Yellow vest protestor in a guy fawkes mask waving a french flag in paris

EU Cost of Living Crisis: “The EU … don’t have a magic wand to make the price increases go away”

Essay by Eric Worrall

But abolishing 30% of household energy bills by cancelling the green energy transition might help.

EU governments helpless as energy prices soar to four-year highs

There’s a ‘difficult’ winter coming, and ministers have few solutions. 

OCTOBER 29, 2026 8:00 PM CET

BY BEN MUNSTER AND ELENA GIORDANO

LUXEMBOURG — Europe’s energy ministers are running out of ideas to protect citizens from surging energy prices as winter approaches.

…

European gas prices soared above €100 per megawatt-hour on Wednesday for the first time since 2022, as last-minute panic-buying to fill European gas reserves added to supply pressures linked to the war in the Middle East.  

…

“We’ve exhausted most of our short-term options,” said one senior European energy official, granted anonymity to offer a candid perspective. “What’s left is really crisis management.”

…

“The EU and member states don’t have a magic wand to make the price increases go away,” Irish Energy Minister Darragh O’Brien, whose government holds the EU’s six-month rotating presidency, told reporters. “There’s a lot of measures that have been taken already in the short term. What today is about is actually seeing how we can move to more sustainable measures.”

…

“I don’t want to see that we will limit people,” said Mika Nykänen, the state secretary to Finland’s energy ministry. Instead, he called for policy designed to “change behavior” and reduce energy consumption less painfully. “Industry does it naturally. Normal households, normal families — they sometimes need encouragement,” he said. “For instance, subsidies to invest in the energy efficiency of houses, windows.”

…

Read more: https://www.politico.eu/article/eu-energy-prices-fossil-fuels-gas-middle-east-four-year-high/

Pundits covering widespread riots in Europe are careful to describe the problem as “cost of living”, rather than specifically mentioning energy. But there is no doubt energy costs are at the root of much of the hardship driving public anger.

Massive protests sweep Europe over cost of living and strained public services

Germany, France, Spain and Italy are among the nations protesting on Halloween following a recent wave of Gen Z-led marches across the continent.

Oct. 31, 2026, 9:39 PM GMT+10 / Updated Nov. 1, 2026, 7:35 AM GMT+10

By Freddie Clayton

Massive protests were sweeping Europe on Saturday as part of demonstrations driven by the cost of living and deficient public services, with police bracing for potential violence after recent looting and riots.

Germany, France, Spain and Italy are among the nations where demonstrations were being held on Halloween following a recent wave of Gen Z-led marches across the continent.

French officials said they would deploy 70,000 police on Saturday following some of the worst rioting in decades, which erupted in cities across the country after student protests about the state of education evolved into wider demonstrations about the cost of living and social security.

…

Read more: https://www.nbcnews.com/world/europe/europe-braces-massive-halloween-protests-cost-living-public-services-rcna606671

The Irish Energy Minister’s claim that the EU and member states don’t have a magic wand to make the price increases go away in my opinion rather understates what they do have the power to do.

Bill attribution is an absolute rat’s nest of indirection, so I asked Claude to make sense of it.

What proportion of consumer electricity bills in the EU are levies intended to fund the green energy transition?

…

Can you produce a shorter summary emphasising the hidden grid fees – I’m looking for an estimated aggregate cost number.

…

My estimate is that about 20–35% of the average EU household electricity bill, centrally around a quarter, is attributable to the green transition once grid and carbon costs are counted alongside the explicit levies.

There’s no official aggregate figure, so this is a rough estimate built from three parts:

ComponentShare of billBasis
Explicit renewable levies~5–10%Part of the 10% “other taxes” slice in ACER’s 2024 breakdown (48% energy, 27% network, 15% VAT, 10% other taxes)
Transition-driven grid fees~8–13%Assumes a third to a half of network charges come from integrating renewables. This is my assumption; no EU-wide split is published.
Carbon cost in the energy price~7–15%Carbon prices make up 20–50% of the wholesale price across European markets, according to AFRY, applied to the energy component
Total~20–35%

Why grid fees are the “hidden” part. Network costs show up on bills as delivery charges, not as green levies. Network tariffs make up about 25% of the bill, and regulators estimate grid costs for consumers could nearly double by 2050. The pressure is visible at country level. In Germany, the regulator found that customers in regions with strong renewable growth were bearing all the costs of integrating renewable energy, and it began spreading those costs nationally from 2025. In the Netherlands, the average household grid tariff could nearly triple, from €400 to over €1,100, after the planned offshore wind build-out.

Caveats:

  • The grid figure is the weakest part of the estimate. Some network spending would happen anyway, for ageing infrastructure and rising demand.
  • The estimate is gross, not net. Renewables also push wholesale prices down in many hours, and governments recycle ETS carbon revenue, partly back to households.
  • National differences are large. Germany or the Netherlands would come out well above this range, and Malta or Hungary well below it.

Sources:

Full transcript: https://claude.ai/share/528761de-7d8b-42c0-a055-59caf3253daf

What can I say? The Irish energy minister is right that a magic wand won’t reverse cost increases, and obviously some of the estimates above are based on incomplete data, but the possibility of abolishing up to 35% of energy bills by cancelling the green energy transition is surely worth a second look.

Note that Claude’s estimates of the potential savings from cancelling the green revolution swing wildly depending on what instructions it is given, so Claude is having just as much trouble untangling what makes EU energy so expensive as I am. Claude also sometimes struggles to give coherent answers to questions on sensitive topics like the green energy transition, for obvious reasons. In addition I suspect the EU are deliberately obfuscating source information to conceal the damage their green energy obsession is causing, though I can’t prove that assertion at this stage.

Whatever the true figure, cancelling a significant percentage of people’s energy bills, and improving energy security by say repealing EU bans on fracking, would go a long way towards easing pressures on people’s finances. Such immediate cost of living relief would surely help calm the anger which is driving the rage on Europe’s streets.

4.7 15 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
84 Comments
Neil Pryke
November 3, 2026 2:25 am

The comment is so obvious…

It’s actually superfluous/redundant…

Bryan A
Reply to  Neil Pryke
November 3, 2026 5:45 am

The one singular thing that Would help in for All European constituent States/Countries to increase available Domestic Gas Supplies to the point they’re not dependent on foreign adversaries for their energy supplies. Increasing domestic supply reduces overall energy prices.

James Snook
Reply to  Bryan A
November 3, 2026 9:40 am

Unfortunately such a suggestion in the U.K. means more N.Sea drilling and, horror of horrors, FRACKING. Our gormless Government wets its knickers at the very thought of either, regardless of the fact that we need the gas AND the wealth creation. For a Labour Government the latter words are actually blasphemous.

MrGrimNasty
November 3, 2026 2:28 am

The UK isn’t supposed to be in the EU but it’s hard to tell, and getting harder by the day.

That aside, we have the same issues, cost of energy and dangerous immigration and loss of democracy and increasing anarcho-tyranny and censorship.

But don’t worry, the chancellor is going to give households in the bottom 4 council tax bands a one-off £100 (of our own money back). Never mind next year’s council tax increase will wipe that out many times over, as will the next electricity price increase that is already baked in. It’s so paltry in context, it’s actually more insulting than it is helpful.

November 3, 2026 3:35 am

The Irish energy minister is right that a magic wand won’t reverse cost increases …

“The U.K. has had seven prime ministers in the last ten years. That’s because no politician can be what the people want, a genius who figures out how to give out endlessly more money with ever less working people, and we’re heading down the same road, only with bigger cars and fatter people.” — Bill Maher (23/10/2026 monologue on “Real Time”)

Bill Maher (!) said something I don’t totally disagree with, I’m going to have to lie down for a moment …

There are problems with the (career) politicians but voters — and their “completely reasonable expectations / demands” — all around the world, not just in the UK and the US, aren’t entirely blameless.

Reply to  Mark BLR
November 3, 2026 4:11 am

More politicians need to learn to be blunt and honest!

George Thompson
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
November 3, 2026 5:56 am

Won’t happen until it all falls apart; then its too late and the Libs and socialists establish a “State” like the US has never seen. God save the Republic.

ethical voter
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
November 3, 2026 11:59 am

More voters need to invest in mirrors.

SxyxS
Reply to  Mark BLR
November 3, 2026 7:25 am

Actually his statement is BS – as usual.

UK had many Prime Ministers who ruled for more than a decade and the longest ruling ones of the last century may also have been the most disputed(Thatcher/Blair).
It never had anything to do what people want.

It is the deliberate destruction of culture, country, wealth and energy supply the urges the City of London to replace the Downing Street puppets at such a pace.

Btw – not long ago one of the many UK Prime Ministers explained it very well “Voting doesn’t matter or who is in Downing Street – the banks are in charge” – Liz Truss

Maher is the guy who went along with all leftie lunacy and only had a change of heart because it took him almost 2 years to change his garage door because of left lunacy – that’s where his priorities are.

Reply to  Mark BLR
November 3, 2026 7:41 am

Bill Maher has been making sense quite a bit lately, but he still seems to be unable to make a critical connection…

ethical voter
Reply to  Mark BLR
November 3, 2026 11:58 am

“aren’t entirely blameless.” No. the voters are entirely to blame. They break the first rule that ‘A person who cannot represent themselves cannot represent anybody’.

The voters are the cause and therefore also the cure.

November 3, 2026 3:36 am

“The EU and member states don’t have a magic wand to make the price increases go away,” Irish Energy Minister Darragh O’Brien, whose government holds the EU’s six-month rotating presidency, told reporters.”

Cheapest gasoline in the EU is 1,34 Euro/litre. Most expensive is 2,52 Euro/litre.
Cheapest electricity in the EU is 11,39 ct/Kwh. Most expensive is 36,18 ct/Kwh.
Source: https://euenergyprices.eu/en/energy-prices

Clearly there is a magic wand: see the cheapest countries. Omitting parts of the truth is also lying. This EU apparatsjik is lying or extremely stupid or both.

The enormous problems of the grid in The Netherlands, where I live, are deliberately denied by the government. Electricity usage has been flat for years. The root causes of the current problems are not consumption, they are architectural. The grid was designed round a few large producers of electricity and a very large numbers of small consumers. The architecture is centralised.
When small producers like windturbines and solar panel are introduced as producers, the architecture cannot cope. Right now the grid is being rebuilt to become decentralized. 
That is an extremely difficult, costly and very long operation.

Is it a good idea though? 
No. All “renewable” energy currently produces less electricity than 1 average nuclear reactor at astronomical cost.
That is the real reason for the insane energy prices.

The fact that Ukraine had the NordStream pipeline blow up hurt even more. Cheap Russian gas was the engine of European industry. That is gone now.

Reply to  huls
November 3, 2026 4:12 am

“Right now the grid is being rebuilt to become decentralized. 
That is an extremely difficult, costly and very long operation.”

And it’s gonna be ugly.

George Thompson
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
November 3, 2026 5:59 am

Yep, and the same here, just with a different-um-flavor, if you will.

James Snook
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
November 3, 2026 9:43 am

In the U.K. it is already ugly!

John Hultquist
Reply to  huls
November 3, 2026 7:47 am

“All “renewable” energy currently produces less electricity than 1 average nuclear reactor at astronomical cost.”
My high school English instructor would suggest a rearrangement of the prepositional phrase.

Reply to  John Hultquist
November 4, 2026 12:08 am

ChatGPT has this to say:

“The sentence is grammatically understandable, but it could be phrased more naturally.

Suggested correction:
“All ‘renewable’ energy sources currently produce less electricity than a single average nuclear reactor, at astronomical cost.”
A few improvements:

  • “Energy sources produce” is more precise than “energy produces.”
  • “A single average nuclear reactor” sounds more natural than “1 average nuclear reactor.”
  • “At astronomical cost” is grammatically correct and gives the sentence a strong rhetorical punch.

Your original wording is also acceptable in an informal or argumentative context.”

Not bad for a non-native speaker, thank you very much.

ethical voter
Reply to  huls
November 3, 2026 2:45 pm

“Cheap Russian gas was the engine of European industry.” Also the ace up Putins sleeve, at least in his mind, when he invaded Ukraine. Just another energy miscalculation.

November 3, 2026 3:37 am

Open the working pipe of the Nord Stream. Get repair crews on the other 2. Reopen coal plants. Reopen the nuke plants. Stop all subsidies to green projects. Cut all penalties on CO2. Instead of to the Ukraine, give the money to their citizens. Stop spending on war munitions and give that money to the citizens

Scissor
Reply to  Jimmy Walter
November 3, 2026 4:18 am

None of that will succeed like more immigration will, if one wants to rule over the ashes.

Reply to  Jimmy Walter
November 3, 2026 4:59 am

There you go using common sense. That is a commodity which is sorely lacking among the Brussels leaders.

Reply to  isthatright
November 3, 2026 8:53 am

Right you are! – but I think they want to destroy Europe. This has been their plan all along

Dave Andrews
Reply to  Jimmy Walter
November 3, 2026 8:54 am

Unfortunately in the UK all the coal plants, apart from Drax which now uses wood from the US, were blown up by clueless Government ministers.

Reply to  Dave Andrews
November 3, 2026 10:31 am

They knew exactly what they were doing. I am not going to entertain that this was all done by mistake

steveastrouk2017
Reply to  Jimmy Walter
November 3, 2026 2:48 pm

It was done by highly edumacated people with degrees in PPE from Oxbridge…..

Tom Johnson
November 3, 2026 3:45 am

“normal families sometimes need encouragement,” he said. “For instance, subsidies to invest in the energy efficiency of houses, windows.”

Can’t afford to pay your electric bill?? No problem: Simply install new windows and new “energy efficient furnaces, insulation, and other devices. The government will pay for a pittance of the cost. Spoken like a true idiot government bureaucrat with a 6 figure income.

gezza1298
Reply to  Tom Johnson
November 3, 2026 9:15 am

You would think a Finn would know that all their properties are well insulated in the first place. Isn’t it the home of triple glazed windows?

November 3, 2026 3:59 am

Firstly

they don’t want to

and secondly

even if, they lack the will to do what needs to be done…

there, I said it…

November 3, 2026 4:04 am

““We’ve exhausted most of our short-term options,” said one senior European energy official

Because you’re woke idiots!

Tom Johnson
November 3, 2026 4:29 am

Other than as an example of useless bilge from the anti CO2 crowd the article is nothing but useless bilge from the anti CO2 crowd. Critical is the fact that the article topics ” Climate Change” “and “PEB” are nowhere defined. Readers can infer from historical discussions what “climate change” means But I think that if you asked 10 informed citizens for a definition, you would get 10 different answers. Similarly, if you look hard enough you can find that PEB are the first letters of the article attached to this WUWT overview. What that title means is equally undefined.

This is not intended to be critical of WUWT. It’s an interesting example of the useless bilge from the CAGW (Catastrophic Anthropogenic lobal Warming) crowd (which this reply is written) and why it is certainly not “Science”.

John Hultquist
Reply to  Tom Johnson
November 3, 2026 7:55 am

PEB was used recently on another post as “ Pro-Environmental Behaviour (PEB)” — the Leipzig Psychologists post. ‘Acronym Finder’ hasn’t found it yet.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Tom Johnson
November 3, 2026 9:25 am

PEB.
Too many versions to make a definitive choice,
Best choice, IMHO, given the context of the article:
Plus Energy Building (PEB): An EU sustainability term for highly efficient buildings that generate more renewable energy than they consume on an annual basis.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Tom Johnson
November 3, 2026 11:56 am

Further research supports John Hultquist’s response.

Pro-Environmental Behaviour (PEB).

November 3, 2026 4:34 am

Story tip.

New paper by Jonathan Cohler and Willie Soon.

https://papers.jcohler.com/co2-dynamics/

strativarius
Reply to  JeffC
November 3, 2026 5:43 am

You just know the alarmists will say Thermo what?

strativarius
November 3, 2026 5:10 am

Europe is witnessing an unholy alliance between the far left and islam and Tiny Andy wants to take us back in on his/Labour’s terms with no democratic input, mandate or permission to do so. Everything is being done to stoke up fears and alarm, and above all to create division – the one thing they claim to be wholly against. Multicultural tosh.

Labour had no one to take over from Starmer, not a one in over 400 MPs. Burnham had to be parachuted in and essentially crowned unopposed. But to get there… he deliberately lied to an overwhelmingly Leave constituency.

Andy Burnham has promised not to “re-run” Brexit arguments, as he said he was not proposing the UK considers rejoining the European Union. The Greater Manchester mayor, who is expected to challenge Sir Keir Starmer for the Labour leadership if he wins the Makerfield by-election, said Brexit had been “damaging” but “Britain will be stuck in a permanent rut if we’re just constantly arguing”. – BBC

Then we get the real agenda.

Burnham Reopens EU Free Movement Debate Four Months After Promising Not to Revisit Brexit

Then the push back follows…

Burnham Denies That He Ever Proposed Bringing Back Freedom of Movement

He has prejudiced two live trials by opening his idiotic gob without engaging the single neuron, and now he’s pulled the rug from under Charles in the Caribbean. A complete and utter moron.

The EU is in decline, managed or otherwise – see riots. As for energy costs, get back to me in January when it goes up on steroids.

gezza1298
Reply to  strativarius
November 3, 2026 9:21 am

Football Shirt Boy was crowned by Labour totally unopposed. There was no leadership contest at all, despite the mutterings that there would be, nobody had the support of the needed 81 MPs to provide a challenge. Still, FSB should remember that while the seals are all clapping for him, these are the same bunch that stabbed Two Tier in the back then shamelessly applauded his leaving speech.

November 3, 2026 5:15 am

Riots sweeping Europe are owing to cost of living? That’s absurd — of course they are not caused by things that have been known for a decade.

They are caused by open borders paired with incentives not to assimilate. Keep these things separate in our minds, or we will fail to understand and course correct at all.

strativarius
Reply to  Willy
November 3, 2026 5:34 am

They want to bring down the state – and capitalism. The students were used as an excuse.

Consider this. Students who were allegedly protesting against a lack of text books… So, why were no bookshops attacked?

Naturally, it has to be brought here… Keep an eye open on 20th November.

MarkW
Reply to  strativarius
November 3, 2026 7:16 am

A recent survey of US college students found that 30% felt that it was ok to use violence to respond to speech you didn’t like.
50% believed that violence was the appropriate response to hate speech.

https://www.foxnews.com/media/thirty-percent-college-students-say-violence-acceptable-way-stop-speakers-campuses-survey-finds

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/university-president-sounds-alarm-nearly-half-students-justify-violence-stop-hate-speech

Another example of conservative speakers being physically assaulted on college campuses.

https://www.foxnews.com/media/conservative-jewish-activist-vows-not-silenced-attack-university-michigan-campus

strativarius
Reply to  MarkW
November 3, 2026 7:21 am

The critical theories rot started in Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Stanford, Columbia, MIT, Berkeley, Brown, Caltech, Penn State… I could go on and on.

Exported to the western world.

John Hultquist
Reply to  strativarius
November 3, 2026 8:01 am

Penn State or UPenn?

SxyxS
Reply to  strativarius
November 3, 2026 7:37 am

There is a reason why the protesters are labeled GEN Z.

Just like hippies GEN Z is an artificial creature – made in USA , using the youth,
happening all over the west, created to force societal information.

Same BS, same playbook, same strategy – it started wuth hippies, went on with X and Y and ends with the last letter/Generation – Z.
So the new man in the new Utopia can rise out of the ashes of the great reset and own nothing and love it.

Keep in mind – there have been many reasonsto protest the hell out of governments(covid,vax, wars)
but only fake made in GEN Z and BLM(with pallets of bricks delivered to the protests and abundance of criminals(all 3 Rittenhouse victims were serial offenders))

John Hultquist
Reply to  strativarius
November 3, 2026 8:00 am

“a lack of text books“
Haven’t text books followed the rotary phone into the ash heap of history?

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  strativarius
November 3, 2026 9:47 am

Schools were set on fire. Funny that.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Sparta Nova 4
November 3, 2026 11:58 am

Clarification: Funny as in ironic.
No humor in schools on fire.

Mr.
November 3, 2026 5:19 am

But costs of living are not restricted to just the direct electricity bills that consumers get.

The production costs affect every product & service that consumers get, so a 20 – 35% reduction in base cost would show up as a most-welcome lowering of the cost of everyday items at the supermarket as well, surely Shirley?

Bryan A
Reply to  Mr.
November 3, 2026 5:49 am

And Energy cost increases (Electricity Petrol Diesel Oil NatGas) directly affect the cost of goods throughout the entire supply chain. Every place from mining to manufacturing to transportation to storage, all costs are directly influenced by the cost of energy.

Victor
November 3, 2026 7:05 am

AI robots and pilots are more efficient and cheaper. AI outcompetes humans.
AI-driven efficiency increases profits.
https://aerospaceamerica.aiaa.org/new-test-campaign-will-put-ai-pilots-in-most-realistic-flight-conditions-yet-darpa-official-says/

George Thompson
Reply to  Victor
November 3, 2026 7:22 am

Dream on….still gonna need original thinking and human instinct. Maybe if sheer numbers of drones or somesuch, but I still dunno. I’m afraid we’ll see.

Victor
Reply to  George Thompson
November 3, 2026 9:09 am

Is the fight or flight instinct something that AI can’t replicate?
https://www.psychologytools.com/tools/pdf-tools/fight-or-flight-response?language=en-us

Reply to  Victor
November 3, 2026 9:34 am

Is looking out the window and observing that the real horizon is not in the same orientation as what the instrument is reporting something that AI CAN replicate?

Is landing in a river (seen by the pilot through the windshield) against all policy and ATC advice after a bird strike takes out your engines a decision that AI can make?

(I’ll note that if your answer to either of those is “yes” then you clearly are not living in the real world)

Victor
Reply to  Tony_G
November 3, 2026 11:48 am

A camera sees the horizon, the ground, and the river. AI interprets the camera’s images.
Ask an AI tool the question and see what answer you get:
ATC advice after a bird strike takes out engines.

Reply to  Victor
November 3, 2026 12:07 pm

Go back to your 24th century holodeck, Victor.

Victor
Reply to  Tony_G
November 3, 2026 10:15 pm

You don’t see the possibilities.

Leon de Boer
Reply to  Victor
November 4, 2026 3:17 am

I see the possibilities all too clearly … hundreds dead.

Reply to  Victor
November 4, 2026 6:37 am

possibilities != reality

Leon de Boer
Reply to  Victor
November 4, 2026 3:16 am

Until the camera can’t see because it flying towards the sun … ask anyone with assist on a modern car what happens. A simple bird dropping or bugs splattering in the middle of your windscreen and your auto assist is useless. What do you propose the AI do about it?

Victor
Reply to  Leon de Boer
November 4, 2026 5:17 am

If the camera sunshield is lowered, the camera will not be dazzled.
Activate the windshield wiper / lens wiper.

Reply to  Victor
November 4, 2026 6:39 am

If the camera sunshield is lowered

You really don’t live in the real world.

George Thompson
Reply to  Victor
November 3, 2026 10:40 am

Don’t know, we’ll see…it took millions of years to evolve our instincts-and we still don’t know them all, or perhaps don’t properly access or use them. You know, for example, that “feeling” we sometimes can’t quite “put a finger” on? Or that warm feeling on the back of your neck when somebody is staring at you? And more…

Victor
Reply to  George Thompson
November 4, 2026 5:27 am

Jim Woodford has met God and the angels. Do God and the angels possess greater knowledge regarding technology and fundamental laws than what humans have developed and are aware of?
If you are offered guidance characterized by warm feelings, are you also offered knowledge that is unknown to humans?
https://jimwoodford.com/

George Thompson
Reply to  Victor
November 4, 2026 5:40 am

Um, huh? Talking to God is an unknown, so far as I know, in my personal experience. So, no clue as to WTF you’re talking about, nor do I care.

Victor
Reply to  George Thompson
November 4, 2026 7:20 am

Angels often make their presence known through physical sensations. Many people describe feeling sudden warmth, like being wrapped in a cozy blanket, or tingling sensations on their skin: especially on the back of the neck or arms.

https://meetmattfraser.com/how-to-know-if-your-guardian-angel-is-trying-to-reach-you/

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Victor
November 3, 2026 11:59 am

AI and robots can only do what they are programmed to do.

If it is not in their programming, well…. disaster and death in the case of airplanes.

MarkW
Reply to  Victor
November 3, 2026 2:50 pm

Current robots and auto pilots are not AI, not even close.
You seem to feel that any code that is complex is AI.

Leon de Boer
Reply to  MarkW
November 4, 2026 3:22 am

Ain’t that the truth they are actually dangerous in some situations. The best way to make a current model Isuzu safe is to put tape over the camera. Any bushes that hang over road and go anywhere near camera and the stupid thing wants to break and veer off and at night in the country if you want to drive down the centre of road to give max chance of avoiding kangaroos it has kittens. Isuzu claims they can’t turn the features off because it’s part of their amcap rating for the car and it’s permits so a piece of tape solves it.

MarkW
Reply to  MarkW
November 4, 2026 8:08 am

Examining a 1000 line code module and a requirements document in order to make recommendations regarding how the code should be modified, is AI.
Keeping a car between the white lines is not AI.
Keeping a plane straight and level and avoiding the other dots on the radar, is also not AI.

Reply to  MarkW
November 4, 2026 8:39 am

Keeping a plane straight and level…

And regardless of ANY automated systems involved, they should ALWAYS be able to be overridden by a human operator. There have been several airplane crashes that have occurred due to automated systems that couldn’t be overridden.

MarkW
November 3, 2026 7:07 am

The left tends to view government as being potentially, all powerful.
They really do believe that government can make these problems go away, if only we stopped limiting what government is allowed to do.

George Thompson
Reply to  MarkW
November 3, 2026 7:19 am

Let me count the ways that’s been tried before and failed…oh, damn! I ran out of fingers and toes, and even dropped my pants to aid the count. No good.

MarkW
Reply to  George Thompson
November 3, 2026 2:51 pm

TMI dude.

George Thompson
Reply to  MarkW
November 3, 2026 3:37 pm

Yeah, well-wanted to make a point. Guess I did?

ethical voter
Reply to  MarkW
November 3, 2026 2:59 pm

Governments are good at creating problems. Not so good at curing them. For that you need people.

Harry Durham
November 3, 2026 7:17 am

If I am interpreting this statement correctly, the climate hoaxsters even have misled AI’s:

“Renewables also push wholesale prices down in many hours, and governments recycle ETS carbon revenue, partly back to households.”

A self-licking ice cream cone works only until the ice cream is all melted and dripping on the ground. And an economic cycle only works until there is no more ‘other people’s money’ to inject to keep the cycle turning.

J Boles
Reply to  Harry Durham
November 3, 2026 9:15 am

Leftists always believe that if they do it enough then it will reach a tipping point where it becomes self moving where all get on board and make it work. But leftist idea always suck and never work, and then they never learn that they are idiots. They always believe that the peasants need to be whipped harder and harder to make the bad ideas work. Well you know where it always goes.

mleskovarsocalrrcom
November 3, 2026 8:04 am

Another Trump claim/premonition/thinking out loud/warning/conspiracy theory that he was laughed at for by the EU heads of state during a G7 meeting comes true.

November 3, 2026 8:24 am

Story Tip

Seems from recent Telegraph stories that the UK Government is getting worried. Here is today’s story.

Andy Andy Burnham has ordered a halt to new wind and solar power subsidies in a net zero climbdown aimed at cutting household energy bills.

The Government revealed on Tuesday that next year’s auction of contracts for difference (CfDs) – a form of state support for renewable energy projects – will be paused to ensure it benefits consumers.

This year’s auction, known as auction round eight, is expected to continue as normal in the coming weeks.

Michael Shanks, the energy minister, told the House of Lords environment committee that the next auction was being put on hold so that the CfD programme could be reformed.Burnham has ordered a halt to new wind and solar power subsidies in a net zero climbdown aimed at cutting household energy bills.

The Government revealed on Tuesday that next year’s auction of contracts for difference (CfDs) – a form of state support for renewable energy projects – will be paused to ensure it benefits consumers.

This year’s auction, known as auction round eight, is expected to continue as normal in the coming weeks.

Michael Shanks, the energy minister, told the House of Lords environment committee that the next auction was being put on hold so that the CfD programme could be reformed.
……..
Dan Tomlinson, a Treasury minister, said after the Budget that Mr Burnham would pursue “a new energy pathway” to “bring energy costs down to help British business to compete and British households to cope”.

Pointing to the rising cost of wasted wind power, Mr Tomlinson said: “With growing constraint and distribution costs, it’s right that the system costs of all new power are considered.”

He added that the UK would “only procure clean power” through auction round eight “if we are confident it will lower bills” and “we will reform the contract for difference [for the next auction] to support building the lowest cost system, fixing market distortions and siting assets in the right place”.

Ministers have also imposed a moratorium on new levies and policy costs being added to bills.

The Government insists that it stands by the 2030 clean power targets, which aim to ensure that 95pc of electricity generated by the end of the decade comes from “clean” sources such as renewables, nuclear or batteries.

Right, they would say that, wouldn’t they?

Dave Andrews
Reply to  michel
November 3, 2026 9:26 am

“siting assets in the right place” good luck with that one. Slight problem for the UK is we are the worst place in the world for solar, the wind blows more in the Highlands of Scotland and out in the northern North Sea but where the electricity is needed the most and the greater population reside is far away from those areas.

In a sane world that would mean forget the unreliables and build coal, gas and SMR power stations nearer to the major centres of population.

Sparta Nova 4
November 3, 2026 9:14 am

Control the energy, control the money.
Control the money, control.

Bruce Cobb
November 3, 2026 12:41 pm

Well first, you need to stop digging.

Bob
November 3, 2026 4:01 pm

We should always try to make things as simple as possible. The simple fact is that government caused this problem, the simple solution is for them to step aside. Government has had more than three decades to fix a problem they think exists but doesn’t. The simple solution is to start fresh, wipe the slate clean of all climate change rules, regulations and mandates. Give the power producing sector ten years and a free hand to bring back our energy accessibility and affordability? Things would be way better by next year.

ResourceGuy
November 3, 2026 6:29 pm

Subsidize it even more or blame Trump. What else?

Victor
Reply to  ResourceGuy
November 3, 2026 10:32 pm

I believe the Republicans lost the election because the MAGA administration has not kept its campaign promises.

Trump promised to eliminate $19 trillion in national debt by 2024; instead it has nearly doubled to $39 trillion and is approaching $50 trillion.

Refinancing trillions in maturing debt at today’s yields of 4 to 5 percent instead of 2020’s near-zero rates adds hundreds of billions in annual carrying costs.

https://finance.yahoo.com/economy/policy/articles/donald-trump-once-said-eliminate-180618882.html