Guest post by David Archibald
In May, WUWT kindly hosted a post with slides from a presentation I gave to the Institute of World Politics in Washington. Following are some further slides from a presentation I gave during the week to the triennial Nuffield Conference in Perth, Australia.
Figure 1: US Wheat and Corn prices 1916 – 2011 in 2011 constant dollars
Grain prices fell 70% in constant dollar terms from the Korean War to the end of the 20th century. In 2008, energy-related inputs relative to total operating expenses were about 60% for both wheat and corn. A $200 per barrel oil price will raise operating costs by 60% from the 2008 level. A similar price response was experienced during the First Oil Shock of 1973. This time the price increase will be permanent.
Figure 2: Tunisian Wheat Consumption 1960 – 2010
The Arab Spring began with a vegetable vendor, but what they mainly eat is wheat. Figure 2 shows Tunisian wheat consumption per capita from 1960. A 2,500 calorie per day diet is 267 kg per annum of wheat and that is shown as the red line in the graph. The population of Tunisia is 10.4 million growing at 1% per annum. On that basis, Tunisian wheat demand is ratcheting up at 28,000 tonnes per annum.
Figure 3: Yemeni Grain Consumption 1968 – 2010
Yemeni agricultural production falls well short of what is required to feed them. While the average per capita consumption of wheat is half that of Tunisia, the median age is also about half that of Tunisia at 18 years. Tunisia’s is 30 years. Similarly, 43% of Yemenis are under 14 years old while the figure for Tunisia is 23%. Therefore Yemen’s biggest wheat-eating years are ahead of it. Note the big jump in grain imports in 1988.
Figure 4: Yemen Oil Production 1982 – 2015
The big jump in grain imports in 1988 is explained by the fact that 1988 was the year that Yemeni oil exports took off. Production peaked a decade ago and is now in steep decline. With or without a civil war, by the end of the decade there will be very little oil production to pay for wheat imports. The population of Yemen is 24 million growing at 2.6% per annum. Population is currently increasing at 630,000 per annum. If we assume that they all make it to adulthood and eat 267 kg of wheat per annum for a 2,500 calorie per day diet, wheat imports are ratcheting up at 170,000 tonnes per annum.
Figure 5: Afghanistan Wheat Consumption 1960 – 2010
As unpleasant as Yemen is, there is a place that is yet more execrable. To paraphrase Mark Steyn, Afghanistan is a pestilential nation of pederasts, the chief exports of which are terrorism and heroin. As Figure 5 shows, the modern history of that country is written in its wheat consumption. Wheat imports started in the mid-1970s when Afghanistan was no longer able to feed itself from its own efforts. Imports keep rising during the early years of the Russian invasion and then collapsed along with domestic production. Population growth didn’t fall below 2% per annum during this period of restricted supply. Wheat imports rose dramatically after the US started its turn at running the country. Afghanistan is very similar to Yemen in having a median age of 18 years and population growth rate of 2.4% per annum. At that rate, the current population of 29.8 million is growing by 715,000 per annum. Thus wheat demand is ratcheting up at about 190,000 tonnes per annum.
Figure 6: Population of Afghanistan from 1960 with a projection to 2025
Heroin is 25% of Afghanistan’s GDP. One day the world may stop paying for that heroin and the Danegeld for its terrorism. So where will the wheat come from then? Another alternative is that there may be a will to send Afghanistan some grain but there will be a physical lack of grain due to a climatic event. Figure 6 shows a possible future for Afghanistan’s population in the event of a sudden cessation of grain imports. Population can be expected to collapse below the natural carrying capacity of the country of about 12 million.
Figure 7: Pakistan Wheat Production 1960 – 2011
Wheat imports into Afghanistan would have to come through Pakistan which would have first call on them. Figure 7 shows that Pakistan’s wheat production profile is quite impressive with a five-fold increase from 1960 to nearly 25 million tonnes per annum.
Figure 8: Pakistan Wheat Production per Capita 1960 – 2032
Figure 8 shows that Pakistan’s per capita wheat production from 1980 has been static in the range of 120 to 140 kg per annum. If population keeps growing at its established trend rate, by 2030 Pakistan will be needing another 8 million tonnes of wheat per annum.
Figure 9: Wheat yields in developing countries 1950 – 2005
The biggest driver of higher wheat yields over the last 60 years has been the development of dwarf strains, pioneered by Norman Borlaug. In a sense, that put off the problem for a generation and made it twice as bad. Wheat yields have plateaued from 1996.
Figure 10: Egyptian wheat and corn consumption by source
Two hundred years ago, Egypt’s population is estimated to have been about 4 million. It is now 82 million and growing at 2% per annum – another 1.6 million Egyptian souls are created each year. As adults, their temporal bodies will want to consume an extra 440,000 tonnes of grain per annum. Figure 10 shows that on established trends, Egypt will be needing to import two thirds of its grain consumption. The projected import requirement matches the current level of US wheat exports.
Figure 11: Egyptian oil production and consumption 1965 – 2020
Food and fuel are subsidised in Egypt. What has helped fund that is Egypt’s oil production. That peaked in the 90s and Egypt’s oil consumption is now higher than its production. Oil and grain imports are now rising in tandem. Whoever controls Egypt from here, either the Muslim Brotherhood or the Army, will have a hard time balancing the budget.
Figure 12: US production of major grains and soybeans 1960 – 2010
The biggest increases in agricultural production in recent years have been from the US and Brazil. The mandated ethanol requirement has increased US corn production by 100 million tonnes per annum. That quantum could feed some 300 million people. In fact total US grain and soybean production could feed some 1,500 million people on a vegetarian diet, with the soybeans offsetting corn’s deficiency in lysine and tryptophan.
Figure 13: Mexican major food imports 1960 – 2010
South of the border, the situation isn’t as rosy. As Figure 13 shows, Mexico imports about half of its food requirement. With a population of 113 million growing at 1.1% per annum, there are another 1.2 million Mexicans created each year who, as adults, will need another 370,000 tonnes of imported grain to feed them.
Figure 14: Mexican oil production and consumption 1965 – 2021
Mexican oil production has peaked and is now falling rapidly towards the level of domestic Mexican consumption. That line will be reached in 2016, beyond which Mexico will have to pay for oil imports as well as increasing food imports, or do without something.
Figure 15: Brazilian sugar and soybean exports 1960 – 2010
Demand pull from China, importing 50 million tonnes of soybeans per annum, has created a supply response in other places. Figure 15, showing a dramatic increase in Brazilian soybean and sugar exports starting in the mid-1990s, begs the question of how much more land in Brazil could be put to the plough. With protein content of 38%, Brazil’s soybean exports equate to 100 million tonnes per annum of wheat in terms of protein content.
Figure 16: Russian wheat production and consumption 1987 – 2010
In accordance with good economic theory, Russian wheat production rose as a consequence of the end of communism in 1990, though it was a very lagged response. The drought in 2010 reduced production by 20 million tonnes and the Russian Government banned exports as a consequence.
Figure 17: World production of major grains in 2009
The World produces about equal quantities of wheat, rice and corn for a total of 2,200 million tonnes. This equates to 311 kg per capita for the seven billion people on the planet. The recent increase of US corn production by 100 million tonnes per annum in response to the price signal from the mandated ethanol requirement suggests that production of grains in the US could increase as the price signal increases. On that basis, there may be the ability to return more land to cropping in the US and increase production by a further 100 million tonnes per annum.
It has been estimated that Brazil has 190 million hectares of currently uncropped land that could be brought into production. Assuming 2 tonnes per hectare, Brazil’s production could rise by a further 380 million tonnes per annum. Similarly, Russia has 40 million hectares of cleared land that could be used for agriculture but currently isn’t. That might provide a further 80 million tonnes of grain per annum. The total is 670 million tonnes per annum of potential further production from the US, Brazil and Russia, which might feed 1,675 million people at 400 kg per capita.
Figure 18: World population growth rates 1950 – 2050
Figure 18 shows the World’s population growth rate from 1950 with a projection in blue to 2050. China’s Great Leap Forward shows up clearly in the chart. 30 million Chinese died as a result of a Government requirement to meet grain quotas while not allowing the peasants to retain enough to live on. This was 5% of China’s population at the time. Assuming that the World could produce a further 670 mtpa of grain and that would feed a further 1,675 million humans, that limit would be reached about two decades from now. There are likely to be some bumps along the way. At one stage in 1816, blocks of river ice from the Mississippi River were encountered by ships 100 kilometres out in the Gulf of Mexico. This was due to the Tambora eruption the year before. As the current de Vries cycle event progresses, the chance that a major volcanic eruption will have an agricultural impact continues to rise.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
So are you saying if they have us over the barrel with our demand on oil, then we should do the same with their demand on food?
So this is why our leaders have been building all them secret well stocked bunkers to hide themselves away during the great population collapse.
On a more serious note what will be the effect of all the new shale oil, tar sands and shale gas on the ability of the world to maintain crop yields? Another thing to consider is the rapid depletion of the Ogallala out West in the USA it is not being replenished and once it’s gone a lot of Prairie out West will revert to desert or be only good for cattle ranching.
A rather Malthusian forecast.
In large areas of the world the limiting factor in agricultural production is water availability.
Here in Australia proposals to double food production by damming northern rivers, as has been done in the Ord River, have been met with howls of protest from the Greenies.
In other places like the Middle East desalination could rapidly increase agricultural production.
I think the danger isn’t in being able to progressively increase food production to meet rising demand, albeit at a higher cost. The danger is from a volcanic eruption that dramatically reduces agricultural production for one or two years.
I have long argued that rather than spending money on AGW, something that will happen slowly (if at all) giving us plenty of time to prepare and adapt, we should spent the money stockpiling food in preparation for an abrupt cooling that doesn’t give us time to prepare and adapt.
Otherwise I’d agree with David, as food demand rises relative to supply, the risks associated with a sudden cooling event rise.
Typo: “It has been estimated that Brazil has 190 hectares of currently uncropped land” is missing “million”.
By the way, India is doing fine in its food grains production. There is enough to feed everybody, only, the poor might not get it on their plates because of lack of purchasing power, bureaucratic indifference and/or corruption. This is even without GM varieties. A higher oil price does increase fertilizer and transport prices. Unfortunately western ideas and subsidies for bio fuel did raise Indian food prices a lot the last 3 years.
A quick research of the Ogallala leads me to the North Plains Groundwater Conservation District
web site where I find that at present usage, if it never rains again there, the water will run out by the end of this century. Is it expected to not rain there much for the rest of this century? Am I missing something?
http://npwd.org/new_page_2.htm
Well done WUWT…very informative.
Could Kilter explain by what mechanism change the aquifer is not being replenished please?
Don’t get me wrong, but by them fleecing us on oil, it in turn cost more for us to produce food, well it cost us more to produce everything,that in turn drives the cost of everything up. So when I asked or said “So are you saying if they have us over the barrel with our demand on oil, then we should do the same with their demand on food?” It boils down who wants to play fair now doesn’t it, because turning the other cheek sometimes can make a difference, if they slap us in the face then they need a slap back to even things out, or what’s good for the goose is good for the gander, so to speak.
About 3200 years ago, within a space of 56 years, city states around the Mediterranean & in the Middle East collapsed.
Possible causes of collapse?
2.1 Volcanoes
2.2 Earthquakes
2.3 Migrations and raids
2.4 Ironworking
2.5 Drought
2.6 Changes in warfare
2.7 General systems collapse
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bronze_Age_collapse
That list seems ominiously familiar. Read it & weep.
Developed countries tend to grow far more of their own food, and export some. Africa needs development to push this assumption into fact. Zimbabwe used to feed Africa when white farmers worked their own lands. Now they have their land confiscated and given to locals who have no expertise or desire to farm by a government led by a criminal Mugabe. The funds wasted trying to prove AGW could have been better spent pushing African development and easing the world food problems.
Me says:
October 8, 2011 at 12:33 am
“So are you saying if they have us over the barrel with our demand on oil, then we should do the same with their demand on food?”
I think you’ll find that is already the case.
Peak oil is likely to affect countries that have to import most of their food the hardest. In Western areas such as NW Europe, economic problems are the most likely symptom i.e. economies nosedive once oil gets beyond a certain price – this has happened several times over the past 50 years. What this means on the ground is far much less vehicle use and far more grow-yer-own food in any available space. Have been doing this myself for the past few years. Best get prepared.
In climate terms, drought is the big one to watch out for – and that can occur during warming OR cooling trends – for example, the ice-age climate was a relatively dry one. Human populations aside for a moment, this is primarily as geographical issue, as e.g. Texans may well have noticed this past 12 months.
Cheers – John
Without being alarmist at all there is going to be conflict between production and consumption. We are facing water shortages and we are losing arable land. We are also losing farmers who have been screwed by grain and produce buyers for decades. The bAustralian government have no farming policies and as stated above the city greens are opposed to new dams and water schemes. Problems are looming and governments everywhere are more concerned with a trace gas. Talk about fiddling while Rome burns.
Perry says:
October 8, 2011 at 1:46 am
“2.7 General systems collapse
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bronze_Age_collapse
That list seems ominiously familiar. Read it & weep.”
I’ve read somewhere that historically civilisations have collapsed when their EROEI dropped under 3. (EROEI = Energy returned on energy invested). As one major component of their energy infrastructure was agriculture, and their yield was not high, a cooling climate leading to failed harvests could push them over the edge.
We have the capacity to gradually increase global food production, political stability, infastructure, education and price are the biggest factors. A cataclismic event will undoubtedly happen at some stage in the future,as it has in the past, no planning will avert that.
“Heroin is 25% of Afghanistan’s GDP. One day the world may stop paying for that heroin and the Danegeld for its terrorism. ”
The Afghan business model looks pretty sound to me. People never stop paying for dope.
The EU’s Common Agricultural Policy keeps land out of production by subsidising set-aside (it’s a price maintenance thing). What difference, if any, would bringing that back on-line make? They are, after all, the closest suppliers to North Africa with spare capacity.
Here is some simple arithmetic which is worth watching and puts some perspective on this subject.
You will then see why this lecture by Dr R. A. Bartlett, from the University of Colorado, has over 3 million hits!!
The solution seems quite simple. According to the theory we need to pump increasing amounts of CO2 into the atmosphere thus increasing world temps by four degrees, consequently moving the production area about 4 to 600 miles further North and releasing the vast areas of tundra in Northern Russia, China and Mongolia, alongside increased areas of Canada for grain production. As the major land masses are in the far north the loss of the sub-tropical south would be irrelevant. (Sorry Aus!)
I am going to throw an extra shovel full of coal on the fire right now.
Does anyone have the figures for how much land would be released per degree increase in global temps?
Seems like an opportunity for a new Borlaug to develop a non-plant equivalent … possibly a protein and starch mix grown by bacteria or yeast.
Rising quakes – volcanic activity – cloud cover – storms – floods, as happened before world devastating 5year 1815-20 volcanic winter and during most of the Little Ice Age, that provoked the cannibalic COLLAPSE of deforestating Mayas, Aztecs, Incas…
If altruist rescuers coordinate, humankind may revive truce and mutual-aid to AVERT next ice age!
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-nvSG3nbwTJU/TikXuPeac1I/AAAAAAAAAvg/gQthSGp13JQ/s1600/volcanic+crater+cap+2.jpg.
We immediately must test the proposal to AVERT volcanic winter through crater-caps/grids hold by zeppelins over extra active volcanoes to prevent ash ejection to the stratosphere: the begining of every ice age.
OPEN PUBLIC DIALOGUE, DECENTRALIZATION and GLOBAL AFFORESTATIONS offer food and wood, promote mutual-aid and prevent
cannibalism.
I do not quite agree with David about the timing of peak oil -there is lots still to be found in Alaska and arctic waters and also in the southern ocean around the Falklands, southern Chile etc. However, I do agree with his early presentation where he wrote about coal to liquids which is now viable at present oil prices, only politics is a problem, nuclear energy -in particular Thorium reactors which the Chinese will have up and running in about seven year. Countries that ignore or restrict nuclear energy (like Germany) will get left behind. It is notable that the Swiss have voted to lift the restriction on nuclear expansion.
Re Neil Jones – compulsory set-aside, as such, ended a few years ago in the EU, what we have now (in the UK) are schemes to use bits of land for ‘envronmental’ benefit, eg 6m grass strips alongside ditches and streams to reduce fertliser and pesticide runoff, field corners and strips of flower and clover mixes for pollinators and other insects and areas planted for overwinter bird feed.
These are part of ‘environmental stewardship’ shemes or what is called ‘cross-compliance’ see:
http://www.naturalengland.org.uk/ourwork/farming/funding/es/els/default.aspx
I understand that the details vary from country to country.
This really points out how silly it is to grow corn for fuel.
Worth reading. An ongoing series on the issue of food security from DTN: http://www.dtn.com/ag/food_security/
==========================================================
Agriculture’s Greatest Challenge
Growing enough food to feed a hungry world will create new opportunities for America’s farmers. But it also means greater volatility and uncertainty for your financial future.
Risk And Rewards Of Food Security – A letter from Editor In Chief, Gregg Hillyer
9,000,000,000 – It’s a daunting number of people to feed by 2050. Can the world’s farmers meet the challenge?
Volatility, The New Norm – Sure, the world can’t get enough of what you produce. But strong global demand creates more risk for your farming business.
The Hungriest Continent – Africa struggles to feed its people in a world of plenty.
Producers Prepare to Serve Billions and Billions – The world’s appetite for beef, chicken and pork offers a promising future for the U.S. livestock industry.
Bye Bye Ethanol Boom? – Corn is a key food and feed ingredient. Will the corn ethanol industry win out over feeding the world?
The Food Futurists – These distinguished experts share their thoughts on the challenges of feeding a hungry world and how agriculture will respond.
A New Land Grab? – For some countries, securing their future food supply means looking beyond their borders.