Name 3 clear signs of the coming Thermageddon

thermageddon

OK, so my art is a bit tongue in cheek. But it does fit the disaster theme of the topic.

This op-ed piece in the Herald Sun is interesting, because it touches on many of the points covered here on WUWT. This is the first time I’ve seen all these collected in one article in a major newspaper. Andrew Bolt routinely uses material from WUWT, and this is the first time I’ve been able to reciprocate. There are some truly unique points raised by Bolt that are indigenous to Australia that we haven’t discussed here, but they are valid for discussion nonetheless. In cases where we have covered a point on WUWT, I’ve made a footnote link [in brackets] – Anthony


From Andrew Bolt, The Herald Sun

Global Warming Alarmists Out in the Cold

April 29, 2009 12:00am

IT’S snowing in April. Ice is spreading in Antarctica. The Great Barrier Reef is as healthy as ever.

And that’s just the news of the past week. Truly, it never rains but it pours – and all over our global warming alarmists.

Time’s up for this absurd scaremongering. The fears are being contradicted by the facts, and more so by the week.

Doubt it? Then here’s a test.

Name just three clear signs the planet is warming as the alarmists claim it should. Just three. Chances are your “proofs” are in fact on my list of 10 Top Myths about global warming.And if your “proofs” indeed turn out to be false, don’t get angry with me.

Just ask yourself: Why do you still believe that man is heating the planet to hell? What evidence do you have?

So let’s see if facts matter more to you than faith, and observations more than predictions.

MYTH 1

THE WORLD IS WARMING

Wrong. It is true the world did warm between 1975 and 1998, but even Professor David Karoly, one of our leading alarmists, admitted this week “temperatures have dropped” since – “both in surface temperatures and in atmospheric temperatures measured from satellites”. In fact, the fall in temperatures from just 2002 has already wiped out a quarter of the warming our planet experienced last century. (Check data from Britain’s Hadley Centre, NASA’s Aqua satellite and the US National Climatic Data Centre.)

Some experts, such as Karoly, claim this proves nothing and the world will soon start warming again. Others, such as Professor Ian Plimer of Adelaide University, point out that so many years of cooling already contradict the theory that man’s rapidly increasing gases must drive up temperatures ever faster.

But that’s all theory. The question I’ve asked is: What signs can you actually see of the man-made warming that the alarmists predicted?

[ Ian Plimer, Temperature trends]

MYTH 2

THE POLAR CAPS ARE MELTING

Wrong. The British Antarctic Survey, working with NASA, last week confirmed ice around Antarctica has grown 100,000 sq km each decade for the past 30 years.

Long-term monitoring by the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration reports the same: southern hemisphere ice has been expanding for decades.

As for the Arctic, wrong again.

The Arctic ice cap shrank badly two summers ago after years of steady decline, but has since largely recovered. Satellite data from NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Centre this week shows the Arctic hasn’t had this much April ice for at least seven years.

Norway’s Nansen Environmental and Remote Sensing Centre says the ice is now within the standard deviation range for 1979 to 2007.

[Antarctic Ice Growth, Arctic Ice Recovery ]

MYTH 3

WE’VE NEVER HAD SUCH A BAD DROUGHT

Wrong. A study released this month by the University of NSW Climate Change Research Centre confirms not only that we’ve had worse droughts, but this Big Dry is not caused by “global warming”, whether man-made or not.

As the university’s press release says: “The causes of southeastern Australia’s longest, most severe and damaging droughts have been discovered, with the surprise finding that they originate far away in the Indian Ocean.

“A team of Australian scientists has detailed for the first time how a phenomenon known as the Indian Ocean Dipole – a variable and irregular cycle of warming and cooling of ocean water – dictates whether moisture-bearing winds are carried across the southern half of Australia.”

MYTH 4

OUR CITIES HAVE NEVER BEEN HOTTER

Wrong. The alleged “record” temperature Melbourne set in January – 46.4 degrees – was in fact topped by the 47.2 degrees the city recorded in 1851. (See the Argus newspaper of February 8, 1851.)

And here’s another curious thing: Despite all this warming we’re alleged to have caused, Victoria’s highest temperature on record remains the 50.7 degrees that hit Mildura 103 years ago.

South Australia’s hottest day is still the 50.7 degrees Oodnadatta suffered 37 years ago. NSW’s high is still the 50 degrees recorded 70 years ago.

What’s more, not one of the world’s seven continents has set a record high temperature since 1974. Europe’s high remains the 50 degrees measured in Spain 128 years ago, before the invention of the first true car.

MYTH 5

THE SEAS ARE GETTING HOTTER

Wrong. If anything, the seas are getting colder. For five years, a network of 3175 automated bathythermographs has been deployed in the oceans by the Argo program, a collaboration between 50 agencies from 26 countries.

Warming believer Josh Willis, of NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, reluctantly concluded: “There has been a very slight cooling . . .”

[Ocean cooling]

MYTH 6

THE SEAS ARE RISING

Wrong. For almost three years, the seas have stopped rising, according to the Jason-1 satellite mission monitored by the University of Colorado.

That said, the seas have risen steadily and slowly for the past 10,000 years through natural warming, and will almost certainly resume soon.

But there is little sign of any accelerated rises, even off Tuvalu or the Maldives, islands often said to be most threatened with drowning.

Professor Nils-Axel Moerner, one of the world’s most famous experts on sea levels, has studied the Maldives in particular and concluded there has been no net rise there for 1250 years.

Venice is still above water.

[Sea Level in the Maldives, Sea Level satellite data]

MYTH 7

CYCLONES ARE GETTING WORSE

Wrong. Ryan Maue of Florida State University recently measured the frequency, intensity and duration of all hurricanes and cyclones to compile an Accumulated Cyclone Energy Index.

His findings? The energy index is at its lowest level for more than 30 years.

The World Meteorological Organisation, in its latest statement on cyclones, said it was impossible to say if they were affected by man’s gases: “Though there is evidence both for and against the existence of a detectable anthropogenic signal in the tropical cyclone climate record to date, no firm conclusion can be made on this point.”

[Ryan Maue and Hurricane energy, Hurricane landfall trends]

MYTH 8

THE GREAT BARRIER REEF IS DYING

Wrong. Yes, in 1999, Professor Ove Hoegh-Gulberg, our leading reef alarmist and administrator of more than $30 million in warming grants, did claim the reef was threatened by warming, and much had turned white.

But he then had to admit it had made a “surprising” recovery.

Yes, in 2006 he again warned high temperatures meant “between 30 and 40 per cent of coral on Queensland’s Great Barrier Reef could die within a month”.

But he later admitted this bleaching had “minimal impact”. Yes, in 2007 he again warned that temperature changes of the kind caused by global warming were bleaching the reef.

But this month fellow Queensland University researchers admitted in a study that reef coral had once more made a “spectacular recovery”, with “abundant corals re-established in a single year”. The reef is blooming.

MYTH 9

OUR SNOW SEASONS ARE SHORTER

Wrong. Poor snow falls in 2003 set off a rash of headlines predicting warming doom. The CSIRO typically fed the hysteria by claiming global warming would strip resorts of up to a quarter of their snow by 2018.

Yet the past two years have been bumper seasons for Victoria’s snow resorts, and this year could be just as good, with snow already falling in NSW and Victoria this past week.

[New low temp record at Australian ski resort this year]

MYTH 10

TSUNAMIS AND OTHER DISASTERS ARE GETTING WORSE

Are you insane? Tsunamis are in fact caused by earthquakes. Yet there was World Vision boss Tim Costello last week, claiming that Asia was a “region, thanks to climate change, that has far more cyclones, tsunamis, droughts”.

Wrong, wrong and wrong, Tim. But what do facts matter now to a warming evangelist when the cause is so just?

And so any disaster is now blamed on man-made warming the way they once were on Satan. See for yourself on www.numberwatch.co.uk/warmlist.htm the full list, including kidney stones, volcanic eruptions, lousy wine, insomnia, bad tempers, Vampire moths and bubonic plagues. Nothing is too far-fetched to be seized upon by carpetbaggers and wild preachers as signs of a warming we can’t actually see.

Not for nothing are polar bears the perfect symbol of this faith – bears said to be threatened by warming, when their numbers have in fact increased.

Bottom line: fewer people now die from extreme weather events, whether cyclones, floods or blinding heatwaves.

Read that in a study by Indur Goklany, who represented the US at the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: “There is no signal in the mortality data to indicate increases in the overall frequencies or severities of extreme weather events, despite large increases in the population at risk.”

[Going down – death rates due to extreme weather events]

So stop this crazy panic.

First step: check again your list of the signs you thought you saw of global warming. How many are true? What do you think, and why do you think it?

Yes, the world may resume warming in one year or 100. But it hasn’t been warming as the alarmists said it must if man were to blame, and certainly not as the media breathlessly keeps claiming.

Best we all just settle down, then, and wait for the proof — the real proof. After all, panicking over invisible things is so undignified, don’t you think?

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

344 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
philincalifornia
May 1, 2009 3:56 pm

Hmmmm, drowning polar bears didn’t even make the top ten !!!

philincalifornia
May 1, 2009 3:57 pm

… at least as their own category.

May 1, 2009 4:18 pm

I’ve seen things like this graph that indicate a plateau or possible decline in global temperature:
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/img/climate/research/global-jan-dec-error-bar-pg.gif
But, what is the source of this claim under “myth 1”? “In fact, the fall in temperatures from just 2002 has already wiped out half the warming our planet experienced last century.” Is it based on one month’s anomaly? For example, March 2009?

Paul Coppin
May 1, 2009 4:19 pm

Please don’t use the word “indigenous’ unless you’re referring to an already sanctified ethnocultural group of misfits already approved as such. Otherwise, the UN will be obligated to make a call for a new cluster of NGOs, strike a task force and relief agency, and compel 123 nations to sign a declaration of some sort attesting to some obligation or another, and your taxes will go up, again, and Jim Hansen and Al Gore will have yet another group to pontificate before, and that can only come to no good.

DJ
May 1, 2009 4:21 pm

A nice demonstration of the sceptic echo chamber bouncing inaccurate tid-bits around the globe.
Let’s drill down to some of the “evidence”…
Snow in April is nothing new in OZ – there was heavy snow last year.
The snow season last year was not a bumper one nor was 2007. They were both very poor seasons overall – very short, very little overall snowfall and marked by very warm and dry conditions in spring (hyped by industry and “sceptics” – http://www.snowyhydro.com.au/snowDepth.asp?pageID=46&parentID=6 ).
The 2007 was the hottest year on record in the snowfields.
The last 10 years have seen the hottest driest drought on record in the snowfields.
Snow has shown drastic declines of near 50% since the 1950s in Australia.
Perhaps some of the other “sceptics” here might deal with the other 9…
REPLY: You live is Australia, why not deal with all of them then? How about the Barrier reef, you work in waterworld, explain that one and why the claims made by Bolt are all wet. Oh, and Jennifer Maohasy is still waiting for you to answer a question on her forum.- Anthony

Ray
May 1, 2009 4:23 pm

For a complete list of things caused by global warming see this: http://www.numberwatch.co.uk/warmlist.htm

Ray
May 1, 2009 4:24 pm

1. Al Gore said so.
2. Al Gore said so.
3. Al Gore said so.
And the debate is over.

Mick In The Hills
May 1, 2009 4:30 pm

Andrew Bolt routinely applies what I call the practical person’s “sniff test” to public policy issues.
When a rational adult applies their “sniff test” to the whole agw proposition, the odor makes their eyes water.
Here Bolt breaks through the instinctive stench surrounding agw, and lays out why it is so on the nose.
The great pity is that, in a so-called intelligent age, our politicians seem unable to arrive at these same conclusions immediately.

Gerry
May 1, 2009 4:37 pm

Hey, the religion of carbon-caused Climate Doom from the very start has merely been exercising its right to free speech and indoctrination. They said all along that their beliefs are based on consensus, which everybody knows is not how science is done. As with any other religion, the more myths incorporated, the stronger is the faith of the followers. I’m sure they have a whole holy book full of myths – far more than your paltry list, Andrew. The Head Ministers will, of course, be entitled to Carbon Credits. It’s the least the world can do for them in return for being saved.

Ron de Haan
May 1, 2009 4:44 pm

As the world keeps on blabbermouthing about CO2, who tells Obama that he is about to make the biggest mistake in life?
Stop Obama talking Gore.

Mike Bryant
May 1, 2009 4:47 pm

Micajah,
Here is the graph you posted:
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/img/climate/research/global-jan-dec-error-bar-pg.gif
This one is from NASA JPL (scroll down to the temperature data) which was just updated to include 2008:
http://climate.jpl.nasa.gov/keyIndicators/index.cfm#GlobalTemperature
Also the recent high years are lower in the JPL than the NOAA graph…. why? I have no idea.

Adam from Kansas
May 1, 2009 4:49 pm

I could name a sign, the big heat blobs rolling over Asia on Intellicast’s forecast maps, oh wait maybe that happens every year.
Maybe this one, SST’s today are higher than at various times in the last 2 months, oh wait they’re still lower than in January.
Maybe this one, Fairbanks has been seeing above average temperatures, oh wait it’s actually below average elsewhere on the globe.
I plum can’t think of any solid un-debatable reasons O.o

Craig Moore
May 1, 2009 4:52 pm

Well, well, Thermador still makes man made ovens that get hotter than hell. 😉

James
May 1, 2009 4:59 pm

DJ, I have reservations about the opinion of anyone who uses the term “drilling down to some of the evidence” – it usually means selectively cherry picking the evidence to suit one’s own point of view. Alas I think you fall into this category. By the way I too live in Australia, and enjoy skiing. The snow here hasn’t got any worse over the last 20 years – it was always fairly ordinary.

hunter
May 1, 2009 5:01 pm

That is not fair! How dare you!
Hansen prophesized it, Gore profitted it, the IPCC wrote it, Obama promised to cure it, and that is that!

Mike Bryant
May 1, 2009 5:01 pm

Don’t worry… the consensus scientists are always working on new and even scarier scenarios. The next one? Ocean acidification!!! Already shriveling under the white hot heat of truth… The good warming.

Leon Brozyna
May 1, 2009 5:04 pm

Interesting reading.
An Executive Summary to the Layman’s Guide to Global Warming Myths.
And here, on WUWT, complete with footnotes.

Sandw15
May 1, 2009 5:14 pm

That whole thing about “faux pas” on the last topic got me off into this. An example of correct southern usage goes something like, “What’s that shotgun faux, pas?”
“DJ (16:21:12) :
A nice demonstration of the sceptic echo chamber bouncing inaccurate tid-bits around the globe. “
Now don’t get me wrong…I admire your beliefs. You need to realize that as well as trying to save the world, you need to look after your family. You realize that it is a foregone conclusion that we won’t be able to stop global warming in time. Heck, I think we’ve passed at least two or three tipping points in the last ten years. You have to face up to it…there isn’t time to do anything about it now. It’s still early enough to invest in property which at the moment is just farmland…in central Louisiana. In a few years, it will be the new gulf coast. Think about it…Sandw15 Boudreaux’s Port of New New Orleans. A huge amount of shipping goes through the current city of New Orleans…you will be able to tap into the millions of dollars that will go through the new Port of New New Orleans.
You will be surprised at what a relatively small investment will yield as sea level rise drowns the old infrastructure. We at Sandw15 Incorporated are committed to recreating this infrastructure at the new mouth of the Mississippi River. Heck, we’re even going to improve it by making sure that the entire city of New New Orleans is entirely above sea level. Want the night life of old New Orleans? We have a plan to disassemble the French Quarter brick by brick and restore it in New New Orleans.
Just keep in mind that based on the strength of your commitment to the environment, this is the most logical course for you to take. The world may go to hell, but your insightful investment will ensure the welfare of your descendants and give you the economic clout to help many others. And this will be the end of your worries on vanishing wetlands. The whole family will agree…this is the wettest land you ever saw!
And I want you to know, for every share of stock that you buy in Sandw15 Boudreaux’s New Port of New New Orleans, I will give you three shares of stock in Sandw15 Boudreaux’s Lucky 15 Casino and Water Park and I will give you five free days at Sandw Boudreaux’s Lucky 15 Casino Hotel. You will get a 5 day pass to the Lucky 15 water park for the whole family…this includes unlimited rides on the awesome Broken Levee Water Slide!! How can you pass this up?

Ted Clayton
May 1, 2009 5:22 pm

Very well-written, Anthony. I could see this picked up by the MSM.
The ‘test’ that strikes me as most impressive to the public is the state of the Arctic icepack. Thanks to Al Gore & Co. hyping such an easily understood outcome – does it melt, or not? – we have a people-friendly symbolic proxy for the eye-glazing complexity of ‘climate change’ science that anyone can feel comfortable with.
Come late this summer, a lot will be riding on how arctic the Arctic ocean looks.

May 1, 2009 5:26 pm

Here is a related list, this from the U.S. EPA’s Proposed Finding that CO2 (and 5 other gases) are greenhouse gases.
EPA stated “The effects of climate change observed to date and projected to occur in the future–including but not limited to” (my responses in parentheses)
1. the increased likelihood of more frequent and intense heat waves, (even if valid, which is debatable, given the dust bowl years of the 1930s, these are more likely related to Jet stream and El Nino, which are natural events and very cyclical)
2. more wildfires, (likely not a valid statement, given the short period of records, plus modern fires are more likely due to forest mis-management, lighting strikes, arson. I made a point earlier on a WUWT thread that evidence of massive wildfires in the form of layers of charcoal can be found in the banks of rivers and streams)
3. degraded air quality, (air quality laws are improving air quality)
4. more heavy downpours and flooding, (storm intensity index not higher as stated by Bolt, but more damage occurs due to population growth and location in areas prone to flooding)
5. increased drought, (droughts are cyclical, more severe droughts in the past are known, some areas of drought are caused by poor land management)
6. greater sea level rise, (see the answer already given by Bolt)
7. more intense storms, (refer to the answer for more heavy downpours and flooding, above)
8. harm to water resources, (non-sequitur; water resources are affected by agricultural runoff, overuse, population growth, but not CO2)
9. harm to agriculture (no evidence provided, crop shortages and failures not noted, instead, cold weather is inhibiting planting and is shortening growing seasons).
10. harm to wildlife and ecosystems-(polar bear populations are growing, coral atolls are thriving)
Looks to me like the EPA is 0-for-10 on this one…that is even worse than Michael Jordan’s minor league batting average.

May 1, 2009 5:33 pm

DJ (Dodgy Joe), why don’t you get accurate with your evidence and present it with an unbiased slant.
Yes it’s not unusual to get some snow in April in the high country of Australia, usually 5 to 10 cm in some areas every 2nd of 3rd year and its gone in about 24 hours.
This year we got 70 cm at Mt Buller and all other resorts got over 40 cm in one dump. Now lets put this in perspective. It is rare in Australia to get 70 cm in one dump in any resort at any time of the year and an event worth celebrating. In fact a yearly maximum snow pack of 70 cm. at any resort would be a great season that most ski enthusiasts would want. The sort of season where you dont have to dodge rocks etc.
Mt. Buller has just officially opened for the 2009 ski season, 5 weeks ahead of schedule, the earliest in history. The closest time was in 1964 on 16th may. Hey that was the last time we had a natural global cooling cycle, and the period of data that all allarmists exclude from their studies so they can show a false extreme warming trend.
I think you will have to agree that this is an unusual cooling event and strong evidence to support world wide data that we are entering another natural multi decadal climate cooling variable.

May 1, 2009 5:33 pm

Environment Canada announced to day that by the end of April, Winnipeg has had five consecutive months of below normal temperatures. Believe me, in this climate, any kind of warming is welcome!

May 1, 2009 5:38 pm

[snip]

May 1, 2009 5:40 pm

Hey DJ, i think you’ll find the newly discovered Indian Ocean Dipole explains virtually all the recent weather, including droughts in SE Australia. No need for AGW at all.

1 2 3 14