Svensmark's cosmic ray theory of clouds and global warming looks to be confirmed

Note: Between flaccid climate sensitivity, ENSO driving “the pause”, and now this, it looks like the upcoming IPCC AR5 report will be obsolete the day it is released.

From a Technical University of Denmark press release comes what looks to be a significant confirmation of Svensmark’s theory of temperature modulation on Earth by cosmic ray interactions. The process is that when there are more cosmic rays, they help create more microscopic cloud nuclei, which in turn form more clouds, which reflect more solar radiation back into space, making Earth cooler than what it normally might be. Conversely, less cosmic rays mean less cloud cover and a warmer planet as indicated here.  The sun’s magnetic field is said to deflect cosmic rays when its solar magnetic dynamo is more active, and right around the last solar max, we were at an 8000 year high, suggesting more deflected cosmic rays, and warmer temperatures. Now the sun has gone into a record slump, and there are predictions of cooler temperatures ahead This new and important paper is published in Physics Letters A. – Anthony

Danish experiment suggests unexpected magic by cosmic rays in cloud formation

Researchers in the Technical University of Denmark (DTU) are hard on the trail of a previously unknown molecular process that helps commonplace clouds to form. Tests in a large and highly instrumented reaction chamber in Lyngby, called SKY2, demonstrate that an existing chemical theory is misleading.

Back in 1996 Danish physicists suggested that cosmic rays, energetic particles from space, are important in the formation of clouds. Since then, experiments in Copenhagen and elsewhere have demonstrated that cosmic rays actually help small clusters of molecules to form. But the cosmic-ray/cloud hypothesis seemed to run into a problem when numerical simulations of the prevailing chemical theory pointed to a failure of growth.

Fortunately the chemical theory could also be tested experimentally, as was done with SKY2, the chamber of which holds 8 cubic metres of air and traces of other gases. One series of experiments confirmed the unfavourable prediction that the new clusters would fail to grow sufficiently to be influential for clouds. But another series of experiments, using ionizing rays, gave a very different result, as can be seen in the accompanying figure.

The reactions going on in the air over our heads mostly involve commonplace molecules. During daylight hours, ultraviolet rays from the Sun encourage sulphur dioxide to react with ozone and water vapour to make sulphuric acid. The clusters of interest for cloud formation consist mainly of sulphuric acid and water molecules clumped together in very large numbers and they grow with the aid of other molecules.

Simulating what could happen in the atmosphere, the DTU’s SKY2 experiment shows molecular clusters (red dots) failing to grow enough to provide significant numbers of “cloud condensation nuclei” (CCN) of more than 50 nanometres in diameter. This is what existing theories predict. But when the air in the chamber is exposed to ionizing rays that simulate the effect of cosmic rays, the clusters (blue dots) grow much more vigorously to the sizes suitable for helping water droplets to form and make clouds. (A nanometre is a millionth of a millimetre.)

Atmospheric chemists have assumed that when the clusters have gathered up the day’s yield, they stop growing, and only a small fraction can become large enough to be meteorologically relevant. Yet in the SKY2 experiment, with natural cosmic rays and gamma-rays keeping the air in the chamber ionized, no such interruption occurs. This result suggests that another chemical process seems to be supplying the extra molecules needed to keep the clusters growing.

“The result boosts our theory that cosmic rays coming from the Galaxy are directly involved in the Earth’s weather and climate,” says Henrik Svensmark, lead author of the new report. “In experiments over many years, we have shown that ionizing rays help to form small molecular clusters. Critics have argued that the clusters cannot grow large enough to affect cloud formation significantly. But our current research, of which the reported SKY2 experiment forms just one part, contradicts their conventional view. Now we want to close in on the details of the unexpected chemistry occurring in the air, at the end of the long journey that brought the cosmic rays here from exploded stars.”

###

The new paper is:

Response of cloud condensation nuclei (>50 nm) to changes in ion-nucleation” H. Svensmark, Martin B. Enghoff, Jens Olaf Pepke Pedersen, Physics Letters A 377 (2013) 2343–2347.

In experiments where ultraviolet light produces aerosols from trace amounts of ozone, sulfur dioxide,and water vapor, the relative increase in aerosols produced by ionization by gamma sources is constant from nucleation to diameters larger than 50 nm, appropriate for cloud condensation nuclei. This resultcontradicts both ion-free control experiments and also theoretical models that predict a decline in the response at larger particle sizes. This unpredicted experimental finding points to a process not included in current theoretical models, possibly an ion-induced formation of sulfuric acid in small clusters.

FULL PAPER LINK PROVIDED IN THE PRESS RERLEASE: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/51188502/PLA22068.pdf (open access PDF)

LOCAL COPY: (for those having trouble with link above):  Svensmark_PLA22068 (PDF)

(h/t to “me” in WUWT Tips and Notes)

Added: an explanatory video from John Coleman –

And this documentary:

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

486 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
David
September 4, 2013 9:20 am

So of course, it is the sun 🙂

MikeN
September 4, 2013 9:27 am

Yes that’s what this would mean. The sun keeps out cosmic rays.

David
September 4, 2013 9:27 am

sun(s)

September 4, 2013 9:28 am

Continuing the sterling reputation of Danish science in the tradition of Tycho, Steno & Bohr, redeeming the odium of Boiling Jim Hansen, possibly of Norwegian extraction.

steven
September 4, 2013 9:29 am

Can somebody say Nobel?

NeedleFactory
September 4, 2013 9:30 am

Can others open the “open access” pdf? I cannot.

Kurt in Switzerland
September 4, 2013 9:31 am

Waiting for Pierrehumbert and Gavin to get in their obligatory stabs.
But still hoping that curiosity will win over dogmatism.
Kurt in Switzerland

Dave Day
September 4, 2013 9:32 am

It is stuff like this that is why I love this site and return daily…….
I learn so much.
Many thanks Anthony,
Dave

September 4, 2013 9:34 am

The open access PDF seems to have an extra space embedded in the file extension. If you save it with a different extension and then back to .pdf it opens fine.

David
September 4, 2013 9:35 am

Absolutely, it was always going to be magnetic/gravitational modulation of cosmic rays together with solar activity.
Piers Corbyn isn’t looking so silly now is he?
Of course the warmists are going to attempt to blame the pause on this effect which may be difficult if the cloud cover records don’t match the temperature plateau.
REPLY: Piers looks silly because he makes grandiose forecast skill claims that are so vaguely written they can compete with Jeane Dixon style astrological forecast language, not because he believe is cosmic ray modulation – Anthony

GlynnMhor
September 4, 2013 9:35 am

Meanwhile, here in Canada ice cover is delaying supply shipments to northern communities:
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/north/story/2013/09/03/north-barge-delays.html

Sensorman
September 4, 2013 9:36 am

Needle – yes, it has an extra hyphen in the file extension, but just open it with Acrobat reader and it should be fine

Bill Parsons
September 4, 2013 9:37 am

The process is that when there are more cosmic rays, they help create more microscopic cloud nuclei, which in turn form more clouds, which reflect more solar radiation back into space, making Earth cooler than what it normally might be.

Does Svensmark suggest that the level of cosmic radiation is in flux – or that fluctuations in the sun’s energies cause variations in the earth’s magnetic shield?

Kurt in Switzerland
September 4, 2013 9:37 am

NeedleFactory:
Save file (already has a .pdf extension) — will go to your Downloads folder
Open Acrobat (probably helps if you have a recent version)
Open File (PLA22068.pdf)
Kurt in Switzerland

JimS
September 4, 2013 9:38 am

So let me get this straight: reduced solar radiation, means more cosmic radiation, which means more clouds? If so, then this would be a double whammy negative feedback system? I apologize for the non-scientific terminology used.

Londo
September 4, 2013 9:40 am

“Can others open the “open access” pdf? I cannot.
There is a minus (-) sign at the end of the file name. Just rename the file.

Corey S.
September 4, 2013 9:41 am

“the upcoming IPCC AR5 report will be obsolete the day it is released.”
I agree, but the ‘purveyors of all the is climate science’ will say that since it isn’t IN the report, that they will have to wait until the next one.
Everyone knows that the IPCC report is the top of the food chain for ‘true’ CC scientists./
The powers that be will find some way to exclude it, in the end. Just wait and see. Or, they will have some on their side write a paper that ‘refutes’ this one, giving them the cover they need.
It will be interesting to see this one play out.

mrsean2k
September 4, 2013 9:44 am

Parsons
Nigel Calder has a long-but-worth-reading post on the mechanism and some of the claimed effects it’s had on earth over geological timescales (over a year old, so likely some changes):
http://calderup.wordpress.com/2012/04/24/a-stellar-revision-of-the-story-of-life/

September 4, 2013 9:44 am

Interesting but still doesn’t explain the circulation changes between zonal and meridional jets with varying degrees of atmospheric ‘blocking’.

Bill Parsons
September 4, 2013 9:46 am

The process is that when there are more cosmic rays, they help create more microscopic cloud nuclei, which in turn form more clouds, which reflect more solar radiation back into space, making Earth cooler than what it normally might be.
Does Svensmark suggest that the level of cosmic radiation is in flux – or that fluctuations in the sun’s energies cause variations in the earth’s magnetic shield?

I could have read further before I posted. The sun’s role is explained below..

DirkH
September 4, 2013 9:47 am

JimS says:
September 4, 2013 at 9:38 am
“So let me get this straight: reduced solar radiation, means more cosmic radiation, which means more clouds? If so, then this would be a double whammy negative feedback system? I apologize for the non-scientific terminology used.”
Total Insolation does not change significantly. What changes significantly is only the magnetic field. So; “single whammy” – by modulating the albedo of Earth.

September 4, 2013 9:50 am

I have always believed that this was one of the many secondary effects associated with changing solar conditions.
That is a quiet sun allows more cosmic rays to enter earth’s atmosphere which in turn will promote more clouds colder temperatures.
The location of the Magnetic Pole, also has a bearing as to where the cosmic ray penetration will be greatest over the earth. The lower the latitude of the magnetic poles ,the lower will be the latitude of maximum cosmic ray penetration,. The lower the latitude of comic ray penetration the more moisture will be present, for the cosmic rays to work with.

September 4, 2013 9:52 am

So this raises a question:
Is this the Nobel Prize for Chemistry or Physics?

September 4, 2013 9:53 am

steven:
At September 4, 2013 at 9:29 am you ask

Can somebody say Nobel?

Elevation of the Svensmark Hypothesis to be the Svensmark Theory would open up entire new fields of climate physics. That elevation requires that the experimental observation can be understood theoretically.
So, Henrik definitely would deserve a Nobel Prize for physics if he can evince the required theoretical understanding of his experimental observation.
I think we should be prepared to start a pro-Nobel campaign for Henrik when he completes his study.
Richard

Ursus Augustus
September 4, 2013 9:54 am

An interesting speculation is that the cloud albedo effect is non uniform and say more effective over the Pacific and drives the ENSO cycles and hey presto… a powerfull compound mechanism. But that’s just me here in Oz getting excited that we are about to boot out a loony warmist government and elect one with a leader who once expressed the opinion ( as we are often reminded) that global warming alarmism was “just crap”.

1 2 3 20
Verified by MonsterInsights