.worldnpa.org/php2/index.php?tab0=Scientists&tab1=Display&id=646

October 18, 2009 11:54 am

Ron de Haan (14:12:59) :
Why is this important? Well, for starters, it resolves the matter of missing neutrinos; the Sun puts out far fewer neutrinos than theory suggests
Manuel’s ‘theory’ is pure nonsense. And there is no neutrino problem. The Sun puts out precisely what theory predicts. With detectors that were only sensitive to electron neutrinos we only saw 1/3 the neutrinos expected. With modern detectors we see all three types and the flux is just as expected. The resolution of the ‘problem’ is that neutrinos change their ‘flavor’ [of which there are there – hence the 1/3] in flight. There is no problem.
vukcevic (05:26:30) :
Also: what the HCS role might be if any regarding the ribbon shape, considering that in the area concerned, HCS may be flattened and field aligned ?
For the zillionth time: Magnetic changes cannot travel upstream in the solar wind. The IBEX data gives us information about the outer heliosphere, not the inner.
James F. Evans (01:11:13) :

Welcome to the Plasma Universe.

Another piece of nonsense. The galactic magnetic field interacts with the plasma of the heliopause and the resulting electric currents deforms the heliosphere, just like for the Earth’s magnetosphere.

October 18, 2009 1:42 pm

Leif Svalgaard (11:54:25) :
“For the zillionth ” (10E3n where n tends to infinity?) “time: Magnetic changes cannot travel upstream in the solar wind. The IBEX data gives us information about the outer heliosphere, not the inner.”
I accept you point about upstream, it isn’t what I had in mind, perhaps my question was not properly phrased.
Quote:” At the boundary of our Solar System, the interactions between solar wind particles and interstellar medium particles create Energetic Neutral Atoms (ENAs), particles with no charge that move very fast”
http://www.ibex.swri.edu/
Dave McComas, IBEX Principal Investigator states “interactions between solar wind particles and interstellar medium particles. ”
According to McComas, the ribbon seems to be full of charged particles, which seem to have been concentrated along its length – but how they got there is a mystery…. The ribbon appears to be produced by the alignment of magnetic fields outside our heliosphere.
I was enquiring if HCS might have role (if any) in forming ‘the ribbon’ along the line of interaction. Considering HCS may be flattened and field aligned, of much reduced strength (due to the radial dispersal), possibly partialy diffused into the stronger galactic magnetic field, giving it the observed alignment.

October 18, 2009 2:45 pm

Dr. Salgaard wrote: “Another piece of nonsense. The galactic magnetic field interacts with the plasma of the heliopause and the resulting electric currents deforms the heliosphere, just like for the Earth’s magnetosphere.”
It’s becoming increasing clear Dr. Svalgaard’s ideas are nonsense.
At least the NASA researchers have the good sense to acknowledge their models were wrong — apparently Dr. Svalgaard doesn’t.
NASA: “Moreover, electric current causes magnetic fields (see Electromagnetism)…”
http://stargazers.gsfc.nasa.gov/resources/electricity.htm
Galactic magnetic fields are caused by galactic electric currents.
Dr. Svalgaard stands up as an old bull of outdated dogma.
The science is passing you by…
Time and additional discoveries will only make that more evident.

Richard
October 18, 2009 5:00 pm

The remotest inhabited place on Earth is the tiny island of Rapa Nui also known as Easter Island. When the Polynesians first settled it around 500 AD it was a lush island filled with gigantic trees. At its heyday there were about 10,000 inhabitants on the island. This was unsustainable and wars and ecological desecration decimated the population. When the Europeans (Dutch) visited them in 1722 there just a few hundred and not a tree grew there.
In 1200 years of isolation the Islanders forgot that they came from somewhere else and thought they were the only people on Earth.
Rapa Nui is a microcosm of the Earth.
We have similarly forgotten, among other things, that our Earth is in fact a tiny island floating in the great ocean of space.
As we float along we encounter space debris, storms and dust from far beyond the frontiers of our island that effect us, sometimes greatly.

October 18, 2009 5:56 pm

Quotation from Physics World:
“According to McComas [IBEX principal investigator], the ribbon seems to be full of charged particles, which seem to have been concentrated along its length –- but how they got there is a mystery.
IBEX data suggest the alignment of the ribbon is related to the local interstellar magnetic field, which could mean that its origins lie outside of the solar system. The ribbon also appears to have a fine structure, suggesting that the ion concentrations vary along its length.”
http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/40676

solrey
October 18, 2009 6:25 pm

Leif Svalgaard (11:54:25) :
Welcome to the Plasma Universe.
Another piece of nonsense. The galactic magnetic field interacts with the plasma of the heliopause and the resulting electric currents deforms the heliosphere, just like for the Earth’s magnetosphere.

Mr. Svalgaard might want to consider these further details obtained in cooperation with Cassini, describing a spherical heliosphere, not an elongated “teardrop”.
http://www.physorg.com/news174908954.html

“These images have revolutionized what we thought we knew for the past 50 years; the sun travels through the galaxy not like a comet but more like a big, round bubble,” said Stamatios Krimigis of the Applied Physics Lab, in Laurel, Md., principal investigator for Cassini’s Magnetospheric Imaging Instrument which carries the Ion and Neutral Camera. “It’s amazing how a single new observation can change an entire concept that most scientists had taken as true for nearly fifty years.”

The Ion and Neutral Camera images suggest that the solar wind’s interaction with the interstellar medium is instead more significantly controlled by particle pressure and magnetic field energy density.
“The map we’ve created from the images suggests that pressure from a hot population of charged particles and interaction with the interstellar medium’s magnetic field strongly influence the shape of the heliosphere,” says Don Mitchell, Magnetospheric Imaging Instrument/Ion and Neutral Camera co-investigator at the Applied Physics Lab.

Taken as a whole, this information about the belt and accompanying stringy ribbon structure, spherical heliosphere, etc., suggests a toroidal ring current surrounding a spherical double layer (heliosheath) within a galactic “Bennett pinch” (indicated by the surrounding charged particle’s high temperature and pressure, and apparently strong magnetic field).
Pretty much expected in Plasma Cosmology/Electric Universe.

Richard
October 18, 2009 10:03 pm

There are discrepancies between the reports from the University of Chicago and from Boston University.
1. Chicago – “The outgoing solar wind blows at 900,000 miles an hour, crashing into a 60,000-mile-an-hour “breeze” of incoming interstellar gas.”
Boston – “..the solar wind, which continually emanates from the Sun at millions of miles per hour, slams into the magnetized medium of charged particles, atoms and dust that pervades the galaxy and is diverted around the system.”
Big difference between the speeds given by the two reports. Also Chicago suggests that the incoming interstellar gas also has a speed of 60,000 mph (relative to what? I wonder)
2. Chicago – “Energetic protons create forces as they move through the [interstellar] magnetic field, and when the protons are bathed in interstellar neutrals, they produce energetic neutral atoms.”
This doesnt sound right. If protons crash against “interstellar neutrals”, whatever they maybe, (Neutrons?), how could they produce neutral atoms? That should only be possible with interactions with electrons or negative ions.
Boston – “As the solar wind travels outward, it sweeps up newly formed “pickup ions,” which arise from the ionization of neutral particles drifting in from interstellar space. IBEX measures energetic neutral atoms (ENAs) traveling at speeds of roughly half a million to two and a half million miles per hour. These ENAs are produced from the solar wind and pick-up ions in the boundary region between the heliosphere and the local interstellar medium.”
That sounds more correct.
As for solrey (18:25:10) quoting ““It’s amazing how a single new observation can change an entire concept that most scientists had taken as true for nearly fifty years.” – One could only be “amazed” if a) one had an original concept, b) one understood the new concept and c) one understood the difference. (Old concept like a comet, New concept like a bubble? hmmm… pretty amazing I guess)

October 19, 2009 12:42 am

vukcevic (13:42:07) :
Quote:” At the boundary of our Solar System, the interactions between solar wind particles and interstellar medium particles create Energetic Neutral Atoms (ENAs), particles with no charge that move very fast”
Why the ENAs when it is about magnetic fields?
I was enquiring if HCS might have role (if any) in forming ‘the ribbon’ along the line of interaction. Considering HCS may be flattened and field aligned, of much reduced strength (due to the radial dispersal), possibly partialy diffused into the stronger galactic magnetic field, giving it the observed alignment.
The HCS does nothing in itself. The fields on either side are involved in the interaction. The HCS begins to dissove at the heliopause as the field is shocked and tangled.
James F. Evans (14:45:04) :
NASA: “Moreover, electric current causes magnetic fields (see Electromagnetism)…”
Galactic magnetic fields are caused by galactic electric currents.

In general, it takes an electric current to create a magnetic field is ordinary life [and that was what NASA’s piece was about].
In cosmic plasmas the magnetic field is the cause of the currents in material moving relative to the magnetic field.
solrey (18:25:10) :
The Ion and Neutral Camera images suggest that the solar wind’s interaction with the interstellar medium is instead more significantly controlled by particle pressure and magnetic field energy density.
Precisely, the magnetic field is responsible for the interaction.
toroidal ring current surrounding a spherical double layer (heliosheath) within a galactic “Bennett pinch” (indicated by the surrounding charged particle’s high temperature and pressure, and apparently strong magnetic field).
As you say, the ring current is generated by the strong magnetic field.

October 19, 2009 4:22 am

Leif Svalgaard (00:42:06) :
The HCS does nothing in itself. The fields on either side are involved in the interaction. The HCS begins to dissolve at the heliopause as the field is shocked and tangled.
Ok, but that may not be certainty, since all predictions about this area are not coming to fruition.
Let’s consider following scenario: magnetic field is carried by charged particles creating a field aligned current, so it can be assumed the same applies to the galactic charged particles flow (very distant from the source). Two ‘field aligned currents’ flowing in the same direction (in this case skirting along boundary of heliosphere, solar from within, galactic from without) will attract each other. This would allow mixing and neutralising of particles, as well as the abundance of leftover (non-neutralised) particles, but only in the areas where remaining parts of solar wind skirt the boundary, hence ribbon appearance.
This would explain :” the ribbon seems to be full of charged particles, which seem to have been concentrated along its length – but how they got there is a mystery…”
I am inclined to believe that interaction is from the HCS, since it is a ‘ribbon shaped’ rather than due to faster polar solar wind, in which case it would be a much wider spread. If so, as one of discoverers of the HCS, your contribution to science might be further enhanced (just trying to swing around your judgment).

solrey
October 19, 2009 5:42 am

Mr. Svalgaard, I think you forgot one important detail,

The map we’ve created from the images suggests that pressure from a hot population of charged particles and interaction with the interstellar medium’s magnetic field strongly influence the shape of the heliosphere.

that detail is “pressure from a hot population of charged particles…” in addition to the magnetic field influencing the spherical shape of the heliosphere.
(it’s not just a band of ENA’s that was discovered)
They have also described filaments of charged particles in the ribbon/belt, which are field aligned electric currents, a.k.a. Birkeland currents.
Mr. Svalgaard, when you say,

Precisely, the magnetic field is responsible for the interaction.

As you say, the ring current is generated by the strong magnetic field.

you seem to fail to consider the other half of the equation…the charged particles in the surrounding interstellar medium.
I’m curious about your thoughts on the spherical shape of the heliosphere, which prompted the declaration, “These images have revolutionized what we thought we knew for the past 50 years.”.
peace

October 19, 2009 8:34 am

vukcevic (04:22:21) :
Ok, but that may not be certainty, since all predictions about this area are not coming to fruition.
Is an invalid argument, especially the word ‘all’.
Let’s consider following scenario: magnetic field is carried by charged particles creating a field aligned current
The current [in the HCS] is perpendicular to the magnetic field. So all the rest is moot.
I am inclined to believe that interaction is from the HCS, since it is a ‘ribbon shaped’ rather than due to faster polar solar wind, in which case it would be a much wider spread.
Perhaps clean up the sentence as it is ungrammatical to the point of not being comprehensible.
http://www.leif.org/research/HCS3.png [b] shows a vertical cut through the HCS, and http://www.leif.org/research/HCS-Movie-hi.gif shows a movie of the speed structure [which is tied to the HCS – where the speed is low].
solrey (05:42:18) :
Mr. Svalgaard, I think you forgot one important detail,
that detail is “pressure from a hot population of charged particles…”

There is a misconception here [and an important one]. The ISM and the solar wind are both electrically neutral, as is a plasma in general. The pressure has nothing to do with the electrical properties of the medium. It comes from the gas bing hot. The same process takes place around the Earth where the pressure of the particles in the solar wind is balancing the pressure of the Earth’s magnetic field.
I’m curious about your thoughts on the spherical shape of the heliosphere, which prompted the declaration, “These images have revolutionized what we thought we knew for the past 50 years.”.
There is the usual NASA hype here. The shape of the heliosphere is determined by the pressure balance between the ISM and the solar wind and the solar wind moves 20 times faster than the relative speed of the Sun and the ISM, so will be the determining factor, so one would not expect a long comet-like tail. Especially not, since the interstellar magnetic field is not aligned with the direction in which the Sun is moving.

October 19, 2009 8:48 am

It seems that there are two currents, one going out and the other coming in. Is this so?

October 19, 2009 9:14 am

vukcevic (04:22:21) :
Let’s consider following scenario: magnetic field is carried by charged particles creating a field aligned current
The current [in the HCS] is perpendicular to the magnetic field. So all the rest is moot.
Let me elaborate a bit on this. The HMF is not created by the HCS, rather, the HMF maintains the HCS due to gyrations of the particles. The HCS is thus a purely local phenomenon: there is no large-scale heliospheric electric current system keeping everything neatly organized. When the magnetic field becomes weak enough that the gyro radius becomes so large compared to the irregularities in the field [termination shock], the HCS begins to break down and dissolve.

October 19, 2009 9:40 am

Adolfo Giurfa (08:48:20) :
It seems that there are two currents, one going out and the other coming in. Is this so?
So, not really. The HCS is a ‘drift current’ and need not close in the same manner as a ‘battery’ current. A similar thing happens with the equatorial Ring Current in the Earth’s magnetosphere. It is caused by particles drifting in the inhomogeneous magnetic field.