The Power Stroke

Guest Post by Willis Eschenbach

I got to thinking about the well-known correlation of El Ninos and global temperature. I knew that the Pacific temperatures lead the global temperatures, and the tropics lead the Pacific, but I’d never looked at the actual physical distribution of the correlation. So I went to the CERES dataset, and Figure 1 shows the result.

internal correlation two month lagFigure 1. Correlation of detrended gridcell temperatures with the global temperature two months later. Blue square shows the extent of the 3D section shown in Figure 2. Gray lines show the zero value.

The joy of science to me is wondering what the final map will look like. This map made me laugh when it came up on the silver screen. I laughed because it’s a very good map of the path of the warm water pumped from the equator to the poles by the magnificent El Nino pump. I didn’t expect that at all.

To understand why a map showing each gridcell’s correlation with the planetary temperature two months later should also be a great map of the path of the water pumped by the El Nino pump, let’s consider the action of the pump in detail. Figure 2 shows a 3D section of the Pacific showing the ocean before and after the power stroke of the El Nino pump.

nino nina tao triton temp and dynamic height

Figure 2. 3D section of the Pacific Ocean looking westward along the equator. The area covered is the blue box at the equator in Figure 1. Click on image for larger size. ORIGINAL CAPTION: This is a view of the current El Nino / La Nina evolving in the tropical Pacific Ocean. You are looking westward, across the equator in the Pacific Ocean, from a vantage point somewhere in the Andes Mountains in South America. The colored surfaces show TAO/TRITON ocean temperatures. The top surface is the sea-surface, from 8°N to 8°S and from 137°E to 95°W. The shape of the sea surface is determined by TAO/TRITON Dynamic Height data. The wide vertical surface is at 8°S and extends to 500 meters depth. The narrower vertical surface is at 95°W. SOURCE: click on “Animation”.

Now, every intermittent pump has a “power stroke” when it does the actual pumping. For example, the power stroke of your heart is marked by the “beat” of your heartbeat. (The heart has two pumping chambers, so there are two power strokes, with their timing signified by the “lub-dub” of your heartbeat.) The power stroke is the time when the work is done—it is the portion of the cycle where the water is moved by the pump. Figure 2 shows the situation before and after the power stroke of the El Nino pump.

On the left of Figure 2, we have the condition prior to the power stroke of the El Nino pump. In this condition, there is a build-up of warm water on the surface. As you might imagine, this also warms the atmosphere above it, and a few months later the warmth spreads to the planet as well.

However, when the amount of this warm water reaches a critical point, the El Nino phenomenon emerges. The wind that powers the El Nino pump arises, and it begins to blow. This wind blows the warm surface water strongly westwards. Essentially, the wind skims off the warm surface layer and pushes it all along the equator until it meets up with continental arc. This movement of untold cubic kilometres of water is the result of the power stroke of the El Nino pump.

On the right of Figure 2, we have the condition after the power stroke, when the wind has  already blown the warm surface water westwards. Note that the cooler subsurface layers have been exposed. These layers are up to as much as 10°C cooler than the surface was  before the power stroke. Naturally, the exposure of this huge area of cool water cools the atmosphere and thus the planet.

So with that as prologue, why does the correlation map of Figure 1 show the track taken by the warm water? It’s all a matter of timing.

Consider what happens when the El Nino pump skims off the warm surface of the equatorial Pacific waters. When the cool subsurface water is exposed all across that huge tropical area, first the Pacific atmosphere and then the whole planet starts to cool.

But actually, that’s not quite true. The whole planet doesn’t cool … because the warm surface water moved by the El Nino pump has to go somewhere. This means that the previously cooler areas to which the warm tropical water has been pumped are warming, while the rest of the planet is cooling … and as a result, we get the lovely blue and green areas of negative correlation shown in the western Pacific in Figure 1.

These areas demonstrate that when the warm Equatorial water hits the Asian continent and the shallow-water arc connecting Asia to Australia, the water pumped by the El Nino splits into two parts. One part of the warm water goes north, and one goes south.

And of course, like the other emergent climate phenomena, the El Nino pump functions to keep the Pacific from overheating. When there is a buildup of warm water, the El Nino pump emerges, pumps the warm water to the poles along the path shown in Figure 1, and then disappears until it is needed once again.

I can only stand in awe. This is a most ingenious method for temperature regulation. When the warm Pacific tropical surface waters get overheated, an emergent pumping system arises, which pumps the warm water polewards and exposes the cooler water underneath, and the cooler ocean waters in turn bring down the temperature of the whole planet … brilliant.

My regards to everyone,

w.

AS ALWAYS: If you disagree with something I’ve said, please quote the exact words you disagree with. That way all of us can understand exactly what you object to.

PS—It does strike me that with both a positively correlated and a negatively correlated area regarding the global temperature two months later, we should at least be able to forecast a few key climate parameters for a couple of months ahead …

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

144 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Alan Robertson
February 27, 2014 10:10 am

He’s doing it again! Thanks, Willis.
I’ve learned a lot from this site and a lot of that knowledge has come from your work and the resultant discussions.

February 27, 2014 10:17 am

Beautiful.
Isn’t it a pity that some folk can’t just admire it all and work out ways to live with it rather than trying to control or change it.

February 27, 2014 10:19 am

Brilliant piece Wiilis, thanks again. Note Fig 1 caption should read along i.s.o alone.

R2Dtoo
February 27, 2014 10:25 am

Great job Willis. Can we learn anything by doing the same thing for 1, 3, 4, 5, 6… months? What I’m really curious about is the timing of the warm water off Alaska this winter. It really seemed to have an effect on NA’s weather.

February 27, 2014 10:26 am

That ENSO heart beat is observable in the rate thunder clouds pump CO2 into the upper atmosphere where it is delivered to the polar sinks. As with the global atmospheric temperature, there is a delay in the stroke signal observed at the poles.

O. Olson
February 27, 2014 10:38 am

Is this right? Seems to me the left side of figure 2 “is” the power stoke of el nino and the right side is a La nina (the recharge stroke). Also, the power stroke of el nino occurs when the trade winds are “reduced” does it not?

O. Olson
February 27, 2014 10:43 am

The same thing I suppose… just looking at it another way perhaps.

eqibno
February 27, 2014 10:44 am

El Nino plays a significant role in US weather as well. Despite the odd discrepancy (Andrew in 1992 etc.) the hurricane season in the Atlantic is quashed by the shear generated during El Nino years. That is a form of the “prediction” of which you speak.

Theo Goodwin
February 27, 2014 10:48 am

Great post, Willis. Thanks.

JJM Gommers
February 27, 2014 10:49 am

Can I draw a conclusion that the frequency and/or intensity of the El Ninos should have increased with the rising global temperature over the last 100 years?

Gary
February 27, 2014 10:51 am

The Global Precipitation Mission just launched from Japan. Hopefully, in a year or so you will have rainfall data to add to this analysis.

Michael D Smith
February 27, 2014 10:55 am

And then the exposed cool water suppresses cloud formation, reducing albedo, and allowing sunlight to heat the cool water area, until it is sufficiently warmed to re-initiate the power stroke. Perhaps this is the intake stroke.

cnxtim
February 27, 2014 10:55 am

I think it is marvellous that scientists study the climate and do so on the taxpayers dollar within reasonable bounds.
However, there are far more pressing subjects that need to occupy science and engineering.
BUT, when scientists and politicians fly off at a tangent over what is nothing more than an interesting theory, force serious engineers into attacking a ‘problem’ that is 100% unproven, scare the living daylights out of people, raise the spectre of humankind destroying the planet – I think it very timely that those that can influence and control public perception and the political representatives we elect MUST stop this madness with its consequent massive damage of economies and our quality of life – NOW!
Best regards,
Tim
http://lannamoon.com Skype: chiangmaitimcomment image
On 28 February 2014 00:56, Watts Up With That? wrote:
> Willis Eschenbach posted: “Guest Post by Willis Eschenbach I got to > thinking about the well-known correlation of El Ninos and global > temperature. I knew that the Pacific temperatures lead the global > temperatures, and the tropics lead the Pacific, but I’d never looked at the > actu”

ponysboy
February 27, 2014 10:58 am

A good chance to repeat an unanswered question That I asked recently:
It appears from much data over several decades that the cooling of the planet from the La Nina is never quite enough to totally overcome the previous warming from the El Nino. Two issues I wonder about:
1. Does this seemingly unbalanced cycle always leave a (semi-) permanent increase in global temperatures at the end of the cycle…and therefore periodic step increases in global temperatures? And, if so, at what point will it stop….. or will it stop without some other forcing?
2. Or is this phenomenon of apparent step changes due to the underlying continuous increase in global temperature (due to AGW or some other natural cycle) so that the baseline is always trending upward?
Thanks for anyone’s thoughts on the above.

February 27, 2014 11:09 am

In watching and saving the daily sst anomalies I had been wondering similar as to why some level of forecast could be possible, using the great visual real time tools available. For example the cool pool areas in the southern ocean that gradually were developing and then moving towards Australia. Three months ago, I found myself wondering if this would lead to cooler temps for Australia. The only part that I didn’t know was in the timing of the event ie, ‘how long does that water take to move the needed distance to have an effect’. There are three main cooler water pockets in the southern ocean. One was to the west and it had developed off of the Antarctic coast and then moved north, but not as easterly as I was thinking it would. It still sits to the west and is only slowly drifting eastward. The second pocket developed further east off of Antarctica and has moved straight north. This cooler water enveloped New Zealand early on, and then finally has touched the south eastern and eastern coast of Australia. Melbourne has been showing the effects of this in recent weeks. The third cooler water developed in the northern Indian Ocean and then moved eastward and southward to impact Australia from the north. Most of the northern coast of Australia now has that cooler water sitting off of it,s coastline. Only the northwest and southern coastline of Australia are still being impacted by warmer waters. The next step would be to understand the timing of the flow rate, which would be driven by wind and currents, to complete a picture of the total package. From there a partial forecast of temp conditions could be possible.

Old woman of the north
February 27, 2014 11:17 am

Just a small typo under Diagram 2 – ‘alone’ when you mean ‘along’, Willis.
Your explanation of the ‘pump’ action of El Nino is great. Is there a mirror one in the Atlantic to set off the Gulf Stream? Does the warm water going north and south have a name like the Gulf Stream?
[Thanks, OWOTN, fixed. -w.]

February 27, 2014 11:26 am

Willis, you point out in the beginning of the post that the Pacific leads the globe in temp changes. In early November of last year there was a spike in sunspots and activity from the Sun. Some weeks later the temps shifted dramatically here in No California. After 2 months of bitter cold the days warmed up and the night time temps gradually increased. The shift in temps was an increase of 20F for the night time temps. It seemed to me that the solar spike had led to the warming change. I had asked a question regarding a possible connection between the solar influence and the temp change in the coastal mountain area where I live, but received a negative response to the question. From the point of view that the Pacific leads the globe is it possible that the temp change was due to the circumstances which I am describing, solar heats eastern Pacific warmth moves inland off of the ocean?

February 27, 2014 11:30 am

“And of course, like the other emergent climate phenomena, the El Nino pump functions to keep the Pacific from overheating.”
teleology

Walt The Physicist
February 27, 2014 11:37 am

@cnxtim says:
February 27, 2014 at 10:55 am
Dear Tim,
Real science is boring. It is boring to general public and it is boring to most of the government officers that decide what to fund and distribute funding. It is boring to the officers and heads of the private funds that support science. So, scientists that seek funding have to propose something that is exciting, disruptive, futuristic, fantastic,.. not boring. Something that is femto-, nonlinear Schrodinger, atto-, peta-, relativistic, nano-bio-, Higgs, and gravizapa related. Or, it should be something that will save us from killer-asteroid strike, man-made global warming, or will stop hurricane with 5,900 wind turbines in its path (and also will generate a lot of energy that will be stored in gigantic underground thermal storage chambers). Or, something that will disturb gravitation and disrupt navigational path of unfriendly alien civilizations if they will decide to attack the Earth… Studying water properties and its structure that, in spite of common believe, is practically completely unknown and not studied?! I see you yawning, falling asleep, I see you getting bored… So, who do you think “must stop this madness with its consequent massive damage of economies and our quality of life” and how will they do this?

James Strom
February 27, 2014 11:44 am

ponysboy says:
February 27, 2014 at 10:58 am
A good chance to repeat an unanswered question That I asked recently:
It appears from much data over several decades that the cooling of the planet from the La Nina is never quite enough to totally overcome the previous warming from the El Nino. Two issues I wonder about: . . .
_____
I think this is a really good question, implying that El Nino may be gradually ratcheting up the global temperature. And if you look at a graph of temperature anomalies going up through the 90’s you get the impression that El Nino has been doing just that. However, there have been several El Ninos since the big one in 1998, and they have all occurred during a period of a rather flat trend in global temperatures.
Here is what Wikipedia has to say (today) about recent ENSO history:
>>A strong La Niña episode occurred during 1988–1989. La Niña also formed in 1995 and from 1998–2000, and a minor one from 2000–2001. In recent times, an occurrence of El Niño started in September 2006[42] and lasted until early 2007.[43] From June 2007 on, data indicated a moderate La Niña event, which strengthened in early 2008 and weakened before the start of 2009; the 2007–2008 La Niña event was the strongest since the 1988–1989 event. The strength of the La Niña made the 2008 Atlantic hurricane season one of the most active since 1944; 16 named storms had winds of at least 39 mph (63 km/h), eight of which became 74 mph (119 km/h) or greater hurricanes.[19]
>>According to NOAA, El Niño conditions were in place in the equatorial Pacific Ocean starting June 2009, peaking in January–February. Positive SST anomalies (El Niño) lasted until May 2010. SST anomalies then transitioned into the negative (La Niña) and have now transitioned back to ENSO-neutral during April 2012. In early July, NOAA stated that El Niño conditions have a 50+% chance of developing during the Northern Hemisphere summer. As the 2012 Northern Hemisphere summer started to draw to a close, NOAA stated that El Niño conditions are likely to develop in August or September. The September 30, 2013 NOAA report indicates high probability of no El Niño or La Niña (ENSO-neutral) through Spring 2014.[37]<<
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/El_Ni%C3%B1o#Recent_occurrences

James at 48
February 27, 2014 11:48 am

And we can thank Plate Tectonics for the design of the current pump configuration. We have a long road ahead with this config. And that means, the ice will return.

James Strom
February 27, 2014 11:48 am

Steven Mosher says:
February 27, 2014 at 11:30 am
“And of course, like the other emergent climate phenomena, the El Nino pump functions to keep the Pacific from overheating.”
teleology
____
Nope–just casual idiomatic language, which you are smart enough to translate into formal scientific prose.

1 2 3 6