My town's Climate Action Protest- I get to be "zombietime"

WUWT readers may know of the famous zombietime.com where an anonymous photographer captures some of the bizarre things that happen at protests in SFO and Berkeley.  Today on the campus of Chico State University, a protest of sorts was held, I went there to take photos to document it. It was much more down to earth than some “zombietime” offerings, but it was still a bit strange and full of mixed messages.  The main message: stop a parking structure (with solar panels on it even!) and others, the secondary message was something about climate, but it isn’t clear what.

I first noticed this protest when I saw this image on Facebook advertising it:

I sent an email to organizer Dr. Mark Stemen of CSUC stating my concerns over the imagery and what it represents to some people in the community and he agreed to pass it on to the students. I’m happy to report that I didn’t see any masked faces at the event today.

That was followed by another sign on Facebook, one far more normal and inviting:

The stated objective from their Facebook page reads:

Critical Mass, Climate Action Protest

Our Objectives:

1. Two more parking structures are scheduled in the CSU, Chico Master Plan after this one is complete. We say, Never Again. Revoke both of these projects immediately.

2. Zingg [president of the CSUC campus], we offer you the stage for a public discussion about what “Campus Climate Neutrality” looks like off of paper, revoke your signature or redefine your perception of sustainability– We won’t stand for greenwashing.

* An apology for calling your students ‘uninformed voters’ would also be appropriate during this time; for democracy… & science.

3. Stop selling parking permits to students within one mile of campus. Getting these students to campus without a car will free spots for individuals that commute and need a space.

In the 2011 CSU, Chico AS Elections, 76% of students voted in OPPOSITION to this University proposed plan. The structure will cost $14,000,000 and incur 30 years of debt that will be paid for by an increase in student fees. With this semester’s tuition increased by more than 32%, this plan does not represent the interests of the students and the student vote is evidence of this realization.

The University has gone along ignoring its President’s commitment to “Campus Climate Neutrality” as well as the overwhelming student dissent and will begin construction early this August. This project supports an infrastructure that is not responding to the demands and needs for sustainable transportation. At a campus where 80% of students live within two miles, the students believe they can do better, much better.

Here’s what the event looked like as I approached on foot in downtown Chico.  Click all images below to enlarge them.

I annotated the image above to show that the protest was held next to the parking structure under construction. Some background is helpful.

For years, downtown merchants have been asking the City Council to do something about the parking situation. On certain days and hours, finding parking downtown is an exercise in futility, and you can find yourself driving in circles for several minutes trying to find an open parking space. A newspaper article in 2005 by the alternate weekly highlights the problem.

Plans were made for a new parking structure by the city, but anti-growth people launched a referendum to vote it down. Chico State decided to forge ahead on their own to solve the problem and recently got approval from the CSU trustees to build the parking structure, even though Stemen’s class had a vote and sent the trustees a letter arguing against it. The local daily newspaper praised the decision to go forward in an editorial on May 12th:

Our view: The CSU trustees were able to focus on the obvious — that Chico State University needs more parking for its students.

In Chico, where things such as election dates, disc golf and bridges over irrigation ditches become full-blown controversies, no decision is easy. That’s why it was a relief that the decision over Chico State University’s planned parking structure was made by a board in Long Beach.

The also printed a comment from CSU trustees who were surprised to get a complaint about adding more parking saying usually such plans are met with open arms by the students. But, as the newspaper editorial points out, this is Chico were getting things done that are considered normal by most of the rest of the USA turn into full-blown controversies. In this case, Professor Mark Stemen and a handful of students (who won’t be around in a few years to live with issues they protest) are driving this controversy.

If it was just a parking garage, then maybe, one might be able to argue that such protests might have a basis. But there’s a bizarre twist to this. This parking  structure is part office space and part sustainability shrine, with a 15 kilowatt solar power array (expandable) and with LEED certification.

Here’s the architectural drawing from the CSUC web page on the structure, annotations mine:

Features:

  • 15kW photovoltaic array with trellis and infrastructure to expand
  • 10 electrical vehicle charging stations
  • Heating and cooling system 15% more efficient than required
  • Water efficient fixtures
  • Drought tolerant plants
  • Low e-windows
  • Occupant sensored energy efficient lighting system
  • White interior walls and ceiling (in parking structure)
  • Open/Full capacity sign at structure entrance
  • Recycled materials used in concrete
  • Designed to LEED Silver equivalent

And here’s a video made by students highlighting some of the features:

Here we have a parking structure with solar panels, a combined office with LEED certification, and  made with recycled materials. What’s not to like? Automobiles, that’s their issue. It seems that with Eco-zealots, it is never enough.

Oh, and who’s the LEED certifcation and sustainability guru at CSUC? Why CSUC’s Dr. Mark Stemen of course, the same guy organizing opposition to the LEED certified parking structure and today’s protest.

So here’s the pictures of the protest today against this structure, others like it to follow, and somewhere in all that some protest about climate and using bicycles is mixed in. Click images to enlarge them.

The view from 2nd and Normal Street ~ 1:15 PM 9/10/2011
View of the main protest site - seems hardly "critical mass" with so few people
The sustainable band is getting warmed up, meanwhile some hippie walks barefoot on asphalt on a 100 degree F day
The band's electric organ, guitars, and PA system is pedal powered by a team of 4 stationary bike generators (Note: people make CO2 too ya know)
Getting the stink eye for taking pictures
At the other end of the parking lot, guards say "no cars allowed". Apparently they didn't get out of bed early enough to prevent some scofflaws from parking there.
~ 2PM 9/10/2011 - I thought maybe I got there too early the first time, and that's why the crowd was so thin, so I came back an hour later to see if anything had changed, after all, they say 76% of the student body was against the parking structure.
Nope, an hour later, no increase in the crowd, so I left

Later in the day, one of the protesters put this photo up on the Facebook page for the event:

"Honk if you hate parking", yeah, that'll work. Photo by Luann Manss

A couple of closing images. First, from Dr. Mark Stemen’s Facebook page. I never thought of parking and eating being linked. I guess I just don’t have my mind right…yeah, that’s it, “Cool Hand Mark” has it all figured out:

In the face of such logic, I suppose it would be pointless to point out that parked cars don’t produce CO2 (as opposed to the ones still driving around looking for a parking space) and that increased CO2 actually benefits agricultural production worldwide. As NASA says, The biosphere is booming thanks to increased CO2 [insert electrical short circuiting sounds here].

Nature’s wind today had other ideas though, and turned one of the signs posted up on the construction fence a block away into litter, only to be trampled by one of the hideous CO2 belching beasts:

Of course I’m sure some of the protestors will say I staged that photo, what with me being a “denier” and all that. But no, that’s exactly how I happened upon it. In fact, it was the first hint I was getting close to the protest, as it was the first sign I saw today one block west of the protest.

In closing, the protest was pretty mild, the students didn’t wear face masks as the poster advertised they might, protestors got to socialize, listen to some pedal powered tunes, free speech was upheld, and I had a good chuckle from it all. I hope you did too.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

113 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jeff Alberts
September 10, 2011 9:24 pm

Protest? Looked more like a farmer’s market or craft show.

DJ
September 10, 2011 9:38 pm

I’d like to personally thank all the protesters for the success of their rally. It worked.
It worked so well, in fact, that the cooling they achieved reached Reno, and today was quite comfortable.
……perhaps too comfortable…. I’m noticing the advent of fall here, with leaves showing up on my lawn, and IMHO, a bit earlier than normal.

September 10, 2011 9:39 pm

Jeff, they were busy dreaming, believing and giving the protest some face. It sewems as though there wasn’t much oomph behind their message.

Editor
September 10, 2011 9:42 pm

A new standard in “laid back.”

Leon Brozyna
September 10, 2011 9:49 pm

And in a few years, after getting introduced to reality, most of those protestors will be in the market for a cheap car to get to and from their jobs and, since it’ll have to be cheap, it’ll probably be a *gasp* CO2 emitting model.

Stephen Singer
September 10, 2011 9:52 pm

Wow, do they even have enough clowns to get up a good game of flag football? The student body is obviously really worked up over this issue, not.

September 10, 2011 9:52 pm

Believers? Well that “zombie” outfit certainly seems like religious vestments.

Jesse
September 10, 2011 9:57 pm

These kids need a hobby or something.

Dave Worley
September 10, 2011 10:03 pm

That’s what they get for not holding a mouse click march.
They could have had millions turn up.

Ted Dooley
September 10, 2011 10:08 pm

A half keg of stale beer at any frat house would have drawn multiple times that many participants….
REPLY: LOL! I passed a couple on the way, I should have taken photos for comparison purposes. – Anthony

Jenn Oates
September 10, 2011 10:14 pm

As a Cal grad, I say “pfffft.” You call that a protest?!
🙂

September 10, 2011 10:17 pm

The solar panels on the structure are not bad as ancillary power when they do produce electricity, BUT—and a big but—how much will they cost to buy, install, and maintain relative to the power they will produce? If there is a mandated buy-in program, which means that they get paid for producing energy even if they use it all in the structure, it’s a scam because it means they are being paid by the taxpayer as a hidden subsidy.
If I make power from my own panels, I simply have a lower electric bill each month; I should not be paid for it. The idea of getting the use of the power and then being paid for it is triple-dipping, as (1) I do not pay for the power, (2) I use my own power and do not pay for it, and (3) they pay me for making it. In England and, for awhile, in Spain, the buy-in program forces the power company to pay several times the electricity rate and then sell it at normal prices–of course, they have to pass the inflated costs on to the customers, so bills go up.
The buy-in cost is such a deal that one of the solar companies in Spain was shining spotlights at night on their solar panels, making electricity, getting paid four times the going rate by the power company buy-in program, and then pay normal rates for the electricity to run the lights. They were making about 200-300% profit by blowing on their own sails due to the ridiculous buy-in scam. Right now foreign companies are building wind turbines all of the UK because of the insanely profitable, taxpayer funded buy-in program for alternative power. It’s a true crime.

pochas
September 10, 2011 10:18 pm

Just some kids havin’ fun, mate!

TomRude
September 10, 2011 10:20 pm

“Huge crowds, massive demonstration”
Beth Sorenstein

Jeff Alberts
September 10, 2011 11:01 pm

YEah, not much energy there.
Around these parts, we get the Starbuck’s Protesters. After getting a mega grande crapafrappachino, they stand out on the street corner of Coupeville, WA and hold up signs about peace not war. As long as the weather’s nice, that is.

pat
September 10, 2011 11:09 pm

“We are the dreamers”
No you are the [.. of …] s that have absolutely no […] worth a bowl of […].
[Please watch the language. Robt]

September 10, 2011 11:14 pm

I feel really sorry for today’s generation of college kids. They have so little left to protest about. A parking garage? My generation protested Vietnam, world hunger, nuclear weapons, overpopulation and so forth. A parking garage? What’s next? A campaign against a street light?

September 10, 2011 11:34 pm

Did they sacrifice the fat guitarist at the end of it?

Doug in Seattle
September 10, 2011 11:42 pm

Dooley, I was thinking the same thing! But then again it was pretty much the same back in my professional student days (the 90s), only then it was some other cause with 20 protesters (and 200 at the frat house).

BillyV
September 10, 2011 11:55 pm

Look, in every college community 0.87 % of the students feel they must join or participate in a protest of some kind and are wannabe activists. The schools represent in general an unbalanced political mindset tilted left, and we always will have someone from the faculty to help the students along. Since we don’t have a “Great” war going on that is popular to demonstrate against- as in prior years; and costs too much to go to Washington to protest against the pipeline, (Mom & Dad would not approve nor fund it.) the issues to get really worked up about are minimal. The local parking garage is the convenient target by these juvenile wannabe thinkers and manages to fulfill the craving of that 0.87% of the students. It is a wonderful target to combine being green and the desire to control other people’s lives and just make noise. The unfortunate thing is that they sometime consume 100% of the local newspaper wannabe reporters and they make it out as some sort of an event of significance when it is just a zit-fest of youth with excess energy. This energy release is necessary for the health of the whole college.

UK Sceptic
September 11, 2011 12:05 am

We get bigger crowds at the local village jumble sale…

Katherine
September 11, 2011 12:10 am

That’s a protest? Pfft. The farmers’ markets I’ve been to had more visitors.

Bryan A
September 11, 2011 12:18 am

perhaps it would be better accepted if they designated an entire floor of the structure for bicycle parking only and included charging stations for electric bicycles

James H
September 11, 2011 12:39 am

“We are the face for change” they say on an image where you can’t see a face as it is masked. What the heck is that supposed to mean?

charles nelson
September 11, 2011 12:55 am

Dreamers and Believers…pretty much seems up the whole AGW movement.

1 2 3 5
Verified by MonsterInsights