Of Coconuts, the Sun, and Small Isolated Islands

Guest Post by Willis Eschenbach

For a few years, I managed a combination of businesses on a very remote 100 hectare (250 acre) South Pacific island. The main businesses were a shipyard; a machine shop building aluminum boats and water tanks; a banking agency; a postal agency; a buying point for locals selling copra (dried coconut), beche-de-mer (sea cucumber), and trocus shell; and a trade store. About 80 acres of the island were planted to coconut, which was harvested and sold. In addition to getting into the 1000-Metre Sweat and the Two-Month Wait as Olympic events, I learned a lot about the logistics and the economics of running a business on an island in the middle of nowhere. The operation was, of course, diesel-powered. You can’t run a big lathe on a few batteries and some solar panels. So I know the problems of supplying fuel in remote islands in the most intimate and personal way, because I was the person who had to arrange the fuel supply, the guy who took the heat when it ran short. I have also looked very, very closely at the economics of coconut oil as an energy source.

As a result, I was both glad and sad to see that the island nation of Tokelau was switching their entire energy system to solar power plus coconut oil … because Tokelau is definitely in the middle of nowhere …

Figure 1. Where on Earth is Tokelau? Australia is at the lower left, and New Zealand is at the bottom center. Papua New Guinea is at the upper left. Tokelau is at the upper right.

Let me explain why I have mixed feelings about the changeover to the two alternative fuels, solar and coconut oil.

The first problem has nothing to do with energy sources. The difficulty is that as near as I can tell, the islanders have no stake in the project. The New Zealand Aid Programme is “advancing” the money to Tokelau, in the form of hiring a New Zealand company to purchase and install all of the solar gear. This kind of “parachute aid” tends not to last, because the local folks don’t have any skin in the game. If the people living in the area don’t take ownership of a project, if they don’t have to sweat to make the project happen, the odds of success plummet. I will be quite surprised if the “advance” of six million dollars from New Zealand Aid ever gets repaid. That’s a huge debt in a nation with the worlds smallest economy. Not just a small economy, the world’s smallest economy, and one of the poorest (182nd out of 194 countries in GDP/capita). So the project has a very shaky foundation.

Regarding solar and coconuts, let me take the easy one first, coconuts. Yes, you can run a diesel engine on coconut oil … if you have the oil. Figure 2 shows the main and largest atoll of the three atolls that make up Tokelau. It contains about half the land in the country. Like many atolls, it is in the form of a ring, with the widest and solidest individual islands on the windward side of the atoll. A coral atoll is not a solid thing. It is a hesitation in a storm-driven river of coral sand and rubble. As a result, on the side where the storms hit, the river of coral rubble is larger, and the islands are longer and more connected. Typically, none of the individual islands rise more than a few metres above sea level. The long island at the lower right of Figure 2 is only about 300 metres (1,000 ft) wide.

Figure 2. Nukunono, the main atoll of the three atolls (Atafu, Nukunono and Fakaofo) that make up the island nation of Tokelau. 5.53 miles equals ~ 9 km. There are about 1,200 people living in Tokelau, and there are about 5,000 Tokelauans living in New Zealand … go figure. Total land area is about 10 sq. km., but a good chunk of that is bare sand and uninhabited islets.

As you can see, there is very little usable land in Tokelau, and that’s the first problem with the coconut oil plan. It takes a heap of coconuts to equal the energy in a barrel of diesel. And it takes a heap of land to grow a heap of coconuts. I should know, coconuts were one of my businesses. And on the coral atolls of Tokelau, there’s very little spare land at all.

Next, humans and coconut palms have travelled together around the Pacific for a very good reason. Coconut palms are an astonishing plant. They can transubstantiate the worst soils, even the salty coral sands of tropical atolls, into rich oil, milk coconut meat, and fats. There are only a few food plants that can grow on the coral rubble and sand, so coconuts are very important to the nutrition of the children, because the coconut milk, meat, and foods cooked in coconut milk make up a large portion of the kids’ diet.

As a result of those issues, for me, on the atolls any coconut oil that gets burned is taken directly from the children’s nutrition … and I can’t see that as being a brilliant plan. Sure, on large volcanic islands like Fiji or the Solomon Islands it makes sense. Those islands have acres and acres of land on which they can and do plant coconuts. But on the atolls? Very doubtful.

Next, the solar question. In the US people say “What goes around, comes around.” In the South Pacific, I used to say “What goes around … stops.” The combination of heat, sand, humidity, and salt makes tropical islands one of the most corrosive and destructive natural environments. As a result, even “hardened” or “weatherized” systems tend to have both a high infant mortality rate and a short life expectancy.

The whole solar package consists of over 4,000 solar panels, 392 inverters, and 1,344 batteries. I would suggest that the lifetime of the batteries and the inverters will not be large. And who will do the repairs when they come due? I have looked at a variety of solar systems that have been installed in some of the more remote Pacific islands … hey, evaluating solar systems on tropical islands is a brutal job, but someone had to take it. Let me say that long-term success in Pacific solar systems is far less common than failure …

Finally, the entire concept of maintenance is quite foreign to the mindset of most Pacific Islanders. I ascribe this to the lack of winter. If you live in say Norway and you don’t plan ahead for the winter, you will die … which puts a real premium on, and selects for, folks who not only think about tomorrow, but act before tomorrow arrives. In the tropics, on the other hand, there is no winter, and no need to plan for the future. Here’s an example.

I once visited a lovely island in the outer reaches of Fiji in order to look at a solar system that they had installed. It was all designed to be foolproof … but the people in the islands are no fools, they are quite ingenious.

In order to keep the batteries from being killed by being drawn down too far, the people who designed the solar system had wisely designed it so that it would only provide power until the battery voltage fell below a certain threshold. At that point, the system was designed to shut off entirely to protect the battery. However, some enterprising soul found out that if you stuck a paper clip or a bit of wire between a certain pair of the contacts on the controller, it would let you drain the batteries entirely … and as a result, every battery on the island was stone, cold dead.

I was new to the Pacific at the time, and I didn’t understand that at all. Didn’t these folks think about what the future would bring when their batteries were dead? But it was all explained by what happened as I was leaving the island. We were all getting in the boat to depart, when a charming guy I’d met on the island came running up with a string of fish. He said “Here, I caught these, take these fish with you.”

I tried to demur, saying “Keep some for yourself, are you sure that you have enough for your wife and your kids?”, because I knew he had a whole passel of children.

“Oh, yes,” he said, “I have plenty. I have kept enough fish for all day tomorrow.”

I realized at that instant that I had just witnessed the long-term time horizon for event planning on a small island … the end of tomorrow. So I didn’t bother to lecture him on smoking fish and salting fish and pickling fish and all the stuff that a good Norwegian burgher would do. I took the fish, and I thanked him profusely.

And I realized later that his response was indeed much more reasonable than mine—the fish would keep much better swimming around in the lagoon than they would last as salted fish in a hot environment …

Sadly, however, while this point of view worked fine for many, many years, it doesn’t work all that well these days when it comes to the maintenance of complex machinery … and while solar systems are better than most in requiring minimum maintenance, they still do need to be maintained. This does not bode well for the future of the Tokelau solar system.

Fortunately, since the Kiwis are putting up the money, none of this really matters. Let me say, however, that my prediction is that in ten years, Tokelau will still be importing fossil fuels for a host of uses, and that much if not all of the solar system will be quietly rusting away … I could be wrong, and I truly hope that I am wrong. I hope that the good folks of Tokelau realize what they have, and that they learn to cherish and maintain and protect it so it serves them well, long into the future, and that they repay the six million dollar “advance” to the Kiwis …

I just wouldn’t bet any money on that happening.

w.

PS—Why do I think the “advance” from New Zealand won’t be repaid? Well, GDP per capita in Tokelau is about a thousand bucks a year … but that doesn’t mean that an average individual earns that much cash in a year, much of that is subsistence farming and fishing, or government income from tuna fishing licenses. What little money the people have goes to things like school fees and clothing and medicines and the like. Most people survive in large measure because of “remittances”, money sent back to the “old country” by Tokelauans living in New Zealand and elsewhere.

The CIA World Factbook says:

The people rely heavily on aid from New Zealand – about $10 million annually in 2008 and 2009 – to maintain public services. New Zealand’s support amounts to 80% of Tokelau’s recurrent government budget. An international trust fund, currently worth nearly US$32 million, was established in 2004 to provide Tokelau an independent source of revenue. The principal sources of revenue come from sales of copra, postage stamps, souvenir coins, and handicrafts. Money is also remitted to families from relatives in New Zealand.

The annual government expenses in Tokelau are four times their revenue … a neat trick made possible by the New Zealand Government making up the shortfall each and every year. In other words, forget about affording to repay the “advance”, they can’t even afford the government that they have.

Six million dollars divided by the 1,200 inhabitants of the atolls is a debt of about $5,000 for every man, woman, and child in Tokelau. Or we could divide it by the “labor force”, which the CIA Factbook puts at 440 souls, which means a debt of about $13,600 per adult …

Given that disparity, I see no feasible way that the advance will ever be repaid. Which is perfectly fine, it simply means that solar energy in Tokelau is just another NZ Aid project, good on ya, Kiwis … but let’s not pretend that it is a loan.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

120 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
William Martin in NZ
August 9, 2012 2:19 pm

Well written Willis,I see the money as a gift.They could never repay it.But look at how our govt.spend money here,or should I say waste it.Our own windmills are losing money.But the majority of our politicians have their brains and balls in the same bag,and the taxpayers are being screwed more and more to support useless projects.Maybe I’m just getting old?

MikeH
August 9, 2012 2:29 pm

What I’d like to know is, did someone on the island of Tokelau actually request and push for this to happen, or did some good Samaritan politician (yup, I chuckled when I typed that last phrase), with absolutely no ties to the alternative energy sector, volunteer to have this done for them (or would that be ‘to them’)?

KevinM
August 9, 2012 2:34 pm

Sounds like if they backed their 6 million investment with 6 thousand a year (paid in strings of fish) they could achieve local buy in. It usually only takes one ambitious person who cares. If I were still young and single I’d apply for the job today.

dalyplanet
August 9, 2012 2:35 pm

I have also considered that cold weather has been the driver of technology and industry for the same reason you mention.. I can imagine living on on a 250 acre island you will get to know the neighbors !

Myron Mesecke
August 9, 2012 2:41 pm

Obviously we must get countries like Japan and the United Arab Emirates that have experience building islands to step up and fill in the center of the atoll so that there is more land to grow coconuts. (sarc)

Bill
August 9, 2012 2:41 pm

Very interesting post, Willis.

NZ Groover
August 9, 2012 3:00 pm

….What I’d like to know is, did someone on the island of Tokelau actually request and push for this to happen, or did some good Samaritan politician (yup, I chuckled when I typed that last phrase), with absolutely no ties to the alternative energy sector, volunteer to have this done for them (or would that be ‘to them’)?…..
Good question, anyone know the answer?

Dr Burns
August 9, 2012 3:02 pm

Well written, great story.

Mike Sphar
August 9, 2012 3:05 pm

Willis, you made no mention of possible typhoons. I am current sitting on my boat waiting for the next tropical cyclone to come along here on the southern side of Puerto Rico. I presume that cyclone visits Tokelau also bringing tremendous winds to grind sand into the solar glass panels and tear the palm fronds from the palm trees as I have seen on other Pacific islands. Paradise can be beautiful but it also has another face which appears occasionally.

matt
August 9, 2012 3:11 pm

I think this solar project might actually do some good for the islanders. Once the solar voltaics have decayed to the point of being usless, all those panels will make exelent roofing material for lean-tos and huts. 🙂

Matthew R Marler
August 9, 2012 3:12 pm

You have made the case that nothing can work there and that the Kiwis should get out entirely. The solar panels do not seem to be worse than anything else they are buying for the place.
It will be interesting to revisit this story in 15 years, and see if the solar power has worked out better than something else would have. Do PV panels actually require more maintenance, either in total hours or skill level, than Diesel engines?

Justthinkin
August 9, 2012 3:12 pm

Gawd. Using food to make fuel,again! I thought the Kiwis being so far from Turtle Bay,they wouldn’t buy into the UN’s Agenda 21.And how many typhoons,or even just the storm surge from one,hits these little islands only 15 ft ASL?Could make a right mess of some solar panels.
What is the average oil produced by one coconut,and how many palms will it take to produce one barrel of “fuel”,and how many acres and tens of thousand of trees to produce enough for one week’s use,let alone one year. So where are the Tokelauans supposed to live,when all their land is in coconut trees?

John Garrett
August 9, 2012 3:12 pm

w-
As you likely know, Steve Thomas (known widely for his hosting of “This Old House” on U.S. PBS), wrote a fascinating book called “The Last Navigator” that related his effort to learn star path navigation from an elder on the South Pacific island of Satawal.
Your description of the Tokelau culture’s lack of any sense of time reminds me of what Steve Thomas wrote of his experience on Satawal. For these people, clocks and calendars are alien concepts.
I always enjoy your perspective, your analytical work and your commentaries here at WUWT.

Sam Hall
August 9, 2012 3:15 pm

I lived in American Samoa for six years and could not agree more when it comes to the maintenance of complex machinery . For example, the Samoans didn’t like a certain model of car, said that it broke down after a year or so. Turns out that what was happening was that when the oil level got a little low, the timing belt broke. I explained that you had to change the oil or at least keep it topped off and they thought I was crazy.
We lost a 100 ton AC unit because the repair guy bypassed the low-voltage disconnect because it was keeping the unit from operating. I kid you not.
The people proposing this clearly don’t know anything about the islands. One thing though, the islanders love their children so, they will get the coconuts.

Mike Wryley
August 9, 2012 3:24 pm

This piece speaks volumes to all kinds of issues in undeveloped countries and certain peoples efforts to “bring them out of the dark ages” without regard to culture. Technology in and of itself is no solution, as witnessed by many a newer tractor sitting in the weeds somewhere in Africa for want of a hose clamp or preventive maintenance.
I am quick to make points with certain liberal folk who blame all the perceived woes in certain areas of the world on a lack of compassion by those more fortunate by reminding them of the fact that the people they are so concerned about had a four thousand year head start.

Doug in Seattle
August 9, 2012 3:28 pm

This isn’t about sustainability, its about the appearance of sustainability.
None of the clowns responsible for a project like this have the slightest idea wht the term means anyway.

Dr Mo
August 9, 2012 3:31 pm

I pity the guy who is your equivalent on Tokelau…

eo
August 9, 2012 3:36 pm

In the UN general assembly every nation has one vote and so is in most special bodies of the UN. giving aids or loan that could not be repaid is one way of getting the nation’s vote towards the particular agenda the leading or donor country has in the UN and special bodies. If the donor gives a billion dollars to India, it will just amount to $1 dollar per capita whereas in the small island country a million dollar will amount to $1,000 dollars per capita. Dont worry about the nutrition related issue. Surely New Zealand dairy industry is already in the queue to fill the gap. Politically, the aid or loan is a “win -win” situation for NZ politicians. Other than keeping the small pacific island country in perpetual debt and may be in a new form of “neo-colonialism” or chained to vote in its international agenda, the 5,000 NZ residents would most likely have taken NZ citizenship. Keeping their home country in perpetual dire straits, would also keep those voters captive. I was doing an island hopping tour in the pacific ( north and south) and I was surprised on the presence of countries with strong agenda in the UN.

Gary Hladik
August 9, 2012 3:39 pm

“However, some enterprising soul found out that if you stuck a paper clip or a bit of wire between a certain pair of the contacts on the controller, it would let you drain the batteries entirely … and as a result, every battery on the island was stone, cold dead.”
A gentle reminder that dead batteries will prevent them from seeing next week’s episode of “The Big Bang Theory” on their satellite TV may extend the time horizon by up to 6 days. 🙂

DirkH
August 9, 2012 3:40 pm

dalyplanet says:
August 9, 2012 at 2:35 pm
“I have also considered that cold weather has been the driver of technology and industry for the same reason you mention.. I can imagine living on on a 250 acre island you will get to know the neighbors !”
I don’t think so. We had lousy weather in Northern Europe for millenia yet we had to import the zero from India in the 9th century.
A key change happened in the 13. century, with scholars like Albertus Magnus and William of Occam; the development of a scientific method. This was during the end of the medieval warm period, a period of less cold and higher wealth. I would think the monks had more time and resources to do research and contemplate logical questions.

Peter
August 9, 2012 3:53 pm

the banksters ponzi paper money scheme has now covered the earth….when does their housing bubble start???

James from Arding
August 9, 2012 3:53 pm

Willis,
With reference to; http://www.horizonfuelcell.com/portable_power_minipak.htm
My question is; “In your opinion does hydrogen as a power source have any future potential in remote locations such as you describe here, or for that matter anywhere in the world?”

Robert of Ottawa
August 9, 2012 3:55 pm

An enviable life, Willis. In the Turcs and Caicos, I met a Brit who was a Scuba dive Instructor. He related how his mother told him constantly how he should stop bumming around and get a real job. “So, with a real job, I could afford to visit the Turcs and Caicos once a year?”.

Coach Springer
August 9, 2012 3:55 pm

Matthew R Marler says:
August 9, 2012 at 3:12 pm
You have made the case that nothing can work there …
===================
I read it a bit differently. The points were that diesel works best for the condtions, that the alternatives won’t work as well or likely wont’t work at all, and that most likely, they’ll be back to what works best in a lot less than 15 years. Seems rational without injecting a preference.

Gary Hladik
August 9, 2012 4:09 pm

I’m curious why solar power was chosen over wind for this project. I understand offshore wind power is more reliable than onshore, and the atoll is about as offshore as you can get.
I gather from the linked article that the solar project will be three big systems. Wouldn’t it be better to use residential-sized installations (wind or solar), with each owner responsible for his own system? Presumably it wouldn’t take long to sort out the “long” time horizon owners from the “short” ones. 🙂

1 2 3 5