Electrical circuit runs entirely off power in trees
From the University of Washington by Hannah Hickey hickeyh@u.washington.edu
![]() |
| University of Washington |
| Electrical engineers Babak Parviz and Brian Otis and undergraduate student Carlton Himes (right to left) demonstrate a circuit that runs entirely off tree power. |
You’ve heard about flower power. What about tree power? It turns out that it’s there, in small but measurable quantities. There’s enough power in trees for University of Washington researchers to run an electronic circuit, according to results to be published in an upcoming issue of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers’ Transactions on Nanotechnology.”As far as we know this is the first peer-reviewed paper of someone powering something entirely by sticking electrodes into a tree,” said co-author Babak Parviz, a UW associate professor of electrical engineering.
A study last year from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology found that plants generate a voltage of up to 200 millivolts when one electrode is placed in a plant and the other in the surrounding soil. Those researchers have since started a company developing forest sensors that exploit this new power source.
The UW team sought to further academic research in the field of tree power by building circuits to run off that energy. They successfully ran a circuit solely off tree power for the first time.
Co-author Carlton Himes, a UW undergraduate student, spent last summer exploring likely sites. Hooking nails to trees and connecting a voltmeter, he found that bigleaf maples, common on the UW campus, generate a steady voltage of up to a few hundred millivolts.
The UW team next built a device that could run on the available power. Co-author Brian Otis, a UW assistant professor of electrical engineering, led the development of a boost converter, a device that takes a low incoming voltage and stores it to produce a greater output. His team’s custom boost converter works for input voltages of as little as 20 millivolts (a millivolt is one-thousandth of a volt), an input voltage lower than any existing such device. It produces an output voltage of 1.1 volts, enough to run low-power sensors.
|
The UW circuit is built from parts measuring 130 nanometers and it consumes on average just 10 nanowatts of power during operation (a nanowatt is one billionth of a watt).
“Normal electronics are not going to run on the types of voltages and currents that we get out of a tree. But the nanoscale is not just in size, but also in the energy and power consumption,” Parviz said.
“As new generations of technology come online,” he added, “I think it’s warranted to look back at what’s doable or what’s not doable in terms of a power source.”
Despite using special low-power devices, the boost converter and other electronics would spend most of their time in sleep mode in order to conserve energy, creating a complication.
“If everything goes to sleep, the system will never wake up,” Otis said.
To solve this problem Otis’ team built a clock that runs continuously on 1 nanowatt, about a thousandth the power required to run a wristwatch, and when turned on operates at 350 millivolts, about a quarter the voltage in an AA battery. The low-power clock produces an electrical pulse once every few seconds, allowing a periodic wakeup of the system.
The tree-power phenomenon is different from the popular potato or lemon experiment, in which two different metals react with the food to create an electric potential difference that causes a current to flow.
“We specifically didn’t want to confuse this effect with the potato effect, so we used the same metal for both electrodes,” Parviz said.
Tree power is unlikely to replace solar power for most applications, Parviz admits. But the system could provide a low-cost option for powering tree sensors that might be used to detect environmental conditions or forest fires. The electronic output could also be used to gauge a tree’s health.
“It’s not exactly established where these voltages come from. But there seems to be some signaling in trees, similar to what happens in the human body but with slower speed,” Parviz said. “I’m interested in applying our results as a way of investigating what the tree is doing. When you go to the doctor, the first thing that they measure is your pulse. We don’t really have something similar for trees.”
Other co-authors are Eric Carlson and Ryan Ricchiuti of the UW. The research was funded in part by the National Science Foundation.
###




Perhaps this could be used to develop a new set of temperature sensors with an autorecorder, perhaps a flash drive, that could be downloaded periodically. Would this fit with the siting requirements of NOAA?
Hmm, if a tree rings in the forest, who picks up?
Please don’t stereotype tree huggers.
Some of us are global warming skeptics.
Mike McMillan (02:26:33) :
I always suspected it took electricity to make a tree ring.
Fantastic!
F Rasmin (02:27:39) :
‘Nature’ works with a minimum cost for survival. Tapping the electricity of a tree could require the tree to try to compensate for the loss thereby reducing its chances for survival.
F Rasmin (02:32:04) :
PS ‘minimum’ is actually the ‘maximum’ that a tree can devote without calling upon other resources neccessary for its survival.
Ummmmm….. so you think we’ve never done this in tha past with any plants?
Rubber trees?
Maple trees?
Opium poppies?
Need I go on? We are very, very good at ectracting what we want from plants and keep them very, very much alive. Because of that we have loads of:
rubber
elastic
maple syrup
heroin
‘scuse fat fingers
Curious. I remember reading a couple decades ago research that found electrical impulses in plants that looked like a slowed down neuronal impulse. (It was part of a larger topic of plant communication looking into how when one plant is attacked by a pest it and neighboring plants produce the same defensive reactions. Most of that was a chemical transport by air and ground, the neuron-analog was more of a curiousity.)
Let’s see, here are a couple recent sources. Ah, keyword neurobiology. There’s a lot of stuff at http://www.plantbehavior.org/ but maybe not relevant to this topic.
This may be a bit of a wacko source, hmm, maybe okay. Expensive book. http://books.google.com/books?id=IH9N4SKWTokC&pg=PA19&lpg=PA19&dq=plant+neuron+communication&source=bl&ots=TezladlI5s&sig=Q9elUvSh-g90skFUZxxUxz3K4Vk&hl=en&ei=DbKnSr-FKpSalAfr_s2AAQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3#v=onepage&q=plant%20neuron%20communication&f=false Don’t be surprised if that URL fails, it’s from searching for plant neuron communication. Ah, I can copy the overview:
Also, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6T2K-4RRFNGF-2&_user=10&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_searchStrId=1005864006&_rerunOrigin=google&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=14d5443ad94601fc820d17a24f7d65f2 says:
It all seems like a lot of work for a tiny amount of power. I wonder if they might do better with a piezoelectric device that converts energy from wind and diurnal movements of branches. Even a small solar cell might be better, though likely more expensive.
@ur momisugly sequoiatreehugger (06:40:24) :
“Please don’t stereotype tree huggers.
Some of us are global warming skeptics.”
Well that’s good to know. Btw, I own several thousand trees. I’m also a woodworker, so I cut them down as needed. Trees are a renewable resource to be used, not worshipped.
What happens when lighting strikes?
@ur momisugly Ric Werme (07:08:59) :
Ric, thanks for the feedback. If it leads to improved yields, etc. then good. I know basic plant research has been of great value in that, but to focus research on power generation from plants seems a bit silly to me, unless it can be enhanced to more efficiently and economically zap the many pests that destroy valuable crops, than present methods.
Why not to use artificial trees instead?
Look at this: http://www.giurfa.com/artrees.html
Ron de Haan (07:29:41) :
What happens when lighting strikes?
That’s a very interesting question. What about the electric capacity?
Yes, and I had a crystal radio when I was a kid. So what?
I wonder if the tree is acting as an antenna for environmental Electro-magnetism? Turn off the hi tension wires and radio/tv/cell towers in the area and poof, there goes your signal.
Ruth (02:45:31) :
There are several types of electrolytic cells and one of them is well known… the two different metals in a common electrolyte. Another is when you use the same metal but with different electrolytes. You just need a conductivity bridge or a membrane to separate them. The different environments around the electrodes will generate the difference of potential. To illustrate this you can even use the same electrodes in the same electrolytes (also separated by a membrane of a conductivity bridge but at different concentrations. That too will generate a difference of potential.
Under those same principles, you could stick an electrode in your a$$ and another one in your mouth and get a difference of potential.
I don’t think that guy will get a Nobel Price for this… on the other hand, they gave one to Al Gore… so it’s possible after all that he will get one.
>There seems to be some signaling in trees, similar to what happens in the human body
They better be careful with this technology. The talking trees might go to war.
What a crock; when I was eight years old I was powering electronic circuits with electrodes stuck in apples, oranges, lemons, pears, rhubarb, probably bananas, and maybe some fruit I have forgotten about; many of which grow on trees. I’m sure I tried passion friut and Chinese gooseberries (Kiwi to you); but those two grow on vines.
Can I get a PhD this long after doing my research ?
Can you get an Obamaloan to stick nails in the trees in your yard. Hopefully this paper will derive an AlGorythm for computing the horsepower versus tree height or weight, so we can figure out how big a tree we need to power our houses.
Sounds more interesting to me that Steve Chu’s microbe/yeast power plant.
George
Wow! Just think, this finding will someday be very important to the Christmas Tree farmers of America. With advances in electronics and genetic modifications of Balsam firs, Douglas firs and the spruces and pines, live trees will come self -lighting. A new meaning for “lit up like a Christmas tree”!
George E. Smith (09:46:28) :
The article makes it clear they are not doing what you did:
The tree-power phenomenon is different from the popular potato or lemon experiment, in which two different metals react with the food to create an electric potential difference that causes a current to flow.
What you did generated much more power, but at the expense of the electrodes,
not so much the electrolyte in the fruit.
The most efficient electrolytic substance, for a variety of reasons, is beer. What we need is more beer. I’ve been saying this for years. Truly the best solution. It’s time to jump on the beer wagon for the salvation of the planet.
Tesla, IIRC, demonstrated electrical power flows between earth and air, varying with altitude, among other things. Commercial amounts of power have yet to be extracted. Almost equal areas of a tree are in the ground and in the air. Might the potential discovered be little more than the voltage drop across the tree’s resistance in the air/ground circuit?
Fred Harwood (11:55:44) : You are right. Go to the link I gave in my post above: Nogw (08:15:06) :
I recall reading that Edison had a water pump which pumped a small amount of water to a tank on the roof of his house whenever someone opened his gate. What a great idea.
Just attach generators to the turnstiles where there are turnstiles, and put turnstiles where there aren’t any at present. People going through the turnstiles would generate lots of electricity if the turnstiles were connected to generators.
Then too, we could make it so sidewalks were constructed of separate sections which could go up and down a bit when walked on, and the up and down movement, as people walked on them could be used to generate electricity.
No end to possibilities. I wonder how much power blinking eyelids could generate.
I hear Current Bushes are the best sources.
I carry a spare fern for my phone when I travel..
Groan….
@ur momisugly Mike D. (11:34:45) :
“The most efficient electrolytic substance, for a variety of reasons, is beer. What we need is more beer. I’ve been saying this for years. Truly the best solution. It’s time to jump on the beer wagon for the salvation of the planet.”
I’ll drink to that. In fact there’s some evidence that Noah and family survived the biblical flood on beer (assuming you buy that story ). It’s full of nutrition and the alcohol kills germs. Much better than drinking dirty river water full of whatever. We’re not talking the watered down AB beer here, but full bodied REAL beer. 🙂
Watch out or the trees will attack. Just ask M. Knight Shyamalan (The Happening)… 8^)