Electrical circuit runs entirely off power in trees
From the University of Washington by Hannah Hickey hickeyh@u.washington.edu
![]() |
| University of Washington |
| Electrical engineers Babak Parviz and Brian Otis and undergraduate student Carlton Himes (right to left) demonstrate a circuit that runs entirely off tree power. |
You’ve heard about flower power. What about tree power? It turns out that it’s there, in small but measurable quantities. There’s enough power in trees for University of Washington researchers to run an electronic circuit, according to results to be published in an upcoming issue of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers’ Transactions on Nanotechnology.”As far as we know this is the first peer-reviewed paper of someone powering something entirely by sticking electrodes into a tree,” said co-author Babak Parviz, a UW associate professor of electrical engineering.
A study last year from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology found that plants generate a voltage of up to 200 millivolts when one electrode is placed in a plant and the other in the surrounding soil. Those researchers have since started a company developing forest sensors that exploit this new power source.
The UW team sought to further academic research in the field of tree power by building circuits to run off that energy. They successfully ran a circuit solely off tree power for the first time.
Co-author Carlton Himes, a UW undergraduate student, spent last summer exploring likely sites. Hooking nails to trees and connecting a voltmeter, he found that bigleaf maples, common on the UW campus, generate a steady voltage of up to a few hundred millivolts.
The UW team next built a device that could run on the available power. Co-author Brian Otis, a UW assistant professor of electrical engineering, led the development of a boost converter, a device that takes a low incoming voltage and stores it to produce a greater output. His team’s custom boost converter works for input voltages of as little as 20 millivolts (a millivolt is one-thousandth of a volt), an input voltage lower than any existing such device. It produces an output voltage of 1.1 volts, enough to run low-power sensors.
|
The UW circuit is built from parts measuring 130 nanometers and it consumes on average just 10 nanowatts of power during operation (a nanowatt is one billionth of a watt).
“Normal electronics are not going to run on the types of voltages and currents that we get out of a tree. But the nanoscale is not just in size, but also in the energy and power consumption,” Parviz said.
“As new generations of technology come online,” he added, “I think it’s warranted to look back at what’s doable or what’s not doable in terms of a power source.”
Despite using special low-power devices, the boost converter and other electronics would spend most of their time in sleep mode in order to conserve energy, creating a complication.
“If everything goes to sleep, the system will never wake up,” Otis said.
To solve this problem Otis’ team built a clock that runs continuously on 1 nanowatt, about a thousandth the power required to run a wristwatch, and when turned on operates at 350 millivolts, about a quarter the voltage in an AA battery. The low-power clock produces an electrical pulse once every few seconds, allowing a periodic wakeup of the system.
The tree-power phenomenon is different from the popular potato or lemon experiment, in which two different metals react with the food to create an electric potential difference that causes a current to flow.
“We specifically didn’t want to confuse this effect with the potato effect, so we used the same metal for both electrodes,” Parviz said.
Tree power is unlikely to replace solar power for most applications, Parviz admits. But the system could provide a low-cost option for powering tree sensors that might be used to detect environmental conditions or forest fires. The electronic output could also be used to gauge a tree’s health.
“It’s not exactly established where these voltages come from. But there seems to be some signaling in trees, similar to what happens in the human body but with slower speed,” Parviz said. “I’m interested in applying our results as a way of investigating what the tree is doing. When you go to the doctor, the first thing that they measure is your pulse. We don’t really have something similar for trees.”
Other co-authors are Eric Carlson and Ryan Ricchiuti of the UW. The research was funded in part by the National Science Foundation.
###




Maybe a grove could power a cell phone tower??
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
I remember that they sold clocks in the 80ies that were running on lemons
“similar to what happens in the human body but with slower speed”
Then stick ’em in humans…. Just imagine the power you could harness off the obese.
“There seems to be some signaling in trees, similar to what happens in the human body”
Trees got brains?
What’s with this ‘peer-reviewed’ prefix ?
The godamn device either works or it doesn’t work.
Next up: peer-reviewed sports results followed by an advert for a peer-reviewed sandwich-maker.
I find it works better if you put electricity into the electrodes, then add air to the wood…
A bit of sparking and PRESTO, lots of thermal power 😉
So, there are 5,967 quintrillion trees and shrubs on Earth, and each produces .002+V constantly.
Let’s wire each tree and shrub up in series, and we will have an electrical energy potential (pardon the pun) far surpassing all of the greenhouse poison gas producing coal-fired death station generation in existence.
Think of the children!
Why can’t we do this, right now? It must frighten Big Oil.
This is the third thread in recent weeks where I have read it and thought ‘but I knew that years ago.’
Fifty years ago our teacher did a similar experiment with some of the trees in the school grounds. As a class we also built our own clocks powered by a potato (the poor kids) and lemons (the rich kids).
It seems that as a society we forget the things that happened in the past-like previous civilisations that had temperatures warmer than todays.
tonyb
‘Then stick ‘em in humans…. Just imagine the power you could harness off the obese.’
isn’t that the plot of The Matrix ?
Might as well use power from trees. The Solar Panel market is all backed up on account of nobody has the money to buy them. Goodbye green jobs.
China can produce them much cheaper than the US, so goodbye Solar Panel industry.
Does this come in a kit?
E.M.Smith (01:48:04) :
I can’t see my monitor… it won’t hold still and I can’t stop laughing.
Oh Jeez.
I always suspected it took electricity to make a tree ring.
‘Nature’ works with a minimum cost for survival. Tapping the electricity of a tree could require the tree to try to compensate for the loss thereby reducing its chances for survival.
PS ‘minimum’ is actually the ‘maximum’ that a tree can devote without calling upon other resources neccessary for its survival.
The lemon, potato or tree (as I understand it) just provides the electrolyte (a liquid that conducts electrical charges). The actual energy comes from difference in potential between the two different metal electrodes which slowly get used up (as in a battery) – so any energy that you get out was put in by refining the metals in the first place.
You have to ask – what is being used up (hint – not the tree)?
I wonder if they are using copper nails, hopefully for the trees they aren’t.
oops – I see they used the same metals for the tree experiment – ok! But the lemon and potato clocks use different ones.
I rather suspect the tree will react over time, probably encysting the electrode?
I notice they used electrodes of similar material to avoid setting up an electrode potential (like the Daniel cell – copper and zinc) but there are other effects giving rise to potential differences such as ionic concentrations in the half cell and very importantly oxygen concentration. Even differences in temperature have an effect.
E=E0-RT/zF*ln(a1/a2)
Never mind the volts, what about the amps?
And anyone know the voltage potential of a grape vine? I can see an eco-power campaign based on bad puns and cheap French vineyards here, and with sufficient envirosubsidies, free booze for visitors!
Link to the original article.
http://uwnews.org/article.asp?articleID=51869
lol a nanowatt, boys better get cranking spiking those trees, you might generate a few watts by 2100 AD.
Atomic Hairdryer (03:49:50) :
“Never mind the volts, what about the amps?”
From the info in the article I would guesstimate it will be around 1.0 × 10-8 amps – not going to take-over from fossil fuels any time soon, unless they find they can get more amps come from currant bushes 😉
“E.M.Smith (01:48:04) :
I find it works better if you put electricity into the electrodes, then add air to the wood…
A bit of sparking and PRESTO, lots of thermal power ;-)”
In Australia we won’t need anything as elaborate as this to start a fire, just a fuel laden forrest, and a spark, usually man-made.
So? I recall similar tests back in the ’60’s demonstrating that plants scream when cut. Another “So?”. What, precisely, is the usefulness of such knowledge (other than busy work)? If it leads to better crop yield, or weed/pest control great, otherwise why care?