This article was originally published at The Empowerment Alliance and is re-published here with permission.
A few years ago, my wife and I bought a new washer and dryer. We were convinced by the salesperson to buy a set that promised energy efficiency for the dryer and, for the washer, better cleaning using less water.
You know what happened. In the name of “efficiency,” our clothes, towels, blankets and other items came out barely damp and far from clean. And even though they were only slightly wet, the dryer took two cycles to do its job.
After just a few days, we called the retailer and exchanged “energy efficiency” for models that provided actual performance. Whether washing and drying clothes, getting dishes clean, sufficiently heating water, making our rooms comfortable in winter and summer, refrigerating or cooking food, Americans want appliances that do the job.
That’s why most Americans from coast to coast are likely celebrating the announcement from the U.S. Department of Energy last week that it intends to “permanently end home appliance and equipment mandates that raise costs and disrupt consumer choice,” according to a press release.
“In America, you should be able to choose a dryer that dries clothes on the first try rather than one that takes multiple cycles – unfortunately, past administrations thought otherwise,” Energy Secretary Chris Wright said.
On the heels of America’s 250th birthday, a return to utilizing technology that results in appliances that really work – along with ensuring the ability of consumers to buy them – are freedoms worth celebrating.
At least, that’s probably how most Americans feel. Not surprisingly, the Trump administration’s effort to reverse draconian regulations was not celebrated by everyone. The far-left (formerly mainstream) media’s reactions were predictable. For instance, the Washington Post – in a news story, not an opinion piece – described the Energy Department’s move as “President Donald Trump’s attack on efficiency standards.”
The Post found someone else to pooh-pooh the idea, too.
“This doesn’t make any sense,” said Andrew deLaski, executive director of something called the Appliance Standards Awareness Project. “They want to handcuff a policy that works well to save energy in our homes and businesses and frees up electricity capacity to meet the growing needs of our economy. It also saves people money.”
What many on the left fail to understand is that most Americans are fully aware that a high-performing appliance will likely cost more money. But that’s our choice. “It also saves people money” is not a decision we want anyone else to make for us – just as we don’t want mandates forced upon us in the name of doing us a favor.
Most Americans are not wasteful. We know we should turn off lights when they’re not needed. We should adjust the thermostat accordingly when no one is going to be home. We should not water the lawn or wash the car when there’s a drought.
What we rightfully resent is obvious hypocrisy. It was laughable when New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani recently urged residents to keep their thermostats no lower than 78 degrees – just a couple of days before the much-ballyhooed wedding of Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce at Madison Square Garden where, as many pointed out online, the bride and groom, along with their guests, were undoubtedly going to stay comfortably cool.
As People reported, Mamdani claimed that “the city is also taking steps to reduce energy demand by maintaining a 78-degree temperature in government buildings, dimming or turning off lights during peak electricity demand, asking private partners to do the same and powering down non- essential equipment.”
But – no surprise – the New York Post soon found that City Hall and other municipal buildings were below the 78-degree mark – with one room coming in at a downright chilly 54 degrees. Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich nailed it when he responded that Mamdani’s post reflected “the reality of big government socialism’s inability to solve problems,” as the Hill reported.
“Telling New Yorkers to set their air conditioning at 78 degrees is an open admission of the failure of the left to provide enough inexpensive electricity that people can be comfortable even in hot weather,” Gingrich said.
The best sources for inexpensive electricity are traditional legacy fuels. The best way to keep energy cost-effective and dependable is for the U.S. to adopt the Affordable, Reliable, Clean Energy Security Act (ARC-ES), which “guarantees that our most affordable and reliable energy sources, including nuclear and natural gas, remain part of the energy mix – a crucial requirement to guarantee affordable and reliable energy for American households and businesses,” as described in a press release announcing its introduction.
For too long, Americans have been treated like children, coerced into buying over-priced “energy efficient” appliances and technologies that don’t do the job, and shamed into adopting lifestyles that are uncomfortable and unnecessary.
The answer is not to make our lives smaller. Americans have never thrived by embracing such a philosophy. Instead, the solution is to make the most of the resources at our disposal. Dream big. Overcome challenges. Rise to the occasion rather than bow to fearmongering. And yes – drill, baby, drill.
Gary Abernathy is a longtime newspaper editor, reporter and columnist. He was a contributing columnist for the Washington Post from 2017-2023 and a frequent guest analyst across numerous media platforms. He is a contributing opinion columnist for The Empowerment Alliance, which advocates for realistic approaches to energy consumption and environmental conservation.
This article was originally published by RealClearEnergy and made available via RealClearWire.
As far as government mandates, the hard part of installing a new shower head is finding the flow restrictor, so I can remove or ream it.
It’s well past time to tell the Madmani’s of the world to Get Stuffed. Used to be “Tar and Feathering” would be sufficient or “Running them out on a rail”. Either way they NEED to be driven back into the shadows or sent to a socialist country of their choosing.
I don’t think that election was rigged. A majority of people actually voted for him.
There are a majority of people who support his fake lying politics. Stupid old New York widows, maybe more than a few dead people, and the haters of being alive.
That’s the problem.
Most Dems seem to support lying politics as well.
Lack of critical thinking skills and appeals to authority convinced too many voters this was a good choice. The rest just want the free ride he offered.
Ya know, If the Dems truly want people to live “Smaller Lives” they owe it to their constituents to lead the way.
I wish I had run for mayor of NYC. Much bigger salary than I make and he just gave himself a 20% raise.
Most of his supporters were actually foreign-born New Yorkers
It’s illegal in California to sell unapproved faucet adapters to “save water”. You can find them, but they cannot be sold to California residents. I had to lathe my own faucet adapter from brass stock to get a hose thread adapter to fit my sink faucet. Why? I want to clean my sink drain with hot water using a cobra head and a regular garden hose. Now that I have one, it works fine. A simple Amazon order denied turned into hours of work.
I did that, as well. But the flow still wasn’t great. I found the spray head holder was ALSO designed to limit flow. I found an old one with no restriction, my wife was very happy.
I have found an easy fix for that. Remove the water flow restrictor rubber washer gasket, slice off about 1/8th of it with a box cutter, and reinstall. Perfect flow. I have found if you remove too much, the water jets are too powerful.
The Left also shamed foreign companies with large market shares to live smaller with more complicated and expensive changes like overstrained twin turbo small engines. Even now toyota is reluctant to turn back even when it means consumer complaints and reputational damage.
It’s time for America to wake up and realize how much natural gas (that fuel that gets combusted to make the electricity) is being wasted in the process of producing the electricity. Our power plants are only +-50% energy efficient. At the same time our residential natural gas appliances combust natural gas to near 100% efficiency. There are also a lot of large commercial companies and institutions who have also applied the technology where they too are consuming their natural gas to over 90% efficiency.
The combusted exhaust leaving the turbines making our electricity can also be captured and be utilized to over 90% efficiency.
We need a more energy efficient America. People should be able to use the electricity to their requirements without feeling guilty about it. Just don’t waste it.
In your opinion power companies are deliberately wasting energy and costing themselves money?
There’s a big difference between a power plant and a water heater.
FYI, an electrical power plant using CCGT technology is 64% thermally efficient. A nuclear power plant is only 33% thermally efficient as is a coal-fired power plant.
[“The combusted exhaust leaving the turbines making our electricity can also be captured and be utilized to over
90% efficiency.”]Oh, do keep up;
we’ve been doing that for 65 years (Korneuburg-A plant in Austria, 1961, was the first).
It’s called a CCGT (combined-cycle gas turbine) plant. Overall Efficiency: Up to 64%; it uses both a gas turbine and a steam turbine.
To achieve “90% efficiency”, the waste heat from the steam turbine must also be used … in an industrial process or for district heating.
Have you heard about “flaring”? Its the process where oil producers, not having a place to deliver their natural gas that comes as a byproduct of extracting crude oil, will just burn the natural gas Right There having exactly 0% efficiency (or less, considering the cost of maintaining and operating the flaring equipment).
In oil country, its common to see the heavens lit up at night with these bright flames—a monument to environmentalist and NIMBY activists who try to derail any attempt to build pipelines so that the natural gas can be delivered to where it can be profitably converted.
But hey, lets have people with no skin in the game, who have earned no authority to decide on behalf of hundreds of millions of people, primarily existing for the purpose of laundering grants and tax dollars to operate their grifting NGO to make broad energy and environment decisions for their own vanity.
Adding hundreds of dollars to the cost of a washer or dryer is not a bargain when you save only a few dollars a year in energy costs.
Except you don’t save, because you have to run them longer to get the same effect.
Just like low powered kettles.
Bingo. My new dishwasher takes 2 hours and 29 minutes to run a single cycle, which is 20 minutes longer than the previous dishwasher which was an hour longer than the one before that. Exactly what am I saving???
Far-left (formerly mainstream) media? So Marxist State Media?
The worst example is vehicles – some of us actually need vehicles to get work done and we need power.
You won’t need cars in your soon-to-be 15 min city 🙂
That’ ll be a future slogan.
A guide to 15-minute cities: why are they so controversial?
https://www.ube.ac.uk/whats-happening/articles/15-minute-city/
Controversial for a lot of reasons-limiting freedom to move about at will,as in needing permission to leave what is by definition, a reservation…just as an example. Control, control of pretty much everything-are you a Red or what?
Which of my neighbor’s homes will need to be destroyed to build a grocery store 15 minutes (approx. 0.5 mi) from my house?
And a doctor.
The elementary school is 1 mile from my house.
Middle school and high school are ~ 2 miles from my house.
Will the new high schools within 15 minutes all have athletics?
How efficient will be a whole bunch of new, much smaller schools be?
More of my neighbors moving out due to homes being demolished.
All that aside, the work I do cannot be done in a small office and little can be done teleworking. We build stuff. It takes teams.
There probably are niche applications where a 15 minute city format improves things, but it would be comparable to a battery operated golf cart as the definition for an EV.
Which of my neighbor’s homes will need to be destroyed to build a grocery store 15 minutes (approx. 0.5 mi) from my house?
They wouldn’t need to destroy any homes to build one 15 minutes from MY house. There aren’t any. No other buildings either. But I would hate to see the woods or the cow pasture go…
How would you like to live life with your selection of employers being limited to those within a 15 minute walk of your home?
Only one grocery store, only one restaurant, etc.
The controversy is the desire to force everyone to live the far left’s desired lifestyle.
No where in the article does it mention how everyone’s work location is going to be only 15 minutes away.
So the problem is stated as “travel distance to work”. The solution is given as “travel distance to everything except work”.
Except for the destination known as “work”.
Here in the US; commercial areas, public areas, etc usually crop up around work destinations. This is exactly the concept of the “15 minute city”. It is a natural progression of growth.
Even the concept of a center city- suburbia is the same concept. It’s no different than a city like Holton, Kansas that has a “square” as the center of the city surrounded by commercial and residential areas. Other minor centers have built up around this center because of concentrations of “work” destinations that don’t work in the original center city – e.g. the local retail agricultural dealers that require large properties for inventory and maintenance infrastructure. Thus you wind up with “suburban” areas surrounding the center city.
The article NEVER addresses how the inventories of all these commercial/retail “destinations” is going to be maintained let alone how the water, sewer, trash, electric infrastructure is going to work.
If you are going to make a centralization scheme work, the center hub should be “work” and not “home”. THAT would be an answer to the problem given as “travel distance to work”.
What about those people working at Cape Canaveral or Wallops Flight Facility or the launch ranges in Hawaii, Wake Island, and Alaska.
I assume the neighbors would not mind massive rocket launches within 0.5 miles of their houses, not that it would be possible to put those facilities in such a small area.
What about Newport News and all of the other ship building facilities.
Certainly a kayak could be manufactured within 0.5 mile of a home, and maybe even a canoe.
The last time the 15 minute city was imposed, it was a function of slavery and of northern industrial economic slavery where the workers were in shanties and not paid enough to every get out of debt to the company store.
Yea. Let’s go back to those.
The point is addressing unintended consequences before forcing something like this down everyones’ throats.
Share the wealth means take from those that do and give it to those that don’t.
And is based entirely on a false assumption – that the amount of wealth is a fixed total and it’s all about its “distrbution.”
In reality, wealth can be, an has been and is being CREATED.
Those nasty Capitalists who invest and gamble (aka risk) billions of dollars to create industries that employ millions. HOW DARE THEY (/sarc) promote the human endeavor.
The article is too soft on the left. It is not that they want us to get by on less, as they want to take virtually all freedoms away, beginning with thermostats and eventually free enterprise. Is it a coincidence that the party of slavery in the antebellum South is becoming the party of socialism? One goal of socialism is “equity,” for the masses — i.e., slavery. (Russia went from serfs to impoverished masses; the Romanovs were replaced by Stalin & Co.) The American party they are consuming is the party formerly known for tolerating slavery. It’s going full circle unless people wake up.
Tolerating slavery and related evils is not toleration…it is full in acceptance; hence the expression often used to describe the relationship of the Dems to their largest voting block is “on the plantation”. Ugly, that, but accurate so far.
Indeed it’s all about choice, there is an old saying ‘there is no virtue in never being tempted’, those who wish to save the planet or whatever have been deprived of the opportunity to display their virtue by being offered a genuine choice.
Now they ought to be thankful for this test of their nobility and goodness.
When “they” embrace and live the life style the demand they be allowed to impose on the rest of us, then perhaps we can observe and consider the “benefits.”
Remember, people who want to lower your standard of living are not your friends.
To be fair americans live really wasteful for what they get out of it.
https://www.npr.org/2022/04/12/1092045712/how-much-energy-powers-a-good-life-less-than-youre-using-says-a-new-report
Having destroyed their infrastructure for car dependence may not have been a good choice. Especially with fuel prices going up again.
https://thehill.com/homenews/5952239-nyc-mayor-thermostat-criticism/
So an open admission of the failure of the trump administration to provide enough inexpensive electricity that people can be comfortable even in hot weather?
On your therapy doll point to where Trump has hurt you.
Pretty sure he keeps pointing at the brain.
It’s hard to hurt what you have never used.
“So an open admission of the failure of the trump administration to provide enough inexpensive electricity that people can be comfortable even in hot weather?”
The Feds don’t make power or deliver it. They only impact the availability of the fuel to do the making and delivering. It’s the STATES that are in charge of making and delivering electricity. It’s the STATES that have restricted the ability to make and deliver electricity that are causing the issues – like in New York City.
It’s the STATES that have shut down highly capable fossil fuel production in favor of non-capable wind and solar. And it is the STATES that have restricted capital investment projects to upgrade the existing grid – like in New York state.
Really? So trumps crusade against and impact on renewable development never happened?
Renewable power is never going to be adequate to keep people cool and comfortable. In the Southwest Power Pool which is the grid providing power where I live in Kansas, renewable power (capacity greater than 40,000 MW) is forecast to provide about 6000 MW today in the heat of the day. Why do we need more windmills and solar farms if they can’t provide power when needed???
Trump’s “crusade” isn’t against renewable development, it is only against tax dollars funding it. Try to be honest with yourself if you can.
“Try to be honest with yourself if you can.”
There’s a first time for everything. Though in this case, we are still waiting.
“Really? So trumps crusade against and impact on renewable development never happened?
”
You really need to get off this flame warrior gig.
He’s failed at everything else.
Wind and solar are neither cheap nor reliable.
No matter how many times you try to push the lie that it isn’t.
Blue states, doncha know?
First article: Stanford University. A survey of 140 countries without any considerations of the differences.
Second article: Mamdani. Enough said.
So, DJT sits on a stationary bike with a generator to provide electricity for the whole country?
While I disagree with what you say, I shall defend to the death your Constitutional right to prove yourself an idiot.
Wow, so self centered, you actually believe that what you want is by definition the ideal life style. So perfect that everyone else should be forced to live it.
You are so blinded by your ideological fervor and sense of self importance that your petty little mind can’t even fathom the concept that other people have valid reasons for rejecting your fascist designs on everyone else’s freedoms.
MUN, You have the definite right to live your life however you see fit.
EV … great
Thermostat at 78°F … go for it
Solar panels on your rooftop … by all means (just don’t make me (my taxes) pay for it)
Heat Pump in your yard … to each his own
Walking to work … whatever floats your boat
You do You
But…
You don’t have the right to FORCE me to live the same way!
A-plus
In the end, the ultimate arbiter of whether or not something is worthwhile is the free market. Once government gets its grubby paws on something all bets are off though, because then the playing field is skewed. Does something “save money” if it is being subsidized, or if its competitor is being penalized? No, of course not. But the Climate and “energy transition” would like us to believe so. All we want really is a level playing field again. Bit by bit, that is what Trump is doing. So let the Climate and Energy Liars howl all they want. Tough noogies.
The only true democracy is the free market (supply and demand). People vote with their dollars. Companies provide what people want.
Efficiency is doing things right;
Effectiveness is getting things done at the lowest cost (in time, effort, or cash).
Yes, and having damp, dirty clothes or dishes emerge from machines whose job is to ean and dry them is meither efficient nor effective.
Why don’t these eco-asshats just tell people to wear dirty clothes and eat and drink from dirty dishes, and get it over with?
Just because those asshats smell bad doesn’t mean we have to-or catch dysentery or some other fun illness like listeria from filthy dishes or utensils.
In reality, the “efficiency mandate appliances” DO NOT “save money.” Running your loads through 2-3 times in order to get them clean and/or dry probably means they cost more to (attempt to) do the same “job.”
It also means the machines don’t last as long, which means more wasted resources AND more wasted money.
I never had problems with energy saving appliances. What kind of crap do you buy? Get some quality ones like from german companies or something.
The other thing is planned obsolescence, but that’s the “free market” working and not energy efficiency.
Did you actaully read this for comprehension before posting it?
“Buy foreign not domestic”.
“Buy expensive instead of inexpensive”
You are a hypocrite of monumental proportions!
It was an example. And appliances are like shoes: Buy cheap – buy twice.
Hard to find a cheap appliance anymore…even the “cheapies” are costly, thanks to the Dems.
Buy twice.
Ok, so I lose 2 days of vacation getting it delivered and installed instead of one. That certainly improves my quality of life.
Idiot.
Yup.
“It was an example. And appliances are like shoes: Buy cheap – buy twice.”
It’s obvious you’ve NEVER lived paycheck to paycheck. You buy what you can afford. It’s the whole idea behind flea markets and used retail stores.
Are you still living in your parent’s home?
I’m long enough here to know the audience I’m talking to and nobody here is living paycheck to paycheck.
ROFL! Nice try. Do better next time.
nobody here is living paycheck to paycheck.
I certainly was when I first found WUWT. I’ve even lived without electricity because I couldn’t afford the bill.
But how is your comment relevant to Tim’s statement? I agree, it’s obvious you never have.
Idiot.
Some of the participants here are retired and get no paycheck.
Well that certainly explains the Chinese Solar Panel Market in a Nut(Zero)Shell
You prefer your clothes to be damp and stained when you put them on?
I’m surprised you aren’t demanding women go back to using wash boards and hanging the clothes to dry.
“For too long, Americans have been treated like children,”
I disagree. Many parents love their children and want what is best for them. Its the highly dysfunctional parents that don’t and they are the ones who deprive their children of many basic things so that the parents can indulge upon themselves.
For example, Mamdani looting the treasury, sadistically raising costs and imposing humiliating directives, and then voting in massive perpetual raises for himself and his henchmen.
I would liken our relationship with government as they treat us like diseased livestock, or worse, things that need to be trafficked.
It used to be 10% for the big guy. It is now 20%. And that does not count the house or the cars and a bunch of other benefits none of the rest of us will ever see.
If you think the Trans-Reality Activists are dangerous, take a look at what the Democratic Socialists of America want to implement.
https://program.dsausa.org/
If they succeed, the long term plans of the Soviet Union and Red China at the end of WWII will be fully accomplished.