Guest Essay by Willis Eschenbach

Abstract
The Thermostat Hypothesis is that tropical clouds and thunderstorms, along with other emergent phenomena like dust devils, tornadoes, and the El Nino/La Nina alteration, actively regulate the temperature of the earth. This keeps the earth at an equilibrium temperature.
Several kinds of evidence are presented to establish and elucidate the Thermostat Hypothesis – historical temperature stability of the Earth, theoretical considerations, satellite photos, and a description of the equilibrium mechanism.
Historical Stability
The stability of the earth’s temperature over time has been a long-standing climatological puzzle. The globe has maintained a temperature of ± ~ 3% (including ice ages) for at least the last half a billion years during which we can estimate the temperature. During the Holocene, temperatures have not varied by ±1%. And during the glaciation periods, the temperature was generally similarly stable as well.
In contrast to Earth’s temperature stability, solar physics has long indicated (Gough, 1981; Bahcall et al., 2001) that 4 billion years ago the total solar irradiance was about three-quarters of the current value. In early geological times, however, the earth was not correspondingly cooler. Temperature proxies such as deuterium/hydrogen ratios and 16O/18O ratios show no sign of a corresponding warming of the earth over this time. Why didn’t the earth warm as the sun warmed?
This is called the “Faint Early Sun Paradox” (Sagan and Mullen, 1972), and is usually explained by positing an early atmosphere much richer in greenhouse gases than the current atmosphere.
However, this would imply a gradual decrease in GHG forcing which exactly matched the incremental billion-year increase in solar forcing to the present value. This seems highly unlikely.
A much more likely candidate is some natural mechanism that has regulated the earth’s temperature over geological time.
Theoretical Considerations
Bejan (Bejan 2005) has shown that the climate can be robustly modeled as a heat engine, with the ocean and the atmosphere being the working fluids. The tropics are the hot end of the heat engine. Some of that tropical heat is radiated back into space. Work is performed by the working fluids in the course of transporting the rest of that tropical heat to the Poles. There, at the cold end of the heat engine, the heat is radiated into space. Bejan showed that the existence and areal coverage of the Hadley cells is a derivable result of the Constructal Law. He also showed how the temperatures of the flow system are determined.
“We pursue this from the constructal point of view, which is that the [global] circulation itself represents a flow geometry that is the result of the maximization of global performance subject to global constraints.”
“The most power that the composite system could produce is associated with the reversible operation of the power plant. The power output in this limit is proportional to

where q is the total energy flow through the system (tropics to poles), and TH and TL are the high and low temperatures (tropical and polar temperatures in Kelvins).
The system works ceaselessly to maximize that power output. Here is a view of the entire system that transports heat from the tropics to the poles.

Figure 1. The Earth as a Heat Engine. The equatorial Hadley Cells provide the power for the system. Over the tropics, the sun (orange arrows) is strongest because it hits the earth most squarely. The length of the orange arrows shows relative sun strength. Warm dry air descends at about 30N and 30S, forming the great desert belts that circle the globe. Heat is transported by a combination of the ocean and the atmosphere to the poles. At the poles, the heat is radiated to space.
In other words, flow systems such as the Earth’s climate do not assume a stable temperature willy-nilly. They reshape their own flow in such a way as to maximize the energy produced and consumed. It is this dynamic process, and not a simple linear transformation of the details of the atmospheric gas composition, which sets the overall working temperature range of the planet.
Note that the Constructal Law says that any flow system will “quasi-stabilize” in orbit around (but never achieve) some ideal state. In the case of the climate, this is the state of maximum total power production and consumption. And this in turn implies that any watery planet will oscillate around some equilibrium temperature, which is actively maintained by the flow system. See the paper by Ou listed below for further information on the process.
Climate Governing Mechanism
Every heat engine has a throttle. The throttle is the part of the engine that controls how much energy enters the heat engine. A motorcycle has a hand throttle. In an automobile, the throttle is called the gas pedal. It controls incoming energy.
The stability of the earth’s temperature over time (including alternating bi-stable glacial/interglacial periods), as well as theoretical considerations, indicates that this heat engine we call climate must have some kind of governor controlling the throttle.
While all heat engines have a throttle, not all of them have a governor. In a car, a governor is called “Cruise Control”. Cruise control is a governor that controls the throttle (gas pedal). A governor adjusts the energy going to the car engine to maintain a constant speed regardless of changes in internal and external forcing (e.g. hills, winds, engine efficiency, and losses).
We can narrow the candidates for this climate governing mechanism by noting first that a governor controls the throttle (which in turn controls the energy supplied to a heat engine). Second, we note that a successful governor must be able to drive the system beyond the desired result (overshoot).
(Note that a governor, which contains a hysteresis loop capable of producing overshoot, is different from a simple negative feedback of the type generally described by the IPCC. A simple negative feedback can only reduce an increase. It cannot maintain a steady state despite differing forcings, variable loads, and changing losses. Only a governor can do that.)
The majority of the earth’s absorption of heat from the sun takes place in the tropics. The tropics, like the rest of the world, are mostly ocean; and the land that is there is wet. The steamy tropics, in a word. There is little ice there, so the clouds control how much energy enters the climate heat engine.
I propose that two interrelated but separate mechanisms act directly to regulate the earth’s temperature — tropical cumulus and cumulonimbus clouds. Cumulus clouds are the thermally-driven fluffy “cotton ball” clouds that abound near the surface on warm afternoons. Cumulonimbus clouds are thunderstorm clouds, which start life as simple cumulus clouds. Both types of clouds are part of the throttle control, reducing incoming energy. In addition, the cumulonimbus clouds are active refrigeration-cycle heat engines, which provide the necessary overshoot to act as a governor on the system.
A pleasant thought experiment shows how this cloud governor works. It’s called “A Day In the Tropics”.
I live in the deep, moist tropics, at 9°S, with a view of the South Pacific Ocean from my windows. Here’s what a typical day looks like. In fact, it’s a typical summer day everywhere in the Tropics. The weather report goes like this:
Clear and calm at dawn. Light morning winds, clouding up towards noon. In the afternoon, increasing clouds and wind with showers and thundershowers developing as the temperature rises. Thunderstorms continuing after dark, and clearing some time between sunset and early hours of the morning, with progressive clearing and calming until dawn.
That’s the most common daily cycle of tropical weather, common enough to be a cliché around the world.
It is driven by the day/night variations in the strength of the sun’s energy. Before dawn, the atmosphere is typically calm and clear. As the ocean (or moist land) heats up, air temperature and evaporation increase. Warm moist air starts to rise. Soon the rising moist air cools and condenses into clouds. The clouds reflect the sunlight. That’s the first step of climate regulation. Increased temperature leads to clouds. The clouds close the throttle slightly, reducing the energy entering the system. They start cooling things down. This is the negative feedback part of the cloud climate control.
The tropical sun is strong, and despite the negative feedback from the cumulus clouds, the day continues to heat up. The more the sun hits the ocean, the more warm, moist air is formed, and the more cumulus clouds form. This, of course, reflects more sun, and the throttle closes a bit more. But the day continues to warm.
The full development of the cumulus clouds sets the stage for the second part of temperature regulation. This is not simply negative feedback. It is the climate governing system. As the temperature continues to rise, as the evaporation climbs, some of the fluffy cumulus clouds suddenly transform themselves. They rapidly extend skywards, quickly thrusting up to form cloud pillars thousands of meters high. In this way, cumulus clouds are transformed into cumulonimbus or thunderstorm clouds.
The columnar body of the thunderstorm acts as a huge vertical heat pipe. The thunderstorm sucks up warm, moist air at the surface and shoots it skyward. At altitude the water condenses, transforming the latent heat into sensible heat. The air is rewarmed by this release of sensible heat and continues to rise within the thunderstorm tower.
At the top, the rising much dryer air is released from the cloud up high, way above most of the CO2, water vapor, and other greenhouse gases. In that rarified atmosphere, the air is much freer to radiate to space. By moving inside the thunderstorm heat pipe, the rising air bypasses any interaction with most greenhouse gases and comes out near the top of the troposphere. During the transport aloft, there is no radiative or turbulent interaction between the rising air inside the tower and the surrounding lower and middle troposphere. Inside the thunderstorm, the rising air is tunneled through most of the troposphere to emerge at the top.
In addition to reflecting sunlight from their top surface as cumulus clouds do, and transporting heat to the upper troposphere where it radiates easily to space, thunderstorms cool the surface in a variety of other ways, particularly over the ocean.
1. Wind driven evaporative cooling. Once the thunderstorm starts, it creates its own wind around the base. This self-generated wind increases evaporation in several ways, particularly over the ocean.
a) Evaporation rises linearly with wind speed. At a typical squall wind speed of 10 meters per second (“m/s”, about 20 knots or 17 miles per hour), evaporation is about ten times greater than at “calm” conditions (conventionally taken as 1 m/s).
b) The wind increases evaporation by creating spray and foam, and by blowing water off of trees and leaves. These greatly increase the evaporative surface area, because the total surface area of the millions of droplets is evaporating as well as the actual surface itself.
c) To a lesser extent, the surface area is also increased by wind-created waves (a wavy surface has a larger evaporative area than a flat surface).
d) Wind-created waves in turn greatly increase turbulence in the atmospheric boundary layer. This increases evaporation by mixing dry air down to the surface and moist air upwards.
e) As spray rapidly warms to air temperature, which in the tropics can be warmer than ocean temperature, evaporation also rises above the sea surface evaporation rate.
2. Wind and wave driven albedo increase. The white spray, foam, spindrift, changing angles of incidence, and white breaking wave tops greatly increase the albedo of the sea surface. This reduces the energy absorbed by the ocean.
3. Cold rain and cold wind. As the moist air rises inside the thunderstorm’s heat pipe, water condenses and falls. Since the water is originating from condensing or freezing temperatures aloft, it cools the lower atmosphere it falls through, and it cools the surface when it hits. Also, the droplets are being cooled as they fall by evaporation.
In addition, the falling rain entrains a cold wind. This cold wind blows radially outwards from the center of the falling rain, cooling the surrounding area. This is quite visible in the video below.
4. Increased reflective area. White fluffy cumulus clouds are not very tall, so basically they only reflect from the tops. On the other hand, the vertical pipe of the thunderstorm reflects sunlight along its entire length. This means that thunderstorms reflect sunlight from an area of the ocean out of proportion to their footprint, particularly in the late afternoon.
5. Modification of upper tropospheric ice crystal cloud amounts (Lindzen 2001, Spencer 2007). These clouds form from the tiny ice particles that come out of the smokestack of the thunderstorm heat engines. It appears that the regulation of these clouds has a large effect, as they are thought to warm (through IR absorption) more than they cool (through reflection).
6. Enhanced night-time radiation. Unlike long-lived stratus clouds, cumulus and cumulonimbus often die out and vanish in the early morning hours, leading to the typically clear skies at dawn. This allows greatly increased nighttime surface radiative cooling to space.
7. Delivery of dry air to the surface. The air being sucked from the surface and lifted to altitude is counterbalanced by a descending flow of replacement air emitted from the top of the thunderstorm. This descending air has had the majority of the water vapor stripped out of it inside the thunderstorm, so it is relatively dry. The dryer the air, the more moisture it can pick up for the next trip to the sky. This increases the evaporative cooling of the surface.
8. Increased radiation through descending dry air. The descending dry air mentioned above is far more transparent to surface radiation than normal moist tropical air. This increases overall radiation to space.
In part because they utilize such a wide range of cooling mechanisms, cumulus clouds and thunderstorms are extremely good at cooling the surface of the earth. Together, they form the governing mechanism for the tropical temperature.
But where is that mechanism?
The problem with my thought experiment of describing a typical tropical day is that it is always changing. The temperature goes up and down, the clouds rise and fall, day changes to night, the seasons come and go. Where in all of that unending change is the governing mechanism? If everything is always changing, what keeps it the same month to month and year to year? If conditions are always different, what keeps it from going off the rails?
In order to see the governor at work, we need a different point of view. We need a point of view without time. We need a timeless view without seasons, a point of view with no days and nights. And curiously, in this thought experiment called “A Day In the Tropics”, there is such a timeless point of view, where not only is there no day and night, but where it’s always summer.
The point of view without day or night, the point of view from which we can see the climate governor at work, is the point of view of the sun. Imagine that you are looking at the earth from the sun. From the sun’s point of view, there is no day and night. All parts of the visible face of the earth are always in sunlight—the sun never sees the nighttime. And it’s always summer under the sun.
If we accept the convenience that the north is up, then as we face the earth from the sun, the visible surface of the earth is moving from left to right as the planet rotates. So the left-hand edge of the visible face is always at sunrise, and the right-hand edge is always at sunset. Noon is a vertical line down the middle. From this timeless point of view, morning is always and forever on the left, and afternoon is always on the right. In short, by shifting our point of view, we have traded time coordinates for space coordinates. This shift makes it easy to see how the governor works.
The tropics stretch from left to right across the circular visible face. We see that near the left end of the tropics, after sunrise, there are very few clouds. Clouds increase as you look further to the right. Around the noon line, there are already cumulus. And as we look from left to right across the right side of the visible face of the earth, towards the afternoon, more and more cumulus clouds and increasing numbers of thunderstorms cover a large amount of the tropics.
It is as though there is a graduated mirror shade over the tropics, with the fewest cloud mirrors on the left, slowly increasing to extensive cloud mirrors and thunderstorm coverage on the right.
After coming up with this hypothesis that as seen from the sun, the right-hand side of the deep tropical Pacific Ocean would have more clouds than the left-hand side), I thought “Hey, that’s a testable proposition to support or demolish my hypothesis”. So in order to investigate whether this postulated increase in clouds on the right-hand side of the Pacific actually existed, I took an average of 24 pictures of the Pacific Ocean taken at local noon on the 1st and 15th of each month over an entire year. I then calculated the average change in albedo and thus the average change in forcing at each time. Here is the result:

Figure 2. Average of one year of GOES-West weather satellite images taken at satellite local noon. The Intertropical Convergence Zone is the bright band in the yellow rectangle. Local time on earth is shown by black lines on the image. Time values are shown at the bottom of the attached graph. The red line on the graph is the solar forcing anomaly (in watts per square meter) in the area outlined in yellow. The black line is the albedo value in the area outlined in yellow.
The graph below the image of the earth shows the albedo and solar forcing in the yellow rectangle which contains the Inter-Tropical Convergence Zone. Note the sharp increase in the albedo between 10:00 and 11:30. You are looking at the mechanism that keeps the earth from overheating. It causes a change in insolation of -60 W/m2 between ten and noon.
Now, consider what happens if for some reason the surface of the tropics is a bit cool. The sun takes longer to heat up the surface. Evaporation doesn’t rise until later in the day. Clouds are slow to appear. The first thunderstorms form later, fewer thunderstorms form, and if it’s not warm enough those giant surface-cooling heat engines don’t form at all.
And from the point of view of the sun, the entire mirrored shade shifts to the right, letting more sunshine through for longer. The 60 W/m2 reduction in solar forcing doesn’t take place until later in the day, increasing the local insolation.
When the tropical surface gets a bit warmer than usual, the mirrored shade gets pulled to the left, and clouds form earlier. Hot afternoons drive thunderstorm formation, which cools and air conditions the surface. In this fashion, a self-adjusting cooling shade of thunderstorms and clouds keeps the afternoon temperature within a narrow range.
Now, some scientists have claimed that clouds have a positive feedback. Because of this, the areas where there are more clouds will end up warmer than areas with fewer clouds. This positive feedback is seen as the reason that clouds and warmth are correlated.
I and others take the opposite view of that correlation. I hold that the clouds are caused by the warmth, not that the warmth is caused by the clouds.
Fortunately, we have way to determine whether changes in the reflective tropical umbrella of clouds and thunderstorms are caused by (and thus limiting) overall temperature rise, or whether an increase in clouds is causing the overall temperature rise. This is to look at the change in albedo with the change in temperature. Here are two views of the tropical albedo, taken six months apart. August is the warmest month in the Northern Hemisphere. As indicated, the sun is in the North. Note the high albedo (areas of light blue) in all of North Africa, China, and the northern part of South America and Central America. By contrast, there is low albedo in Brazil, Southern Africa, and Indonesia/Australia.

Figure 3. Monthly Average Albedo. Timing is half a year apart. August is the height of summer in the Northern Hemisphere. February is the height of summer in the Southern Hemisphere. Light blue areas are the most reflective (greatest albedo)
In February, on the other hand, the sun is in the South. The albedo situation is reversed. Brazil and Southern Africa and Australasia are warm under the sun. In response to the heat, clouds form, and those areas now have a high albedo. By contrast, the north now has a low albedo, with the exception of the reflective Sahara and Rub Al Khali Deserts.
Clearly, the cloud albedo (from cumulus and cumulonimbus) follows the sun north and south, keeping the earth from overheating. This shows quite definitively that rather than the warmth being caused by the clouds, the clouds are caused by the warmth.
Quite separately, these images show in a different way that warmth drives cloud formation. We know that during the summer, the land warms more than the ocean. If temperature is driving the cloud formation, we would expect to see a greater change in the albedo over land than over the ocean. And this is clearly the case. We see in the North Pacific and the Indian Ocean that the sun increases the albedo over the ocean, particularly where the ocean is shallow. But the changes in the land are in general much larger than the changes over the ocean. Again this shows that the clouds are forming in response to, and are therefore limiting, increasing warmth.
How the Governor Works
Tropical cumulus production and thunderstorm production are driven by air density. Air density is a function of temperature (affecting density directly) and evaporation (water vapor is lighter than air).
A thunderstorm is both a self-generating and self-sustaining heat engine. The working fluids are moisture-laden warm air and liquid water. Self-generating means that whenever it gets hot enough over the tropical ocean, which is almost every day, at a certain level of temperature and humidity, some of the fluffy cumulus clouds suddenly start changing. The tops of the clouds streak upwards, showing the rising progress of the warm surface air. At altitude, the rising air exits the cloud, replace by more air from below. Suddenly, in place of a placid cloud, there is an active thunderstorm.
“Self-generating” means that thunderstorms arise spontaneously as a function of temperature and evaporation. They are what is called an “emergent” phenomenon, meaning that they emerge from th background when certain conditions are met. In the case of thunderstorms, this generally comes down to the passing of a temperature threshold.
Above the temperature threshold necessary to create the first thunderstorm, the number of thunderstorms rises rapidly. This rapid increase in thunderstorms limits the amount of temperature rise possible.
“Self-sustaining” means that once a thunderstorm gets going, it no longer requires the full initiation temperature necessary to get it started. This is because the self-generated wind at the base, plus dry air falling from above, combine to drive the evaporation rate way up. The thunderstorm is driven by air density. It requires a source of light air. The density of the air is determined by both temperature and moisture content (because curiously, water vapor at molecular weight 16 is only a bit more than half as heavy as air, which has a weight of about 29). So moist air is light air.
Evaporation is not a function of temperature alone. It is governed a complex mix of wind speed, water temperature, and vapor pressure. Evaporation is calculated by what is called a “bulk formula”, which means a formula based on experience rather than theory. One commonly used formula is:
E = VK(es – ea)
where
E = evaporation
V= wind speed (function of temperature difference [∆T])
K = coefficient constant
es = vapor pressure at evaporating surface (function of water temperature in degrees K to the fourth power)
ea = vapor pressure of overlying air (function of relative humidity and air temperature in degrees K to the fourth power)
The critical thing to notice in the formula is that evaporation varies linearly with wind speed. This means that evaporation near a thunderstorm can be an order of magnitude greater than evaporation a short distance away.
In addition to the changes in evaporation, there at least one other mechanism increasing cloud formation as wind increases. This is the wind-driven production of airborne salt crystals. The breaking of wind-driven waves produces these microscopic crystals of salt. The connection to the clouds is that these crystals are the main condensation nuclei for clouds that form over the ocean. The production of additional condensation nuclei, coupled with increased evaporation, leads to larger and faster changes in cloud production with increasing temperature.
Increased wind-driven evaporation means that to get the same air density, the surface temperature can be lower than the temperature required to initiate the thunderstorm. This means that the thunderstorm will still survive and continue cooling the surface to well below the starting temperature.
This ability to drive the temperature lower than the starting point is what distinguishes a governor from a negative feedback. A thunderstorm can do more than just reduce the amount of surface warming. It can actually mechanically cool the surface to below the required initiation temperature. This allows it to actively maintain a fixed temperature in the region surrounding the thunderstorm.
A key feature of this method of control (changing incoming power levels, performing work, and increasing thermal losses to quelch rising temperatures) is that the equilibrium temperature is not governed by changes in the amount of losses or changes in the forcings in the system. The equilibrium temperature is set by the response of wind and water and cloud to increasing temperature, not by the inherent efficiency of or the inputs to the system.
In addition, the equilibrium temperature is not affected much by changes in the strength of the solar irradiation. If the sun gets weaker, evaporation decreases, which decreases clouds, which increases the available sun. This is the likely answer the long-standing question of how the earth’s temperature has stayed stable over geological times, during which time the strength of the sun has increased markedly.
Gradual Equilibrium Variation and Drift
If the Thermostat Hypothesis is correct and the earth does have an actively maintained equilibrium temperature, what causes the slow drifts and other changes in the equilibrium temperature seen in both historical and geological times?
As shown by Bejan, one determinant of running temperature is how efficient the whole global heat engine is in moving the terawatts of energy from the tropics to the poles. On a geological time scale, the location, orientation, and elevation of the continental land masses is obviously a huge determinant in this regard. That’s what makes Antarctica different from the Arctic today. The lack of a land mass in the Arctic means warm water circulates under the ice. In Antarctica, the cold goes to the bone …
In addition, the oceanic geography which shapes the currents carrying warm tropical water to the poles and returning cold water (eventually) to the tropics is also a very large determinant of the running temperature of the global climate heat engine.
In the shorter term, there could be slow changes in the albedo. The albedo is a function of wind speed, evaporation, cloud dynamics, and (to a lesser degree) snow and ice. Evaporation rates are fixed by thermodynamic laws, which leave only wind speed, cloud dynamics, and snow and ice able to affect the equilibrium.
The variation in the equilibrium temperature may, for example, be the result of a change in the worldwide average wind speed. Wind speed is coupled to the ocean through the action of waves, and long-term variations in the coupled ocean-atmospheric momentum occur. These changes in wind speed may vary the equilibrium temperature in a cyclical fashion.
Or it may be related to a general change in color, type, or extent of either the clouds or the snow and ice. The albedo is dependent on the color of the reflecting substance. If reflections are changed for any reason, the equilibrium temperature could be affected. For snow and ice, this could be e.g. increased melting due to black carbon deposition on the surface. For clouds, this could be a color change due to aerosols or dust.
Finally, the equilibrium variations may relate to the sun. The variation in magnetic and charged particle numbers may be large enough to make a difference. There are strong suggestions that cloud cover is influenced by the 22-year solar Hale magnetic cycle, and this 14-year record only covers part of a single Hale cycle. However, I have yet to find any significant evidence of this effect on any surface weather variables, including clouds.
Conclusions and Musings
1. The sun puts out more than enough energy to totally roast the earth. It is kept from doing so by the clouds reflecting about a third of the sun’s energy back to space. As near as we can tell, over billions of years, this system of increasing cloud formation to limit temperature rises has never failed.
2. This reflective shield of clouds forms in the tropics in response to increasing temperature.
3. As tropical temperatures continue to rise, the reflective shield is assisted by the formation of independent heat engines called thunderstorms. These cool the surface in a host of ways, move heat aloft, and convert heat to work.
4. Like cumulus clouds, thunderstorms also form in response to increasing temperature.
5. Because they are temperature driven, as tropical temperatures rise, tropical thunderstorms and cumulus production increase. These combine to regulate and limit the temperature rise. When tropical temperatures are cool, tropical skies clear and the earth rapidly warms. But when the tropics heat up, cumulus and cumulonimbus put a limit on the warming. This system keeps the earth within a fairly narrow band of temperatures (e.g., a change of only 0.7°C over the entire 20th Century).
6. The earth’s temperature regulation system is based on the unchanging physics of wind, water, and cloud.
7. This is a reasonable explanation for how the temperature of the earth has stayed so stable (or more recently, bi-stable as glacial and interglacial) for hundreds of millions of years.
Further Reading
Bejan, A, and Reis, A. H., 2005, Thermodynamic optimization of global circulation and climate, Int. J. Energy Res.; 29:303–316. Available online here.
Richard S. Lindzen, Ming-Dah Chou, and A. Y. Hou, 2001, Does the Earth Have an Adaptive Infrared Iris?, doi: 10.1175/1520-0477(2001)082<0417:DTEHAA>2.3.CO;2, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society: Vol. 82, No. 3, pp. 417–432. Available online here.
Ou, Hsien-Wang, Possible Bounds on the Earth’s Surface Temperature: From the Perspective of a Conceptual Global-Mean Model, Journal of Climate, Vol. 14, 1 July 2001. Available online here (pdf).
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Average “non-ice age” Temp ~ 22C (295K)
Average “ice age” Temp ~ 12C (285K) (not counting U. Jur./L. Cret ice age)
Median Phanerozoic Temp ~ 17C (290 K)
That is a variation from the median of less than 3% over the last 600 million years or so. During the current ice age, the glacial period average temp’s are ~6C cooler than the current ~15C average temp.
Average Quaternary/Holocene glacial Temp ~ 8C (281K)
Average Quaternary/Holocene interglacial Temp ~15C (288K)
Median ~12C (285K)
That is a variation from the mean of a bit over 1%.
Since the onset of the Holocene, the variation from the mean has been less than 1%…~3C.
Think of it like a nested series of oscillating functions.
Great discussion. I note that the phrases “greenhouse gas” and “radiative equilibrium,” are not mentioned at all. Infrared radiation is discussed only in reference to loss of heat from high in the atmosphere. Hmmm…
NCDC now places May as the 4th warmest on record – http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/img/climate/research/2009/may/glob-may-pg.gif
The oceans which have been the drag on temperatures in recent years are now warming rapidly as La Nina is replaced by El Nino – 3rd warmest on record (yep and no heat islands there).
Year will now come in in the top 2-4 years. .. amazing for a deep solar minimum.
REPLY: and UAH places it as the 15th coldest. There’s some disconnect somewhere. I wonder if the surface record has been corrupted? BTW, why not show us what your employer, BoM says about Australia? – Anthony
John Galt,
Did you find Jamais Cascio’s article above or below the daily astrology column?
I almost swallowed my tongue when I opened Sunday’s WSJ and found that article on which a few above have already commented. The one about geo-engineering to cool the planet.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203658504574191922455122210.html
What’s up with that ?!!!!!
I don’t think there’s any question that clouds help keep us cool in the day and warm at night. However the active process of condensation whereby the heat of change of state is released is, in my opinion, occuring mainly during daylight when convection of the water vapor is actively rising, (as opposed to night when existing clouds are more often than not like big inert thermal blankets.) So, during the day, how is it determined how much of the IR being seen by satellite is that radiated directly from the change of state of water vapor back to liquid, (noting that there is no change in temperature during the phase change but energy MUST be released up there), versus incoming solar IR being reflected back by the clouds?
Mike Monce (06:10:47) :
I think the article is good, but ignores a very crucial aspect of energy transport: namely that of tropical cylones. While daily thuderstorm formation certainly helps the heat engine run, I would supect that tropical cyclones contribute much more to the transport of energy from the tropical regions to the polar regions. Comparing the energy in a cyclone to a thunderstorm is like comparing a ladyfinger firecracker to a nuke.
Mike,
Although you are correct with your assessment, the continuity sticks in the frequency and the numbers.
A tropical strom is nothing more but an over energized depression, fueled by the relative warm ocean waters.
If you make the calculations you will find that the cyclones only represent a relative small percentage of the overall, daily and seasonal activity powered by our sun.
>REPLY: and UAH places it as the 15th coldest. There’s some disconnect somewhere. I wonder if the surface record has been corrupted? BTW, why not show us what your employer, BoM says about Australia? – Anthony
Anthony why do you respond with irrelevant ad hominen attacks? Perhaps you might stick to the science and stop throwing up insults and strawme – we live at the surface and the MSU data is a complex function of temperature 1000s of feet above our heads.
In your quest to understand the science you might start with a critical look at the MSU which is strongly contradicted by ocean, land, ice, snow, sea level, and heat content data. Does it make sense that with a significant El Nino developing in the Pacific we have a cold tropics as the MSU implies? Where are all the reports of cold tropical temperatures? expanding glaciers? snow? frost etc? which should accompany a cold tropics. Why is sea level rising rapidly upwards – http://sealevel.colorado.edu/current/sl_ib_ns_global.jpg – with all that “cooling”?
You know that the MSU is a patch of a dozen satellites with large corrections applied for orbital drift, diurnal drift, calibration drift etc. You also know that it is affected by moisture variations, pressure changes (pressure levels rise as the planet warms and moisture increases), and includes data which is fictional as its extrapolated 100s of metres below the the earth’s surface in places such as the Antarctic.
REPLY: And you also know that the satellite and surface record are divergent right now. Since you are the climate expert at BoM, why not tell us why? I’ll even offer you a guest post provided you have the courage to use your own name. – Anthony
Maybe I am ignorant, but whats new here? I mean, isn’t this already common knowledge?
“7. This is a reasonable explanation for how the temperature of the earth has stayed so stable (or more recently, bi-stable as glacial and interglacial) for hundreds of millions of years.”
There is strong evidence to suggest the earth was frozen pole-to-pole during the neoproterozoic. So if a “snowball Earth” is considered stable climate, that’s news to me.
Also, where is the data? We have some albedo measurements, but beyond that and some “thought exercises” where’s the data?
Interesting afternoon read nonetheless though.
Cheers,
Ben
John Galt (14:35:20), as you yourself note, your post is off topic. In addition, it’s generally considered to be bad blog manners to post an entire long article. If the article is interesting and relevant, give us a link to it, along with your ideas about why it is interesting and relevant.
While your participation is welcome, merely parroting another man’s thoughts by posting a long, rambling, and admittedly off-topic article will not gain you any traction.
DJ (14:41:57) :
NCDC now places May as the 4th warmest on record – http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/img/climate/research/2009/may/glob-may-pg.gif
The oceans which have been the drag on temperatures in recent years are now warming rapidly as La Nina is replaced by El Nino – 3rd warmest on record (yep and no heat islands there).
Year will now come in in the top 2-4 years. .. amazing for a deep solar minimum.
DJ,
You can forget all about your El Nino and any reference that presents May 2009 as the 4th warmest this century is a joke.
Have you forgotten that NOAA curently serves a Political Agenda and has lined up with the UN. They sing the the same biased tune as the British Weather Service.
Why don’t you consult other )non biased) sources that tell an entirely different story.
You must be a true believer!
With reference to these words from Willis:
“A governor, on the other hand, is quite different. It must perforce be able to increase as well as decrease the overall performance. In other words, when the earth gets too cold, the governor must be able to warm it up, and when it gets too cool, the governor must cool it down. A simple negative feedback cannot do that.
In order to maintain a steady state, governor also must be able to bring the system back to the starting point. In terms of temperature, it must be able to more than just reduce the size of an increase, it must actively cool the earth down to (or in practice below) the starting point. This is what thunderstorms can do.”
I don’t think the Earth gets too cold or too warm.
What seems to happen is that the solar energy input is slowed down in it’s passage through the Earth’s system of ocean and air and some of the energy is thereby converted to heat just as in an electrical resistor.
The oceans create nearly all that slowdown and the air just an insignificant bit of the total.
It is the level of solar input combined with the length of the delay in the transmission of energy through the oceans and air that fixes the equilibrium temperature of the Earth’s climate. It is a dynamic and constantly varying equilibrium temperature because of the variability of the solar input and the complex and very different circulations in both oceans and air.
It is primarily variations in the oceans that periodically alter the speed of the flow of energy through the system. Once that happens then as Willis says a thermostat does indeed kick in and tropical weather and especially tropical convection are indeed part of the thermostatic process.
However that thermostatic process actually involves all the air circulation systems and not just the tropics.
As I say in an earlier post it is the movement of the latitudinal position of all the air circulation systems that has the required effect. That movement has profound effects on the overall rate of energy transfer from surface to space.
Willis is also correct in asserting that the air has to both reduce a trend of warming and similarly reduce any cooling trend and so shift both back to the equilibrium point.
Now in my view the equilibrium point in practical climate terms is the sea surface temperature. The sea surface temperature varies up and down but never goes too far from the basic equilibrium set by the input of solar energy combined with the length of time it takes to be transmitted through the oceans and back into the air (then space).
Thus, if the sea surfaces warm up (from internal oceanic variability) then the equatorial air masses expand and energy is accelerated to space faster by the air whilst the temperature of the air catches up with the warming of the sea. That is of course a self limitimg process such that in due course the excess energy is removed from the sea surfaces out to space and the basic equilibrium of the entire system is restored.
Then, if the sea surfaces cool down (from internal oceanic variability) then the equatorial air masses shrink and more polar air is able to encroach equatorward. That has the effect of that cooler drier air pulling more energy from the water to try to offset the net loss of energy to space caused by the shortfall of energy coming from the oceans. So again the system works to limit the cooling of the air and work back towards the basic equilibrium of the entire system.
The air can only push excess energy to space or pull a deficit from the oceans. It cannot pull energy from space or push energy into the oceans.
That fits with Willis’s suggestion of a climate ‘governor’ but it involves all the air and not just the tropics.
The basic equilibrium around which it all happens is set in the way I have said and it is the oceans that induce variability around that equilibrium with the air a mere passenger (albeit the climate governor) and CO2 changes of no significant account.
Benjamin P. (15:37:23), you say:
The idea that the earth has an active climate system which works to maintain a set temperature is hardly “common knowledge”.
As to evidence, I have given what evidence I know of. However, as with evidence about anything to do with the climate, evidence is in short supply. The cited work of Bejan and Ou are relevant in this context.
I know of some evidence for a “snowball earth”, but I would hardly call it “strong evidence”. In addition to the lack of strong evidence, there are also theoretical problems with how the earth would freeze over to start with, and if it did so, how it would emerge from the frozen state.
More than direct evidence, however, my hypothesis is built on circumstantial evidence, observation, and logic. Not as good as evidence, I know, but Einstein dealt heavily in “thought experiments”, and my thought experiment was verified by the albedo study.
Overall, I am reminded of Henry David Thoreau’s famous line. To understand his line, you need to know that in earlier times, it was common to adulterate milk by adding water to it, in order to increase profits. Thoreau said:
“Some circumstantial evidence is very strong, as when you find a trout in the milk” …
I would love to find more evidence. I would say, though, that already my hypothesis has more observational support than the climate models. It has made a testable proposition, and it passed the test … don’t know of a single climate model that has done that.
However, one has to start somewhere. If you know of further evidence that might either support or demolish my hypothesis, I invite you to present it.
All the best,
w.
Smokey (14:43:56) :
John Galt,
Did you find Jamais Cascio’s article above or below the daily astrology column?
Smokey and John,
American Thinker already took care of the WSJ publication in an effective manner.
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2009/06/wsj_publishes_nutty_global_war.html
Well Bill those links are interesting… it’s going to take a while to digest what they are saying… what is the conclusion that they make then regarding the Earth’s Energy Balance and Budget?
Dear Willis,
Some ideas have a sense of rightness, internal consistency, believability and inevitability. Congratulations, in my opinion you have hit the bullseye.
Cheers,
Jim K
It makes sense to me except for the “4 billion” year idea. Seems to me only a billion or two years would be more than enough to level all the mountains in the world what with the amount of erosion being carried downstream in the rivers with the water being returned by evaporation and condensation, but none of the eroded material being carried back up.
Another important regulating feature is the strange characteristics of water. It is an extremely light gas with a Molecular weight of 18, so as a gas it rises quickly. But it is an extremely dense liquid, so once it condenses, it forms rain.
Furthermore water holds a heck of a lot of heat. Basically water is an ideal convective heat medium to carry heat high up into the atmosphere.
Finally, ask any engineer what is an order of magnitude more potent, convective or radiant heat transfer. Convective heat transfer overpowers radiant heat transfer.
One more thing, consider the moon. It is hotter than the earth during the day, and colder during the night.
A truly great contribution Willis. The ‘big picture’ is there and also lots of little pictures too that make a great deal of sense.
I see some controversy in this thread about the role of high cloud and whether it traps energy or not (Bill, George Smith) . Recently I came across this:
http://www.aero.jussieu.fr/~sparc/SPARC2000_new/OralSess1/Session1_3/X_Zhou/CPT_sparc.htm
“A warming trend in SST was found almost everywhere in the tropics. The warming SST tends to destabilize the static stability of the troposphere, and convection will occur more frequently and/or be more intense. Convective clouds will reach higher altitude and/or cover larger area. As an indication of this, the OLR shows a decreasing trend almost everywhere in the tropics. The OLR trend corresponds closely to the trends observed directly from the in situ rainfall observation (Waliser and Zhou, 1997). Stronger convection and more precipitation produce larger diabatic heating in the tropics, which forces a higher tropopause so that the pressures and temperatures of the tropical tropopause become lower and colder.”
So, the cooling process in the equatorial zone involves a fair degree of decompression (due to uplift) rather than radiation and as the engine warms there is more of the former than the latter. It’s the ‘refrigeration’ process. on the other hand, where the air descends it will warm by compression, just as it does in a bike pump. Roy Spencer explains this very well.
At the poles an increase in surface pressure is accompanied by a warming of the air. As the air warms ice cloud disappears. In high pressure zones world wide, radiation should increase as the tropical turnover increases. There are large high pressure cells at the poles, over Greenland and Siberia and also in the subtropics. Because of compressive warming these zones are relatively cloud free, particularly at the lower levels. The first sign of a change in the weather is the appearance of very high cloud coming from the tropics.
Between the areas of tropical convection characterized by decompressive cooling and the high pressure cells of the subtropics characterized by radiative cooling there is a zone of relatively abundant high ice cloud. The amount varies directly with the rate of uplift in the ITCZ. This cloud can be observed to reach into the stratosphere.
The temperature of the air in which this ice cloud resides varies directly with the ozone content and temperature of the tropical stratosphere at 20hPa.
As this ice cloud comes and goes in response to change in upper troposphere/lower stratosphere temperature (on an average 27.1 month schedule), the ocean outside the zone of tropical convection warms and cools. The response peters out at about 40° of latitude. The surface waters are driven towards the equator by the trades.
We measure the change in water temperature in the ENSO 3.4 region and call this the ENSO phenomenon.
The flux in the ozone content of the tropical stratosphere is ultimately driven by the sun via its effect on the abundance of nitrogen oxides that keep the mesosphere cool and are always eating into ozone levels at the margins of the stratosphere and via the polar vortexes. This dynamic can change gradually over long periods of time or quite abruptly as it did in the period 1978-83.
The warming and cooling of the globe over long periods of time owes a great deal to the dynamic that determines the temperature of the air in the ice cloud zone between the equator and about 40° of latitude.
The dynamic of an appearing and disappearing zone of high ice cloud with the associated cooling and warming of the ocean shows what ice cloud does. It reflects sunlight.
To understand the climate one must understand the complexities that space and geography introduces to the argument. The atmosphere is a collection of heat pumps and radiation shields in constant motion. These heat pumps and radiation shields very sensitively reflect the influence of the sun.
This is not an atmosphere that can be readily modeled. Nor is it an atmosphere that responds to change in trace gas composition. There is no water vapour amplifier. There is no high cloud blanket to trap infrared. It doesn’t work that way at all.
Great post. Lots to think about.
bill (10:08:43) :
This document indicates that cloud forcing in 1980’s was already incorporated in at least 2 GCMs:
Methinks you should read the whole thing:
Since there appears to be good agreement between modeled and observed clear-sky fluxes, it is evident that the parameterizations of cloud amount, type, and optical properties used in the various GCMs are inadequate at this point.
Great exposition. It introduces a powerful and (to me) original new concept, the “sun’s eye view” that dispels a lot of confusion and gives us the heating picture with time function converted to spatial map. Brilliant. It also works intuitively: we’ve all watched those T-storms and wondered at their power. For myself, in trying to get a “feel” for the AGW argument and where the heat was going, I kept going back to the question of all the work that is done by evaporating water and carrying it to great heights. it would be interesting to try to figure out (in the sun’s eye view, at some reasonable granularity) how many T-storms are there, how much work each is doing, thus how much of the sun’s inbound energy at that moment is being offset by the albedo, the water-lift, the radiation off cloud-tops and from the cooling packets of lifted air. Not a strict accounting but maybe suggestive.
Bottom line, a most informative and well-written article. I have some friends whom I am trying to cure of carbonophobia and this should prove very useful. Thanks: to Anthony, to Willis Eschenbach, and to the other commenters. I always profit from my visits to this excellent blog.
““Willis Eschenbach (15:59:00) :
Overall, I am reminded of Henry David Thoreau’s famous line. To understand his line, you need to know that in earlier times, it was common to adulterate milk by adding water to it, in order to increase profits. Thoreau said:
“Some circumstantial evidence is very strong, as when you find a trout in the milk” … ””
When I was about 8 dad got a higher paying job. Until then I thougt all milk had trout! Sorry, couldn’t help myself.
Seriously, Willis and the rest of you, this has been informative, entertaining, and even fun. Thanks to all.
“For story ideas or other items related to this website: leave a comment on any thread.”
Here is an idea. This paper proposes that Changes In the earth’s main magnetic field are induced By the oceans’ circulation. The entire concept of the dynamo operating in the Earth’s core is called into question.
Cool. I love “settled science”.~
http://www.iop.org/EJ/abstract/1367-2630/11/6/063015/
–Mike Ramsey
The postulated high cl0ud positive feedback simply does not exist; clouds are always a cooling influence on the earth, and it is that inevitable negative feedback that locks the earth temperatures into that narrow range established by the fundamental physical and chemical properties of H2O.
George,
That’s not correct. The cooling effect from high clouds is well known. The simplest example is an IR satellite picture that shows that cold cloud tops radiate significantly less IR to space than land or water or low cloud tops.
The University of Wisconsin blog has lots of IR satellite pictures and analysis of various features. Here’s the home page http://www.ssec.wisc.edu/ and I found a 6MB PDF http://www.ssec.wisc.edu/overview/ssec-booklet2007.pdf with lots of extraneous info, but it did explain how satellite IR sensors work.
Here’s a NASA site with some information on outgoing IR as seen from satellite: http://visibleearth.nasa.gov/view_rec.php?id=45
OT Sarychev eruption gets serious:
Plume altitde now reaching 10 miles up causing major flight cancellations.
http://scienceblogs.com/eruptions/2009/06/sarychev_peak_eruption_update.php