Met Office Admit Kew Is A Class 5 Junk Site

September 3, 2026

From NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT

By Paul Homewood

Huge news from Dr Eric Huxter’s website:

As Ray Sanders had picked up from a January 2026 FOI request for a list of CIMO 1 and 2 class weather stations.

Kew Gardens, up to now Class 2, did not appear on this list. On May 24th I sent an enquiry as to its current status to the Meteorological Office Enquiries desk. My enquiry was given a case number and I awaited the response. In July there had been no answer therefore I sent the question again, with the associated number. On the 29th August I received the following answer:

We apologies in the delay getting back to you, our support team has come back and said the CIMO rating is or can be different for each sensor depending on the exposure assessment.

I was suitably impressed at the length of time to produce this deflection and sent a more precise question as to the CIMO Site Class for the air temperature sensor and today received this response:

The air temperature sensor at Kew Gardens is classified as CIMO 5.

Full story here.

As readers will be aware, Ray, Eric and I have been paying close attention to Kew Gardens, since it set the May temperature record earlier this year.

Despite being classified as Class 2, recent photographs revealed overgrown vegetation and close proximity of the screen to a fence. By WMO standards, Kew should at best be a Class 4.

On top of that are the inappropriate surroundings in the Gardens.

Kew has often topped the daily lists for hottest places, including that May record:

As WMO rules make clear that Class 5 sites should not be used for climatological purposes, I look forward to the Met Office removing the spurious “record temperature” from their website.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
5 1 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
7 Comments
September 5, 2026 2:10 am

You are looking forward to the Met Office removing etc..
I wouldn’t hold your breath.
And I bet the BBC, who used the “record from Kew” just the other day, doesn’t report this either.

MrGrimNasty
September 5, 2026 2:12 am

Why would they delete the record?

The recording and presence of daily weather trivia is not ‘for climatological purposes’.

If/how they use the data in long term analysis and/or climate propaganda is where the issue arises.

Phillip Chalmers
Reply to  MrGrimNasty
September 5, 2026 2:34 am

Sharpen your reading skills? Record is being used in two senses.
One is, keeping it as a unit of data in a list of recordings from the detector
The other: Record! being the highest or the biggest or the longest as in climate catastrophe propaganda.

Mr.
Reply to  MrGrimNasty
September 5, 2026 2:40 am

One can only hope that they do keep misusing these kinds of dodgy records as input to “average temperature” constructs.

Supports the reality of the piss-poor probity of the “data” used in GAT constructs.

Reply to  MrGrimNasty
September 5, 2026 3:05 am

You can record the data in a record and report it as a record when the recorded data is the maximum of the data in the corresponding records.

strativarius
September 5, 2026 2:31 am

I look forward to the Met Office removing the spurious “record

Fifty quid says they won’t do it. They haven’t given up on RCP8.5

Neil Pryke
September 5, 2026 3:09 am

Do the useless pen-pushers and pretend-administrators realise that they are responsible for misleading potentially millions of people…the sort of thing that can lead to the downfall of a nation..?