A little known 20 40 year old climate change prediction by Dr. James Hansen – that failed will likely fail badly

UPDATE: Thanks to a tip from Willis Eschenbach, there’s some developing news in that story from Dr. James Hansen. The Salon interviewee and book author, Rob Reiss that I quoted, now admits he somehow conflated 40 years with 20 years, and concedes that Dr. Hansen actually said 40 years for his prediction. However, as the newest analysis shows, it doesn’t make any difference, and we still aren’t seeing the magnitude of sea level rise predicted, now 23 years into it.

See the relevant excerpt below:

Michaels also has the facts wrong about a 1988 interview of me by Bob Reiss, in which Reiss asked me to speculate on changes that might happen in New York City in 40 years assuming CO2 doubled in amount. Michaels has it as 20 years, not 40 years, with no mention of doubled CO2. Reiss verified this fact to me, but he later sent the message:

I went back to my book and re-read the interview I had with you. I am embarrassed to say that although the book text is correct, in remembering our original conversation, during a casual phone interview with a Salon magazine reporter in 2001 I was off in years. What I asked you originally at your office window was for a prediction of what Broadway would look like in 40 years, not 20. But when I spoke to the Salon reporter 10 years later probably because I’d been watching the predictions come true, I remembered it as a 20 year question.

Source: this update on Dr. Hansen’s personal web page at Columbia University.

In my story, below, I quoted from Reiss here in the Salon interview.

So I’m happy to make the correction for Dr. Hansen in my original article, since Mr. Reiss reports on his original error in conflating 40 years with 20 years. But let’s look at how this changes the situation with forty years versus twenty.

Per Dr. Hansen’s prediction in 1988, now in 2011, 23 years later, we’re a bit over halfway there … so the sea level rise should be about halfway up the side of Manhattan Island by now.

How’s that going? Are the predictions coming true? Let’s find out. Let’s look at the tide gauge in New York and see what it says.

Here’s the PSMSL page http://www.psmsl.org/data/obtaining/stations/12.php

You can see the terrifying surge of acceleration in the sea level due to increasing GHGs in the 20th century. Willis downloaded and plotted the data to see what the slope looked like, and then plotted a linear average line.

Here it is overlaid with the Colorado satellite data. Note the rate of rise is unchanged:

And add to that, the recent peer reviewed paper from the Journal of Coastal Research that said: “worldwide-temperature increase has not produced acceleration of global sea level over the past 100 years”

As of this update in March 2011, we’re 23 years into his prediction of the West Side Highway being underwater. From what I can measure in Google Earth, Dr. Hansen would need at least a ten foot rise in forty years to make his prediction work. See this image below from Google Earth where I placed the pointe over the West Side Highway, near the famous landmark and museum, the USS Intrepid:

According to Google Earth, the West Side Highway is 10 feet above sea level here - click to enlarge

The lat/lon should you wish to check yourself is: 40.764572° -73.998498°

Here’s a ground level view (via a tourist photo) so you can see the vertical distance from the roadway to the sea level on that day and tide condition. Sure looks like at least 10 feet to me.

Image from Panoramio

According to the actual data, after 23 years, we’ve seen about a 2.5 inch rise. There’ s still a very long way to go to ten feet to cover the West Side Highway there.

To reach the goal he predicted in 1988, Dr. Hansen needs to motivate the sea to do his bidding, he’s gonna have to kick it in gear and use a higher octane driver if he’s going to get there. – Anthony

The original story is below:

===========================================================

The news today from the Pew Institute tells us that many Americans are backing away from the predictions of catastrophic climate change. This may be because many predictions simply haven’t come true.

Most, if not all, WUWT readers know Dr. James Hansen of GISS. He’s credited with jump starting the debate in 1988 with his now famous “sweaty” testimony before Congress in June 1988. See more about the stagecraft of that event here.

http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2009/05/hansen_1988_congress.jpg

Readers might be tempted to think that I’m going to point out the discrepancies between the three different model scenarios that Dr. Hansen presented to Congress in 1988, as shown below. But these model projections are very well known. I’m talking about something else entirely.

Hansen's 3 model scenarios compared to temperature records from RSS (satellite) and GISS (surface). Graphic: Steve McIntyre of Climate Audit

In Dr. Hansen’s case, he’s been living the life of a scientist in the media spotlight since, giving thousands of interviews. He’s also taken on the role of activist during that time, getting himself arrested this year for obstructing a public highway.

He likely doesn’t remember this one interview he gave to a book author approximately 20 years ago, but fortunately that author recounted the interview on Salon.com. What is most interesting about this particular Hansen interview is that he dispenses with the usual models and graphs, and makes predictions about what will happen in 20 years to New York City, right in his own neighborhood. Sea level figures prominently.

Here’s the interview.

In a 2001 interview with author Rob Reiss about his upcoming book “Stormy Weather” Salon.com contributor Suzy Hansen (no apparent relation to Jim Hansen) asks some questions about his long path of research for the book. One of the questions centered around an interview of Dr. James Hansen by Reiss around 1988-1989. Red emphasis mine.

Extreme weather means more terrifying hurricanes and tornadoes and fires than we usually see. But what can we expect such conditions to do to our daily life?

While doing research 12 or 13 years ago, I met Jim Hansen, the scientist who in 1988 predicted the greenhouse effect before Congress. I went over to the window with him and looked out on Broadway in New York City and said, “If what you’re saying about the greenhouse effect is true, is anything going to look different down there in 20 years?” He looked for a while and was quiet and didn’t say anything for a couple seconds. Then he said, “Well, there will be more traffic.” I, of course, didn’t think he heard the question right. Then he explained, “The West Side Highway [which runs along the Hudson River] will be under water. And there will be tape across the windows across the street because of high winds. And the same birds won’t be there. The trees in the median strip will change.” Then he said, “There will be more police cars.” Why? “Well, you know what happens to crime when the heat goes up.”

And so far, over the last 10 years, we’ve had 10 of the hottest years on record.

Didn’t he also say that restaurants would have signs in their windows that read, “Water by request only.”

Under the greenhouse effect, extreme weather increases. Depending on where you are in terms of the hydrological cycle, you get more of whatever you’re prone to get. New York can get droughts, the droughts can get more severe and you’ll have signs in restaurants saying “Water by request only.”

When did he say this will happen?

Within 20 or 30 years. And remember we had this conversation in 1988 or 1989.

Does he still believe these things?

Yes, he still believes everything. I talked to him a few months ago and he said he wouldn’t change anything that he said then.

I’ve saved the Salon.com web page as a PDF also, here, just in case it should be deleted. So not only did Dr. Hansen make the claims in the late 1980’s, he reaffirmed his predictions again in 2001.

The scenario of the interview with Dr. Hansen looking out his window and describing the changes he envisions 20 years into the future is very plausible. As we established yesterday, Dr. Hansen’s NASA GISS office at 2880 Broadway in NYC,  has a view of the Hudson River.

Here’s a Google Earth street level view of 2880 Broadway:

GISS is located right aboive "Monk's - Click for a larger image
The NASA GISS building at 2880 Broadway and 112th Street- The arrows indicate my guesses for offices of Dr. James Hansen and Dr, Gavin Schmidt - Click for a larger image

Using Google Earth, I can actually fly right up to (what I think is) Dr. Hansen’s window and recreate the view. (Note to anyone who worries, this info about the location is public domain information, published on the NASA GISS office website)

First let’s establish the location in traditional downlooking map style view at put Dr. Hansen’s line of sight on the image:

Click for a larger image
Click for a larger image

Here is a close in view, from further east on 112th street, just behind the GISS building looking northwest to the Hudson river. Google’s 3D buildings feature is used to recreate the buildings:

Click for a larger image
Click for a larger image

Here’s what the view from Dr. Hansen’s window at GISS looks like:

Click for a larger image
Click for a larger image

And finally, here is the view from the Hudson, looking back to the GISS building:

Click for a larger image
Click for a larger image

In the recounting of the interview by Rob Reiss, Hansen makes several claims about trees, birds, police cars, and crime. I can’t comment on those as I have no data. What I can comment on is this prediction by Dr. Hansen:

“The West Side Highway [which runs along the Hudson River] will be under water.”

As you can clearly see in the Google Earth images, the West Side Highway remains dry and open. Sea level (at which the Hudson River at that point becomes) is not encroaching on the highway. Note the date on the Google Earth timeline toolbar in the upper left. The aerial imagery was taken approximately 20 years later, on May 12th, 2008.

So much for local climate change predictions by the leading global authority on climate change.

Even if we give Dr. Hansen the benefit of 30 years, I’ll point out that satellite measured rate of change of global sea level has slowed significantly in the last few years, and is not likely to rise enough to meet Dr. Hansen’s prediction even 30 years out. See this story.

In fact using the University of Colorado interactive sea level plotting tool, we can see virtually no trend in the last 20 years:

Sea level plot - just off Manhattan Island - Graph: University of Colorado
Sea level plot - just off Manhattan Island - Graph: University of Colorado

You can reproduce it here at sealevel.colorado.edu

I wonder what Dr. Hansen thinks when he looks out that window today?

5 1 vote
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

161 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Gene Nemetz
October 22, 2009 10:21 pm

“If what you’re saying about the greenhouse effect is true, is anything going to look different down there in 20 years?”
“Ya, um, the most famous tv show ever will film lots of scenes right down there.”
What a crazy prediction…wait, umm…..

tokyoboy
October 22, 2009 10:23 pm

To err is human, to forgive divine….. up to a point though.

Gene Nemetz
October 22, 2009 10:26 pm

To err is human, to forgive divine….. up to a point though.
But he’s sticking with that err. Maybe, and I’m not being sarcastic, he’s a bit mad.

kuhnkat
October 22, 2009 10:29 pm

“I wonder what Dr. Hansen thinks when he looks out that window today?”
Just a little more [snip] alarmism and WE WIN!!!!!

Gene Nemetz
October 22, 2009 10:35 pm

…in 1988 with his now famous “sweaty” testimony before Congress in June 1988. See more about the stagecraft….
For those who still don’t believe this happened watch this video starting at 0:51

jorgekafkazar
October 22, 2009 10:40 pm

“When did he say this will happen?”
“Within 20 or 30 years. And remember we had this conversation in 1988 or 1989.”
Okay, 9 or 10 years to go, at the outside.

martin brumby
October 22, 2009 10:42 pm

I wouldn’t believe him if he predicted tomorrow was going to be Saturday (without checking a calendar three times).

david alan
October 22, 2009 10:55 pm

Dr. James Hansen
Premier Climatologist
Author of: Storms of My Grandchildren
National Launch Event For The Book
Monday December 7 at 7:30   NEW DATE!
Location: Wortham Center, Houston,Tx
Originally scheduled for October 29, the event has been rescheduled because of temporary health issues of Dr. Hansen
Health issues my ***. Dude writes a book and its obvious, no one cares. This event was suppose to be his big coming out party for his new book right before Copenhagen. Blah Blah Blah.
I have to organize some kind of protest. That is if he even shows up.
Any ideas? :p

REPLY:
a new date that will “live in infamy” – A

Norm/Calgary
October 22, 2009 10:56 pm

“I wonder what Dr. Hansen thinks when he looks out that window today?”
He’s probably wondering if his window opens [snip]

April E. Coggins
October 22, 2009 11:03 pm

I have a theory about Hansen. He is off his rocker from his created global warming [snip]. If he would just admit his exaggeration and come clean, his conscience would be relieved and so would his tortured soul. [snip] It’s going to happen sooner or later, why not just admit the error before the house of cards comes down? We may laugh for a day or two but we won’t eat you. It can’t possibly be worse than what will happen if you don’t.

Keith Minto
October 22, 2009 11:09 pm

Post modern climate science is sniffing the political winds ,battening down the hatches, firmly gripping the Capstan with clenched teeth as the cast and crew of the good ship AGW slowly sinks.
There is a good German word for the pleasure in watching this unfold….Schadenfreude.

david alan
October 22, 2009 11:10 pm

david alan (22:55:10) :
REPLY: a new date that will “live in infamy” – A
Holy Bat Buano Batman, that’s hilarious.

October 22, 2009 11:19 pm

Does aybody else think he looks like a combed and shaven Denethor?

FredG
October 22, 2009 11:31 pm

Hansen and all alarmists are counting on the cap-n-trade bill + the Copenhagen treaty to be adopted, then 5 years from now they’re gonna be celebrating victory, claiming that it worked and they saved the world.
Watch.

Michael hauber
October 22, 2009 11:32 pm

The prediction made in that paper was that the average temperature would warm to above 0.4 degrees ‘within the next few years’. The significance being that he considereed 0.4 degrees to be the maximum climate variation likely due to natural variation, and that if it warmed up past this point that would be a clear sign that something not natural was going on. He calculated 0.4 degrees as the threshold based on the 20th century temperature history, and on the models output.
It would be interesting to know if any skeptics pointed out at that stage that natural climate variation could take temperatures above 0.4 degrees, or if this claim has only been made recently after that amount of warming was observed.
The actual forcings since he made this climate projection have been quite close to scenario B. The scenario B projection was made on a climate sensitivity of 4.2 degrees, and in the same paper he claimed a climate sensitivity is likely to be between 2.5 and 5. So it is interesting to note that his model was running towards the upper end of what he considered the likely sensitivity. If you use 2.5 to 5 to estimate an error bar on scenario B, this would put the bottom of the error bar just below 0.5, and current temperatures close to the bottom of the error bar.
So are current temperatures close to this low end because climate sensitivity to CO2 is actually at the low end of what Hansen considered reasonable? Or are temperatures at the low end because Hansen’s projection did not include cooling due to the now negative PDO and the current strong solar minimum?

Leon Brozyna
October 22, 2009 11:32 pm

An object lesson in embracing and holding onto a belief system in the face of evidence which contradicts that belief system. The greater the amount of evidence which contradicts the belief system, the more shrill are the voices raised to defend that belief system. Whatever else it may be, the AGW belief system has long since lost is claim to the mantle of science.

Landin
October 22, 2009 11:34 pm

In the novel Atlas Shrugged, the State Science Institute worked with the government to hide truth. State Science Institute scientists claimed Reardon Metal was dangerous and would harm society, when in fact Reardon Metal was one of the greatest inventions of all time bound to vastly improve society.
Eerily, today we have institutions of science working with the government to hide truth. They claim CO2 is dangerous and will harm society, when in fact CO2 is a harmless trace gas necessary for life on Earth, that improves society by helping enable more productive crops.
What happened to those who hid the truth in Atlas Shrugged? They were exposed as frauds and their institutions imploded.
Truth can never be hidden forever.

rbateman
October 22, 2009 11:34 pm

I wonder what Dr. Hansen thinks when he looks out that window today?
It’s near impossible to tell if he is being totally stubborn, is putting on a face, or he really does see those things when he looks out there.
How would we know what he thinks if he has not confided to someone what his doubts about this are, if he has any?

FredG
October 22, 2009 11:35 pm

p.s. Anthony, are you trying to intimidate Hansen by posting the exact address of his workplace?
While I don’t really care what happens to Hansen, it seems a bit much to point out his office window. There might be some lunatics out there taking aim.
REPLY: I’m not doing anything that GISS already doesn’t do on their own web page. They give the address and directions to their office, pictures of the building, and even a description of the entrance. See the GISS web page here: http://www.giss.nasa.gov/about/visiting/
It has been made public by them, well before I did. – Anthony

Gerard
October 22, 2009 11:36 pm

We have a much respected science reporter and scientist Robin Williams who works for the government broadcaster Australian Broadcasting Commission who predicted sea levels would rise by 100m by the end of the century due to climate change. I am pretty sure Tim Flannery made similar predictions.

Michael hauber
October 22, 2009 11:36 pm

And yes its also probably fair to acknowledge that it does appear that Hansen overestimated the likely impacts of sea level rise over a 20-30 year period, although being always skeptical of the ‘skeptic’ claims I would always want to hear the other side of the story before being sure…

October 22, 2009 11:38 pm

Here’s the sea level history for just offshore New York City, from sealevel.colorado.edu. Not much rise in that sea level since 1994 to now. In fact, the present sea level is below the “norm,” by about 5 cm.
http://tinypic.com/r/315ejpk/4

REPLY
: Thanks Roger, I forgot about the UC sea level interactive tool, I’ve added it to the story. – Anthony

October 22, 2009 11:50 pm

It would be great if a (sub)site would record all these predictions. Like Prince Charles, WWF, Hansens, etc, who all predict we’ll have something very bad things in x years, or so. Does anybody know of such site, or should we start a new one?
Ecotretas

Editor
October 22, 2009 11:50 pm

I drove over the former west-side highway a couple of weeks ago. The bow-wave from my 1988 Mazda B3000 pick-up truck was truly exceptional… had to avoid a couple of kayackers trying to paddle up 112th Street…. I think one of them was Gavin…. gave me the finger as I headed toward downtown and the Theater District…. in my wake I heard something about “Yuppie oil-company financed environmental criminal… ! ”
I smiled.

Kath
October 22, 2009 11:56 pm

Is there a website anywhere that lists all the predictions & pronouncements made by climate scientists and others? It would be nice to see such predictions listed against real observations.

1 2 3 7