National Wildlife Federation predicts more Cleveland heat waves

Image courtesy City of Cleveland

People send me stuff. I’m thinking they must be worried about the urban animals. Why else would a wildlife federation be jumping into city public policy? Hmmm.

I’m not against making cities cooler with more greenery and white/green roofs,. In fact I think the FLIR rooftop image they have in the report is pretty cool.

But when trying to convince people for the immediate need of something, timing is everything:

From NOAA: “Ohio, Iowa, Illinois, Indiana, West Virginia, and Pennsylvania experienced their coolest July on record.

Also note that the record high for Cleveland in August was set on August 27th, 1948 with 102°F. The all-time record high in Cleveland of 104 °F (40 °C) was established on June 25, 1988.

Funny how they mention in the report they released today that “With mostly pleasant temperatures across the Midwest and Northeast in summer 2009, it is easy to lose sight of the long-term warming trend. But, this is not the time to let down our guard. This temporary respite is due largely to natural climate oscillations working in our favor. We are nearing the end of a minimum in the 11-year solar cycle during which the Earth is receiving slightly less heat from the Sun.”

They seem worried, because in this one press release they manage to cover just about every talking point we’ve ever heard. Here’s the nifty press release.

Immediate Release:  August 25, 2009

Contacts:Tracy Sabetta, National Wildlife Federation 614-581-2907

tsabetta@initiativeohio.com

Cleveland Will See Increase in Heat Waves Risks

More Extremely Hot Days Projected with Global Warming

Cleveland, Ohio (August 25)–This morning, environmental and community advocates gathered in a cool location to discuss a hot topic.  Together on the “green” rooftop of a downtown building, representatives of the National Wildlife Federation and others announced that Cleveland is on a list of the 30 cities believed to be most vulnerable to heat wave effects as the planet warms.  According to a new report by the National Wildlife Federation and Physicians for Social Responsibility, Cleveland’s relatively high level of vulnerable populations and low rates of air conditioning were among the reasons cited by the groups for its selection to the top 30 list.

“Many American cities are vulnerable to increased heat waves that will result from global climate change,” said Tracy Sabetta of the National Wildlife Federation in Ohio. “People in poor health and the elderly often suffer the most, but everyone will feel the heat unless measures are taken to adequately prepare cities.”

In a report being released today called, “Heat Waves: Global Warming’s Wake Up Call,” scientists have concluded that heat waves caused by global warming are going to bring significant challenges for American cities.  The report’s authors examined four major risk factors associated with heat-related mortality to identify 30 large cities in the United States that are especially vulnerable to heat waves based on current conditions.  Factors considered included the average number of oppressively hot days each year, percentage of homes without central air conditioning, percentage of the city population living in poverty, and the quantity of ground-level ozone pollution.

Three Ohio cities appear on this list: Cincinnati, Toledo, and Cleveland.  According to the report, 49 percent of the households in Cleveland are currently without central air conditioning and 30 percent of the population is living below the federal poverty level of $16,530 for a family of three.  That is more than double the national average.

As the United States warms another 4 to 11°F on average over the next century, we will have more extremely hot summer days. Every part of the country will be affected. Urban areas like Cleveland will feel the heat more acutely because asphalt, concrete, and other structures absorb and reradiate heat, causing temperature to be as much as 10°F higher than nearby rural areas.

“Cooler years like this one can set us up for trouble by making us complacent and less prepared for inevitably hot years to come,” continued Sabetta.  “And make no mistake — the trends clearly show more hot years are on the way.”

Cooler-than-average temperatures across the Midwest and Northeast over this past summer make it is easy to lose sight of the indisputable long-term warming trend.  According to the most recent science on heat waves, the jet stream took an unusually southern track across the nation this summer, bringing more Arctic air and less tropical air to the Midwest and Northeast.

But while it may be cool in Cleveland, Ohio this summer, the planet as a whole is continuing to warm.  According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, this July was the 5th warmest on record globally.  Temperatures through July put 2009 at the 6th warmest year on record, tying 2004

The increased air pollution that typically accompanies heat waves can especially harm children, who have a higher risk of developing asthma, have lungs that are still developing and growing, and have higher exposure because they breathe at a higher rate than adults and spend more time outdoors engaging in vigorous physical activity. Historically, about 20 to 28 percent of weather-related deaths have been due to heat, more than any other single weather-related cause.

“Through our programs that focus on the environmental health concerns of children and the elderly living in poor neighborhoods, we at Environmental Health Watch are all too aware of the health consequences of more frequent extreme heat events and increased air pollution associated with global warming,” said Stuart Greenburg, Executive Director of Environmental Health Watch.  “Our focus in the fight to reduce greenhouse gases is on the housing sector, which accounts for 24 percent of carbon emissions.  We need widespread home weatherization to reduce carbon emissions, increase comfort and health, and make housing more affordable.”

Residents of all Ohio cities can begin to prepare for hotter temperatures by reducing climate change pollution that is heating the planet while taking steps to cool our cities and boost public health response systems.

“Our nation’s environmental challenges are inherently tied to the economic needs of our most vulnerable communities,” said Shanelle Smith, Ohio Organizer for the Apollo Alliance. “This report makes it clear that if we want to have a sustainable environment and put people back to work, we must invest in clean energy. Investing in the clean energy economy will reduce the impact of pollution on our climate and create good green jobs in the process.”

“If we are to prevent crossing critical tipping points such as the melting of all arctic permafrost which will cause the release of huge amounts of methane into our atmosphere, we must act now,” said Dr. Eric Schreiber, speaker for the Climate Project.  “The task falls to us.  Those who came before us did not understand the need to act.  Those who come after us will be powerless to prevent the crippling and deadly effects of climate destabilization.  Future generations will judge us by our willingness to make the tough decisions.”

We can reduce the severity of heat waves and their impacts on vulnerable populations.

Curbing global climate change pollution as much and as quickly as possible is an essential first step. Legislation recently passed by the US House and currently being considered in the Senate will reduce carbon emissions and move us toward a clean energy economy.  Shifting to clean solar energy is an especially promising option because sunlight is plentiful during heat waves, when electricity demand for air conditioning peaks.

At the same time, we must make our cities cooler and greener, for example by introducing more green space—parks, trees, and “green, reflective roofs” —to greatly reduce the urban heat island effect. Furthermore, cities must implement public health measures—such as heat watch and warning systems, public cooling places, and assistance to low-income residents for home improvements that make buildings cooler—to reduce the impact of extreme heat that we cannot avoid.

###

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
73 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
the_Butcher
August 26, 2009 2:18 am

Ripper (01:34:43) :
Today in Australia We just heard that climate change is shrinking polar bears heads.
http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/content/2009/s2667304.htm
============================================
That’s just a justification the north Europeans use to explain their small john-sons.

Stephen Wilde
August 26, 2009 2:55 am

The jet streams started moving back equatorwards as long ago as 2000 on a worldwide basis. In fact all the world’s air circulation systems shifted equatorward. During the warming spell they shifted poleward.
As long as they stay where they are there will be slow cooling.
Warming will only return when the jets move poleward again.
The jets will only move poleward again when the oceans begin to release energy to the air faster so that the equatorial air masses expand again.
The longer the sun remains relatively inactive the less likely it becomes that there will be a substantial poleward shift because less energy is entering the oceans.

rbateman
August 26, 2009 2:57 am

Yes, everyone gets to play as long as they talk a green planet and pay the tax.
It’s like going to confession and saying 10 Al Gores and 50 Jim Hansens for your pennance. Then you can go out and spend twice as much for the same products as you did before they sold you on thier ideas. The Fed will simply print twice as much green stamps. If you aren’t fabulously wealthy as a Green Insider Trading Partner, then be sure to pick up a copy of Dumpster Diving for Dummies.

E.M.Smith
Editor
August 26, 2009 3:42 am

This temporary respite is due largely to natural climate oscillations working in our favor. We are nearing the end of a minimum in the 11-year solar cycle during which the Earth is receiving slightly less heat from the Sun.
So they are admitting it’s the Sun? And that the Sun can over power what people are doing? And that CO2 is relatively wimpy when compared to the Sun? Golly! Better tell the IPCC!
At the same time, we must make our cities cooler and greener, for example by introducing more green space—parks, trees, and “green, reflective roofs” —to greatly reduce the urban heat island effect.
How about we just move the thermometers from the HOT airports with their Airport Heat Island (AHI) effect over to the “green space – parks, trees”.
http://chiefio.wordpress.com/2009/08/26/agw-gistemp-measure-jet-age-airport-growth/
It would cost a lot less (and be more honest) to move the thermometers to the parks that do exist than to remake our society based on a fiction that is an artifact of folks “jetting off” to the Tropics for vacation…

E.M.Smith
Editor
August 26, 2009 3:54 am

Andrew Parker (22:36:40) :
So, if the U.S. warms 4 to 11 degrees ON AVERAGE, how does that break down? Does it mean that winters will be not quite as cold and summers a little hotter and Spring and Fall lasting a little longer or a little shorter; or will it break down by area?

Well, the GHCN temperature record only shows a warming signal in the N. Hemisphere winter.
http://chiefio.wordpress.com/2009/08/09/co2-takes-summers-off/
Summer data top out at about 20C and hold there. In all geographies, BTW.
But when you look into it more closely, you find that the ‘warming’ is largely in new thermometer records that tend to be added in the Tropics and the S. Hemisphere:
http://chiefio.wordpress.com/2009/08/17/thermometer-years-by-latitude-warm-globe/
And then when you look into THAT more, you find it is largely an artifact of how airports are handled:
http://chiefio.wordpress.com/2009/08/17/thermometer-years-by-latitude-warm-globe/
And as stated in my prior comment: The thermometers moving onto Airports in droves is a factor too.
So, my answer to your question is:
It’s getting warmer at Tropical Airports in the N. Hemisphere winter. So take a winter vacation to Brazil or French Polynesia and enjoy it…

E.M.Smith
Editor
August 26, 2009 3:56 am

GAK! The link for the “how airports are handled” sentence was supposed to be:
http://chiefio.wordpress.com/2009/08/23/gistemp-fixes-uhi-using-airports-as-rural/
Not the dup of the other link…

Vincent
August 26, 2009 4:12 am

“We are nearing the end of a minimum in the 11-year solar cycle during which the Earth is receiving slightly less heat from the Sun.”
This is the point in the movie where James T. Kirk notices the enemy has just contradicted himself (the enemy I’m thinking of was masquerading as God in that movie) and poses the question, “Excuse me, but what does God need a star ship for?”
With apologies to Kirk:
Erm, excuse me, didn’t you (IPCC, Hansen, Schmidt, Gore. . .) just say a while back that the solar cycle has NO effect on temperatures?
It should be clear now to any clear headed thinker that the AGW movement has become so mired in contradictory and self serving statements, so befuddled with back peddling and double think that it makes no more sense than did Ptolomey’s earth centric model requiring layer upon layer of epicycles in order to fit observations. The warmists have their layers and layers of epicycles but STILL does not fit observations.
How sad!

jeroen
August 26, 2009 4:20 am

City’s that lay in placed with hot summers, should look at buildings in warmer regions. Like South Portugal Algarve. I was on a holliday over there and the temperatures reached almost every day plus 30C. But in side the buildings it was a smooth 25. No Airconditioning! The homes there are with smaller windows away from direct sunlight by placing balcony’s. The buildings are mostly white and on the outside you can shut the windows with doors.

Bruce Cobb
August 26, 2009 4:44 am

Could they possibly be any more predictable? It’s as though robots crank this garbage out. The pretense of being concerned about the urban poor is a nice, big fat red herring. Sure, drive energy costs up through the roof, and see how they fare, especially in winter when, as any moron knows, people are most vulnerable.

Mark
August 26, 2009 5:46 am

Here’s an interesting news clip from January 29, 2009 about Cleveland snowfall:
“Starting with the three-tenths of an inch that fell on Oct. 29, some 59.1 inches of snow fell at Cleveland Hopkins International Airport from mid-Fall since through Wednesday.
The season total includes 10.8 inches on Jan. 9-10, and 9.5 inches over the last two days.
The total is more than double the amount at the same time last year.
In fact, it took until March 8 last year for Cleveland to surpass 59 inches for the season. In all 77.2 inches fell during the 2007-08 snow season.”
I would think that Cleveland would be looking forward to a little global warming in the coming years!

Bob H.
August 26, 2009 6:15 am

Thanks, Anthony. That is a fun press release. I would like the cities to be “greener” with more trees, parks, maybe a few lakes here and there. Oh, let’s use concrete instead of asphalt for pavement (it doesn’t get as hot or hold the heat as long) or maybe use an open block paver which can be planted. Realistically though, where are the cities and states going to come up with the extra “green” to pay for all of this “green” during the current economic times? Ah yes, raise taxes, drive businesses out of downtown, buldoze the vacant buildings and build a “green” park for the commuters.
By the way, has anyone looked at the infrared signature of the green roof? I would guess it may emit as much LW radiation as concrete or perhaps even an asphalt roof, but it looks cool. One more thing, doesn’t A/C use a lot of energy primarily generated by those evil power companies who receive “death trains” every day?

Steven Hill
August 26, 2009 7:46 am

WOW, man really has power and has destroyed the planet in the last 60 years.
Depending on what you believe, the earth has been here billions, millions or thousands of years and man has killed it in just 60 years.
Hum, I don’t think so.

Keith
August 26, 2009 9:49 am

“Shifting to clean solar energy is an especially promising option…”
Hahahahahahahahahahaha!
These dolts have obviously never even been to Cleveland. With a combination of short winter days, constant cloud cover spawned by Lake Erie moisture, and a nice covering of snow and ice, solar power cells would be essentially useless for half the year. People can’t even make solar cost-competitive in places like California and Arizona without government subsidies. In Cleveland? Hahahahahahahahaha!

Tamara
August 26, 2009 9:53 am

“climate destabilization”
Watch out for this phrase. I am seeing it, and it’s permutations, more and more frequently.
Climate change means going from one state to another, i.e. cool to hot.
What does climate instability mean?
If your argument is failing, change the argument.

jack straw
August 26, 2009 10:37 am

Born and raised in Greater Cleveland – a resident for nearly 50 years. I would love to have some more global warming here. Bring it on. I believe we had one day above freezing in January of this year. I don’t ever remember that happening. I have central air, and turned it on for the first time last week.
So these people cite poverty levels and lack of a/c as issues, but then say that they need to retrofit their houses to be more efficient, and/or add solar panels. How do they expect them to afford those things, not to mention increased energy prices due to cap and trade policies?
One last point – we don’t have a lot of sunshine here. We consistently compete with Seattle for the most cloudy days of the year. That doesn’t bode well for implementing solar, by my understanding of the process.
Great site, Anthony – keep it going. I visit daily.

Nogw
August 26, 2009 10:53 am

Please be kind to remember this post next november and december to tell us, SH inhabitants, how was it, and if those gwrs.were right or not.

Nogw
August 26, 2009 11:21 am

Tamara (09:53:39) :
“climate destabilization”

So they are inventing new names instead of “global warming”/”climate change”…hmmm, perhaps they are using focus groups to search for the best marketing strategy, however how they will call next Super-Maunder like minimum?
Fortunately, as you know, CO2 works for this one too: When reactng with humidity it’s endothermic…we’ll be to blame also. No way: They win.

Nogw
August 26, 2009 1:45 pm

More probable are “Heat Waves”…of anger, if measures against global warming are taken and your energy bill doubles. 🙂

August 26, 2009 2:16 pm

Sounds like the American version of the Austrailian Declarations pre-election of the water shortage in Sydney by 2007 and Perth would be a ghost city.
The wailing of the AGW faithful is reaching a crescendo.

Gary Pearse
August 26, 2009 3:15 pm

“Urban areas like Cleveland will feel the heat more acutely because asphalt, concrete, and other structures absorb and reradiate heat, causing temperature to be as much as 10°F higher than nearby rural areas. ”
Trouble with a rambling multi-issue press realease is you inadvertently make some true statements that you wouldn’t make if you were careful. You see! They really do believe in the UHI effect.

sky
August 26, 2009 5:56 pm

As a former Clevelander, I know that anything that will make the town hotter will be welcomed there. What do they have left there, now that Drew Cary’s left for L.A. and the Browns and Indians are underperforming? The R&R Hall of Fame? That’s for tourists! They’ve got enough parks and fountains to survive.

Patrick Davis
August 26, 2009 6:10 pm

Wetter and warmer than normal spring for Western Australia (A very very very large state). Lets see if their predictions come true…
http://www.watoday.com.au/wa-news/wetter-and-warmer-spring-on-way-for-wa-20090826-eyza.html

Mark
August 27, 2009 5:53 am

Sky: I was in Cleveland to visit the R&R Hall of Fame just two weeks ago. Lots of interesting exhibits, but you can’t spend an entire day there.
By the way, the weather (for this mid-August day) didn’t get above 79 degrees. It was beautiful. I also noticed that huge windmill at the Science Center, between the Browns stadium and the R&R Hall. I was wondering if the Browns had decided to go green…..but an article at http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2008/07/great-wind-on-the-great-lakes-52697 has straightened me out. See below:
“Two years ago, on 9 June, 2006, the GLSC installed what it now calls its ‘iconic’ Vestas machine in its front yard. Linda Abraham-Silver, president and executive director of the GLSC says: ‘The Science Center’s primary goal for installing a wind turbine is to create a highly visible exhibition to demonstrate wind power technology and raise public awareness about renewable energy.’ Along the way, it is also generating about 7% of the electricity the Center uses, and has opened the door for what many in Cleveland hope will be a whole new level of industrial development….Abraham-Silver also admits to a ‘Big Dream,’ in which renewable electricity from the wind turbine and solar array will be used to convert water drawn from the lake into hydrogen to power buses for ‘kids on field trips.”
Yes! I won’t mind paying exhorbitant energy prices and higher taxes in the future, so long as we can ensure that school kids can ride hydrogen-powered buses to the zoo! Sign me up for this “Big Dream”!