Today at 00 GMT (5PM PST) a new month started. Every time a new month of statistics starts being logged by WordPress for Watts Up With That, I say to myself, “there’s no way I’ll get this sort of traffic again”. And yet, again I’m surprised that WUWT not only met last months stats, but significantly exceeded them.
Thank you again, loyal readers.
Click for full sized image
It was one year ago that I moved from the Typepad blog to WordPress, and as you can see from above, the growth has been steady, except for one month, April. which had a slight dip.
For September 2008 the total was 846,193 page views, up from 667,215 page views in August 2008.
But there is a caveat, I think the real numbers are just shy of 800,000, because on the weekend of 09/20 and 09/21 I got quite a bit of unexpected traffic that I’m not sure is real or not. During that time, we got a lot of Spam on one particular older entry comparing UAH, RSS, HadCRUT, and GISS, but not anywhere near the numbers specific to that post, shown below:
Blog Stats Increase due to DOS “something”
Saturday 09/20 23,486
Sunday 09/21 25,319
Monday 09/22 1,006
Total: 49,811
You can read about it here in this entry
I checked with WordPress support, twice, and they assured me that the numbers are real, saying:
Hi,
Our stats expert has had a look and found no evidence of a DoS or anything untoward. He says “the most plausible reason is an email newsletter featuring the URL, or else some other non-browser app loading the URL such as a feed reader. I have not been able to find any evidence of of a DDOS attempt or other “foul play.”
Separately, I’ve checked our security logs and see no other signs of activity that would normally indicate a blog under attack.
In short: we’re quite sure the traffic is genuine and doesn’t correspond with an attack of any kind.
Kind regards,
Alex
WordPress Support
Even so, I’m unconvinced. I got not one single comment added on that posting during the onslaught of traffic, almost 50,000 page views, which tells me the numbers aren’t real, no matter what WordPress support says.
Therefore I have decided to take the step of publishing an “adjusted” set of numbers this month. The difference is that instead of inflating the numbers, such as GISTEMP and USHCN adjustments do, I’m reducing them to what I consider a truly representative value for the month.
Raw WUWT September numbers: 846,193 page views
WUWT Spam Uncertainty numbers: -49,811 page views (from 09/20 to 09/22)
Final Adjusted WUWT September numbers: 796,382 page views
Still, not too shabby.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Adjustments, adjustments … it is a slippery slope I tell you.
Soon you’ll be running your numbers through a “robust” algorithm and discovering that every other page view on the internet is teleconnected to this site so should be counted.
Mark my words! 🙂
Lots of things to think about… firm, but not too firm, moderators… blog owner’s integrity… and some really professional and thoughtful commenters.
The world is coming to know Mr Watts.
Thanks,
Mike Bryant
This is a unsolicited call for a few contributions [I give to WUWT every month]. If those interested in this site could give just a small donation every month, WUWT could move up to the professional WordPress version, which costs $500/month. Anthony certainly puts in a lot of his time, gratis, to support this site.
The truth is worth supporting, IMHO. For only the cost of a couple of Big Macs a month, we can negate Al Gore’s propaganda — and his $300 million propaganda budget.
There is no coercion here, only a request to help get the truth out. Click the “Fling Funds” icon on the right if you can help. Thanks.
Sincerely,
~ Smokey
Anthony,
I think that 49,810 of those hits were because I kept checking in to see if there was another sunspot. I can’t tell you who the other guy is.
Congratulations and may you preside over this blog for many years to come, or at least until we have this all figured out. WUWT is a daily read, actually more like hourly read, but you get the picture.
I’ll have to find a large enough rock for engraving that, to prevent loss of raw data to future researchers: “Raw WUWT September numbers: 846,193 page views”
You need not be so modest. You have a quality site with valuable information that even we lay people can grasp. You are doing a wonderful job providing a reputable source for those of us who think anthropogenic global warming is a vehicle for people like Al Gore et al, are to pocket loads of cash. Yes, the climate is changing but the science is not yet settled as to the cause. Thank you so much for all you do.
In my opinion, the trend is a clear indication that Anthony’s “approach” to the subject matter encourages thoughtful consideration of this important debate.
I have to agree with the previous comments. Anthony, your blog is a credit to ‘real’ science. I check in daily to see what news is presented. It is refreshing to see people dedicated to true scientific inquiry examine the biased news of the day. Keep up the good work. The truth is always and absolute defense, and your blog delivers the truth on a daily basis.
Smokey (20:30:54) :”This is a unsolicited call for a few contributions . . . . .”
I’m disappointed in us WUWT’ers I guess I’m naive, but given the value received, “support” via “Fling Funds” should easily cover this. My whole debate with Anthony regarding the PayPal button was driven my “knowledge” that we would support this important work if he would just put the “silly damn button” on the blog..
I contribute $10.00 each month. If I made a list of people here that I “knew” — scratch that — “thought” were contributing — this would never have come up. I can not do what Anthony does. Fortunately Anthony does WUWT. The least I can do is help.
Just what I need another website I have to check a couple of times a day.
Climbing hits are no surprise. You have a web site with a viewpoint, but it lets in informed opinion from all quarters, and you have a good selection of non-radical regulars posting. WUWT aggregates info from all over, and presents it understandably. Nasty ad hominems don’t make it to the site, but gentler digs do. You aren’t afraid to link to the alarmist Real Climate, which notably doesn’t reciprocate.
And, even Al Gore would be forced to acknowledge the real contribution of the Surface Station survey.
It is a popular blog because it is well written, with a healthy dose of common sense. I enjoy your posts and the inciteful comments of your readers who by and large seem to know what they are talking about. It is also nice to have the occasional chuckle from either the posts or the comments. Keep up the good work. I’m hitting this site about 10 times a day.
Congratulations.
Enjoy it while you can.
Problem is that you’ve become a much bigger target now. You’re too big, and you’ve started to upset some really nasty people. They are not amused.
Do you think you still live in an age where the truth is given free speech?
You’d have to be on some serious hallucinagenics not to think a new government will not attempt to dictate the media after November.
I know you are not taking this seriously, but you will be soon.
34 days left till election day.
Just think Anthony, if you let Jim Hansen adjust your data instead, you could soon be part of an unstoppable flood of Global traffic Warming to your site.
Smokey,
Why does the professional WordPress version cost $500/month? Is is because the site gets so much traffic that a hosting provider would charge that much for bandwidth? WordPress is free. If you host your own domain at tubu.net for instance, you get your choice of several opensource blogging platforms for free, including WordPress.
Anthony,
Congratulations yet again. An excellent site for the true scientific evidence (and that’s what most people want, or should want) and sensible comment. I predict 1,000,000 views a month by the end of October; and do I detect a hockey stick here, without need for any adjustments?
Hmmm . . . looks suspiciously like a Hockey Stick” to me 😉
A great blog Anthony!
Interesting reads:
http://news.softpedia.com/news/Earth-039-s-Poles-Are-Shifting-To-New-Coordinates-94392.shtml
and:
http://www.nature.com/news/2008/080928/full/news.2008.1136.html
Mick.
As traffic has gone up I believe that is due to some rather ‘propoganda’ like methods. The headlines and speculations are far from ‘solid’ science and the speculations about the Sun are the reason behind the traffic. Is it another Dalton or Maunder? Were sunspots really the key figure, or was the Mount Tambora eruption also a factor ? The colomn height seems to be significant if you look at the site http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mount_Tambora .
My feeling on these sunspots or lack of them is that yes they are a factor and yes it’s interesting but I don’t think it’s a simple “low sunspots = cold weather” connection, I feel there are a lot of factors(including greenhouse gases, ozone,earth’s orbit, sun’s orbit, precession,etc)
Your site is an interesting read and the comments range from bizarre to indepth , and the subjects are Interesting, but the truth of your success lies in the tabloid approach.
More traffic doesn’t equate to quality . Still a good site, but keep it that way.
I wonder what the next ‘hot ‘ internet science topic will be and if this blog starts it or follows it.
Congrats on yet another good month. Not too shabby indeed! Keep up the quality and you’re sure to be increasingly noted/cited by other blogs/outlets which will help to further your increase in readership in the months ahead.
Best of luck to you Andrew!
I hope you challenge Drudge soon !!
REPLY: Thanks, Anthony
Congratulations Anthony, well done indeed. I can only agree with what other say here.
My only wish for improvement would be an index over all articles posted on this site since the beginning. There are many older articles that deserve a second look, but there is really no way to find them…..
Well, you’re too big now to change the name, anyway. In a few years people are going to be wondering why the premier go-to site for serious climate news is called WUWT. Meh, it could have been worse. Go on, what were the rejected names? Dr Watt? (for British TV fans).
Still, Watts in a name? Congratulations!
Anthony, you run a great blog. Now that you have so many hits you could start advertising on the borders of your blog. You can use the revenue in part to help spread the word of the climate skeptics agianst the huge onslaught from the likes of Al Gore and his cohorts.
“Go on, what were the rejected names?”
– Newton meters per second Up With That
– Huh?
– Weather or Not