Closing on a quarter billion

250,000,866Guest essay by Ric Werme

As we close into the 250 millionth page view at WUWT (likely to happen in a few hours done), I’ve been thinking both back to the early days and and wondering what today would be like if WUWT never existed.

Before the impending catastrophe of global warming was introduced to the world, I recall two things that got my attention.  The first was the initial release of the Keeling curve.  That pretty much silenced the impending Ice Age crowd, which I had mostly given up on anyway.  After Keeling, I started pointing out that nuclear power plants didn’t release CO2.  A decade or two later, I heard what was probably a short news note on the Hockey Stick, and figured that CO2 must actually be doing us in.  I started souring on that when I realized later it also got rid of the Little Ice Age.  How could that be?  I had heard too much about the LIA to think it could be wiped away with a wave of a hockey wand.

Various tidbits made me think solar activity was a significant driver, and when I learned about the PDO (Pacific Decadal Oscillation) and began to meet people like Joe D’Aleo I decided to bide my time for a bit longer and start getting active when the PDO next flipped negative and SC23 (Solar Cycle #23) reached its end.  At another talk by Joe, he said both of those had essentially happened.  That was February 2008.  SC23 hung on for another year or two before it finally got an updated tombstone, but it was pretty much moribund during that period.

By then I had found Anthony Watt’s Surface Stations project and discovered that the surface record was worse than I could have ever imagined.  I found RealClimate, but found WUWT made more sense.  I found videos from Bob Carter about the scientific method, something I have deep respect for, and that led me to write my first real climate web page, http://wermenh.com/climate/science.html – Science, Method, Climatology, and Forgetting the Basics.  It’s now somewhat dated, but not bad.  I found that the science behind the Hockey Stick was worse than I could have imagined.

I settled in at WUWT becoming a daily reader.  My main two regrets then were first, wishing I had started reading WUWT when it started late in 2006, and when I learned about John Daly, one of the first serious skeptics, I wished I had been able to see him in action before his death in 2004.  The former seems a bit silly now, the latter I’m glad I’m helping preserve http://john-daly.com

The most momentous event in WUWT’s existence was the release of the Climategate Emails in 2009.  Now we had proof that much of the manipulation we suspected was going on behind the scenes really was.  I stayed up until 3 AM unable to pull myself away from the Harry README file.  As a software engineer, I related very well to what that poor guy had to deal with.  More science, worse than I could have imagined.

Climategate changed WUWT forever.  Whereas before the posters generally had a lot of technical background, a flood of new readers came in (I expected for a short while), some with a technical background, but a lot more just plain folks goaded into looking into the global warming claims they now had reason to question.  This new cohort is still here, having found that WUWT is the best source of information within the climate community.  Very little escapes WUWT, in part because its reach encourages people to submit stories here than try to start their own blog.  (A couple have been successful – especially https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/ and https://chiefio.wordpress.com/)

All in all, WUWT has “won” a battle for readers it never tried to win.  Anthony has managed to find an almost perfect level of moderation where things are kept under control, but people given enough slack to prove their character warrants banishment.  He and the moderation team do an incredibly good job of handling an impossible task.  Anthony credits his years as a TV meteorologist in helping understand audiences, that makes a lot of sense to me.

Anthony could have thrown in the towel at many points along the way, and shutdown or radically changed the blog to give him more time for his professional and personal lives.  I know the impact on me and my “obsession,” I can imagine WUWT feels like a heavy burden at times for Anthony.  After all, he once said way back in 2007:

I don’t want fame, fame is painful. A complete and thorough accounting of the surface temperature record is all I want.

Forecasting the future is difficult….

I’ve also been wondering what would the climate scene be if WUWT had never been created?  Some of the “specialty” blogs would certainly be around and thriving.  Other “generalist” blogs likely would have appeared, but unless they were run by someone who understood his audience I doubt they’d be as successful as WUWT.

I’d bet there would be blogs as tightly controlled as RealClimate and Skeptical Science.  They would fade from lack of reader support.  There would be blogs that are a total free for all to “do things right,” but they would collapse under battles between competing trolls, forcing people with a genuine curiosity out to look for someplace else or just give up.

Ten or twenty years or so from now people will try to analyze the history of the climate debates, I think WUWT will come out both as important and influential.  Maybe we can find Anthony some relatively painless fame then.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

201 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
November 2, 2015 10:06 am

250,000,000 +1.

expat
Reply to  beng135
November 2, 2015 11:27 am

I ran WUWT page view numbers through one of the climate models and found that the true adjusted number is 307,000,000 and by 2047 will overwhelm the internet if nothing is done.

Bryan A
Reply to  expat
November 2, 2015 1:04 pm

Just refreshed and bam, 250,000,866

Harry Passfield
Reply to  expat
November 2, 2015 1:05 pm

By sheer coincidence, in 2047 I shall be x66 – so I just want to post-date a congratulation to WUWT for having reached 307M in that year – in case I’m not around to do so. Mind you, that’s a heck of an underestimation. Makes a change from some (all) other models. 🙂

Ken
Reply to  expat
November 2, 2015 2:33 pm

So, it’s worse than we thought.

goldminor
Reply to  expat
November 2, 2015 2:52 pm

Bryan A…and not even 2 hours afterwards almost another 12,000.

Reply to  expat
November 2, 2015 4:18 pm

Brilliant! Funny, pointed, well said.
Thanks expat.
Thanks to Anthony Watts. The Surface station project was also, like expat’s humor, exceptionally good. With the help and support of many knowledgeable people he has made an enormous contribution to humankind.
Anthony, be sure and thank your compatriots. You are the leader and organizer but they have done much of the good.

steveta_uk
Reply to  expat
November 3, 2015 1:30 am

I get the same number as Bryan A – 250,000,866. Assume this isn’t a live counter, but a snapshot.

skeohane
November 2, 2015 10:08 am

Thank you Anthony for this oasis of sanity in this modern climate that sorely lacks the same.

Mark from the Midwest
Reply to  skeohane
November 2, 2015 12:20 pm

My thoughts exactly, there is a degree of sanity here that is sorely lacking in many other places

Tom Yoke
Reply to  skeohane
November 2, 2015 12:59 pm

Rick’s thoughts on the reason for WUWT’s success are much appreciated, but there is another reason that I think cannot be over-estimated: lots of fresh content every day.
Most blogs, climate or otherwise, show primarily the thoughts of the author. Nothing wrong with that, but essentially no one has the time, or the breadth of perspective, to be worth tuning in to, every day. Anthony, as a broadcaster, seems to understand that.
In my opinion, much of the value of WUWT lies in the sheer volume of news worth reading.

Auto
Reply to  Tom Yoke
November 2, 2015 5:02 pm

Tom
Thanks – you distilled my thoughts.
Huge kudos to AW, his moderators and contributors.
Even a little ‘peep’ for the commenters – most more expert than I will ever be in weather, history, maths, demographics, statistics, climate, politics and more.
Being read by thousands – or more – each day can be empowering where the readers have such diverse backgrounds, specialities – and even simple home locations!
Auto – still a bum boatie with a keyboard

kim
November 2, 2015 10:11 am

Heh, the url says 14 billion. Mebbe some day.
==============

richardscourtney
November 2, 2015 10:16 am

Ric Werme:
You say

All in all, WUWT has “won” a battle for readers it never tried to win. Anthony has managed to find an almost perfect level of moderation where things are kept under control, but people given enough slack to prove their character warrants banishment. He and the moderation team do an incredibly good job of handling an impossible task.

Yes, very true and well said. Thankyou for writing it.
I copy it here in hope of drawing attention to it.
Richard

Reply to  richardscourtney
November 2, 2015 11:36 am

Ironically, richardscourtney is one of those who has been banned from this blog for a time.
🙂
[Reply: But only for a very short time, as others have been. Including this moderator.☺ ~mod.]

Craig
Reply to  M Courtney
November 2, 2015 12:46 pm

Really? Courtney and the mod was banned, lol, what did you guys do or say?

Latitude
Reply to  M Courtney
November 2, 2015 1:24 pm

yes…and it was hysterical!

Reply to  M Courtney
November 2, 2015 1:34 pm

Where can we read all about it?
Inquiring minds want to know…out of curiosity but also to see how to avoid same.

Reply to  M Courtney
November 2, 2015 1:45 pm

Craig
November 2, 2015 at 12:46 pm
Really? Courtney and the mod was banned, lol, what did you guys do or say?

If they told you, they’d have to ki…er…ban you…er…each other.

Severian
November 2, 2015 10:16 am

I don’t think the impact of WUWT can be overestimated. It has done more than any other site in my opinion to publicize the problems with the CAGW “science” than any other site due to its popularity and amazing number of page views and comments. There are many good climate sites, such as Climate Audit, but WUWT provides clear descriptions of the real science involved and the issues with the “consensus” position in a way most laymen can comprehend. And the results of the Surface Stations project have pulled the cover off the horrible quality of surface temperature measurements that never would have happened otherwise.
Both congratulations and kudos are due to our host Mr. Watts. May he long continue to be a thorn in the side of the people pushing false climate science.

Bernard Lodge
Reply to  Severian
November 2, 2015 2:58 pm

Totally agree with your thought that the impact of WUWT cannot be overestimated.
I think Anthony’s biggest legacy will be that he has invented the concept of ‘Public Review’ which subjects climate science papers to rapid confirmation or rapid demolition by his thousands of expert readers. Far more reliable than the Peer/Pal review process.

Knute
Reply to  Bernard Lodge
November 2, 2015 3:32 pm

Indeed
As a recent example re Antarctica ice gain article. I switch over to my mainstream reads and I read nuthin, nadda, crickets.
WUWT needs better distribution.
The article AND the essay AND the comments are perfect material for a 10 minute you tube.
Why does WUWT only have 15100 followers on twitter ?
https://mobile.twitter.com/wattsupwiththat
Am I looking at the right twitter account ?

Rascal
Reply to  Bernard Lodge
November 2, 2015 9:41 pm

I have to agree with you, especially your ‘Public Review’ comment.
I think that most readers, while they may not have the specific knowledge of some of the details noted on articles, do have sufficient knowledge and even experience. with parts of the concepts involved, be it statistics, thermodynamics, physics, chemistry, or even history!
This broad spectrum allows readers to evaluate the validity of certain so-called ‘experts’,and some of the ‘Public Reviewer’ may actually have more understanding of certain phenomena.
Anthony has managed (even if he never intended) to bring the sum of all knowledge about a situation to one place, each comment enlightening other commenters.

Evan Jones
Editor
Reply to  Severian
November 3, 2015 4:15 am

And the results of the Surface Stations project have pulled the cover off the horrible quality of surface temperature
It’s worse than we thought . . .

Editor
November 2, 2015 10:20 am

Good article. I think the world would be in a much more perilous state had Anthony not started WUWT. Like you I thought that AGW was a problem. I have a scientific background (A’ levels in Chemistry, Physics, Biology and a degree in Dentistry) At first the science seemed to be sound, until the first alarmist claim that defied common sense was made (Earth could turn into another Venus).
Anthony should be congratulated for founding this website and giving us facts that supported my instincts that catastrophic AGW was fiction and AGW was more fiction than fact. It is frightening to think what would happen or still may happen to humanity, if these alleged scientists had their way. I think that if no International agreement is forthcoming at Paris later this month, then this whole farce will die a justifiable and long overdue death!

EdB
Reply to  andrewmharding
November 3, 2015 6:09 am

Anthony deserves all the praise he gets here. However, IMO, equal praise should go to Steve McIntyre and his Climate Audit blog. OK, I will settle for two Nobels, one for worldwide science communications to Anthony, and another to Steve for the advancement of statistics and critical thinking in science.

November 2, 2015 10:21 am

And the truth shall set you free…250 million times over!
Congrats Anthony and all WUWT contributors for providing imformative and trusted content that never treats the reader with contempt.

JohnWho
November 2, 2015 10:24 am

249,975,244 views – not yet and not me.
But Congrats when it happens.

Jannie
November 2, 2015 10:28 am

I first heard of WUWT when I saw some Greenie denouncing it on TV. Searched for “What’s up with that” but got here anyway. Have been a quiet reader for maybe 5 years now. Good stuff Mr Watts. Thanks.

Jeff Mitchell
November 2, 2015 10:32 am

Fame is pretty worthless. Influence is what you want. I’m glad this site is here, and I try to look at it daily. I appreciate what Anthony has done here. I’d really like it if people would post legitimate questions about climate on the other sites, so they can find out quickly what happens to people who do. Here, I see people able to ask questions, get a variety of viewpoints, and the community handles trolls pretty well.
Ours is not a homogeneous group either. There is disagreement and lots of back and forth on issues. I learn a lot from the comments and really appreciate those who have expertise that I lack. I would miss all this if this blog didn’t exist. I think of the movie “Its a Wonderful Life” showing George Bailey what his community would be like if he hadn’t been born. Thank you very much Anthony.

Rascal
Reply to  Jeff Mitchell
November 2, 2015 9:56 pm

The strength of this blog is non-homogenty that you note. Some of us are knowledgeable in certain areas, but reading another persons comment comment can often have the result of checking our facts and sources.
Sorry, but it’s late and I have run out of coffee.

Janice Moore
Reply to  Jeff Mitchell
November 5, 2015 8:56 am

Nice analogy to “It’s a Wonderful Life” (my favorite movie!) … great minds (I think several of us have thought the same thing) 🙂
Reprise from Dec., 2013, thanks to Jeff Mitchell’s inspiration:

Virtual Advent Calendar Door Number 15
Dedicated “to Anthony Watts, the richest man in town.”

(youtube)
We love you, Anthony. Thank you, so much, and
MERRY CHRISTMAS! HAPPY THANKSGIVING! 🙂
(yes, I posted this video on WUWT ,once twice before,
but, it seemed timely to post it again, tonight today)

Janice Moore
Reply to  Janice Moore
November 5, 2015 8:58 am

Whoa. So THAT is what happens when you post a video inside a blockquote. Sorry for the BIG SCREEN, there (*blush*).

Coeur de Lion
November 2, 2015 10:35 am

Don’ forget the BOOKS – ‘Watermelon’; ‘The Hockey Stick Illusion’, ‘Climate Change – the Facts’, ‘The Real Climate Change Disaster’ and for a jolly good laugh ‘A Disgrace to the Profession’. Nearly all Amazon/Kindleable at mod prices. Enjoy!

rogerknights
Reply to  Coeur de Lion
November 2, 2015 1:01 pm

Don’t forget “The D*niers” and “. . . Climatism” and “The Climate Caper”.

PaulH
November 2, 2015 10:41 am

As I recall, I started in perhaps 1999 checking sites like JunkScience.com, the World Climate Report, EnviroSpin Watch, Climate Audit, the John Daly site and others. Somewhere in that mix I found the Surface Stations project, and then WUWT. I read just about every article that appears on WUWT. Many thanks for the terrific work!

Paul Westhaver
Reply to  PaulH
November 2, 2015 11:17 am

I was a few years later, but that is exactly how I came upon WUWT. It was the surface stations project work that made me take notice.

Reply to  Paul Westhaver
November 2, 2015 12:06 pm

Paul (and Paul),
That was my experience, too. Anthony’s Surface Stations project was a real eye-opener for me. I could not believe that most of the gov’t run surface temperature stations are 2ºC – 5+ºC out of tolerance! (Maybe not exactly ‘out of tolerance’; what are their error bars, anyway?)
http://www.surfacestations.org/Figure1_USHCN_Pie.jpg
That is the “data” used to supply government departments like NASA, NOAA, NSIDC, etc., with their temperature numbers. And those temperature numbers feed the ‘runaway global warming’, and ‘climate change’ scares. But >90% of the reported temperatures are wrong by 1º – 5+º! So in fact, it could be that the planet is actually cooling. From the ‘data’ provided, we just don’t know.
The climate alarmism narrative is about a 0.7ºC wiggle in global temperatures — over the past 150 years! But a big part of that number comes from government-run surface stations that have error bars of 1º – 5ºC. — far more than the 0.7ºC. of global warming that is claimed.
Conclusion: we can’t trust the government’s conclusions.

DD More
Reply to  PaulH
November 2, 2015 2:26 pm

Paul, I also started on JunkScience and his reposting of WUWT links. Slowly switched over to daily checking of WUWT. Never was taken in by the CAGW story. Might have been Al Gore and the post 2000 poll where only 13% ‘Believed All or Most” of what he said.
Many thought provoking postings by people and recognizing so many names.

Hugs
November 2, 2015 10:46 am

My thanks to moderators who have managed to run this impossible task apparently well.
Also special thanks to our regular contributors.

Bloke down the pub
November 2, 2015 10:48 am

I heard of wuwt on Christopher Booker’s column in the Sunday Telegraph and have been a daily visitor ever since. I had the pleasure of meeting Anthony when he came to Bristol for a presentation by John Cook and hope he and all at wuwt continue the good work. Hopefully one day when cagw is dead and buried he will get the official recognition that he deserves.

Julian Williams in Wales
Reply to  Bloke down the pub
November 2, 2015 11:45 am

Me too, I thought Booker and North had overstepped the mark, the hockey stick was just so convincing. Then I found the real data on WUWT, and few months I later discovered the PDO…buy then I had already worked out that I had been duped by what looks like very amateur science to me, a non scientist! Why are the scientific community putting up with this stuff on their doorstep? The tolerance of scientist for Mann and other AGW junkies makes me despair about humanity, but then Watts, Booker and North give me hope and resilience.

GeeJam
Reply to  Bloke down the pub
November 2, 2015 6:54 pm

Me too. The mighty Booker’s Sunday column guided many of us to WUWT. Like most regulars, I also visit here every day – although tend to comment less now (just like Jimbo, Janice Moore, and a few others).

Janice Moore
Reply to  GeeJam
November 5, 2015 9:07 am

Hey! There’s my name (smile). Hi, GeeJam — hope all is well with you and your wife and that lovely Golden. So nice to be remembered 🙂
that I had to say so.

James Bull
Reply to  Bloke down the pub
November 3, 2015 12:25 am

My first visit here was also prompted by Christopher Booker. I was trying to work out how the “official” story could be so far off what CB was telling his readers. I found out with the Surface Station Project and have been a daily visitor here ever since.
I have learned much the greatest is that there is still a lot to learn.
As my Mum is want to say when wishing you a long life “Lang may your lum reek”
James Bull

UK Marcus
Reply to  James Bull
November 3, 2015 4:20 am

Another Booker fan who, through his remarkable Sunday Telegraph column, found WUWT And then stayed to be educated, entertained and enlightened. But also angered by the prostitution of science in the name of expediency.
Stocks of popcorn ready for the Paris shindig…

SteveT
Reply to  James Bull
November 4, 2015 5:57 am

I had read of WUWT in Christopher Booker’s column and thought “I must go and have a look sometime” but didn’t get round to it until just before the Copenhagen conference. All the media was full of Copenhagen this and Copenhagen that so I decided I needed to have more information with which to form a slightly better opinion than my somewhat slightly skeptical natural leaning.
Well, what a start. The first morning I logged on to see what was what there was a tremendously exciting commotion about some (possibly) hacked emails and whether they were genuine and etc. etc. I was online reading for hours and also the following days as the Climategate saga unfolded.
I still read here most days because I learn so much and there is always an allowance to be skeptical about anything – so one gets to hear more sides of any particular position.
Well done Anthony, Mods and all the many contributors who make it so worthwhile.
Thanks
SteveT

Resourceguy
November 2, 2015 10:49 am

Thank you for everything. It has been enlightening all along the way. Pointing out Al Gore faked video science with Bill Nye at the expense of school kids was also eye opening.

Resourceguy
Reply to  Resourceguy
November 2, 2015 11:03 am

PS. Any school kid that faked science like that would get an F in the science class or the science fair part of the course and any respectable college that dealt with such video cheating would result in expulsion.

johnbuk
November 2, 2015 11:01 am

Yes, thank you Mr Werme for reminding us all what a truly wonderful resource we have here and most of all to Anthony and the moderators for their tireless work in bringing us a beacon of sanity in this somewhat narcissistic world we now inhabit. Another visit to the DONATE button is overdue.

Keith
November 2, 2015 11:09 am

Ric – a very cool article. I am sure many readers here at WUWT feel something similar. I was always convinced about natural variability (given theories like Croll / Milankovich cycles (geological background) Then about 2006 I remember being convinced concentrated solar was the way forward if there really was a problem, Thereafter via sites like WUWT it became apparent that many people populated both sides of the debate. Climategate was the point when WUWT became a daily visit for me.
Congratulations to Anthony, moderators, all the many regular and occcasional contributors and commenters. As you point out, the world would be a different place if we did not have WUWT. This is not to play down many other fantastic sites on the skeptical side.
Maybe one day there will be a Nobel for the skeptics who kept pointing out the flaws in the orthodox position.

John Whitman
November 2, 2015 11:15 am

Guest essayist by Ric Werme said,

“As we close into the 250 millionth page view at WUWT (likely to happen in a few hours), I’ve been thinking both back to the early days and and wondering what today would be like if WUWT never existed.”

I think Anthony’s strength is that he has intelligently avoided being a mere player in someone else’s play about climate science because he owned a wonderful stage where the climate science players presented. Anthony has managed the situation to mitigate against himself becoming what Macbeth morbidly described,

{Words said by the character Macbeth in Act 5 Scene 5 from Shakespeare’s play ‘Macbeth’’}
MACBETH – “[. . .] a poor player
That struts and frets his hour upon the stage
And then is heard no more. It is a tale
Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,
Signifying nothing.”

As Anthony’s venue approaches the 250,000,000th view I say that it has always been a great intellectual ride! Thanks.
John

eyesonu
Reply to  John Whitman
November 2, 2015 3:57 pm

It has truly been an intellectual ride. Absolute brain candy.
I have referred to it as WUWT University in past comments.

Knute
Reply to  eyesonu
November 2, 2015 4:54 pm

+ 10

John Whitman
Reply to  John Whitman
November 2, 2015 4:51 pm

eyesonu on November 2, 2015 at 3:57 pm
– – – – – –
eyesonu,
Indeed.
John

Proud Skeptic
November 2, 2015 11:18 am

WUWT is a part of my daily routine. God Bless Anthony Watts!

Douglas
Reply to  Proud Skeptic
November 2, 2015 11:36 am

Plus 1

November 2, 2015 11:21 am

Thank you for this article.
In the face of such ridiculous acrimony, Anthony’s work here has stood the test of time. Practically every day there is a new push toward some ill-defined absurdity. Today it was Bill Gates inserting his wisdom into the debate, which I wrote about. His view on capitalism and environment are incomprehensible and so similar to the inclinations of his predecessor industrial titans, who, after damaging the life around them, had a change of heart and stopped trusting themselves and demanded restraint. How interesting that Gates’ views magically align with President Obama and the Pope. Could not be more transparent that this is all about wealth transfer and austerity of some kind for everyone except his family.
Often, when my sanity felt at stake, I have sought refuge and found relief here. Learned so much. In my distant past, I worked with people with similar levels of expertise that appear on these pages. Back in a time when the general study of the environment was fresh and brand new. We paid attention to complex things like complex chemical substances and questioned their use and discharge. EISs were actually completed and actions taken. We studied problems and negotiated reasonable solutions. All replaced by dictates, with no real thought given to people.
For someone like me, who once worked with incredible people, scientists and engineers, on real problems that were actually addressed, I am glad to be out this world. The politics sicken me. Watching wonderful people beaten up by media or discharged for their views show little recognition for man’s history and all of those times when the so called consensus has been completely wrong. My respect for Anthony and many other who post here is immense. Surely, at some point, the ranks will grow further and one billion will be seen as a small number. Again, many thanks.

NZ Willy
November 2, 2015 11:24 am

I read WUWT in the very beginning when it wasn’t entirely about climate but, in my mind, complemented Bill Whittle’s EjectEjectEject website. I was already a climate skeptic but WUWT became a fortifying resource.

Editor
November 2, 2015 11:27 am

Well said Ric. It has been a priviledge to be a tiny part of it.

Editor
Reply to  Ric Werme
November 3, 2015 3:55 pm

Thanks Ric!

Janice Moore
Reply to  Ric Werme
November 5, 2015 9:15 am

Hey — that (Verity’s blog) is an eloquently written, high-quality content, well-informed, blog! Thanks for sending us there, Ric Werme.
And, thank you, dear Verity, along with all the other mods, for helping to make WUWT a more accurate, sane, and courteous place to be.

Amatør1
November 2, 2015 11:28 am

I was here in February 2008 also. Well done Anthony.

Latitude
November 2, 2015 11:28 am

WUWT when it started late in 2006….
good grief…that made me have to stop and think
…where has this past decade gone?

Latitude
Reply to  Ric Werme
November 2, 2015 12:58 pm

Ric we’re in trouble…..

November 2, 2015 11:30 am

One quibble and a suggestion for the correction.
“…Other “generalist” blogs likely would have appeared, but unless they were run by someone who understood his audience…”
should be
“…Other “generalist” blogs likely would have appeared, but unless they were run by someone with considerable weather and ‘explain to the people’ experience who understood his audience…”

1 2 3 4