António Gutteres in 2012. By U.S. Mission Photo by Eric Bridiers - https://www.flickr.com/photos/us-mission/7704332996/, Public Domain, Link

Secretary General António Gutteres is on Track to be the UN’s Biggest Climate Loser

Essay by Eric Worrall

Boutros Boutros got the UNFCCC, Kofi Annan the Kyoto Protocol, Ban Ki-Moon the Paris Agreement, but António Gutteres gets – nothing.

‘Fight for humanity’: Avoiding a climate catastrophe means acting now

  Climate and Environment

Record heat waves, deadly flooding and extreme weather reflect an ever-warming planet poised to soon breach safe temperature limits, according to a UN report released on Tuesday, but doubling down on climate action now could avoid a climate catastrophe.

Key points

  • Rapid, collective and global action is vital to cap the temperature rise at 1.5°C
  • Climate action can reverse current trend by slashing methane pollution, protecting land, forest and oceans and accelerating the phaseout of fossil fuels
  • Every fraction of a degree will cost lives, destroy livelihoods, deepen inequality and push ecosystems closer to irreversible damage

The scorching heat in the northern hemisphere in recent months, raging wildfires and deadly floods are a warning of what lies ahead, UN Secretary-General António Guterres said.

He recalled that the historic 2015 Paris Agreement on climate change saw world leaders pledge to keep temperature rise to the 1.5°C limit above pre-industrial levels, which scientists say is critical to avoiding the worst climate devastation.

Indeed, the world is failing to keep that promise, according to the new report from the UN Environment Programme (UNEP)

The fight for 1.5 degrees is the fight for humanity,” he said. “We are set to breach the 1.5°C limit within the next few years.”

Read more: https://news.un.org/en/story/2026/09/1168240

The lack of UN progress on climate change is so desperate, Gutteres tried to diversify;

Antonio Guterres at AI Impact Summit: ‘Less hype, less fear’ – IPCC-style UN panel aims for ‘human control’ of AI

At the India AI Impact Summit 2026, UN chief Antonio Guterres emphasised the need for a balanced approach to AI, advocating for less hype and fear while promoting human oversight. 

Written By Gulam Jeelani
Published 20 Feb 2026, 11:57 AM IST

India AI Impact Summit: UN chief Antonio Guterres on 20 February called for ‘less hype, less fear’ over Artificial Intelligence (AI) as he said that a new expert panel aimed to make human control ‘a technical reality’, news agency AFP reported.

Guterres said the United Nations General Assembly had confirmed the 40 members proposed for the Independent International Scientific Panel on Artificial Intelligence.

“Science-led governance is not a brake on progress” but can make it “safer, fairer, and more widely shared”, he said at the AI Impact Summit in New Delhi.

‘Less hype, less fear. More facts and evidence’

“The message is simple: Less hype, less fear. More facts and evidence,” he said. The advisory body – aiming to be to AI what the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is to global warming – was created in August.

“We are barrelling into the unknown. Our goal is to make human control a technical reality — not a slogan,” he said.

Read more: https://www.livemint.com/technology/tech-news/antonio-guterres-at-ai-impact-summit-less-hype-less-fear-says-ipcc-style-un-panel-aims-for-human-control-of-ai-11771566064031.html

But with China and the USA going all in on the race for artificial super intelligence, nobody is going to put the brakes on AI development anytime soon.

Gutteres became UN Secretary General in December 2016 – just after President Trump won his first term. When Trump was defeated by President Biden in 2020, Gutteres must have known hope for a climate achievement of his very own.

But this was not to be. Biden’s unfocussed scattergun approach to advancing green causes failed to win traction with the global community. The one real chance Biden had of advancing environmental causes – silencing people who criticised him – collapsed in ridicule, after it emerged the person Biden chose to head his climate censorship push was a real oddball.

The Disinformation Governance Board, DisavowedHomeland Security pauses a speech board that sparked public mistrust.

By The Editorial Board May 18, 2022 at 6:36 pm ET

Quick as she came, the Mary Poppins of Disinformation unfurled her umbrella and floated away to her next job, nannying another nation of children who had the wrong ideas. Nina Jankowicz, age 33, was supposed to lead the Department of Homeland Security’s new Disinformation Governance Board.

Only three weeks after that announcement, media reports say the board is being “paused” and Ms. Jankowicz has resigned. It isn’t difficult to see why. “You can just call me the Mary Poppins of disinformation,” she tweeted last year, with a video of herself singing modified song lyrics to “Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious.”

Read more: https://www.wsj.com/opinion/the-disinformation-governance-board-disavowed-nina-jankowicz-homeland-security-mary-poppins-11652910532

Who can forget the video, of the woman chosen by Biden to silence climate skeptics singing her version of Mary Poppins?

Gutteres one big hope for a major climate treaty to his name, a global carbon tax on shipping, was derailed by President Trump threatening economic retaliation against anyone who tried to impose such taxes on the USA.

UN Secretary General António Gutteres only has until the end of December to make his mark. I can’t see him achieving anything significant in the time remaining to him – I mean, if he hasn’t achieved anything in the last decade, why would that change in the next few months? But expect a few months of increasingly shrill UN headlines.

Hang on, maybe I spoke too soon – Will COP 31 “President of Negotiations” Chris Bowen save the day with a world changing green diplomatic breakthrough?

Perhaps not.

What do you think UN Secretary General António Gutteres should do to make his mark?

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
4.8 10 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
70 Comments
Sweet Old Bob
September 5, 2026 10:07 am

“Every fraction of a degree will cost lives, destroy livelihoods, deepen inequality and push ecosystems closer to irreversible damage”

WHERE ???

Reply to  Sweet Old Bob
September 5, 2026 11:12 am

I think it also caused the flat tire on my car a couple of days ago.

Mr.
Reply to  ToldYouSo
September 5, 2026 11:22 am

That’s because you’re using compressed air, which contains so much CO2 these days that it just doesn’t work for keeping tires inflated any more.

You should be using Nitrogen.

Or better still, Helium or Hydrogen, like what inflated the Hindenburg.

(but beware throwing cigarette butts out the window)

Keep safe out there, sports fans!!
🙂

Reply to  Mr.
September 5, 2026 11:51 am

Oh . . . thanks for the clarification. I am so dumb as to consider it was related to the the CO2 in my inflation air (not pure nitrogen) causing my tire to become excessively hot and perhaps crack the rubber, thereby creating a leak.

Mr.
Reply to  ToldYouSo
September 5, 2026 1:22 pm

🙂

SxyxS
Reply to  ToldYouSo
September 5, 2026 11:47 am

Usually tires get pumped up when the air gets hotter.

Maybe it got so hot that it started to melt.

Reply to  Sweet Old Bob
September 5, 2026 12:55 pm

Wow! Every fraction? Amazing. 😆

noaaprogramer
Reply to  Paul Hurley
September 5, 2026 1:22 pm

Yeah, there’s an Aleph-2 number of them.

ResourceGuy
Reply to  Paul Hurley
September 6, 2026 9:24 am

There is an actuary somewhere whispering how much more reward there is for him in swiss bank accounts per fraction claimed.

Bruce Cobb
Reply to  Sweet Old Bob
September 5, 2026 2:43 pm

I know for a FACT that it already causes more heebie jeebies and collywobbles. Prove me wrong, all you heebie jeebie and collywobble deniers!

ResourceGuy
Reply to  Sweet Old Bob
September 6, 2026 9:21 am

That was during negotiations to buy that sea side villa next to the danger rising seas.

Mr.
September 5, 2026 10:10 am

“the historic 2015 Paris Agreement on climate change saw world leaders pledge to keep temperature rise to the 1.5°C limit above pre-industrial levels”

So these UN carnival barkers seriously think that “world leaders” can actually control how this planet’s coupled, non-linear, chaotic climates function?

I mean, delusional doesn’t even come close to describing these numpties.

Gregory Woods
Reply to  Mr.
September 5, 2026 10:17 am

Sounds like someone trying to sell you a penny stock over the phone. Buy now before it is too late!!!

Mr.
Reply to  Gregory Woods
September 5, 2026 11:25 am

a DEI stock broker appointment if ever there was one.

Reply to  Mr.
September 5, 2026 11:15 am

The only way in which the 2015 Paris Agreement deserves the adjective “historic” is in terms of unprecedented failure in virtue signalling.

Reply to  Mr.
September 5, 2026 4:00 pm

King Cnut – thats all I will write.

King-Cnut
Mr.
Reply to  sskinner
September 5, 2026 5:00 pm

Your spell checker isn’t working properly 🙂

Reply to  Mr.
September 6, 2026 12:40 am

World leaders? Do you remember any name today? If this is the case, will you remember any in another five years? The point is that those who are still leaders did not sign up to that nonsense in 2015.

Neil Pryke
September 5, 2026 10:13 am

He has to retire before next year…

One possible successor, on eligibility grounds, might be Sir Keir Starmer…

Yes, when I heard it, I didn’t know whether to feel relieved…or nauseated…

Rod Evans
Reply to  Neil Pryke
September 5, 2026 10:53 am

Pease no, surely presiding over the cultural destruction of one nation does not provide the perfect credentials to preside over the cultural economic and future destruction of all nation. By making Starmer head of the UN would be like putting Dracula in charge of the blood banks.

Reply to  Rod Evans
September 5, 2026 11:50 am

Dracula & Blood Banks Ha ha ha ha ha ha!

First chuckle of my day. (-:

SxyxS
Reply to  Neil Pryke
September 5, 2026 12:06 pm

Queer would be the best choice ever.

Someone you can oppose and hate from the get go – and no one will object as he is a male Kamala Harris and can’t hide behind skincolor and can be called war criminal all day long.

And that’s they won’t let him.
The only reason this still may be allowed to happen has 6 letters – but if this happens the corruption would become so obvious – it would be the end of UN.

cgh
Reply to  Neil Pryke
September 5, 2026 12:16 pm

Neil, not possible. Starmer is not even nominated. Here’s the list of nominees.
Selection and Appointment of the Next Secretary-General | United Nations

Given the list of previous incumbents,
Secretary-General of the United Nations – Wikipedia
it’s probably the turn of either South America, Africa or Asia. The current list of nominees suggests that the nominators well understand the rotation. The only question is which of the various nominations the Permanent Security Council finds least disagreeable. It is certainly not impossible that a Security Council member like the United States could obstruct or veto any appointment, as was attempted in 1951 by the Soviet Union.

Jeff Alberts
Reply to  Neil Pryke
September 5, 2026 5:59 pm

Narcissist Neil the Pryke, at it again.

Tony Sullivan
September 5, 2026 10:37 am

“…safe temperature limits”

😂

Sean2828
September 5, 2026 10:52 am

I know the perfect award. Let’s give him the credit (blame) for the trajectory of global emissions for the last 30 years.

  • Annual CO2 emissions have increased from 22 billion tons in the mid nineties to 40 billion tons last year.
  • The effort has had a cumulative cost in the neighborhood $15 trillion and the current annual cost are close to $2 trillion annually with less than nothing to show for the effort.
September 5, 2026 10:56 am

Personally, I will forever remember UN chief Antonio Guterres as the man behind the “boiling oceans” meme of climate catastrophism (yeah, pity me!).

During a press briefing at UN Headquarters on July 27, 2023, Guterres famously declared that “the era of global warming has ended; the era of global boiling has arrived.”

While his speech focused on a broad global climate crisis—citing the “hottest” three-week period on record and “unprecedented” global ocean temperatures (hah!)—the MSM and climate alarmists immediately linked his “global boiling” rhetoric to a localized event that had recently occurred off the coast of Florida (refs:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/2023/07/29/un-what-is-global-boiling)
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/26/climate/florida-100-degree-water.html), and
https://theconversation.com/do-phrases-like-global-boiling-help-or-hinder-climate-action-210960.

The issue was that just days before Guterres’ speech, a marine buoy in Manatee Bay, Florida, recorded a “stunning sea surface” temperature of 101.1°F (38.4°C), approaching hot-tub levels and setting a potential world record for “ocean heat”.

However, the facts are that “marine bouy” was revealed to be located resting on subsurface sand in an shallow bay (less than 3 feet depth water, near the shore) having stagnant water and located miles from the nearest inlet to the Atlantic ocean off Florida. WUWT featured an article by Anthony Watts thoroughly debunking this absurd, unfounded MSM feeding frenzy over “boiling oceans”: see https://wattsupwiththat.com/2023/08/03/wrong-mainstream-media-floridas-sea-water-is-not-setting-records/

Anybody know if Guterres accomplished anything of significance during his tenure (ending December 31, 2026) as Secretary-General of the UN . . . that is considering, of course, that his 2015 Paris Agreement has turned out to be pure BS?

cgh
Reply to  ToldYouSo
September 5, 2026 12:32 pm

Very good question, TYS. The main mission of the UN is prevention of another European land war since WW2. This main purpose is stated in Article 1 of the UN Charter. Gutty failed this test massively in 2022. The UN had already failed this main purpose in the Russian invasion of Georgia in 2008 and in its first invasion of Ukraine in 2014.

It could reasonably be suggested that the UN has failed at its main purpose of war prevention every single time that war has emerged among UN members.

The main reason for UN concentration on global warming since 1990 is that the UN needs a new mission to justify its existence. After all, it had no success whatsoever at its existing mission.

Mr.
Reply to  cgh
September 5, 2026 1:30 pm

The UN sucks at absolutely everything it announces and/or tries to accomplish.

(Except of course, sucking up $$$$s from the taxpayers of most (not all) participating member countries. They’re masters at that caper.)

cgh
Reply to  Mr.
September 5, 2026 5:17 pm

I agree. If the UN building in New York City was leveled to the ground and the UN organization was completely destroyed on a global basis, no one would notice the slightest meaningful difference. A few UN agencies do some useful work, but the General Assembly and the Security Council? Nothing whatsoever.

Reply to  cgh
September 6, 2026 1:21 am

Not entirely. Countless friends, classmates, nephews, nieces, mistresses and lovers of UN administrators, Foreign Affairs Ministers, Ambassadors and alike from all over the world would notice meaningful difference not seeing their UN monthly pay slips any longer. 

Reply to  ToldYouSo
September 5, 2026 1:18 pm

100 degrees is the boiling point of water.. everyone knows that ! 😉 😉

1saveenergy
Reply to  bnice2000
September 5, 2026 11:14 pm

NO
Water boils at 100°C, or 212°F, or 373.15 K, or 671.67 °R; at sea level.
But it depends on atmospheric pressure …
On Mount Everest, water boils at about 68°C (154°F), so you can’t boil an egg or make a decent cup of tea. 

Reply to  1saveenergy
September 6, 2026 1:17 pm

You do know I was looking at it from the knowledge level of Secretary General António Gutteres, don’t you. 😉
He is just the sort of guy to see a measurement of 101 degrees, and not know the difference between F and C.

Reply to  ToldYouSo
September 6, 2026 1:03 am

“In 1992, after the Socialists’ third consecutive defeat in Parliamentary elections, Guterres became secretary-general of the Socialist Party. He was also selected as one of the 25 vice presidents of the Socialist International in September 1992. Guterres was elected president of Socialist International in November 1999, he remained president of the Socialist International until June 2005.” As one can see, he reached his level of incompetence as back as in 1992. All of his subsequent career moves merely served to illustrate the Peter Principle.

oeman50
Reply to  ToldYouSo
September 6, 2026 5:51 am

Do you think Guterres confused 100°F and 100°C?

Reply to  oeman50
September 6, 2026 1:18 pm

It would not surprise me in the least !!

Portugal uses the metric system….

Its easy for a man of such little intelligence to get confused.

J Boles
September 5, 2026 11:00 am

NO ecosystem damage is “irreversible”. The Earth rebounded after the major extinctions, doing well now in fact.

September 5, 2026 11:03 am

“What do you think UN Secretary General António Gutteres should do to make his mark?”

He should gather driftwood at the beach, start a fire, and put a pot of seawater on it to confirm his “oceans are boiling” claim. That’ll be fun to watch.

Does this sound silly? Good. His pronouncements all along have been a theatrical absurdity.

That is all for now.

John Hultquist
Reply to  David Dibbell
September 5, 2026 1:04 pm

If he is in the pot of boiling seawater, I will … nah.

Reply to  David Dibbell
September 5, 2026 1:20 pm

““What do you think UN Secretary General António Gutteres should do to make his mark?””

He already leaves a strange stink where-ever he goes. !

ResourceGuy
September 5, 2026 11:15 am

Which Swiss property is he aiming for like Kofi?

cgh
Reply to  ResourceGuy
September 5, 2026 12:34 pm

Why? He’s a citizen of East Timor.

Mr.
Reply to  cgh
September 5, 2026 1:33 pm

Get real, CGH – no way will he want to return to East Timor after living the high life at UN headquarters, sucking off the taxpayers’ teat for all those years.

ResourceGuy
Reply to  Mr.
September 5, 2026 3:29 pm

He will take both plus a good helping of Swiss Bank accounts.

Phillip Chalmers
Reply to  cgh
September 6, 2026 1:32 am

He was born in Lisbon. Grew up in Portugal and served as a parliamentarian there. Timor Leste voted him honorary citizenship, it was a colony of Portugal

ResourceGuy
September 5, 2026 11:20 am

Surely the Chinese can give him some big award for new records in coal production and staying well away from the ethic gulag in western China for any human rights on-site investigation. Given all the solar products from coal power with slave labor there, the EU could second the motion.

ResourceGuy
Reply to  ResourceGuy
September 5, 2026 3:27 pm

Ethnic gulag

September 5, 2026 11:35 am

The AI thing is turning into the same kind of alarmist, arm waving, hysterical, we need to DO something that Climate Change is.

I’m tired of the rhetoric around this and I blasted articles in TFP for it. Is AI potentially dangerous? Damn right it is. Do we need government panels and new laws to contain it? That would be worse than doing nothing.

None of the AI alarmists can quantify exactly what risk we’re trying to mitigate. If we don’t know the risks we’re trying to mitigate, then how do we design defenses? They are now resorting to claims the damage could be incalculable, so we should err on the side of caution. That is EXACTLY the strategy employed in the early days of the climate debate.

Further, the AI alarmists seem to think that AI is imbued with some magical power to do unimaginable things when in fact it is quite constrained. After all, AI is just another way to breach IT security. That and nothing more. It can FIND previously unknown attack vectors, it cannot CREATE new attack vectors. What is the ultimate defense against a security break? A well designed and implemented Backup and Disaster Recovery plan that can return systems to their exact state just before the attack. That was the last line of defense 60 years ago and it hasn’t changed. It is of course much more complicated than that. Real-time systems controlling water purification for example could poison an entire population before the attack is detected. Answer; Air gap those systems from the internet. Every IT security problem has an IT security defense strategy. For every IT security challenge there is a defense strategy available and it is the exact SAME defense strategy as for any OTHER cyber attack. Not to mention that cybersecurity tools have themselves been using AI to fight AI for more than a decade and they will evolve just as fast as the AI threats.

Don’t let the creepy UN get their fingers into this mess on top of climate. They are charlatans through and through and the blood suckers are already lining up to siphon your money into their pockets.

Story Tip
Well sort of. I would like to see WUWT get involved in this matter. The arm waving and alarmism around AI is identical to the early days of the climate debate. I’m sure that WUWT could recruit some well informed writers to shed some light on the AI debate.

Reply to  davidmhoffer
September 5, 2026 11:59 am

There was a defense system (I can’t remember which) that had air-gapped computers in the ground system. They got hacked during a maintenance activity when a technician plugged a thumb-drive into the air-gapped computer, and the thumb drive was carrying a virus. One has to check the material going into the air-gapped computers – air-gapping itself is insufficient protection.

Reply to  Retired_Engineer_Jim
September 5, 2026 12:51 pm

Any tactic I mentioned requires attention to detail. IT Security is a very complex subject. I intended to point out the high level strategy, attending to every detail would require an article unto itself and a lengthy one at that.

I’ve also seen a tech make things easier for himself by bringing a wifi router accessing the hot spot on his phone into an air gapped facility so he could wander around with his laptop and work from anywhere. Dumbass. I could go one, but you get the idea.

Reply to  Eric Worrall
September 5, 2026 1:12 pm

Hi Eric,
I saw that. Agree with the content. But what I’m advocating for is strictly from an IT security perspective. There is a giant misunderstanding of this issue gaining traction in the popular narrative that AI can do “something” without ever defining what the “something” is but its going to be a disaster, we have to act now. Well it can’t do anything that any other malevolent hacker can do. It can discover previously unknown vulnerabilities, but it cannot create new ones, it has to attack vulnerabilities that already exist. From an IT security perspective nothing really changes. Backup is your last line of defense, tools like endpoint protection, SIEM and NDR (all of which are driven by AI) are your front line. Nothing changes. AI does what hackers do, it just does it much faster which is why you need AI based defense tools.

IT security tools have had AI embedded in them for at least ten years, and hackers have been using AI to assist in attacks for at least as long. IT security used to be a human attacker on one side of a firewall and a human defender on the other side. Today, there is a human attacker directing AI tools on one side, and AI tools and a human defender on the other side. Instead of arm waving, a security centric explanation of the issues would be welcome.

Reply to  Eric Worrall
September 5, 2026 5:04 pm

Thanks Eric. Feel free to reach out if you want my thoughts. I’m recently retired so soon obsolete, but my whole career has revolved around data protection (backup and DR) and security.

Phillip Chalmers
Reply to  Eric Worrall
September 6, 2026 2:53 pm

I wave my arms about for neither the climate crisis solutions nor banning the use of nuclear material for both arms and power generation. I adopted computer use with the first Apple and telephone internet and shared in pioneering computerisation of clinical chemistry pathology.
I understand LLMs and heed good contemporary research.
The top 3 were put to rigorous testing, commanded to document ALL their steps and asked carefully crafted questions which have definite single correct answers and were posed in politically biased ways.
They got wrong answers, and the errors were more often caused by the bias of the question. They documented their references and many did not actually exist, some were irrelevant and some actually said the correct answer.
They lied. Some admitted their lies while others argued their innocence or simply contradicted the accusation and went mute.
At this stage, they do not have my tick of approval for use in medical practice.

September 5, 2026 11:36 am

“What do you think UN Secretary General António Gutteres should do to make his mark?”

Hold a press conference and admit that Global Warming / Anthropogenic Global Warming / Catastrophic Global Warming / Climate Change / Catastrophic Climate Change is a giant hoax / fraud. Oh, and admit that the oceans are not boiling.

denny
September 5, 2026 12:40 pm

This is what will happen in the next decade. The IPCC will announce that they made a mistake in calculating the 1850-1900 baseline because of poor spatial coverage in the SH SST and we are really at only 1C over the baseline period. That will give them an excuse about why doomsday didn’t happen. Thus the process starts all over again so we have another few decades of life. It will also provide Greta2 time to mature a little and become ready to capture the world’s imagination. Lucky us.

Reply to  denny
September 6, 2026 1:26 am

No. As long as the IPCC is funded by tax-payer’s money they will never admit any mistake.

September 5, 2026 1:10 pm

Guterres legacy will be to have reinforced the useless futility of the UN—and not just concerning climate.

GeorgeInSanDiego
Reply to  Rud Istvan
September 6, 2026 4:20 am

Useless Nobodies

1saveenergy
September 5, 2026 2:05 pm

[“but António Gutteres gets – nothing.“]

Not true; he’ll get a big fat pension & lots of invites to give after-dinner speeches £$£$

Edward Katz
September 5, 2026 2:06 pm

Gutierrez shouldn’t bother even showing up at these events. All he needs to do is provide a recording of his previous songs-and -dances on the climate change issue and that would be sufficient because no one listens to his narratives any more and hardly at all from the outset. I get the idea that to gain the position of UN Secretary-General, one has to be able to provide the largest amount of climate alarmism; otherwise, don’t even apply.

September 5, 2026 3:58 pm

“He recalled that the historic 2015 Paris Agreement on climate change saw world leaders pledge to keep temperature rise to the 1.5°C limit above pre-industrial levels…”
And how will the ‘leaders’ do that then?

King-Cnut
September 5, 2026 4:44 pm

UN Secretary General António Gutteres should do [what], to make his mark?

The Guttmann Swan-Song: Nevermind, Oh Never-you-Mind
Oh won’t you Stand (My Little-Mann)
on this Table* Before Us,
so we can know what
all this Time’s been for?
Oh won’t you simulate (cgi-gcm)
your deathbed conversion
to the school of Skepticism?
Oh won’t you tell us now,
how this has all been
just one awful sad mistake?
From CharnNASty, up to Montréal,
from Kyoto to Copenhagen-gate,
… of how we’ll always-have-le-Climat[e]
d’Paree, no more, not-ever-more?
Oh won’t you tell us:
please just tell us
Nevermind!’ oh never-you-mind?
——————
*A Podium Swan-Song for the GuttMann of Antalya ( Türkiye ) COP-out XXXI, 20.11.2026

Bob
September 5, 2026 4:44 pm

Gutteres is delusional, trillions of dollars spent in an effort to reduce CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere yet concentrations have increased. What part of failure does he not understand?

ResourceGuy
Reply to  Bob
September 5, 2026 8:00 pm

It’s all in the preaching and safe subject selection.

leefor
September 5, 2026 8:55 pm

“Lees hype, less fear” Except for AGW/CC. 😉

cartoss
September 6, 2026 2:49 am

AG’s head is a brain-free zone. I think the brain cells leaked out of his always-open mouth.