Guest essay by Eric Worrall
An Australian climate scientist is concerned that President Trump might shut down US government servers which hold climate data being used to prepare the next IPCC assessment, which might prevent the next IPCC assessment from proceeding.
‘Everyone is vulnerable’: Trump presidency a risk to Australia’s climate science
A Trump presidency in the US could have serious impacts on Australia’s climate science and other research, with fears the cuts could be “CSIRO times 50”.
Donald Trump’s pledge to end US participation in the Paris climate agreement and expectations he will appoint climate change denier Myron Ebell to a key environment role has scientists bracing for fallout.
Australia’s climate research relies on many US programs, some of which have been targeted by the Republican-controlled Congress. President Barack Obama resisted cuts to agencies such as NASA and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration but he will leave office on January 20.
At the extreme end, a Trump administration could jeopardise global climate research efforts by withholding access to observational data that underpins climate models, with the output used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, said David Karoly, an atmospheric scientist at Melbourne University.
“All the [Coupled Model Intercomparison Project] data is stored on US data servers,” Professor Karoly said, adding the US is the only place storing all that information.
Any interruption could mean the next IPCC assessment potentially doesn’t proceed, which “would be an enormous setback for climate science”, he said.
Others, though, noted that while earlier model data were singularly housed on servers belonging to the US Department of Energy’s Lawrence Livermore National Lab, the international Earth System Grid Federation now shares the load. The network is led by the US but has nodes elsewhere, including in Australia.
…
While I applaud US efforts to help David Karoly find his climate data, suggestions that a cut in funding would make access to data impossible seem a bit overblown.
We live in an age where data storage is cheap. For example, Amazon charges $0.02 / Gb / month for data storage, or $20,000 per petabyte per month (assuming no further bulk discounts are available) – more than enough hard disk for even the most bloated climate dataset.
If all the 20,000 climate participants in Marrakesh chip in a dollar each every month, climate data storage and access will not be an issue, regardless of US funding cuts.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
I’d be more concerned it it were kept on Hillary’s server.
True, but no matter what happens, erasing all that climate data that ahem.. “underpins” climate models won’t be any great loss, since it’s inaccurate to the point of useless or worse and they should bin the lot anyway.
and the nay-sayers are part of a Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy
Note: I think it’s totally cool that I’m a tiny part of the vast conspriracy that took that Bitch Hillary and her criminal syndicate down.
Trump knows ( as construction type guy) that anything that “underpins” and is bad will eventually bring the building down. ( maybe he should just let these “scientists” keep building their “tower” on terribly bad foundations and THEN after the building collapses completely say “Told you so”)
Joel: You are a deplorable in a basket!/sarc
http://climatechangedispatch.com/breaking-1920s-brit-fatally-infected-all-government-climate-models
Come on, ЯΞ√ΩLUT↑☼N (November 16, 2016 at 12:53 am ) … yet another 2LoT rant … when will this BS end ? warmistas are not that fool, to violate 2LoT nowadays, even if some early one did a century ago.
One only show himself a fool to believe otherwise.
‘I think it’s totally cool that I’m a tiny part of the vast conspriracy that took that Bitch Hillary and her criminal syndicate down.’
Boy, here in Oregon it doesn’t FEEL like a vast conspiracy. In fact, I think it’s me and, like three other guys… and maybe a few other people in Eastern Oregon. Out here you can’t even safely drive into downtown Portland – certainly not after dark – what, with all these tolerant types out ‘protesting’ – or ‘acting on their free speech rights’ – which to my knowledge doesn’t include blocking freeways, spray-painting, vandalism, smashed windshields – some people have reported knives being tapped on their car windows – and then having citizens, calling for help from their cars, being told by the police (acting with the restraint demanded by Mayor Charlie Hales) to ‘just sit tight and let it blow over.’
SO, at this point, if there’s a ‘conspiracy’, where do I sign on?
And I just HAVE to burst in here to say…
THAT I AM STILL CELEBRATING!!! 🙂
#(:))
“Joy to the WORLD” — I know it’s not even December….
IT’S ALREADY CHRISTMAS FOR ME!
#(:))
#(:))
#(:))
Janice: Perhaps it’s a defense mechanism on my part, but I’m holding off on the celebration until he’s actually in office – right now that seems like forever and a day.
Then… well, then, that party will be something to see.
Yes, because then the Chinese or Russian counterparts of the NSA or even various script kiddies could have “adjusted” them down, not only up like the “good guys” from the Five (Anglo) Eyes.
+10 🙂
Policy based climate science is not needed in a democracy?
Can be stored on an ISIS server in Nimrud. Just don’t draw any faces on the disks.
Why? Everyone and his dog would have access, and the data would be backed up on her staff’s relatives PC’s.
No problem, the Chinese have hacked them already, just ask them.
Just like the BOM.
It would be perfectly safe on Hillary’s server. Wikileaks would look after the backups!
That brought a smile then a “hmmmmm?”.
Or a pay – for – password?
“ a fault tolerant distributed backup system.”
Great description, ….. I loved it.
“I’d be more concerned it it were kept on Hillary’s server.”
There would be copies of the data all over the place if it was on Hillary’s server. We could probably buy a dataset from the Russians or the Chinese, or the Iranians, or North Korea, or a lone-wolf hacker.
All you had to do to crack Hillary’s security was create a legitimate-looking link and send it to them. Lots of people are capable of doing that.
“I’d be more concerned it it were kept on Hillary’s server.”
Yes, but there’s plenty of storage space on it now!
Yes, but you are discounting the POLITICAL LEVERAGE that Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt create when generated by a CLIMATE SCIENTIST. Or so goes the Leftard conventional wisdom. And “climate science” is a political movement before everything.
This is the thing the Left doesn’t get about the election: people know the Left lies and distorts the truth to scare people into voting “correctly.” They know the MSM is in on the ruse.
Media Research Center just published an extensive polling dataset (ahem) that reveals even Hillary! supporters saw through the lies, and knew the MSM was participating.
Americans at least, don’t like to be manipulated and treated as if they are as stupid as Leftard elites believe they really are.
So what does the Left do once it’s obvious a whole lot of voters saw through the propaganda program, thumbed their noses and voted for Trump anyway?
MOAR!!!! Of course.
FUD is a falure. Brexit; Trumpit.
I like Trumpit.
I rather like Top Trump(s), a card game, originated in the UK in the 1970’s. The details on the better card, Trumps, or WINS!
“Climate scientists” often appear to be feeble minded. Bless their little hearts.
“Climate scientists” often appear to be feeble minded. Bless their little hearts.”
It’s all that tension they feel in trying to save the world, and then along comes Trump an upsets the applecart. This terrifies them and makes them lose sleep, which causes sleep-deprivation, which causes confusion in the mind. Sleep-deprivation is a *very* serious problem for the Left right now.
Bless their little hearts? These climate “scientists” have been not only raiding the cookie jar for years but the entire kitchen. They should be shown for the little thieves they are and some severe punishments should commence.
Simple, if they reveal the algorithms they have been using to adjust data, they can have some money.
Even a cursory analysis of those “algorithms” would ensure they can have jail instead.
Sounds good to me.
“a Trump administration could jeopardise global climate research efforts by withholding access to observational data that underpins climate models”
What a joke, judging from the inaccuracy of the climate models, I would say they are both guessing and bending the data.
No access to their data would have no visible effect on the output in my opinion.
If I was one of these scientists, I would be more worried about financing my research and keeping my job.
Cheers
Roger
http://www.thedemiseofchristchurch.com
No big deal, even if all data is lost…
Just make up some new ones
well what else would they use their supercomputers for? certainly not for storage….lol
Couldn’t they do like they already do and just infill data?
If they just pull numbers out of their arse, they will be more accurate than what they are getting now.
Easy peasy! Just use the Mannmade method:
http://images10.newegg.com/ProductImage/A5B1_1_20140702557728746.jpg
More like this I think;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hurley_(stick)
Get one of those wrapped around your head…
It’s David Karoly. Who cares?
Exactly!
counting down for next whine from…hmm?
which one first?
ove hugh whatsit
or mr 98% crook?
guess Karoly will be the abc man of the day interview this week after this drivel
sigh ;-/
I have David Karoly to thank for becoming a skeptic and starting along my way to being a denier. Grandstanding grubs like Karoly make being a denier the only moral position to take. I watched him sit behind one of his alarmist buddies, a Nobel Prize winner in medical biology no less, at a Melbourne University event as his rent boy put up slides listing flouride, vaccination, and the Holocaust along with CAGW skepticism and the word ‘denier’. Much of it was aimed at Iam Plimer, another professor at Melbourne.
It was utterly disgusting, cowardly (Plimer was not a speaker) and said all you needed to know about just what sort of low rent alarmist he was, IMO. I was gobsmacked by the slithering cowardice of it all. I had read Plimer’s book Heaven and Earth then not long published and while I did not buy everything in it could see the clear headed logic and reference to well know facts that contradicted CAGW. I guess I was just nainve as to just what CAGW was abut and just what sort of pond slime so many of the CAGWarmists and their fellow travellers and useful idiots were.
If David Karoly says the sun is shining, don’t believe him, he’s probably lying, IMO.
There is a even greater fear. After Jan 20 the “Data” may be real and not altered. Also a real audit might be done on all past data and the results released.
It is going to be interesting yes?
THAT’S what I’d like to see, a real audit. I’m surprised the airports aren’t packed already with fleeing cheaters, but then I suppose it takes time to pocket all that loot, pack a suitcase and find one’s passport.
Why would a climate skeptic want to get rid of any of these data?
Because Trumps position is not supported by the data. Actually come to think of it, does he actually have a position on climate change? He hasn’t really said anything that could be regarded as serious…. has he?
Actually Simon, the REAL data does support his position. TH, and several other people are constantly showing the REAL raw data and how it has been manifestly tortured to FABRICATE a warming trend.
And how it has been de-Wigley’d ie 1940’s peak SQUASHED out of existence.
Its all the crap with “e” next to it, and all the NOAA/GISS manipulations that need to be thrown in the circular file and bleached. !!
I expect that might happen “accidentally” once POTUS-elect start looking to investigate.
I’m sure one of the NOAA/GISS guys will know how to use BleachBit.
AndyG55
TH, and several other people? Who?
“He hasn’t really said anything that could be regarded as serious…. has he?”
Maybe because he realizes it’s not a serious consideration in reality? Perhaps he lives in the REAL world.
Alan Ranger
“Maybe because he realizes it’s not a serious consideration in reality? Perhaps he lives in the REAL world.”
Or maybe because he really doesn’t understand or care (which was my original point and I will retract it if anyone can find a sensible thing DT has said on the subject). Let’s not forget though he was more than happy to cite climate change as a problem when it suited him. What a guy?
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/donald-trump-climate-change-golf-course-223436
The New York billionaire is applying for permission to erect a coastal protection works to prevent erosion at his seaside golf resort, Trump International Golf Links & Hotel Ireland, in County Clare.
A permit application for the wall, filed by Trump International Golf Links Ireland and reviewed by POLITICO, explicitly cites global warming and its consequences — increased erosion due to rising sea levels and extreme weather this century — as a chief justification for building the structure.
I doubt DJT himself applied for permission…but it shows smarts to turn the tables on the alarmist by using their own rhetoric to get said permission.
Oh dear!
Green Party leader, Eamon Ryan TD, said the barrier poses “a real threat” to the sand dunes, pointing to research from a snail expert, Dr Evelyn Moorkens, into the impact it will have on a protected species, the Vertigo Angustior.
http://www.irishtimes.com/news/environment/doonbeg-says-yes-to-donald-trump-s-golf-resort-wall-1.2685465
Clipe
“…..but it shows smarts to turn the tables on the alarmist”
Ha ha, you are too much. It shows Olympic level hypocrisy.
Simon,
http://www.irishtimes.com/news/environment/doonbeg-says-yes-to-donald-trump-s-golf-resort-wall-1.2685465
I doubt DJT himself applied for permission…but it shows smarts to turn the tables on the alarmist by using their own rhetoric to get said permission.
You cannot be serious…
@Simon
“Or maybe because he really doesn’t understand or care (which was my original point …)”
Or maybe it’s because he does understand that it’s not a serious consideration in reality (which was MY point)
“explicitly cites global warming and its consequences — increased erosion due to rising”
Simon, do you believe sea level change and erosion are the same thing, as almost all French journalists do?
Eggsactly. Skeptics talk about data. Alarmists talk about everything but. It’s “98% believe” and “scientists project” and “new data adjustments that show a completely different conclusion about Da Pause as last week’s dataset” and “someone else says.”
The last thing they ever want to do is have me bring up a spreadsheet with the actual RSS dataset, multi-variate regressions and a string of other analytics hanging off it.
Simply an admission that the data manipulation crimes at NOAA and NASA/GISS have global implications for continuance of the Climate Hustle.
How is this not defamation?
Because the slimy beggars are using the word “could” instead of “will”. What they wrote doesn’t allege let alone prove anything, but it still engenders some type of fear in the reader. Slimy.
I picked up on this bit from the article: “Any interruption could mean the next IPCC assessment potentially doesn’t proceed,” Would the next IPCC assessment not proceeding be such a bad thing? Maybe if the data was kept but withheld on purpose … I wonder if Trump reads this blog?
What that means is they haven’t finished fudging the data yet.
..OMG…They seem to get stupider every day…Have they never heard of data storage ?? There are 100’s of ways to store data…Just don’t use Hillary’s server, it might get wiped with a clothe….
Isn’t it ironic ? The accusation of “withholding data” ? How many times did conspiracy to avoid FOIA data requests come up in the ClimateGate emails ?
I seem to recall statements to the effect of ” why should we show you the data when your just going to try to find something wrong with it”.
Is Trump putting Phil Jones in charge of the data?
No wonder you’re worried, you may never see the (original) data again.
President Trump ate my homework!
I saw an article earlier today where a woman was arrested for drunk driving and she blamed Trump. 🙂
That was Hillary (or maybe Nancy Pelosi)!
That is for consumer level data. Enterprise level storage is considerably more expensive, and, if you will excuse the phrase, significantly more robust.
Amazon claims 99.999999999% durability – likely better than the average government / academic server farm.
Until some politician get’s at it with BleachBit !
It is a bit more complicated than that. First of all, Amazon (and their competitors for the most part) have add on charges for things like IOPS. So, having your data is one charge and using your data is another charge. I could expand on this for several screens. The price is not what it seems at first blush.
That said, storage is pretty a rounding error when compared to the costs to the economy of windmill and solar panel insanity.
On the other hand, defunding the cost of storing the data doesn’t seem to be the accusation. The accusation is that the data might be withheld which is ludicrous. There are so many copies of it floating around, many of them not even held by government but at universities and other research institutes, that withholding them be a nigh on impossible task.
There is a question of integrity of the data. Consumer storage lacks the ability to confirm that every bit you uploaded actually made it in one piece. Kind of important when your files are hundreds of GB’s (databases and virtual servers) compared to a typical consumer file in the MB range. A bit of corruption essentially bricks your backup and potentially renders your database or virtual server useless while the consumer looses a picture of their cat. On top of that try to get application support on consumer storage.
“accusation is that the data might be withheld”
I found that extremely hilarious for some reason.
I doubt very much that Amazon has separate disk systems for both consumer or enterprise storage. Even if they did, any news about Amazon losing customers’ files wouldn’t raise a red flag – it would raise red fireworks and Microsoft, Oracle, et al would launch an advertising campaign touting their services.
I doubt very much that Amazon has separate disk systems for both consumer or enterprise storage. Even if they did…
Ric, if this is important to you, send me an email. Eric too. This stuff is not what it seems but it can’t be dealt with in a few sentences. Bottom line, buyer beware, read the fine print, all is not as it seems.
Sorry Greg F, nonsense. And if you’re so worried, the industry figured out how to ensure accurate transmission and storage of data about a thousand years ago. (There’s a bit of sarcasm there Lief). If they’re so worried let them spring for their own server.
Here is some ‘nonsense’ for you to read:
https://www.necam.com/docs/?id=54157ff5-5de8-4966-a99d-341cf2cb27d3
You also might want to search for “silent data corruption” to educate yourself.
Cube and Ric,
You might want to try a search for “silent data corruption”. Also the following might be beneficial.
https://www.necam.com/docs/?id=54157ff5-5de8-4966-a99d-341cf2cb27d3
The computer-code climate data analyses have been with-held by the Hi-Priests of CAGW so many times as to question how the basic data are (ab)used. One smells self-serving rats, the more so that the hi-Priests deny access to their mannipulations & computationms!!
To the altruist, data measured properly & objectively are ‘hard data’ and shd be enshrined. How they get (ab)used is another matter.
Along with the usual drivel from Karoly at the SMH, we have more alarmist nonsense from the SMH;
http://www.smh.com.au/business/consumer-affairs/sydney-homeowners-face-properties-being-reduced-in-value-because-of-climate-change-climate-risk-group-says-20161115-gsq5mu.html
In some way this is actually a problem for us all as Fairfax continues its decline.
We need honest researched verifiable competent reporting.
SBS, ABC, channel 9 [‘got someone to kidnap?can do’] are scraping the bottom of the online feed barrel and just putting it on the news telecasts.
The greatest of the Fairfax mastheads has just gone under.
http://spectator.com.au/2016/10/official-the-moment-the-age-died/
No wonder the internet is booming.
What they need is a WOM. Write Only Memory.
I am happy to host it at half the price that Amazon will quote.
Write all your data there and it is safe. It will never be read again, which is appropriate given what utter rot it is.
“Any interruption could mean the next IPCC assessment potentially doesn’t proceed, which “would be an enormous setback for climate science”,
Sorry Mr Karoly.. it is the IPCC reports and the IPCC itself that are holding back real climate research.
Losing the IPCC would be absolutely beneficial for real science, because one major stream of propaganda and politically based lies and misdirection would disappear.
BINGO…
No reason why the IPCC reports/assessments should be delayed at all. Since when has the SFP ever relied on either the science or the data? And the WG reports can be bodged together much later and released, as usual, when no-one gives a rip anymore. The MSM will never read them and any dissenters will be pilloried per SOP.
I note the Karoly weasel words “could”, “might” etc and wondered if he wasn’t using some kind of proprietorial “disastrous result” model instead of facts. You know they must have one!
Self awareness FAIL, do climate scientists realise how much they are reacting like priesthoods have always done to threats to their special status?
Anybody remember this?
http://www.surfacestations.org/
Even before the questionable adjustments, the “data” should have been in doubt.
There is no bedrock in the climate data. Just shifting sand.
This map shows that nearly half the land surface has NO DATA. !!
And I bet they have basically zero idea of the quality of the data that is actually collected in many places.
Anybody knows the percentage of surface stations placed at airports? It was an issue here at WUWT some years ago, but now nobody talks about it any more. I believe it was over 35% in Australia. Utterly non-representative of the continent (unless aussies have covered 35% of their continent with airports)
For Sydney, Australia we have Observatory HIll, which was moved, and the airport. I won’t give you any gold stars for the one that is constantly quoted on hot days in the MSM. But as I posted below, the BoM uses 112 devices to calculate a national average, 1 device for every ~68,500 square kilometers and IIRC most are based at airports/urban areas.
There is also a thread here at WUWT called something like “March of the Thermometers”, which documents the removal of rural devices in favour of urban devices leading to a “skewed” result in favour of warming.
Thanks for the info, Patrick
The wailing will only increase. America benefited greatly from spending on basic research but that effort was hijacked by Al Gore in the early nineties. He personally facilitated turning NASA and other agencies into naval gazing earths climate. We have and will continue to pay the price.
Your point about existing data makes sense. It’s what the alarmist is hoping others don’t know.
And holding the launch of a satellite that could measure CO2 levels. And once it was launthed at third attempt, if memory serves, data seems to be withheld. O-CO or something is its name, I have only seen the data for the first 8 to 10 months I haven´t done much effort to find it, though. I only check this site.
IIRC the very first one, built and launched by the Japanese crashed, on launch.
So memory does not serve, thanks. Yeah, I knew that at least one ended up at the bottom of the Pacific ocean. I did not know that one was japanese. thanks for the info. I am under the impression that warmists did not like that particular kind of satellites.
urederra, I suggest you check this site. Are you aware of the box at the top titled “Search WUWT”? enter |oco-2| in it and it will take you to https://wattsupwiththat.com/?s=oco-2
It won’t take you to any recent results, I might prod them someday. The New Horizons people did a much better outreach job with Pluto.
The accusation is that Trump might withhold data. This is patently absurd for two reasons:
1. Trump doesn’t control most of the data. How, for example, would he “withhold” HadCrut data which is held by UofEA in Britain?
2. The history of the matter is that it is the alarmists who have attempted to withhold data. Hansen famously complained that he shouldn’t have to release his data because someone would just try to find something wrong with it, and we also found out from the ClimateGate emails that there was quite the attempt to hide behind various laws and to delete email trails showing what they were doing. And don’t even get me started about the blatant deception in “Hide the Decline”.
Point 2. Wasn’t that Jones of the UEA CRU? What a great scientist! (Nitpicking either of them could have made that statement and both would apply).
Doh! Yes, it was Jones, not Hansen.
Yeah, Phil Jones, the infamous one. (The famous one would be the footballer). But never mind, he has already published a paper where you can see that according to HadCRUT3, 1998 was the warmest year evah, but when they fiddle some things and produce HadCURT4, then 1998 was the 3rd warmest year evah.
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/hadobs/hadcrut4/HadCRUT4_accepted.pdf
In fact, might I make a suggestion?
WUWT has a treasure trove of stunning threads exposing the malfeasance of the alarmists. These go back so many years ago that I imagine quite a few people who are now regulars aren’t even aware of them. So, now is the time, before Trump takes office, while the alarmists are slinging mud, to trot them out again and get them back into the public consciousness. There are SO many to chose from. Some examples would be:
Various ClimateGate threads
Bill Nye’s fake experiment aired by Al Gore
Hide the Decline
Yamal’s most Powerful Tree in the World
..and so on.
@davidmhoffer
I would be interested in an informative resume about climategate. I’m a fairly recent confirmed sceptic and missed most of the scandal because it wasn’t reported properly in the msm.
“The Informed Consumer November 16, 2016 at 1:37 am”
See the post made by Chris in Hervey Bay November 16, 2016 at 2:16 am to give you a glimpse of the sort of mishandling of data. You can do a search at WUWT to find the threads. Also point 2 in the post davidmhoffer November 15, 2016 at 11:17 pm made.
Climategate was a real eye opener all thanks to someone called “Harry”.
@Patrick MJD
Much obliged, I’ll have a look.
Patrick, I save a bunch of stuff from the ‘Harry_Read-Me.txt. Here is another, about Australia, where I live.
“Discovered that WMO codes are still a pain in the arse. And that I’d forgotten to match Australian
updates by BOM code (last field in header) instead of WMO code – so I had to modify newmergedbauto.
Also found that running fixwmos.for was less than successful on VAP, because it’s already screwed:”
.
“Chris in Hervey Bay November 16, 2016 at 3:45 am”
Thanks for the reminder. The BoM processes are seriously flawed and IIRC use only 112 devices to calculate a national average, 1 device for every ~68,500 square kilometers. Year right BoM, not only is an average meaningless, 112 devices for a country as large as Aus.
I am in Sydney.
After 7 years, November 17, 2009, it is revealing to go back and have another look at what was going on. Here is another example.
“I am very sorry to report that the rest of the databases seem to be in nearly as poor a state as
Australia was. There are hundreds if not thousands of pairs of dummy stations, one with no WMO
and one with, usually overlapping and with the same station name and very similar coordinates. I
know it could be old and new stations, but why such large overlaps if that’s the case? Aarrggghhh!
There truly is no end in sight. Look at this:”
So who really cares if the ‘data’ is lost or unavailable anymore. I thought we decided back 7 years ago that the whole climate change was a hoax. We thought then with all the evidence in the emails, that it was over, but, alas, it seems as though Donald Trump, in 2017, will close this chapter, once and for all.
Soon, Anthony will be able to close this web site and have a well deserved, long vacation.
.
I heard that the HARRY_README file was getting hard to find on the Web (don’t believe anyone who says the Internet preserves data forever). So I added a coy to my web site. Recommended reading for any poor soul who’s had to port a large software package where the original author has joined a religious order.
http://wermenh.com/climate/HARRY_READ_ME.txt
Exactly. Everything that the liberals claim are things they are guilty of. Just listened to Harry Reid crying on the floor or congress about Trump causing chaos because he hates all minorities and black girls are fearful of his hate. The tripe enrages the left towards the right. It works to their advantage. And it must stop.
I think what they are really afraid of is that the money pipeline will be shut down. The real problem will be the data won’t be ” adjusted ” to fit the the story when convient. We all have data, it’s easy to download. … ” where did you get that data? ” asked Sam Cougar. NOAA is my reply. Why would reported co2 ppm per year need to be revised for the last 60 years ? Why would temperature anomolies need to be revised for even the last 10 ? Because reality isn’t matching their models ? Does NOAA have data that a skeptic can access, but their scientist have different data ? The true data . Not the made up data downloaded from their site ? Oops, let’s scramble the egg. All of the egg is still there, but the sunny side is gone. See skeptics have no idea what they’re talking about. The yolk isn’t in the center.
I have to say it is takes true talent to keep inventing stories. Someday perhaps somebody could turn this into a children’s fairytale.
The tale is fabulous.
A) It isn’t observational data that underpins climate models, it’s bad assumptions and confirmation bias.
B) This is rich coming from David Karoly; losing observational data, losing luxurious international fetings is more likely.
The climate models are undermined, rather than underpinned, by the observational data.
Beautifully elucidated!
Well phrased!