Well, this is amusing. But, after looking at some numbers on food production, it may simply be that CO2 is helping us grow more food. And what happens when a well fed population has more food? It eats it of course. The caveat is that correlation is not always causation, the Green Revolution (the agricultural one, not the crazy one) and Norman Borlaug had a lot to do with this too.
Source: FAO agriculture report and Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center
From ScienceNordic: New theory: CO2 makes you fat
Danish researchers have announced a rather wild hypothesis: Perhaps we are getting fatter and fatter because of the increasing CO2 levels in the atmosphere.
I had to laugh at this “fact” sidebar in the article:
Researchers are wondering whether CO2 affects embryos in the womb, so the embryos develop a tendency towards obesity.
This is one of the hypotheses that will be tested if the researchers can raise funding for large-scale trials with rats.
Gosh, giant CO2 fattened people and fat rats. These might do well with the smaller climate optmized green cat-like overlords from our other crazy story this week.

Other excerpts (tinfoil hats optional):
…
CO2 makes us eat more
This discovery made it possible to develop a precise hypothesis for how CO2 makes us fatter: We breathe more CO2, which makes our blood more acidic; this affects our brain, so we want to eat more.
In 2011, together with researchers Anders Mikael Sjödin and Arne Astrup from the University of Copenhagen, Hersoug started to test the hypothesis on humans.
At the university’s Department of Human Nutrition, they placed six young men in special climate rooms, where some of them were exposed to increased amounts of CO2. After seven hours, the men were allowed to eat as much as they liked.
This little pilot study showed that the men with the greater amount of CO2 in their blood ate six percent more food than the men who had been in climate rooms with a normal amount of CO2.
“We could also see that the extra amount of CO2 caused the men’s heartbeat to rise, and this gives us an indication that CO2 affects the brain’s nerve cells – orexins in the hypothalamus – which among other functions control our appetite and the composition of our nutrient intake,” says Hersoug.
“A very small change in the activity of these nerve cells will presumably have great importance for our development of obesity or for maintaining our weight.”
Does CO2 give men beer guts?
If the researchers’ hypothesis is correct, it raises many questions.
CO2 is found in the bubbles in fizzy drinks and beer – does that have any importance for obesity?
“Of course I have considered whether CO2 has very local impacts, which could explain how beer guts develop,” says the researcher.
…
Exercise and vegetables can limit the ‘CO2 effect’
But Hersoug says the hypothesis gives us no excuse for dropping diets and exercise – on the contrary.
“We know already that a sedentary lifestyle is a risk factor for many diseases,” he says. “According to our theory, this may be because of the higher acidity in the blood arising from a sedentary lifestyle indoors in a CO2 concentration that is higher than it is outdoors.”
On the other hand, he says, “If you’re out running, you get your blood circulating and you can pump much of the CO2 out of your body, so our hypothesis is really further evidence that exercise is healthy. And exercise may be even more necessary in the future, when we can expect even higher CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere.”
Hersoug adds that fruit and vegetables also reduce the blood’s pH value, so the CO2 theory is also an argument for eating more healthily.
…
Oh noes! Blood acidification – the next CO2 scourge! Breath deeply, it worked in The Andromeda Strain. Do not panic.
Read the whole thing here while you munch on a bag of buttered popcorn.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

It’s well known that climate skeptics principally eat popcorn. Whether supplies at present are sufficient to get us through the next few Climategate-type episodes remains a mystery.
Readers of my book are encouraged to review it on Amazon. Everyone else should simply buy it. Thank you.
It’s official. CO2 is now the “gaseous ex machina” explanation for, well, everything.
Peak Popcorn tis the end of the world.
I hope this is a misrepresentation of the foundation of their study:
“At the university’s Department of Human Nutrition, they placed six young men in special climate rooms, where some of them were exposed to increased amounts of CO2. After seven hours, the men were allowed to eat as much as they liked.”
A sample size of 6 people, with a 6% difference in consumption means precisely nothing.
Hey, people used to think we were crazy for believing in aliens, the flat earth, witches and flying cars run on unicorn farts. Looks who’s (maniacally) laughing now!
Yours,
Syd Barrett
Funny. I always thought beer guts were a result of liver damage.
Love that “If I weighed 200 lbs. I would rip your throat out.” look on the cat…
“… increased CO2… .”
How much increased CO2?
I think we should be told.
That is definately one unamused kitty.
A study involving six males is being extrapolated to 7 billion people. That sounds reasonable.
Apart from that isn’t there a contradiction in there? They say:
Surely that means they are metabolising faster and so will need more food to replace what their body has consumed.
On the other hand, the faster metabolising means other researchers will be able to claim more CO2 causes malnutrition.
Pure social engineering tinfoil hat bunk
““Of course I have considered whether CO2 has very local impacts, which could explain how beer guts develop,” says the researcher.”
Because ALCOHOL doesn’t do anything to one’s neurons or metabolism, or signal for adipocyte maturation, right? Nor that BEER is basically liquid, alcohol laced bread with lots of calories that people drink in far too great of amounts?
Do we have to throw our ALL our knowledge on science so we can demonize CO2?
Just… palms to face…
Get on the band wagon! Just think of it – the general obesity models to be generated on computers! The attribution studies! The hockey sticks we’ll create, the CO2-obesity junkets we’ll enjoy, the international treaties we’ll sign! Imagine all the billions of dollars we’ll do in research on diets during the paleozoic era! This is it folks – if you feel like you missed your chance with CAGW, sign up now!
I’d like to see some evidence to support the claim that more CO2 in the air means more CO2 in the blood.
The body has feedback mechanisms to regulate CO2.
And here I thought it was the bacon.
CO2: Is there anything it can’t do?
Peak Popcorn. +
It’s peak CO2 that’s the problem though.
Do we have to throw our ALL our knowledge on science so we can demonize CO2?
Just… palms to face…
et mains à l’air
“We could also see that the extra amount of CO2 caused the men’s heartbeat to rise”
Heart beats faster. Which means the metabolism has increased.
These guys are surprised that the subjects with higher metabolic rates ended up eating more food?
@Algebra says:
“Funny. I always thought beer guts were a result of liver damage.”
Don’t be silly. Everybody knows beer guts and liver damage both cause beer drinking.
Is Michael Mann a cat-like optimal climate engineered overlord?
Anyone seen him with something to judge scale properly? I suspect that tree ring cross section he often appears next to is about 3 inches in diameter.
I think we can safely blame Greece’s imminent default on CO2. CO2 is also primarily responsible for Justin Bieber.
From vague memories of high school physics, I remember something about how respiration is controlled. Basically out body measures the level of CO2 in the lungs, and when it reaches a threshold point, we breath.
Seems to me that if the level of CO2 in the atmosphere were higher, this threshold level would be reached more quickly. (This is why I doubt higher CO2 in the atmosphere would result in higher CO2 in the blood)
As a result, the respiration rate will increase. More movement of the diaphram ( a pretty big muscle after all) could explain why the heart is beating a little faster.
Faster breathing, faster heart rate. Sounds like more calories getting burned.
This is GREAT, I thought everything was my fault and that I was too fat because I drink too much beer and eat too much.
So that’s why fast food joints serve carbonated drinks……….to get you to eat more.
So, when I drink Pepsi, should I belch out the excess CO2 or try to keep it in? If I belch it out, am I contributing to global warming, or just passing that which was there to begin with before the Pepsi was manufactured?
If I can keep it in, does that make me a CO2 sequestration device worthy of praise and admiration?
If I drink Diet Coke, does that counter the makes-you-fat aspects of the increased CO2?
Just wonderin’.