NYT: Al Gore Is Still Sounding the Climate Alarm & the ‘Moral Case’ of Fighting It – Warns of ‘the Immorality of Inaction’ & Concedes Trump has Ushered in ‘Dark Times’ for activists

From CLIMATE DEPOT

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/09/18/nyregion/al-gore-climate-change.html?smid=tw-share

By James Barron

NYT Excerpt: “The moral case is the central case,” he said in a conversation that served as a prelude to an event in which he is a headliner — an event called “The Immorality of Inaction: Voicing Truth on Climate.” It will take place at Riverside Church, whose neo-Gothic structure in Morningside Heights, as it happens, was mainly financed by John D. Rockefeller Jr., the son of the founder of Standard Oil.

His daughter Karenna Gore is the founder and executive director of the Center for Earth Ethics at Union Theological Seminary, which organized the event with the Center for Sustainable Urban Development at the Climate School. …

The session at Riverside Church is not the only item on Karenna Gore’s calendar. She is involved with the Women’s Water Walk, a 108-mile trek that will begin tomorrow and follow the route of the Constitution Pipeline in upstate New York. She will take part in a ceremony at the theological seminary, at 121st Street and Broadway, and will walk from there to the Hudson River. She will join the walk upstate later in the month.

The session comes at a fraught moment: Next week is Climate Week NYC. This week the Trump administration announced that the United States would no longer limit greenhouse gas emissions from power plants.

“There have been dark times when the advocates felt despair,” Gore said after mentioning “previous moral challenges” like the fight to abolish slavery in the 19th century and the civil rights struggle and the women’s movement in the 20th. “But they kept going. Nelson Mandela said it’s always impossible until it’s done.”

Trump has been “able to slow things down,” Gore said, but he added that he expected courts to strike down the emission rule changes.
“Like King Canute of old, he does not have the power to stop the tides,” he said, “and he has only limited power to stop the world’s rush to clean energy.”

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
3.9 14 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
121 Comments
Neil Pryke
September 20, 2026 10:17 pm

Al Gore doing a pretty good impression of Hitler in the bunker during the last days of the Third Reich…

Bryan A
Reply to  Neil Pryke
September 20, 2026 10:45 pm

The fight to end slavery worked because Slavery was a REAL Man Created Construct.
Climate Changes naturally and has since Climate existed.
It’s only Man’s Hubris that leads them to believe they can affect or control the climate and that Earth has an expected Normal (average) Temperature.

Scissor
Reply to  Bryan A
September 21, 2026 4:07 am

Al Gore lecturing about morality is like Alec Baldwin teaching gun safety.

George Thompson
Reply to  Scissor
September 21, 2026 8:53 am

Sweet…

Jeff Alberts
Reply to  Neil Pryke
September 21, 2026 7:57 am

I’ll bet Hitler was bolding all his comments.

Reply to  Jeff Alberts
September 21, 2026 8:04 am

Not even Hitler was as bold as Pryke, not Mussolini as Italic

September 20, 2026 11:03 pm

I’m sure it is only coincidence that Gore’s “moral case” has also made him wealthy.

SxyxS
Reply to  Shoki
September 21, 2026 6:38 am

He is at least finally so honest to sell his religion at Riverside Church –
and his daughters jihad at Union Theological Seminary should remove the last doubts.

Reply to  SxyxS
September 21, 2026 11:55 am

I looked up Riverside Church. It apparently has a very large nave.
Sounds like it’s going to host an even bigger knave.

Reply to  Shoki
September 21, 2026 8:08 am

Gore became wealthy, while making the rest of us much poorer.

Bill Toland
September 20, 2026 11:39 pm

The horrifying thing is that this obnoxious con merchant almost became president.

Reply to  Bill Toland
September 21, 2026 7:24 am

Even more horrifying is that Trump did.

Jeff Alberts
Reply to  Leo Smith
September 21, 2026 7:58 am

You should go hide in a closet until it’s all over.

Reply to  Leo Smith
September 21, 2026 8:01 am

Excellent! WUWT’s best comment of the week!!!

Especially considering the outright censorship now active in the White House. Big question for all of us here: how soon before the FCC blocks WUWT access to the Web?

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  ToldYouSo
September 21, 2026 9:38 am

So now denying a news reporter access to a press conference is censorship?
Did not tell them what to print or what not to print, therefore no violation of the Constitution as written.

So, not giving an invitation to a news reports is a violation of some fabricated right? I suppose you could walk up and demand to be let in and if they did not you would go to court.

Access to the White House and the President is highly limited and is by invitation only.

Outright censorship is a bogus defamation.

Reply to  Sparta Nova 4
September 21, 2026 10:52 am

Hardly censorship when many other “press” outlets are still admitted. And, if you read the US Constitution, the first amendment prevents Congress from passing any legislation prohibiting free expression. Congress isn’t involved, and there is no legislation.

Reply to  Retired_Engineer_Jim
September 21, 2026 10:55 am

Here is the text in case you can’t find your copy of the US Constitution:

The First Amendment, adopted on December 15, 1791, protects freedom of religion, speech, press, peaceful assembly, and the right to petition the government.
Full Text
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” 

(Bold text is in the source material.)

Reply to  Sparta Nova 4
September 21, 2026 12:29 pm

“Did not tell them what to print or what not to print, therefore no violation of the Constitution as written.”

Some perspective for you, since you obviously haven’t researched this issue:

In his first Presidential term, in 2018, Donald Trump revoked the press credentials (the “Hard Pass”) of CNN’s Chief White House Correspondent Jim Acosta following a contentious press conference. Subsequently, in response to a lawsuit filed by members of the press, a federal judge sided with the press and ordered the White House to immediately restore Acosta’s credentials. This case set a powerful modern precedent that the Executive Branch cannot strip a journalist’s access simply because it dislikes their reporting or questioning.

Yet, despite this precedent, the Orange Man on Friday, September 18, banned CNN, MS NOW (formerly MSNBC), and Politico reporters from the White House, citing cumulative unfavorable coverage and “fiction and lies” (but offering no evidence of such). Access badges for those reporters from those news organizations were deactivated the following morning.

There is nothing in the US Constitution that gives that power to the sitting President. On the other hand, the 10th Amendment to the Constitution states this:
“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”

The privilege of censorship is not delegated to the Federal government (the United States) nor to the States, so it would be reserved to “the people”. AFAIK, the people of the United States of America HAVE NOT granted the power of censorship of the press to the existing President.

The issue is quite clear if one understands what the US Constitution actually states.

Simon
Reply to  ToldYouSo
September 21, 2026 12:51 pm

It is so interesting watching people here defend what is an obvious violation of the first amendment. If Trump genuinely thinks they are printing lies, he should tell the people why, be specific, or better still, do what Trump does and sue.

Bottom line….There has always been left and right press. The left tends to highlight what a republican president does wrong and vice versa. It’s how it works. The problem now is Donald has backed himself into a corner with his actions and he is staring down the barrel of a heavy mid term defeat. All he had to do was do what he promised…. bring prices down and no new wars. But he had to go for glory. Listened to his fwend Bibi. Oh well….. Polymarket now has the Senate at 64% for the Dems and 93% for the House. Can’t wait for early November.
https://polymarket.com/predictions/midterms

Sweet Old Bob
Reply to  Simon
September 21, 2026 1:57 pm

Dadson ?

Reply to  Simon
September 21, 2026 4:46 pm

Uh Simon they were not censored, they were denied ACCESS to a particular room and that the White House doesn’t have to answer any of their inane politically charged crap either.

Reply to  Simon
September 22, 2026 7:02 am

CNN is on the record of supporting the ban of news organizations from the White House pool. Why are they whining now?

starzmom
Reply to  ToldYouSo
September 21, 2026 1:33 pm

There is nothing in the Constitution that requires the President to receive and answer questions from the press either.

Reply to  starzmom
September 21, 2026 7:04 pm

That’s not something I ever claimed. Poor attempt at deflection.

starzmom
Reply to  ToldYouSo
September 22, 2026 4:55 am

Yes, it is. You whined that Trump blocked access of some members of the press.

Sweet Old Bob
Reply to  ToldYouSo
September 21, 2026 1:59 pm

O’biden rejected 442.

Didn’t hear a whimper out of the libs.

Reply to  Sweet Old Bob
September 22, 2026 7:19 am

That was then, this is now.

Sweet Old Bob
Reply to  ToldYouSo
September 21, 2026 2:15 pm

However, it can be recalled that under Biden, more than 442 reporters faced similar restrictions on White House hard passes.
Former White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt made headlines during her first press briefing last January by announcing that the White House would “restore the press passes of the 440 journalists whose passes were wrongly revoked by the previous administration.”

Simon
Reply to  Sweet Old Bob
September 21, 2026 7:07 pm

Nope. Wrong. No Outright Bans: Unlike the Trump administration’s targeted exclusions of specific hostile or critical networks, the Biden credential review applied generalized attendance and work-requirement standards across the entire press corps rather than banning outlets for critical coverage. Big difference.

Reply to  Sweet Old Bob
September 22, 2026 7:19 am

That was then, this is now.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  ToldYouSo
September 22, 2026 9:46 am

You have a very convoluted perspective on censorship in this case.

The court case tomorrow focuses on the lack of following procedures for revoking access to the press conference.

Sweet Old Bob
Reply to  ToldYouSo
September 21, 2026 3:17 pm

President Trump has revoked the special white house access privileges of CNN, MSNow and Politico

NOT censored !

Reply to  Sweet Old Bob
September 21, 2026 4:56 pm

The censoring was committed by the news people who had retained the special white house access. They voluntarily refused to attend as a protest against revoking certain news people’s access.

That action shows you who exactly determines the censorship. It’s no different than striking teachers claiming to be supporting students by not teaching or striking nurses claiming to be supporting patients by not attending to them. When you cut off your nose to spite your face, it shows stupidity in action.

Reply to  Sweet Old Bob
September 21, 2026 6:27 pm

Google’s AI bot’s definition of censorship:

“Censorship is the suppression, blocking, or deletion of speech, public communication, and information that an authority or private group finds objectionable, harmful, or inconvenient.”

Donald Trump, the Orange Man, is blocking public communication to a select group of reporters because he personally and under his authority as US President finds them objectionable (verbally accusing them, without presenting any evidence, of “lies”).

That sure sounds like censorship to me.

MAGA = Making America Goofy Alright

Simon
Reply to  ToldYouSo
September 21, 2026 7:08 pm

It sure does…..

Reply to  ToldYouSo
September 22, 2026 3:44 am

They are not a select group of reporters, they are Leftwing propagandists.

Trump got tired of their lies and distortions and decided to call them out.

Let’s see what the Judiciary says about it. Ought to be interesting.

Reply to  Tom Abbott
September 22, 2026 7:25 am

“Trump got tired of their lies and distortions  . . .”

I suspect that you, just like the Orange Man, will be incapable of posting objective evidence here, to benefit all WUWT readers, on exactly what those “lies and distortions” were.

And I’ll not spend any time waiting for your reply.

Reply to  ToldYouSo
September 22, 2026 7:11 am

The President has no constitutional requirement to talk to any person or organization. If the President wants to only present information to certain people that is his/her prerogative.

Biden did the same thing when restricting press passes to individuals and independent news organizations.

Trump is not censoring nor denying any press person or organization the ability to speak at all. How they obtain the information to write or speak is their problem.

The only “press conference” the constitution requires is the State of the Union address and it doesn’t require a question/answer afterward.

Reply to  Jim Gorman
September 22, 2026 7:27 am

I can only gently suggest that you read/re-read the definition of “censorship” as given by Google’s AI bot that I posted above.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  ToldYouSo
September 22, 2026 9:52 am

He is not suppressing, blocking or deleting speech, public communications and information.

He is not permitting access to a White House press room.

Furthermore, any of those boycotting news groups could have televised the press conference and the subject news organizations could have made commentary. They chose to not do that.

Your lack of fundamental understanding of this is appalling.

Reply to  ToldYouSo
September 21, 2026 4:52 pm

You are confusing ACCESS denial which is what they did to actual PROHIBITION of posting material which they didn’t do into their newspapers, magazines, and books.

Reply to  Sunsettommy
September 21, 2026 6:54 pm

I’m not confused at all, just very concerned.

“While reporters don’t have unique constitutional privileges, the government cannot selectively enforce laws or deny access to punish a reporter based on their viewpoint or the content of their reporting. If a government entity opens a press conference to the media, it cannot arbitrarily ban a specific reporter simply because it dislikes their critical coverage. Doing so violates both the First Amendment and equal protection principles by treating similarly situated media entities differently based on content.”

This bears repeating because so many commenters here appear to be completely overlooking Trump’s stated reason for banning the reporters from the three affected news organizations: he specifically cited cumulative unfavorable coverage and “fiction and lies” (but offering no evidence of such). So now it’s guilty by Presidential decree!

This poseur has totally lost it (respect for the rule of law)! Many here should review the oath the US President-elect swears to just before assuming office.

Reply to  ToldYouSo
September 22, 2026 3:47 am

There is plenty of evidence of “fiction and lies” from these propagandists. Just about everything they say falls in that category.

Reply to  Tom Abbott
September 22, 2026 7:31 am

There’s an applicable saying here: “Put up or . . .”

Reply to  ToldYouSo
September 22, 2026 7:14 am

If a government entity opens a press conference to the media, it cannot arbitrarily ban a specific reporter simply because it dislikes their critical coverage.

Biden did this to 440 journalists, many of whom were their own independent news organization. You are basically saying that size matters. Don’t see that in the constitution anywhere.

Reply to  Jim Gorman
September 22, 2026 7:32 am

“Biden did this . . .”

That was then, this is now.

Reply to  ToldYouSo
September 22, 2026 7:40 am

That was then, this is now.

No, you don’t get to brush this off that easily.

If Biden did this with no repercussions, then it is inappropriate to claim that Trump should have repercussions for doing the same thing. Quoting constitutional language as preventing Trump from doing this is inditing Biden also.

Reply to  Jim Gorman
September 22, 2026 7:54 am

I don’t mind indicting Biden for his past violations of the US Constitution during his tenure as US President. But I don’t know if there are any applicable statutes of time limitation on doing such.

You don’t get to brush off Trump’s behavior that easily.

Reply to  ToldYouSo
September 22, 2026 8:53 am

The point is did any of the large news organizations generate lawsuits and strikes about it when Biden did it? Did any Democrat politician raise a ruckus to impeach Biden? No to both! I’ve already said karma is a bitch.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  ToldYouSo
September 22, 2026 9:55 am

So now you shift from censorship to denial of access, which is not the same.

It does not violate the First Amendment nor does it violate Equal protection principles, regardless of your beliefs.

There is no “law” governing press conferences.

Reply to  ToldYouSo
September 22, 2026 6:59 am

Did you forget that Brian Stelter of CNN declared that Biden should remover Fox News from the White House briefing pool?

Watch: Dana Bash ‘At a Loss for Words’ Over CNN Ban at WH, But Then Video of CNN Suggesting WH Ban Fox News Surfaces

Karma is a real bitch.

Reply to  Jim Gorman
September 22, 2026 7:34 am

“Did you forget that Brian Stelter of CNN . . .”

No, I never—up to just reading your question—ever heard of a “Brian Stelter” of CNN. Honest.

Reply to  Leo Smith
September 21, 2026 8:17 am

Trump is not playing the globalists games and they hate him because he is thwarting their plans.

Reply to  Leo Smith
September 21, 2026 4:49 pm

He stole some cookies from you…….

Reply to  Bill Toland
September 21, 2026 7:49 am

Gore and Kerry both would have been as bad as Biden, in general, and would have done much more than Biden did in trying to implement Net Zero.

Yes, we dodged a couple of bullets in escaping from the delusions of Gore and Kerry.

Trump, on the other hand, is one of our greatest presidents. You may not care for how he gets there, but he does produce for the American people.

How about that Greenland acquition? Bet you weren’t expecting that! I wasn’t. Trump is really pretty amazing once you get past some of the rhetoric.

George Thompson
Reply to  Tom Abbott
September 21, 2026 9:00 am

When wondering what the Don is up to, you must look both ways, then up-then sit down, grab a beer and really, really think. Even then he’s surprising-I’m not because this guy is really smart and a super player. Still and all, I am surprised at how happy Denmark and Greenland seem to be. Huh.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Tom Abbott
September 21, 2026 9:39 am

Wrong. Gore and Kerry would have been much worse than Biden.

Reply to  Sparta Nova 4
September 22, 2026 3:57 am

They certainly would not have been any better, and Biden was a disaster for the United States.

Trump saved us temporarily but the Leftwing Propaganda Force is strong out there, so two more years of sanity and then the unknown.

The Leftwing Propaganda Force is strong and effective. Why else would 75 million people vote for a complete moron like Kamala Harris for President? Obviously, they did not think Kamala was a complete moron, thanks to the lies and distortions put out by the Leftwing Propaganda Machine.

If the truth were told, Democrats wouldn’t stand a chance of being elected. But the truth is not told.

Mario Barbafiera
September 20, 2026 11:43 pm

Why does he not just his mouth and enjoy retirement. Sick of listening or reading stuff from someone who has no expertise in the subject. Name one prediction he got right…..

Bill Toland
Reply to  Mario Barbafiera
September 21, 2026 12:07 am

He probably thinks that he can make still more money out of the scam if he can keep it going for a bit longer. He still gets speaking fees at green conferences for spouting utter drivel and demonstrating that he knows absolutely no science whatsoever.

Reply to  Bill Toland
September 21, 2026 8:20 am

After spouting his drivel, the greens cheer him which builds his already enormous ego.

Reply to  Mario Barbafiera
September 21, 2026 7:50 am

Gore has a very high opinion of himself.

Jeff Alberts
Reply to  Tom Abbott
September 21, 2026 7:59 am

Just like Neil Pryke.

George Thompson
Reply to  Tom Abbott
September 21, 2026 9:01 am

Thank God we don’t.

Simon
Reply to  Tom Abbott
September 21, 2026 7:11 pm

Tom, Gore doesn’t go around telling everyone he is the greatest US politician ever. I know one who does though…..

Reply to  Simon
September 22, 2026 4:06 am

Gore’s ego is just as big as Trump’s.

Gore doesn’t have to do combat with the Leftwing media, so his approach is different from Trump’s.

Trump has to blow his own horn around the Leftwing media. The Leftwing media blows Gore’s horn for him.

George Thompson
Reply to  Tom Abbott
September 22, 2026 5:56 am

And that ain’t all…Gore must be a very satisfied man.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  George Thompson
September 22, 2026 9:57 am

Humor – a difficult concept.
— Lt. Saavik

Simon
Reply to  Tom Abbott
September 22, 2026 11:53 am

OK Tom. Fair enough. But can you give me any examples of where Gore has promoted himself any more than any other politician…. or said he was better than anyone else? That is what someone who has a “high opinion of themselves” does.
Trump on the other hand has said on more than a few occasions that he is the greatest president ever. He is the best at this and the finest at that.
And I do’t accept that Trump has to blow his own horn, that is his style. Bull shit and bluster.

Mr.
Reply to  Mario Barbafiera
September 21, 2026 7:59 am

Name one prediction he got right…..

“I’m going to get very rich off this CAGW caper.”

September 21, 2026 1:27 am

Recent data shows the opposite of everything that Al Gore says. The polar regions show how much heat is being lost by the planet.
Sept 19th 2026
Equator to 50 degree latitude
4.4C per 10th latitude Northern Hemisphere (heat loss)
6.0C per 10th latitude Southern Hemisphere (heat loss)
North and south of 50 degrees Latitude
4.9C Northern hemisphere (per 10th latitude) (heat loss)
12.84C Southern Hemisphere (per 10th latitude) (heat loss)
29C to -7C
29C to -44C
Parts of Antarctic temperatures were below -70C.

Reply to  slindsayyulegmailcom
September 21, 2026 1:37 am

In addition to the warmest water year on record, autumn 2024 was the warmest since 1900 at 2.28°C above the 1991–2020 mean, while the winter and summer 2025 temperatures were the second and third warmest on record at 2.41°C and 0.83°C above the 1991–2020 average.”

https://arctic.noaa.gov/arctic-indicators/

Reply to  Eldrosion
September 21, 2026 1:52 am

It’s those hundredths of a degree that matter isn’t it.

Tom Johnson
Reply to  Eldrosion
September 21, 2026 3:48 am

August being the warmest since 1900 demonstrates there has been no warming since 1900.

Richard M
Reply to  Eldrosion
September 21, 2026 4:44 am

Better save this graph ending in 2025. With the high Arctic having its coldest summer on record in 2026, I expect a dip. I also love the graph clearly shows the 60 year cycle riding on top of the warming since the Little Ice Age. Leaves nothing for your CO2 boogeyman.

George Thompson
Reply to  Richard M
September 21, 2026 9:08 am

That 60 yr cycle that everybody ignored? That cycle? I’ve always wondered what would happen as I’ve lived thru 1 full cycle and a goodly part of the previous one. Experience is at hand for the youngin’s on this site. Maybe, we’ll see…who knows? It’s all a learning curve.

starzmom
Reply to  Richard M
September 21, 2026 2:35 pm

Ice melt in the Arctic ended 5 days before the long term average date.

Reply to  Eldrosion
September 21, 2026 7:14 am

Typically misleading as all of it is during the COLD winter months where it never gets near the freezing mark of 32 degrees F.

Reply to  Eldrosion
September 21, 2026 7:35 am

With the climate warming out of the LIA, a series of ‘warmest years, ever since …’ is inevitable.

Reply to  Pat Frank
September 21, 2026 8:31 am

Science illiterates never understand this elementary understanding of statistics.

Reply to  Eldrosion
September 21, 2026 10:59 am

Did Former Vice President Gore predict sea temperatures across the entire globe, to 2 decimal places?

Wow, he is good.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Eldrosion
September 22, 2026 10:02 am

Departure from a calculated mean, since 1991. Funny the 1900 data was not part of the mean.

Anomalies R US.

Keep trying.

Reply to  slindsayyulegmailcom
September 22, 2026 7:19 am

Most people don’t understand that as temperature goes up radiation goes up by T⁴ thereby increasing cooling. Since there is less and less water vapor as you move into really cold, more radiation makes it to space also increasing cooling.

Ron
September 21, 2026 2:39 am

“Like King Canute of old, he does not have the power to stop the tides,” he said, “and he has only limited power to stop the world’s rush to clean energy.”

“The world still runs on fossil fuels, Globally, fossil fuels supply 80.8% today (2024) only marginally down from 81.4% in 2000″

Dave Andrews
Reply to  Ron
September 21, 2026 7:39 am

The latest Energy Institute Statistical Review of World Energy (June 2026) says in 2025

“Fossil Fuels continued to expand in absolute terms and retained their dominant position accounting for 86% of total energy supply (TES)”

Reply to  Ron
September 21, 2026 11:01 am

But some folks like to look only at energy use to generate electricity, not the total energy supply. “Renewables” look so much better when concentrating only on the power generation sector (but not really that good).

MarkW
Reply to  Ron
September 21, 2026 11:13 am

Like most everything else Gore thinks he knows, he gets the story of King Cnute wrong.
The story is that Cnute used this event to show his courtiers that he was NOT all powerful.

Bruce Cobb
September 21, 2026 2:55 am

It is interesting that Gore, one of the biggest, if not the biggest most dishonest lieapalooza Climate Con Men and Hucksters on the planet speaks of “morality”.

Sweet Old Bob
Reply to  Bruce Cobb
September 21, 2026 6:40 am

Yes.

And Karen na Gore needs to try to walk ON water .

George Thompson
Reply to  Sweet Old Bob
September 21, 2026 9:11 am

She’d best be careful-we all know what happened to the last being that walked on water-and she nor her daddy are qualified.

Eric Ward
September 21, 2026 3:09 am

I guess Gore doesn’t know that Canute was proving to his subjects that he wasn’t omnipotent and couldn’t hold back the tide. One of many things he’s confused about.

DipChip
September 21, 2026 3:53 am

Well I see where AI is rendering the entertainment industry and Hollwood obsolete, so AI may also provide climate change with a heyday of green scams with the faces of present day climate realists changing their advocacy and joining the green Hucksters.

AWG
September 21, 2026 4:13 am

“The moral case is the central case,”

Has anyone ever asked Al “No Controlling legal authority” Gore what is the authority that backs his moral claims?

He can’t say “God” because God says the Earth was made for man, while God told Adam to take dominion over the Earth and subdue it.

He can’t say “The World” because China and India…. enough said.

He can’t say “Society” because the West no longer is a monoculture, there is no dominant culture and the zeitgeist is whatever the TikTok algorithms dictate at the moment.

He can’t say “The People” because Trump won both an electoral and popular vote despite the rampant fraud commuted by his enemies.

He can’t say “Myself” because he would be confusing morals with ethics, while also positioning himself as a transcendental authority.

He should say “Humpty Dumpty” because Algore is just lying for personal gain and hijacking the normal meaning of words to serve his propaganda usage.

The man making a “moral case” is amoral.

Troy Cross
September 21, 2026 4:57 am

This is Gore’s unresolved resentment that he couldn’t steal the 2000 election. Everyone must pay.

September 21, 2026 5:08 am

“the world’s rush to clean energy”

Say what?

September 21, 2026 6:14 am

Union Theological Seminary is a prominent bastion of non-Biblical pseudo-Christian progressive liberal thinking in the U.S., located in New York City’s East Harlem. It is a hot bed of regressive social activism and the essence of ecumenical “theology” (syncretism). Although supposedly independent, it has close ties and financial dependence with Columbia University, and it’s alumni fill the pulpits of fallen and dying mainline Protestant churches in the U.S. (Presbyterian Church (USA), United Methodist Church, Episcopal Church, Evangelical Lutheran Church in America).

Riverside Church characterizes itself as a “welcoming, interdenominational church in New York City,” social activist “code” for non-Christian. It was built with funding from John D Rockefeller, Jr., and has been a focal point of global and national activism since its inception, having a long history of social justice. The church is immediately adjacent and has close physical and philosophical ties to the Union Theological Seminary.
These are products of late 19th and early 20thcentury liberal Biblical criticism and “progressive” humanistic thought. Today they are infected by social radicals of every stripe. Little wonder that Al Gore feels perfectly at home there.

The seminary’s most famous alumnus, Dietrich Bonhoeffer, a German Lutheran pastor martyred by the Germans near the end of World War II, was a strident critic of the infectious ignorance he observed while he studied at the seminary.

Tom Halla
September 21, 2026 6:25 am

Al Gore flunked out of divinity school.

David Wojick
September 21, 2026 7:09 am

Their despair is my joy. They deserve it.

September 21, 2026 7:23 am

Climate change: A most convenient Lie

By:

E LARGO

Reply to  Leo Smith
September 21, 2026 12:27 pm

Climate change: A most convenient profitable Lie
By:
Al Gore

September 21, 2026 7:55 am

WTF? Al Gore is lecturing people on morals???

This from Google’s AI bot:

“In 2011, Al Gore’s advocacy group,The Climate Reality Project, released a ‘Climate 101’ video featuring Bill Nye ‘The Science Guy’. The video showed a classroom-style experiment with two glass jars—one filled with normal air and the other filled with carbon dioxide (CO2)—placed under infrared heat lamps to demonstrate the greenhouse effect.

The Video Controversy
— Recycled Footage: Climate skeptics analyzed the video frame-by-frame and proved that the thermometer readouts shown on screen were digitally altered or duplicated in post-production.
— Flawed Setup: Critics noted that because standard glass blocks a large amount of infrared radiation, a simple desk lamp shining on a glass jar would not cause the CO2 gas to heat up instantly on its own. Instead, the heat lamps were warming the glass jars, which secondary-heated the gas inside.
—The Discrepancy: The video claimed the CO2 jar rose 2°F higher within minutes, but critics demonstrated that the physical setup shown in the video could not achieve that result naturally in that timeframe.

The Project’s Response
— The Climate Reality Project eventually acknowledged that the video utilized television production effects and staging to cleanly illustrate the concept for a fast-moving web broadcast. It was a theatrical demonstration rather than a raw, unedited scientific study.”

Google’s AI bot is reluctant to call it what it was: outright fraud conducted to further garner sales of Gore’s book “An Inconvenient Truth”. Bill Nye, “the Science Idiot”, apparently willing got involved to further his own ego/public persona.

Mr.
Reply to  ToldYouSo
September 21, 2026 8:06 am

Do you reckon that ol’ Billy Nye The Science Guy learned from this sham ‘science experiment’ what is meant by the term –
“a useful idiot”?

Reply to  Mr.
September 21, 2026 8:52 am

Perhaps, although I understand that some keen observers were applying that term to Bill Nye long before 2011. 🙂

According to Wikipedia, Bill Nye first became popular locally in Seattle starting in 1987 on the sketch-comedy show Almost Live!, and achieved national fame when his show Bill Nye the Science Guy debuted in national syndication on September 10, 1993.

MarkW
Reply to  Mr.
September 21, 2026 10:13 am

He’s too much of an idiot to realize that he isn’t useful.

September 21, 2026 8:05 am

According to Al Gore: “There have been dark times when the advocates felt despair”

Those of us who rechecked your data and found that it did not support your dismal predictions have felt despair for decades. We despaired because we foresaw that Trillions would be spent on failed solutions for problems that don’t exist.

We have been proven to have been correct and taxpayers globally have been fleeced of many trillions of Dollars, Euros, Yen, Yuan, Baht and many other tax payments.

September 21, 2026 8:10 am

If ManBearPig screamed in a forest, and no one was around to report it, would it still make a sound?

Maybe it’s time that the Media stop giving him coverage. Why do even cover his factually incorrect sociopathic blathering?

If I rented a conference room at the Ramada, blabbed about Phrenology, would it be newsworthy?

Beta Blocker
Reply to  Dan Donaldson
September 21, 2026 9:44 am

Somebody should do this; somebody needs to do that. (Yeah yeah yeah.)

However, the media is bought and paid for by the climate industrial complex. So why would the media stop giving Al Gore coverage?

Not to please us, certainly.

Reply to  Beta Blocker
September 22, 2026 4:17 am

Good point.

John Hultquist
September 21, 2026 8:44 am

 The Women’s Water Walk, which men (and all) are encouraged to join, will begin at Oquaga Creek State Park near Bainbridge, N.Y. and continue through towns along the proposed pipeline route. Our walk is rooted in prayer and positive action. We will sing as we walk and stop to make offerings …

One prevalent Iroquois etymology interprets Onaquaga (or variants like Oquaga) as “place of wild grapes,”
It is sacrilegious to desicrate such a place with such foolisness.  

Reply to  John Hultquist
September 21, 2026 9:02 am

Any men or women in that event gonna demonstrate walking on water, or is it sacrilegious to desecrate the walk with such foolisness?

Reply to  ToldYouSo
September 21, 2026 6:58 pm

Uhhh, my bad fingers . . . foolisness foolishness.

Beta Blocker
September 21, 2026 9:34 am

From the Manhattan Contrarian:

Rescission Of Carbon Emissions Standards For Power Plants: The Litigation Begins

Francis Menton: “In what may be a world record for turnaround time, the litigation has already begun over the recent rescission by EPA of its carbon emission standards for fossil-fuel fired power plants.”

Here’s my take on this development:

To delay is to deny. What is happening here is that the environmental NGO’s and their law firms in the DC Swamp, the Democratic congressional staffs, and the DC Court judges have all been working together behind the scenes on a strategy and plan to delay the EPA’s rescission until a new Democrat-controlled Congress takes power in January of 2027.

The Democrats in the new Congress, with support from UniParty Republicans, will pass legislation which explicitly and unambiguously directs the EPA to begin aggressive regulation of carbon emissions from all sectors of the American economy.

That legislation will likely be attached as a rider to a must-pass piece of legislation such as the National Defense Authorization Act.

A presidential veto of the NDAA is politically risky, and would be easily overridden in the Congress by a coalition of Democrat ideologues and RINO UniParty Republicans who have sold themselves out to the DC Swamp’s K Street lobbyists.

ResourceGuy
September 21, 2026 11:29 am

The free world is lucky Gore never got elected President by those hanging chads in FL. Some of the thanks go to the voters of TN who voted against their own frat boy disaster who was more a resident of the DC political swamp than his family’s home state. The same goes for Hillary’s run (in your face) too.

Reply to  ResourceGuy
September 21, 2026 12:51 pm

As I recall, after Florida was called for GW, he wanted a recount. He was entitled to a recount of the whole state since it was so close. But “moral Al” didn’t want a recount of the whole state, just Dade County where he was sure he had more votes.
He actually fought against recounting the whole state.

starzmom
Reply to  Gunga Din
September 21, 2026 2:38 pm

When the NY Times managed to get a full state recount (after the fact, etc.) Bush still won.

PS The funny part about Florida is that the greens voted against Gore due to comments about the Everglades. 20,000 votes.

Reply to  starzmom
September 22, 2026 4:20 am

Interesting!

Edward Katz
September 21, 2026 2:34 pm

Gore is doing a pretty good job of demonstrating how to keep fighting a losing battle. Like most alarmists, he’s unaware, or refuses to admit, that the whole climate crisis narrative has worn paper-thin to the point of transparency. Yet he keeps sounding an alarm that almost no one is hearing any more.

Reply to  Edward Katz
September 22, 2026 4:24 am

Gore is the “boy crying wolf”.

The first few times he cries wolf, the villagers come running to his aid, but there is no sign of a wolf.

Eventually, the villagers ignore the cries of wolf.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Edward Katz
September 22, 2026 10:12 am

If this were the movie about Waterloo, Wellington would promote Gore to corporal.
The scene with the pig…. 😉

Bob
September 21, 2026 3:11 pm

Wouldn’t Gore be more at home in Canada? Canada could take him off our hands and it would be a win win for both countries.

Reply to  Bob
September 22, 2026 4:26 am

Gore and Carney would get along just fine. Birds of a feather as to worldview. Egos might clash, though.