In an announcement sure to cause controversy over Svensmark’s theory of cosmic ray to cloud modulation, which is said to be affecting earth’s climate. Svensmark says this is now leading to a global cooling phase. Just a couple of weeks after Svensmark’s bold announcement, NASA has announced that we have hit a new record high in Galactic Cosmic Rays, GCR’s. Apparently, Nature is conducting a grand experiment. – Anthony

From NASA News: Cosmic Rays Hit Space Age High
Planning a trip to Mars? Take plenty of shielding. According to sensors on NASA’s ACE (Advanced Composition Explorer) spacecraft, galactic cosmic rays have just hit a Space Age high.
“In 2009, cosmic ray intensities have increased 19% beyond anything we’ve seen in the past 50 years,” says Richard Mewaldt of Caltech. “The increase is significant, and it could mean we need to re-think how much radiation shielding astronauts take with them on deep-space missions.”
The cause of the surge is solar minimum, a deep lull in solar activity that began around 2007 and continues today. Researchers have long known that cosmic rays go up when solar activity goes down. Right now solar activity is as weak as it has been in modern times, setting the stage for what Mewaldt calls “a perfect storm of cosmic rays.”
“We’re experiencing the deepest solar minimum in nearly a century,” says Dean Pesnell of the Goddard Space Flight Center, “so it is no surprise that cosmic rays are at record levels for the Space Age.”

Galactic cosmic rays come from outside the solar system. They are subatomic particles–mainly protons but also some heavy nuclei–accelerated to almost light speed by distant supernova explosions. Cosmic rays cause “air showers” of secondary particles when they hit Earth’s atmosphere; they pose a health hazard to astronauts; and a single cosmic ray can disable a satellite if it hits an unlucky integrated circuit.
The sun’s magnetic field is our first line of defense against these highly-charged, energetic particles. The entire solar system from Mercury to Pluto and beyond is surrounded by a bubble of solar magnetism called “the heliosphere.” It springs from the sun’s inner magnetic dynamo and is inflated to gargantuan proportions by the solar wind. When a cosmic ray tries to enter the solar system, it must fight through the heliosphere’s outer layers; and if it makes it inside, there is a thicket of magnetic fields waiting to scatter and deflect the intruder.
“At times of low solar activity, this natural shielding is weakened, and more cosmic rays are able to reach the inner solar system,” explains Pesnell.
Mewaldt lists three aspects of the current solar minimum that are combining to create the perfect storm:
- The sun’s magnetic field is weak. “There has been a sharp decline in the sun’s interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) down to only 4 nanoTesla (nT) from typical values of 6 to 8 nT,” he says. “This record-low IMF undoubtedly contributes to the record-high cosmic ray fluxes.”
- The solar wind is flagging. “Measurements by the Ulysses spacecraft show that solar wind pressure is at a 50-year low,” he continues, “so the magnetic bubble that protects the solar system is not being inflated as much as usual.” A smaller bubble gives cosmic rays a shorter-shot into the solar system. Once a cosmic ray enters the solar system, it must “swim upstream” against the solar wind. Solar wind speeds have dropped to very low levels in 2008 and 2009, making it easier than usual for a cosmic ray to proceed.
- The current sheet is flattening. Imagine the sun wearing a ballerina’s skirt as wide as the entire solar system with an electrical current flowing along the wavy folds. That is the “heliospheric current sheet,” a vast transition zone where the polarity of the sun’s magnetic field changes from plus (north) to minus (south). The current sheet is important because cosmic rays tend to be guided by its folds. Lately, the current sheet has been flattening itself out, allowing cosmic rays more direct access to the inner solar system.
The heliospheric current sheet is shaped like a ballerina’s skirt. Credit: J. R. Jokipii, University of Arizona
“If the flattening continues as it has in previous solar minima, we could see cosmic ray fluxes jump all the way to 30% above previous Space Age highs,” predicts Mewaldt.
Earth is in no great peril from the extra cosmic rays. The planet’s atmosphere and magnetic field combine to form a formidable shield against space radiation, protecting humans on the surface. Indeed, we’ve weathered storms much worse than this. Hundreds of years ago, cosmic ray fluxes were at least 200% higher than they are now. Researchers know this because when cosmic rays hit the atmosphere, they produce an isotope of beryllium, 10Be, which is preserved in polar ice. By examining ice cores, it is possible to estimate cosmic ray fluxes more than a thousand years into the past. Even with the recent surge, cosmic rays today are much weaker than they have been at times in the past millennium.
“The space era has so far experienced a time of relatively low cosmic ray activity,” says Mewaldt. “We may now be returning to levels typical of past centuries.”
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
It is not only the peak level that is important but also the duration of the peak . . . . and we’re seeing a lot of duration!!
These new measurements complete the picture that I made about four years ago:
http://www.biocab.org/ICR_and_Temperature_Histogram.jpg
Interesting!
Unfortunately it would be much more useful to this argument (either way you see it) if that graph on GCE’s extended back into the 1990s. As it stands now, hard to say what it correlates to.
Might this be an opportunity for comment on the earth’s weakening MF and such?
Antarctic sea ice extent also just hit a record high. Correlation is not necessarily causation, but it’s there, none the less.
Just help me out here!
What did David Archibald say about cosmic ray levels?
Nature is conducting a grand experiment and we have the front seat row watching it.
Great times.
“Unfortunately it would be much more useful to this argument (either way you see it) if that graph on GCE’s extended back into the 1990s. As it stands now, hard to say what it correlates to.”
Check out:
http://cosmicrays.oulu.fi/
They’ve got data back to 1964!
I look forward too, to results from the CLOUD experiment at CERN…
http://public.web.cern.ch/Public/en/Research/CLOUD-en.html
News Flash: Everything goes pear shaped in the AGW camp. Popcorn available in the lobby.
High since when? LOL we often forget how old the earth really is.
It’s the first time we have had instruments that can read the cosmic rays, this whole sun cycle falls into that magnificent category, scientists everywhere should be celebrating what we can see, and learn. It is fascinating what science nature has chose to display for our watchful eyes.
It’s a great time …
“Svensmark’s theory of cosmic ray to cloud modulation,”
A four minute video synopsis of that :
So, this ultra-deep solar minimum and its incredible effect on temperatures… The confusing thing is that the global average temperature from 2004-2008 is slightly higher than the global average temperature of 1999-2003, which was over the solar maximum. Puzzling, eh?
For those who have missed this video, which has been posted several times here at WattsUpWithThat, here is a 50 minute documentary in 5 parts at YouTube giving more detail of Henrik Svensmark’s theory.
Henrik Svensmark is in much of the documentary.
The article states that “hundreds” of years ago, cosmic ray flux was twice what it is today. Does anyone know offhand the actual dates and whether this coincided with the Little Ice Age? I would guess so, just because of the very deep solar minimum we know occurred at the time which should have caused a steep increase in cosmic rays. The quotation is vague on this point, however.
Does anyone know what the lag time between Nuetron count & effect on temps should be according to Svensmark?
Anyone have a link to data / graphs to show?
Anyone have a link to data / graph of Be10 data – plotted with re-constructured temperature data?
Hundreds of years ago, cosmic ray fluxes were at least 200% higher than they are now
And just what were global temperatures like those “hundreds of years ago”?
“…. it is 90% certain that this Unprecendented Crisis of Increasing Cosmic Radiation is due to Human Industrial Activity and Human reliance on Fossil Fuels….”
“…. Cosmic Rays fried all my Chickens eggs….”
“…. Dangerous Cosmic Rays are a threat to Polar Habitats and could well cause the extinction of the Polar Bear…”
“…. Giving access to cheap energy to humans has caused a machine-gun like increase in shooting Cosmic Rays striking the Earth…”
“…. Increasing Cosmic Rays due to Human Activity will cause the Oceans to Acidify and fish populations to die out…”
“…. Increasing Cosmic Rays will cause increased desertification that will accelerate mass starvation….”
“…. Increasing Cosmic Rays will cause increased flooding that will accelerate mass starvation….”
“…. In the future, only a small number of human “breeding pairs” will survive in Caves, out of reach of dangerous levels of Cosmic Radiation…”
“…. Permanently increased Cosmic Ray Levels will cause migrating birds to lose their sense of direction. The birds will dies out, and the insects that they eat will increase into plagues that devastate Human crop production…”
“…. Increased use by Humans of easily accessible fossil fuel resources will cause a Cosmic Ray Tipping point to be reached that causes Cosmic Rays to increase exponentially until all life is wiped from the surface of the Earth. This is known as the – Microwave Effect – …”
“…. Al Gores new Scientific Documentary – An Inconvenient Ray – has been mandated from classrooms across the nation…”
“…. The fringe of mediocre scientific dinosaurs and Internet Bloggers still clings to the belief that variation in Cosmic Rays is driven by natural forces such as the Sun…”
“…. It is well known that Fossil Fuel Industry Groups are funding Cosmic Ray Mis-Information Campaigns in an effort to divert attention away from their criminal use and purveyance of fossil fuels…”
“…. Only a Global Governance Solution can solve a global crisis of such unprecendented proportions as the Human Induced Microwave Effect (HIME)…”
“…. It has been deemed that a global tax on human energy use will be used to fund the creation of a transnational United Nations Organisation to ensure that the World Economy is shifted to safe forms of Energy and that the Catastrophy of the Human Induced Microwave Effect is averted…”
/parody off
Hell, I got paid today. I think I’ll tip Anthony!
I could have sworn Leif said the counts were dropping months ago….
tarpon (16:24:14) :
It’s a great time …
Agreed Tarpon. But there are those that wish ill for mankind; for those others but not themselves.
RW (16:42:29) :
So, this ultra-deep solar minimum
It isn’t an ‘ultra-deep’ minimum, it’s a normal depth minimum of longer duration than normal.
hi, as far as i can tell various papers suggest that high be levels and low temps , high cosmic rays and solar minimums are suggested from at least the dome fuji ice core sample: Ice core record of 10be over the past millenium from Dome fuji, Antartica: A new proxyrecord of past solar actvity and a powerful tool for sstratigraphic dating
Well it might also be interesting to follow what happens with ozone holes to see if higher levels of cosmic rays striking the earth lead to more ozone manufacture.
Ozone holes have fluctuated for eons and the sun’s effective color temperature has varied as a result of the short wave solar spectrum changes resulting from ozoner holes (ground level insolation).
Well we shall see. I think we have a race between Gaia, and Obama to see who can destroy the most first.
Jeff L-
Look on page 3 for graphs of Be10, C14, and temperature proxies back through the Little Ice Age.
http://aps.arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0804/0804.1938v1.pdf
I think we are seeing the start of the truly troubling effects. Look at the current hemispheric pattern in the NH. Way out of whack. Winter will start soon.