Northern California's coming super soaker event via the 'Pineapple Express'

UPDATE: Added this HiDef imag showing a trio of lows (commas shaped clouds) in the Gulf of Alaska and southward:

Click image to enlarge to HDTV size

There’s lots of buzz here in Northern California about a series of upcoming storms starting today and through the weekend that are expected to bring gusty winds and significant rain. So much rain in fact, that there is likely to be flooding. Some reports have my area of NorCal getting as much as 20″ of rain (~75% of the normal seasonal total). I think that is over-forecasted, but it certainly is a possibility.

I remember one similar event in the El Niño years of the 1990’s, a “March Miracle” that dropped ~17″ of rain in a  24 hour period in the mountains just east of me at a DWR weather station called “Four Trees” above the Feather River Canyon. It was such an anomaly that former California State Climatologist Jim Goodridge and I set out to see if maybe the rain gauge had a urinal attached or some other such issue. It turned out that the station was fine.

The setup of this series of storm systems in not unlike that event though, a strong, deep, Arctic low will guide the storms with its rotation right into Northern California as an “Atmospheric River” (AR) or “Pineapple Express” as we often call it.

TWC writes:

Amazingly, according to NOAA’s Earth System Research Laboratory (ESRL), a strong AR can transport as water vapor up to 15 times the average flow of liquid water at the mouth of the Mississippi River!

Suffice to say, if an AR stalls over a particular area, significant flooding can be the result.  In fact, a study by Ralph et al. (2006) found ARs responsible for every flood of northern Calfornia’s Russian River in a 7-year period.

According to NOAA/ESRL, 30-50% of the average annual precipitation in the West Coast states typically occurs in just a few AR events. With that in mind, one such AR is poised to soak parts of the West Coast this week.

The Quantitative Precipitation Forecast (QPF) model for this event is quite striking, putting the most significant rainfall into Butte County (where I live), Tehama County, and Plumas County from about Midnight Thursday to 10AM PST Friday as seen in these two plots:

That works out to ~ 5 inches in a 12 hour period for those two hotspots in NE Butte County. This image below shows the 5 day total expected rainfall courtesy of the NOAA NWS Hydrometeorological Prediction Center.

That should place some significant strain on the Feather River and Russian River watersheds.

There’s also concern over burn areas from summer fires that may get so saturated that mud and debris flows might be issues:

NWS Sacramento has prepared a video briefing:

Note that no place does NWS say there’s any connection to climate, CO2, or global warming. But just watch, the first news report of some related event or disaster will likely prompt those political activists that want to make you believe things like this are “unprecedented” and exacerbated by “global warming” to make some connection for their purposes.

My local newspaper, the Enterprise Record has a good editorial today about preparedness and Hurricane Sandy. I especially liked this part:

Most of us live in an environment of asphalt and sturdy buildings, with nature tamed into lawns and shrubs and shade trees. Even our “natural” parks are pretty polite places. We throw the switch and the lights come on. We turn the tap, and water comes out of the faucet. Nature is distant and remembered through a romantic mist.

(Read it all here.)

Which is why when political activists like Bill McKibben try to stir up emotions over routine weather events, he is often successful at convincing the gullible that somehow, the weather has changed and turned more sinister, and that people are to blame.

That sort of “blame the witches” thinking went out with the middle ages.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

81 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
November 28, 2012 7:46 am

I forgot all about the “Pineapple Express”. Haven’t heard that term in a few rainy seasons. I was noticing that this storm is warmer than normal for this time of year, and a PE driven storm certainly explains it..

Jim Rose
November 28, 2012 7:48 am

Hi
Thanks for the heads up. Is there any significant snow pack in the Sierras yet — e.g. at Donner’s summit?
Jim

tgmccoy
November 28, 2012 7:50 am

Great article Anthony-puts things in perspective.Anyone who lives with nature just outside the
door knows that it isn’t all Bambi and Thumper (and Bambi had to put up with the possibility of being venison chili or getting burned to a Deer fritter in a fire.). wife and I both have Appalachian
(and Ozark) roots. being prepared is a way of life.BTW this is a fairly typical El Nino pattern is it
not?
One other thing the USFS used to replant with temporary grass seed when there was a big fire.
to reduce the possibility of flooding-not being done any more?

MikeP
November 28, 2012 7:54 am

I remember the 1964 floods (the “thousand year” floods), so major flooding can happen from these type events. This doesn’t look to me like that class of event … at least I hope it doesn’t go that way 🙂 🙂 :).
For those who don’t know the history of N. Cal., there was flooding in 1955 that then gov. Brown (the elder) called the “hundred year floods”. Nine years later there were much worse floods which then gov. Reagan had to describe, hence the inflation of terms. Clearly there aren’t enough statistics to clearly describe the probability of either event.

Tom Bakewell
November 28, 2012 8:02 am

Gods and goddess bless the wonderful writing skills you so aptly demonstrate. Good Job!

polistra
November 28, 2012 8:07 am

Unsurprisingly, we’re still rerunning 1938.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Los_Angeles_flood_of_1938
(Checking these cycles is like shooting fish in a barrel. I simply googled ‘California 1938 rain’ and sure enough, a record-breaker. You don’t need theories when you’ve got cycles.)

November 28, 2012 8:08 am

Clouds may be moving in but the ChicoER shines.
It’s not just the individuals who need to prepare; using their own initiative! Too many local governments are so obsessed with planet saving that they are ignoring their own back yards. As a result, they can’t keep 20 inches of rain at bay in 24 hours; so there’s no hope they’ll be able to do anything about 20 feet of sea level rise in 90 years. 😉

markx
November 28, 2012 8:10 am

Gotta marvel at all this rain.
In Australia the whole AGW story a few years ago was all about incessant drought. It seems to barely stop raining here since then….. and most farmers are happy about that, in spite of occasional flooding.

Les Johnson
November 28, 2012 8:12 am

Lets hope its doesn’t match the sysetm that parked over California for 45 days, in 1861-1862.
http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&ved=0CDkQFjAB&url=http%3A%2F%2Fmeteora.ucsd.edu%2Fcap%2Fpdffiles%2FARkStorm_Summit_Handout_Final.pdf&ei=Kze2UMj8LpHo9gSA4YCYBA&usg=AFQjCNELeOSRSTc5uTcGJ2MCh9GTcf4viw&sig2=lLJg2K4ObpwI2RAej10jeg
If it does, we will have Mckibben tring to sell a global warming sandwich, with Sandy on one side, California the other.
Ah heck, why even try. Even it just rains, its the fault of AGW.

Dario from NW Italy
November 28, 2012 8:27 am

Allways a good work, Anthony.
Something similar is appening here in NW Italy, with a strong vortex centered on the Ligurian Sea (Northern Thyrrenian Sea).
PS I’ve been there back in 1999, I remember Northern California as a very beautiful country; I’ve also spent a few hours in Sacramento at the Bureau of Mine and Geology…

pochas
November 28, 2012 8:34 am

Keep your batteries dry!

November 28, 2012 8:35 am

Here in Blighty, we are all excited that we have recently received 2″ of rain in some areas!

November 28, 2012 8:39 am

Your note about the potential for mass wasting a byproduct of forest fires is as real or perhaps even more real then the flood potential. That flood potential is increased by the lack of forest cover too. Lots of snow a higher elevations is good for skiing though.

P. Solar
November 28, 2012 8:54 am

polistra says:
Unsurprisingly, we’re still rerunning 1938.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Los_Angeles_flood_of_1938
(Checking these cycles is like shooting fish in a barrel. I simply googled ‘California 1938 rain’ and sure enough, a record-breaker. You don’t need theories when you’ve got cycles.)
Indeed, the first thing I thought when I saw this was “global cooling”. As the atmosphere cools it will start dumping it’s water content.
Start writing articles now debunking more claims “extreme weather” BS from weeping Bill & co.
I’m sure they’re already writing some crap blaming this on global warming before the rain has even fallen.

Jean Parisot
November 28, 2012 8:57 am

Wasn’t one of these atmospheric rivers going to wash LA out into the ocean?

be cause
November 28, 2012 9:00 am

so enjoy your weather and if others need to call it climate…what the heck

November 28, 2012 9:04 am
Terry
November 28, 2012 9:25 am

Reminds me that while I was driving through northern California on vacation in the mid 70s. I was driving down US101 after leaving Eureka when the highway took a more inland route. When coming around a curve there was suddenly a deep valley to the left. There was a sign on the right saying ‘High Water Mark’ for some floods maybe 10 years back or so. That valle’ was so deep I could barely see a small creek at the bottom. Must have been a couple 100 feet or more down to the creek. I think it was the Russian river? I grew up in western Oregon so the mountains on the west coast are familiar too me and that was no ravine, it was a deep valley. I still find it hard to believe.
I wonder if that flooding was caused by the same kind of event described here.

November 28, 2012 9:28 am

Jim Rose says:
November 28, 2012 at 7:48 am
Hi
Thanks for the heads up. Is there any significant snow pack in the Sierras yet — e.g. at Donner’s summit?
Jim

Here in the Fresno / Yosemite area, the expected snow level from this storm is going to be only at 7500ft elevation. It’s a warm storm for this time of year. But the warm ones normally bring more rain, and hopefully this one will add a good amount of water to the reservoirs.

Philip Peake
November 28, 2012 9:47 am

Bob: I have relatives in the UK, so keep up with the new there. Saw the BBC news shouting about 2″ of rain in 24 hours, checked my weather station and on the sam day, we had 2.5″ … just a normal day in the life, here in sunny Oregon.

Roger Knights
November 28, 2012 9:48 am

It’s just started to rain in SW Seattle.

Box of Rocks
November 28, 2012 9:59 am

So how much energy will be release into space?
How much of that energy will be what could be considered more than normal?

November 28, 2012 10:00 am

Nah, what did I tell you?
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/11/25/skeptical-science-misrepresents-their-animation-the-escalator/#comment-1158398
what puzzles me a bit is that my own data set shows we have already fallen by 0.2 degrees C globally since 2000 whereas the nearest other dataset (Hadcrut 3) seems to suggest is is only 0.1
I expect a further drop of 0.3 degrees C in the next 8 years or so.

Jay
November 28, 2012 10:00 am

OMG ! ANOTHER Super Storm !

McComber
November 28, 2012 10:01 am

Anthony,
Thanks for the heads up. I have lived in Northern California all my life and have experienced the periodic flooding brought on by these events. During the 12/96-1/97 event, the Feather River drainage received as much as 33 inches of rain in 6 days and 42 inches in 9 days. I remember one article that stated that the cumulative water flow of all Northern California stream gauges exceeded 3 million cubic feet per second at peak flow. Thank goodness for engineers, construction workers and dams. Otherwise it would have been 1862 all over again.
See link for more information. I also remember the 1964 and 1986 floods quite well.
If this type of event occurred in the “Sandy Zone”, what would the result have been with regard to flooding. It appears from the TV feeds that the river valleys in the east tend to be flatter with less ability to transmit water to the coast. Are there any studies / articles that comment on ability to handle massive, longer term rain such as we get here?
file:///Users/paulbhull/Documents/Science/Floods/CNRFC%20-%20Storm%20Summaries%20-%20December%2026,%201996%20-%20January%203,%201997.webarchive

1 2 3 4