100 Year Snow Records broken across the South Eastern US on October 31st and November 01st

I know we want to be fair and all that. But, with the earliest snows in the SOUTH USA since records have been kept following the series of cold winters in N. Am and Europe, unseasonal late snow and frosts damaging crops in Australia and record Antarctica sea ice extent (~+2Msqkm) and the fact that there has been no warming in 18yrs when the warming we hyped about wasn’t much longer than that to start with and the last half of the 18yrs the temperature has actually declined, when does this stop just being an isolated weather event. Add to this that this is all in the face of malfeasance of the temperature station record manipulators – recent e.g.: New Zealand century temp increase at least halved and Australia’s has been the subject of a backlash – two countries that make up the backbone of records for the Southern Hemisphere.

Ok, you’re showing us the ‘hibernating’ Ap Index. How does that explain “Reduced sunspot count shows Solar hibernation is occurring…”
The Ap index is a daily measure of geomagnetic storm activity on Earth, not a count of sunspots. As you can see in this plot, the Ap is only loosely correlated with sunspot activity.
http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2009/01/ap-index-1932-2008.png
So the “sunspot count” does not explain the recent exceptionally negative Ap anomaly. The Ap Index has more do to with solar wind and other geomagnetic disturbances in the magnetosphere and on the Earth.

“…so the Oceans give up their heat much quicker and the world cools.”
You seem to be saying that when a large object “gives up heat” (i.e. radiates), the objects around it get relatively cooler?
Wouldn’t they get relatively warmer? I.e., trying to reach equilbrium, to satisfy the First Law of Thermodynamics?

There is a physical reason (a missing mechanism) as to why there is a delay in cooling (a mechanism that removes cloud forming ions from the atmosphere). The missing mechanism, is the physical reason why the geomagnetic north pole drift velocity increased by a factor of 10 starting in the 1990’s) and is the physical reason why the geomagnetic field intensity is now dropping at 5%/decade as opposed to 5%/century. Abrupt cyclic cooling climate changes correlates with abrupt unexplained changes to geomagnetic field intensity and field orientation.
The solar magnetic cycle is not slowing down, it has been interrupted. Look at the solar large scale polar field. The sun will be spotless by this time next year.
http://www.solen.info/solar/polarfields/polar.html
The sudden and unexplained cooling of the Southern hemisphere will be followed by sudden and unexplained cooling of the Northern hemisphere. There is an interesting reason why the cooling due to this special abrupt change to the solar magnetic cycle is delayed by roughly a decade and why the Southern hemisphere cooling occurs first.
The observed cooling will take place very quickly in a few years, not in decades. The initial cooling will be roughly 0.5C. 90% of the warming in the last 70 years was due to solar magnetic cycle changes not due to the increase in atmospheric CO2. If and when there is unequivocal observational evidence of significant cooling I will explain the mechanisms in detail and what to expect next.
Comments:
Cloud cover is also affected/modulated by solar wind bursts which create a space charge differential in the ionosphere which causes a electric current to flow from the poles of the planet to the equator (return path is through the ocean.) This mechanism called electroscavenging (see attached review paper for details of the multiple mechanisms electroscavenging and GCR/CRF changes) causes high latitude regions to warm or cool and affects cloud properties and cloud duration times in the equatorial regions which amplifies or inhibits
El Nino/La Nina events. Solar wind bursts are primarily caused by coronal holes (coronal hole occurrence and variance is independent of the sunspot count). What causes solar coronal holes and solar coronal hole variance is not known. The solar coronal holes for the last two solar cycles have occurred for some unexplained reason in low latitudes on the sun very, late in the solar cycle. The solar wind bursts from the coronal holes if that mechanism is not taken into account make it appear that changes to the solar heliosphere does not modulate planetary cloud cover.
Solar heliosphere is the name for the magnetic flux and plasma that is stripped off the sun. The solar heliosphere extends past the orbit of the Pluto. The solar heliosphere blocks and defects high speed cosmic particles (mostly protons) that are called for historic reasons cosmic ray flux (CRF) or galactic cosmic rays (GCR). The CRF/GCR strike the earth creating cloud forming ions.
As noted in this review paper solar wind bursts can remove cloud forming ions making it appear that high GCR/CRF does not cause an increase in cloud cover.
http://www.utdallas.edu/physics/pdf/Atmos_060302.pdf

Atmospheric Ionization and Clouds as Links Between Solar Activity and Climate
4b. Altitude and solar cycle dependencies
Ambient ions are continuously generated by galactic cosmic rays as noted earlier, with the magnitude of the
ionization rate variations being a function of latitude and altitude. During a solar cycle, the values of Q vary by ~ 20 -25% in the upper troposphere and ~5-10% in the lower troposphere for high latitudes, and by ~4-7% in the upper troposphere and ~3-5% in the lower troposphere for low latitudes [Ney, 1959]. The effect of such systematic change in ionization rate on the altitude profile for the production of ultrafine particles has been studied by Yu [2002].

5. The Global Electric Circuit and Electroscavenging
5a. Modulation of Jz in the global circuit.
The global electric circuit was illustrated pictorially in Figure 3.1, and a schematic circuit diagram is given in Figure 5.1. General properties of the circuit have been reviewed by Bering et al. [1998[. Earlier comprehensive reviews have been given by NAS [1986] and Israël [1973]. The polar potential pattern is superimposed on the thunderstorm-generated potentials. In a given high latitude region the overhead ionospheric potential, Vi is the sum of the thunderstorm-generated potential and the superimposed magnetosphere-ionosphere generated potential for that geomagnetic latitude and geomagnetic local time. During magnetic storms the changes in Vi from the mean can be as high as 30% within regions extending up to 30 degree of latitude out from the geomagnetic poles [Tinsley et al.1998].
As indicated in Figure 5.1, horizontal potential differences of order 100 kV are generated, high on the
dawn side and low on the dusk side, producing corresponding changes in Vi and Jz. The dawn-dusk
potential difference has a strong dependency on the product of the solar wind velocity, vsw, and the Bz(GSM) north-south solar wind magnetic field component [Boyle et al., 1997].

http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/2009/2009JA014342.shtml
If the Sun is so quiet, why is the Earth ringing? A comparison of two solar minimum intervals.