Iran Nearly Crippled Global Energy, But Trump Found A New Weapon

From THE DAILY CALLER

Daily Caller News Foundation

Benjamin Roberts
Associate Editor

As energy markets reel from the U.S.’ war with Iran, the Trump administration is racing against time to insulate Americans from any more pain at the pump.

The war began early Saturday when U.S. and Israeli forces launched a massive wave of air strikes that killed Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khomeini and struck over 1,000 military installations. Iran retaliated with both conventional missile attacks and drone strikes, taking major energy facilities offline in the Arab Gulf. Brent crude, the oil blend used as an international benchmark for pricing, has risen to over $80/barrel, raising U.S. gas prices by roughly 20 cents/gallon.

“The price for crude oil is set on a global commodity trading market that is reflected mainly in the Brent crude price. All contracts for sale of crude globally work back from that index price,” industry veteran David Blackmon told the Daily Caller News Foundation.

Every $10 increase in Brent crude translates to a roughly 24-cent spike in U.S. gas prices, according to S&P Global. If Brent hits $100/barrel, consumers could fork over nearly $4/gallon at the gas station.

The White House did not respond to the DCNF’s request for comment. (RELATED: How Rubio Prepared Congress For US Campaign Against Iran)

Iran Lashes Out

The Iranian military took Saudi Aramco oil refineries and Qatar’s largest liquefied natural gas (LNG) facility offline with drone attacks after Operation Epic Fury, multiple outlets reported.  In an attempt to disrupt shipping lanes in the Strait of Hormuz, Iran also conducted drone attacks on oil tankers. Global markets and American prices reacted instantly. (RELATED: Trump Says US Decapitated Iran Leadership As They Ate Breakfast)

Iranian strikes punished the U.S.’s Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) allies, crippling energy production and disrupting exports. The GCC is responsible for nearly 30% of global oil exports.

Saudi Arabia’s Ras Tanura Refinery partially suspended its operations after an Iranian drone attack on Monday, and the Gulf’s premier LNG producer QatarEnergy was also shut down. The United Arab Emirate’s Fujairah Oil Industry Zone caught fire after Iranian strikes on Tuesday, delaying tanker refueling and introducing further uncertainty.

Additionally, maritime traffic in the Strait of Hormuz fell to almost zero after a number of Iranian attacks on civilian vessels, according to Joint Maritime Information Center transit advisories.

Initial effects on the U.S. energy market from Iranian strikes and subsequent GCC refinery closures were minimal, but continue to worsen.

Since Operation Epic Fury began, U.S. gas prices have risen from $2.98 to $3.19/gallon, according to AAA. Though a swell for President Trump’s second term, it remains substantially lower than Biden-era highs of over $5.

That prices have only risen modestly so far is partially attributable to the U.S.’ reduced reliance on foreign oil. U.S.’ domestic crude production rose by 50%, net imports declined by 65%, and the GCC’s share of U.S. imports even fell to less than 8% since 2014, the American Petroleum Institute found. But global markets still determine American pricing.

The Strait-Jacket Of Hormuz

Prices could climb higher if the Strait of Hormuz isn’t freely navigable, and maritime insurers’ risk-aversion is keeping ships at port.

“Right now, the stoppage in tanker movements through the Strait of Hormuz is strictly an insurance issue. Insurers are demanding higher war risk premiums from the shipping companies, and those will be negotiated in the coming days,” Blackmon said.

Approximately 25% of the “global seaborne oil trade” transits through the Strait of Hormuz, according to the Energy Information Administration (EIA).

If negotiations between war risk insurers and shipping companies are resolved within “7-10 days, then the rise in gas prices at the pump will likely remain modest,” according to Blackmon. The industry veteran sees continued insurance withdrawal and Iranian destruction of  “significant critical infrastructure in Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Qatar” as “a combination that would send oil prices – and thus, gasoline prices – soaring.” (RELATED: Iran War Reportedly Leaves Oil Tankers Stranded Amid Global Shipping Crisis)

On Tuesday, President Trump announced on Truth Social that the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation (DFC) would provide political risk insurance and even U.S. Navy escorts for merchant vessels in the Strait of Hormuz.

The DFC offer “will not resolve the insurance issue for the shippers on a permanent basis – they will still need to work out long-term coverage for their cargoes with major insurance carriers like Lloyd’s of London,” according to Blackmon.

That being said, as a stop-gap measure, the “combination of U.S. DFC coverage and even escort by U.S. Naval vessels through the Strait could provide enough comfort to shippers to get tanker traffic moving through the Strait again,” Blackmon continued.

If the Strait “is effectively closed short term, meaning days or weeks, then I would expect a minimal disruption to the price of oil,” Republican Alabama Senate Candidate and U.S. Naval Reserve Officer Morgan Murphy told the Daily Caller News Foundation. “Should it be closed on a protracted basis, weeks or months, then oil prices would potentially climb to levels unseen in years.”

Activity in the Strait is still down 90% since Iran began its campaign to close the shipping route. Murphy noted that the U.S. Navy “has a long and glorious history of keeping sea lanes open.”

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
4.9 14 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
140 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
March 8, 2026 6:12 am

‘On Tuesday, President Trump announced on Truth Social that the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation (DFC) would provide political risk insurance and even U.S. Navy escorts for merchant vessels in the Strait of Hormuz.’

Hopefully, the US taxpayer isn’t THE ‘new weapon’. I’d prefer that we had systems that could interfere with how drones are guided to their targets. That, and a no-fly zone in the vicinity of the strait, would probably neutralize the Iranians influence on oil shipments.

Jeff Alberts
Reply to  Frank from NoVA
March 8, 2026 6:48 am

We do have such a system. It’s called killing the operators.

Reply to  Jeff Alberts
March 8, 2026 7:25 am

‘It’s called killing the operators.’

Yes, but perhaps you can provide some specifics with respect to defending against drones. I don’t normally care for the word ‘sustainable’, but I think it might become an issue if we’re expending a million bucks worth of ordinance every time the IRG rolls out in a clapped-out truck.

Reply to  Frank from NoVA
March 8, 2026 7:50 am

Supposedly some Ukrainian drone experts have gone to the Middle East to provide some advice- seeing that they get hit with hundreds of drones and missiles every day- they’re pretty good at defending themselves from them.

Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
March 8, 2026 8:22 am

For $1T+/yr, I’d like to think that our guys know more about drones than the Ukes, e.g., like how to disrupt their guidance systems, etc.

Reply to  Frank from NoVA
March 8, 2026 9:49 am

They know a lot more about small ordnance drones…

Reply to  DMacKenzie
March 8, 2026 10:11 am

If true, that would seem to be a big oversight on our part, given our spending levels and propensity to move expensive assets into harm’s way.

MarkW
Reply to  Frank from NoVA
March 8, 2026 10:15 am

Experience is the best teacher.

Reply to  Frank from NoVA
March 9, 2026 12:43 am

There’s nothing like battlefield experience, it usually beats theory and reliance on technology by experts. It’s “this is what their theory says you do” versus “this is what we actually do”. Ukraine has that experience, I don’t know what their interception rate of drones is but suspect it’s improving all the time.
Israel developed the Iron Dome for short range rockets and artillery and upgraded it for drone attacks and Arrow in response to Scud attacks in the Iraq war.
If I were facing attacks by Iranian drones these would be the two countries I’d go to for defence systems.

Bryan A
Reply to  Frank from NoVA
March 8, 2026 9:40 am

Simple Radio Signal Jamming would be sufficient. I believe something similar is used around the White House to prevent Drone Flyovers there. Further Cell Phone Jamming might be necessary too though.
Of course the systems would need to be installed on EVERY SHIP traversing the Strait.
See my comment below…
A new Canal crossing UAE could be the best option

Reply to  Bryan A
March 8, 2026 9:56 am

Thanks for the info. Not sure why each tanker would need to be outfitted, though, given the relatively limited area of the strait. Also, one might think that it would be possible to locate and neutralize these threats with high fire rate guns, rather than missiles, using airborne assets.

MarkW
Reply to  Frank from NoVA
March 8, 2026 10:16 am

There was a video of a Phalanx gun taking out a drone a couple of days ago.

Reply to  MarkW
March 8, 2026 10:31 am

Probably not the best use of a system designed to protect ships from missiles. I don’t think drones are very fast, so a cheap and scalable weapon that disrupts their guidance systems would be highly advantageous.

MarkW
Reply to  Frank from NoVA
March 9, 2026 1:50 pm

The expensive part of the Phalanx is the aiming. You are going to need a similar aiming system to shoot down drones. You might save a bit of money by having a gun that shoots at a slightly slower rate, but why bother?
Do you think they should have two Phalanx systems, one for missiles and one for drones? What other weapons system do you want them to get rid of so that they would have room for dual Phalanxes?

TBeholder
Reply to  MarkW
March 11, 2026 6:06 am

You might save a bit of money by having a gun that shoots at a slightly slower rate, but why bother?

For one, to have all that ammunition used against whatever threat is actually present, rather than be a liability? Plus weight of the turret, etc etc. Anyhow, an upgrade for Phalanx with electric motor for variable rate of fire was done, too. Surprisingly, as late as 2017.

Reply to  Frank from NoVA
March 10, 2026 6:47 am

It’s almost impossible to completely protect a US aircraft carrier from cruise missiles or a swarm of small drones. That’s why the CNV-72 left the Gulf area. It either received direct or indirect hit from something from Iran.

Iran had targeted all Gulf pipelines including the Saudi’s to the Red Sea and the UAE’s across the Strait. Iran has hit CIA headquarters as well as advanced radar systems. Iran has targeted Desalination systems in Gulf States. They, the Iranians, had plans for years on how to deal with direct attacks by retaliation against those States that hosts the US.

I am not a fan nor do I support the IRGC or their genocidal government in any way. But we must deal with facts not propaganda.

This war will not end well for anyone.

Reply to  MarkW
March 8, 2026 12:24 pm

This is more what I had in mind:

https://x.com/news_az/status/2030689503640486380

TBeholder
Reply to  MarkW
March 11, 2026 3:20 am

There was a film of a Soviet missile-on-missile interception before SALT I. That one was for the gullible, too. A lot of things can be done when set up as a circus trick that don’t translate in military usefulness.
Defenses can be (and are) saturated. Which is why US aircraft carriers these days can be chased away even by Yemen. Point defenses and escorts can help a lot against opportunistic potshots, but a concentrated attack is another matter.
As to Phalanx, it‘s was a good CIWS gun in 1969 and perhaps decent now, but far cry from a “munitions-go-away magic wand”. Slightly more modern AK-630 CIWS are better in most parameters that matter, and a few that are merely nice to have. Russian Navy’s Black Sea Fleet flagship, Moskva, had what, 2 of those per board and 1 on stern and bow each, plus anti-air missiles. But moving predictably resulted in catching a strike package… right between two of these turrets. Perhaps without this much CIWS firepower the ship would be lost immediately with all hands, rather than on the next day — but in the end, it was sunk.

Bryan A
Reply to  Frank from NoVA
March 8, 2026 3:29 pm

Outfitting tankers protects (creates a no fly zone) the area around the tanker while still allowing communications after the tanker has passed

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Bryan A
March 9, 2026 5:44 am

Simple Radio Signal Jamming works in some, but not all cases.

I cannot disclose what I know about this, but jamming is not the light switch for the problem.

TBeholder
Reply to  Sparta Nova 4
March 11, 2026 8:01 am

I cannot disclose what I know about this, but

Gosh golly, you are one secret squirrel…
Here it is, from a year ago and with photos: https://simplicius76.substack.com/p/solving-the-drone-dilemma-can-russia
Then there are things like laser beam riders, for one. I mean, someone actually interested could at least peruse layman terms summaries available in public domain on what was already done decades ago to guide ATGM on much smaller and agile targets, right?
So, most of these grand ideas are kindergarten level, not basic engineer level. It seems to be a part of some coping mechanism.

TBeholder
Reply to  Frank from NoVA
March 11, 2026 2:34 am

I think it might become an issue if we’re expending a million bucks worth of ordinance every time the IRG rolls out in a clapped-out truck.

And it’s much, much worse with AA missiles vs. strike packages. Especially for USA. Even if you want to pay, these just cannot be produced quickly enough.
Especially the high-end ones like THAAD.
Iron Dome was depleted during 12 Day War, NASAM and (mostly obsolete) Patriot stockpiles were seriously depleted during Defense Of The Achievements Of Orange Revolution.
And the systems using them are even harder to replace, of course. See for an old example of how this goes: https://simplicius76.substack.com/p/anatomy-of-mim-104-patriot-destruction
See the summary (with all required sanctimony vignettes) in The Return of Industrial Warfare. It turns out the post-industrial countries have no business duking it out with industrial countries in a war of attrition, by proxy or otherwise.

Reply to  Jeff Alberts
March 8, 2026 7:48 am

And utterly crushing Iran- militarily and economically. We did it to German and Japan and demanded that they surrender unconditionally. Should happen to Iran too. Trump said it then walked that back a bit. I hope he continues with it. We’ve had no trouble with Germany and Japan since then. Even if America backs off that demand, I’m sure Israel will not stop until it feels there’s little more to bomb but the rubble.

Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
March 8, 2026 10:01 am

The “winner” of a war is whichever side mans the checkpoints when the shooting stops and writes the history books for school kids, whether they really “won” it economically or not. Such was the American revolution, the Bolshevik revolution, the French revolution…glory for the declared heroes, while the 80% civilian casualties in the war zone are touted as proof of the heroism. Spun by the survivors because they don’t want to believe their fathers and uncles died because of of a banking system’s pressure on politicians to make sure war loans are repaid.

Reply to  DMacKenzie
March 8, 2026 11:26 am

sure, it’s all lies- but it’s a reality that we live with- and there are actual strategic justifications – it’s the endless struggle- just like the daily struggles in the natural world- eat or be eaten- goes back to the beginning of life – it’s never going to end- so the goal is to be on the “winning side” because that’s better than being on the “losing side”

MarkW
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
March 8, 2026 10:18 am

As a Marine ROTC friend of mine liked to say, “Rubble don’t make trouble.”

Reply to  MarkW
March 8, 2026 11:28 am

Lots of rubble now in Iran.

Sometimes rubble can be an effective place to hide- as the Russians did in the defense of Stalingrad.

Robertvd
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
March 9, 2026 4:22 am

All Iranian’s 32 VLCC (very large crude carriers) are still free to sail all over the planet and the Strait of Hormuz and Persian Gulf . Seizing them would be an enormous economic setback for Iran. You can also sell the oil they are carrying. They will also have to stop pumping crude out the ground as they have not enough storage capacity.

Reply to  Robertvd
March 9, 2026 6:03 am

Just saw a YouTube video where Trump is complaining about Israel torching those oil tanks in/near Tehran. He’d probably prefer to grab their oil rather than burn it. Of course Israel is more concerned about stopping enemy’s use of fuel in the short term.

TBeholder
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
March 11, 2026 8:20 am

We’ve had no trouble with Germany and Japan since then.

And now the rest of the world will stop having problems with USA, for many decades… and in some ways permanently. It turns out to be not quite as hard as it sounds, hmm?

I’m sure Israel will not stop until it feels there’s little more to bomb but the rubble.

See, this time the USA Tentacle #1 is not against helpless civilians and angry goat herders with ill-maintained AKs, but another second-tier state backed by first-tier states. So it appears this time you will have to satisfy your ghoulishness mostly with imagination.
Sure, planes that pop up, lob a missile or glide bomb from high altitude and dive back in a friendly EW zone are near-impossible to hit at long range, not even with Russian SAMs. But between the missions a plane spends most of its time as but another ground target, you know? 12 Day War proved Iron Dome was greatly overrated. With air defenses mostly depleted or destroyed, it’s but a matter of time when anything that proved troublesome will get hit. And then — bomb with exactly what?

Reply to  Jeff Alberts
March 8, 2026 9:46 am

Reading between the lines….its pretty clear the Ayatollah was very close to having a couple of nukes to be used as they have often stated “to erase Israel from the face of the Earth” and their absolutely single-minded zealotry would not have hesitated to use as soonn as they could load on a missile….. It should also clear that more recent intel must have indicated the preemptive attack in June was not completely successful….or the U.S. would not be going in again/heavier…which, since the country was in the throes of civil unrest…is completely counterproductive to allow those factions to bind over a common enemy…

George Thompson
Reply to  DMacKenzie
March 8, 2026 11:11 am

If the Iranians nuked Israel the end result of the
Jews nuking Iran in return would have ruined the whole middle east for oil and quite possibly for any real kind of living for a generation at least for everybody everywhere. Fallout is not forever, true, but it can be a real problem for a good long time…just consider the ramifications… All of them, not just oil but trade, population migrations, and even more punitive rising…

MarkW
Reply to  George Thompson
March 8, 2026 11:34 am

Hiroshima and Nagasaki were re-occupied within a few years of being bombed.

Ex-KaliforniaKook
Reply to  MarkW
March 8, 2026 9:44 pm

Beat me to it. According to Mr. Thompson, Japan has been uninhabitable for decades. Funny that no one seems to know that – or maybe it just doesn’t fit the narrative.

Shortly after Chernobyl I read a report saying over a million people died of radiation in Ukraine. Strangely, the UN recorded less than a hundred – most of whom stayed behind and shut the reactor down.

George Thompson
Reply to  Ex-KaliforniaKook
March 9, 2026 11:33 am

Not what I said. There would probably be many ground bursts meaning lots of seriously hot fallout. I was a student, as it were, of nuclear war theory, application, and results in my youth. What I learned should scare the pants off any poor slob who takes the time to really consider not just radiation, but the human response to it…I even met and listened to Edward Teller before he died…A man of deep and disturbing intellect. Scary doesn’t begin to apply. And who trusts the UN anyways? As little Tuesday said in the Addams family flick, Be afraid…be very afraid.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  MarkW
March 9, 2026 5:47 am

Those were low yield atomic devices. No clue what the Iranians were going for.

MarkW
Reply to  Sparta Nova 4
March 9, 2026 6:03 am

High yield just means that a higher fraction of the uranium/plutonium gets converted to energy.
A bigger boom also means the radiation gets dispersed over a larger area, meaning less radiation per square meter.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  MarkW
March 9, 2026 10:48 am

True about conversion. True about dispersioon.
However the difference are akin to being in a car accident at 60 mph versus 70 mph.

I have not read where Iranian enrichment of uranium was yielding weapons grade plutonium. An atomic bomb is uranium. A nuclear bomb needs plutonium. Of course common/social language calls all the them nuclear bombs, but there are difference between fission and fusion.

To the people who die and the lasting effects, it really does not matter what language is used, only which bombs.

George Thompson
Reply to  MarkW
March 9, 2026 11:43 am

True as far as that goes, never mind the long and lingering deaths or the birth defects. Life does go on, as does the psychological and cultural damage…A book…Hiroshima, Mon Amour…something like that, written in the 1950s I think, is quite sobering.

Reply to  George Thompson
March 9, 2026 6:04 am

Now, almost as bad- is everybody hitting the desalination plants.

TBeholder
Reply to  DMacKenzie
March 11, 2026 8:27 am

Why would they need nukes for that?

TBeholder
Reply to  Frank from NoVA
March 11, 2026 2:11 am

and even U.S. Navy escorts for merchant vessels in the Strait of Hormuz.’

What did U.S. Navy said to this one?
Empty reassurances are empty.

I’d prefer that we had systems that could interfere with how drones are guided to their targets.

Did you pay attention to “Operation Z”? This particular arms race went pretty far in the last few years.

and a no-fly zone in the vicinity of the strait,

Do you need a detailed explanation of why this neocon meme is laughably stupid in 2020s?

March 8, 2026 6:27 am

AyaToeTag Chowmeini drooled for this conflict for 30 years and then died on the first day. Hopefully, the line of replacements will be short and more willing to negotiate for a return to civilization.

Reply to  TEWS_Pilot
March 8, 2026 7:52 am

after unconditional surrender- which must be demanded of them- if they’re not crushed, they’ll be back, like Germany after WWI and even Napoleon when he was first defeated

TBeholder
Reply to  TEWS_Pilot
March 11, 2026 8:32 am

I’m sure they already did negotiate that, with Russia and China. Hence proceeding with slow, but persistent removal of barbarians from the region.

Jeff Alberts
March 8, 2026 6:46 am

What gets me is that the price at the pump went up instantly. That oil/gas was already purchased at a specific price. A gas station doesn’t pay again for something they’ve already purchased just because the crude price went up.

Reply to  Jeff Alberts
March 8, 2026 7:01 am

Probably don’t lower their price if the price of crude goes down until the new load shows up, either. FILO.

Reply to  TEWS_Pilot
March 8, 2026 9:57 pm

Downside stickiness

MarkW
Reply to  Retired_Engineer_Jim
March 9, 2026 6:04 am

Human nature. Fear of the unknown.

The first station that drops it’s prices will get the lion’s share of the market, which will force all the other stations to match the price drop.
Prices won’t come down as fast as they would in a normal market because of the fear, but they will come down.

starzmom
Reply to  Jeff Alberts
March 8, 2026 7:14 am

No, but they will raise prices if they think they will have to pay more for the next shipment.

Reply to  starzmom
March 8, 2026 7:53 am

Right- just normal economics at work there. We should all just try to cut back a bit on driving- or we can all go out and buy EVs. 🙂

Bryan A
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
March 8, 2026 9:48 am

EVs, 🖕 EVs!

TBeholder
Reply to  Bryan A
March 11, 2026 8:39 am

EVs risk a price increase too now.
If BRICS countries involved are preparing for a few bad seasons and as such may want to hoard some important materials, rather than waste them on stupid games.

Reply to  Jeff Alberts
March 8, 2026 8:57 am

The price at the pump reflects the operator’s expected costs for new gas. Yes, even the gas already in the pipeline goes up when supply is constrained or tight supplies are anticipated.

MarkW
Reply to  Jeff Alberts
March 8, 2026 10:23 am

If there is a shortage, you many not be able to get your next shipment, or there is a chance that the next shipment will be smaller than usual. In which case you need to earn enough money from the current supply to carry you over until supplies return to normal.

Another point is that gas stations earn the money they need to buy the next shipment with the current shipment. If the next shipment is going to be more expensive, the earnings from this shipment have to be enough to pay for it.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Jeff Alberts
March 9, 2026 5:49 am

The gas stations are told what price to sell at. A tanker refilled the station just as the first bombs went off. The is not a daily occurrence. Price from Saturday was normal. Price on Tuesday was up $0.50 per gallon. Funny how gas in the ground got more expensive.

Some might view this as wartime profiteering.

MarkW
Reply to  Sparta Nova 4
March 9, 2026 6:08 am

You didn’t bother reading the other responses before responding yourself, did you.

Most gas stations are individual contractors, nobody tells them what to sell at.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  MarkW
March 9, 2026 10:51 am

We could debate this but it will not affect the price per gallon.

A lot of gas stations are franchised. I talked with the owners of a couple of local chain gas stations and they told me they were told what the price should be set at.

Certainly there are a lot of factors that go into it, one of which is the need to get the capital to pay for the next tanker refill, a point you made.

BillR
Reply to  Jeff Alberts
March 9, 2026 5:51 am

The value of an asset isn’t the sunk cost, it’s the replacement cost. You won’t sell your house for what you paid. You sell it for what it’s worth.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  BillR
March 9, 2026 10:52 am

And futures and global pricing are the drivers.

strativarius
March 8, 2026 7:17 am

Strait-Jacket
Please send as many as you can.

ResourceGuy
March 8, 2026 7:43 am

Some things changed this time. Hapless leadership in DC is gone and B-52s are cleared for runs over Iran.

davidinredmond
Reply to  ResourceGuy
March 8, 2026 8:02 am

What? The old “strategy” of sending pallets of cash and gold to the Ayatollahs and trusting them to use it the way they “promised” wasn’t working?? Who woulda thunk it.

Bryan A
Reply to  davidinredmond
March 8, 2026 9:50 am

I thought “Whooda Thunkit” was the name of the German Chancellor.

George Thompson
Reply to  davidinredmond
March 8, 2026 10:58 am

Who? Democrats and other clueless screaming libs.

SxyxS
Reply to  ResourceGuy
March 8, 2026 8:41 am

Actually nothing changed this time.

Israel cried : “We want war, and you’ll do the job . ”

And Americans said: ” Yes massa. That’s why we exist ”
Or as Rubio put it : ” We didn’t want to go to war, but Israel attacked so… ”

And the 1st thing they did was? Kill 170 little girls (and bomb the place again an hour later again after help arrived ).
The Epstein class needs its child sacrifice.
But to be fair its nothing special.
They bombed 190 schools in Yugoslavia.Standard Procedure against the Civil Population but at least they don’t do their massacres at hand.

Taking the Greater Israel Project into account and the Yinon plan
and Wesley Clarks relevation about the 7 countries in 5 years plan,
the mission is about to be accomplished.

But what’s the next target once the list is finished?

Story Tip 1:

” Turkey is next ”
I’m not saying this.
It’s the Massa who said that.

Now you can finally experience how it is to pretend to hate someone before you are being told to do.
I hope the experience won’t be too overwhelming.

Story Tip 2:

It will take some time until people realise that this was the biggest Great Reset and wealth transfer trick in history.

Bryan A
Reply to  SxyxS
March 8, 2026 9:52 am

Whatever you’re smoking, share it with the Dems.

Reply to  SxyxS
March 8, 2026 10:07 am

You’re a vile excuse for a human. Go back to your sewer.

MarkW
Reply to  SxyxS
March 8, 2026 10:54 am

As every good anti-semite knows, Jews run the world.
Anyone who disagrees is in the pay of the Jews.

Reply to  SxyxS
March 8, 2026 10:57 am

Years ago I would ban or moderate people espousing standard anti-semitic nonsense about, in this case, Jews/Israel control the US government. Since it’s become so common now on the Right as well as the Left, I’ve rethought that strategy.

I think I’ll send some horrible weather SxyxS’s way for the foreseeable future.

starzmom
Reply to  Charles Rotter
March 8, 2026 12:21 pm

It is astonishing to me how anti-semitic the world is. Before Oct 7, 2023, it was sort of under the rug. Now it is perfectly acceptable discourse. Unbelievable.

Reply to  starzmom
March 8, 2026 12:47 pm

Covid broke a lot of brains.

conspiracy
Reply to  SxyxS
March 8, 2026 5:21 pm

That’s very close to the bone SxyxS.

The formation of the “Greater Israel” I believe some one stated was the ultimate outcome, that includes Iran and other countries.

MarkW
Reply to  Ozonebust
March 8, 2026 5:58 pm

Do you have any evidence that Israel desires to create this “greater Israel”, or is that just what you and your fellow antisemites are taught to believe?

Reply to  MarkW
March 8, 2026 7:37 pm

Mark W
Exactly why is this antisemitism.

Reply to  Ozonebust
March 8, 2026 8:03 pm

Because it’s based on more than a thousand years of blood libels about Jews and their intent. It has no rational basis, just anti-semites spewing historically illiterate bullshit based on combinations of forged documents, misreading of history, various tenuous unsubstantiated connections, conclusions, and a generic belief that Jews are inherently evil and have a master plans for the planet.

To sum it up, antisemitism literally rots your brain and makes you incapable of rational thought.

Reply to  Charles Rotter
March 9, 2026 11:06 am

To all three of you
Mark W, Chales Rotter and Sparta Nova 4

I did not mention either the Jewish fraternity, or the Zionists.
I have no hatred, hostility, ill feeling, bias, prejudice for anyone.
An AI search for Anti Semitic definition
Firstly, look at what I actually wrote
The formation of the “Greater Israel” I believe some one stated was the ultimate outcome, that includes Iran and other countries.

And then read your comments to and about me. Perhaps you could have corrected me instead of your antisemitic paintbrush diatribe.

Important DistinctionMost scholars and governments make a distinction between:

  • Criticism of the government or policies of Israel
  • Hostility toward Jewish people as a group

Criticizing Israeli policy (for example settlements or military actions) is not automatically antisemitic, but it can become antisemitic if it involves:

  • blaming all Jews for Israel’s actions
  • denying Jewish people the right to exist as a people
  • using antisemitic stereotypes.

https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/svg/2705.svg In simple terms:
Antisemitism = prejudice, hatred, or discrimination directed at Jewish people because they are Jewish.

If you want, I can also explain something interesting about this term:
why the word “Semitic” technically includes Arabs as well, yet “antisemitism” historically came to mean only hatred of Jews. The history of that linguistic shift is quite revealing.

Have a wonderful day

Reply to  Ozonebust
March 9, 2026 11:13 am

I took the option of a further explanation

The reason “antisemitism” refers specifically to hostility toward Jews, even though “Semitic” technically includes several peoples, comes from the history of the word itself.

1. The Original Meaning of “Semitic”The term “Semitic” was created by linguists in the late 1700s to classify a group of related languages.
These languages include:

  • Hebrew
  • Arabic
  • Aramaic
  • Amharic

The name “Semitic” comes from Shem, a son of Noah mentioned in the Book of Genesis.
European scholars used “Semitic” simply as a linguistic classification, not originally as a racial or political label.

2. Creation of the Word “Antisemitism”The word “antisemitism” was invented in 1879 by German political activist Wilhelm Marr.
Marr used the term to describe modern hostility toward Jews in Europe. He deliberately chose a pseudo-scientific sounding word instead of older religious terms like “Jew-hatred”.
His goal was to frame opposition to Jews as a racial and political issue rather than purely religious prejudice.

3. Why It Only Came to Mean Hatred of JewsEven though Arabs and others are also Semitic-language peoples, the term “antisemitism” was never used historically to describe hostility toward Arabs.
By the late 19th century in Europe:

  • The word had already become established as meaning anti-Jewish ideology.
  • Political movements across Europe adopted the term.

This ideology later became central to the racial policies of Nazi Party under Adolf Hitler, culminating in the Holocaust.
Because of that history, the term became permanently associated with hatred of Jews.

4. Modern ClarificationToday scholars and institutions such as the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance clarify that:

  • Antisemitism = hostility toward Jews
  • It is not a general term for hostility toward all Semitic-language peoples.

So although the word’s literal linguistic roots are broader, its historical and political meaning is specific.

https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/svg/2705.svg In short:

  • Semitic originally meant a language family.
  • Antisemitism was a 19th-century political term invented specifically to describe hostility toward Jews.
  • Over time it became the standard word for anti-Jewish prejudice and discrimination.

If you’re interested, there is also a very important historical moment when antisemitism shifted from religious hostility to racial ideology in Europe, which later influenced global politics and the creation of Israel. I can explain that progression if you want.

Reply to  Ozonebust
March 9, 2026 12:07 pm

Same bullshit. This is a long standard dodge of anti-semites going “not me”. In modern culture anti-semitism means Jew hatred. It doesn’t mean Arab hatred, Muslim hatred, or anything else.

You’re a pathetic little pos who probably doesn’t have the brain capacity to realize it.

When your worldview is based on anti-semitic tropes and lies, all you have is anti-semitism no matter how much you squeal like a stuck pig when called out.

Reply to  Charles Rotter
March 9, 2026 12:13 pm

Next you’re going to say you’re just asking questions.

Reply to  Ozonebust
March 9, 2026 5:04 pm

Why do you use AI. Your screeds reek of the way AI’s set up essays covering a subject. Tell us the questions you posed to get these answers.

Your discussion of the origin of the term antisemitism is meaningless as to the results of antisemitic prejudice. Your discussion misses important things like being Egyptian slaves, Muslim-Arabs conquerors causing a diaspora, Russian mistreatment, Nazi persecution, and lately calls for Jewish extermination using “from the river to the sea” calls.

You should not try to minimize the depths of antisemitism by using red herring arguments.

Reply to  Ozonebust
March 9, 2026 12:05 pm

This is the standard anti-semitic dodge.

When your

Criticism of the government or policies of Israel

is based upon

more than a thousand years of blood libels about Jews and their intent. It has no rational basis, just anti-semites spewing historically illiterate bullshit based on combinations of forged documents, misreading of history, various tenuous unsubstantiated connections, conclusions, and a generic belief that Jews are inherently evil and have a master plans for the planet.

Then no, it is pure anti-semitism because none of your criticisms of the Israel government are based on any objective facts and only upon anti-semitic propaganda.

MarkW
Reply to  Ozonebust
March 9, 2026 1:54 pm

Criticizing the Jews, but ignoring the fact that their enemies are a lot worse. You might want to convince yourself that this isn’t anti-Semitism, but no one else is buying it.

MarkW
Reply to  Ozonebust
March 9, 2026 6:11 am

You assume evil intentions on the part of Jews and declare them to be the enemy.

That and assuming plots for which no evidence exists in the real world.

Reply to  MarkW
March 8, 2026 7:55 pm

And then there is the
“Greater North America”
https://youtube.com/shorts/yocVMrnlXyA?si=YTecf1PkTUI1HVRt

MarkW
Reply to  Ozonebust
March 9, 2026 6:16 am

I’m guessing you believe that this means the US is planning to conquer every thing from Greenland to the Panama Canal. (If I were Canadian I would be insulted. According to you, this means Canada isn’t worth invading.)

BTW, what does this have to do with the Middle East, unless you are one of those people who believes that Jews run America.

Reply to  MarkW
March 9, 2026 5:06 pm

Just another red herring to push the narrative in a different direction. It is in the troll handbook.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  MarkW
March 9, 2026 5:58 am

Antisemitism is closely coupled with anti-Zionism. People versus government.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  SxyxS
March 9, 2026 5:56 am

You have verifiable evidence that the school was directly and purposefully targeted?

It is a tragedy when people get killed. War is to be avoided when possible, but appeasment is not the correct strategy as we learned in WWII.

FYI, Iran attacked Türkiye. NATO defenses shot it down.
FYI, Iran attacked Cyprus. UK, Greece, Italy, France, Holland are not positioned to defend.

Try reading from sources the present both sides of an issue. It is enlightening to figure out reality rather than being spoon fed what to believe.

AlbertBrand
March 8, 2026 8:09 am

Wouldn’t Saudia Arabia, Qatar, and United Arab Emirates be a little pissed off at Iran and perhaps join the battle?

ResourceGuy
Reply to  AlbertBrand
March 8, 2026 8:14 am

They need to stay prepped for war with the Houthis.

MarkW
Reply to  ResourceGuy
March 8, 2026 10:55 am

Without Iranian backing, the Houthis aren’t much of a threat.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  AlbertBrand
March 9, 2026 6:00 am

They are.
Iran issued apologies, but with the narrative avoidance that they were merely targeting American assets. It that is literally true, it bespeaks very serious concerns about drone navigation and targeting systems. Interpreting an oil refinery as an air base really stretches ccredibility.

davidinredmond
March 8, 2026 8:10 am

Story tip(s):

energy bad boys on substack have a detailed analysis of the actual cost of wind&solar to ERCOT during winter storm Fern. As usual, when needed most, wind and solar production dropped, right on schedule.

over on zerohedge, article about china no longer emphasizing solar to the point that they’ve dropped solar power forecasts for 2030. maybe feeling the heat now that their oil&gas supply chain has been disrupted. Maybe australia can make up the slack by shipping more coal to china? And another zerohedge, sounds like putin is planning/preparing/threatening to divert oil&gas from the euros to china.

would love to hear thoughts or an article from someone more knowledgeable than I am.

gyan1
Reply to  davidinredmond
March 8, 2026 11:23 am

“sounds like putin is planning/preparing/threatening to divert oil&gas from the euros to china.”

A made up story! Russia was already selling discounted gas and oil to China because of the sanctions that severely limit shipments to Europe and elsewhere. Trump is looking at lifting those sanctions to make up for the loss of gulf oil. China is being marginalized by the elimination of cheap oil imports from Venezuela, Iran and now possibly Russia.

Dave Andrews
Reply to  davidinredmond
March 9, 2026 9:18 am

Australia wants to ship as much coal to China (and the rest of the world) as it can. That is why it has 46 coal mining for export projects underway – almost 50% of all such projects in the world which number 95 in total

IEA ‘Coal 2024 Analysis and Forecast to 2027’ (Dec. 2024)

Strange that Nick Stokes never talks about this.

Petey Bird
March 8, 2026 8:21 am

I have heard that the navy has said that it is not possible. I know nothing first hand.

MarkW
Reply to  Petey Bird
March 9, 2026 1:57 pm

I would be very surprised if the “navy” was saying anything.
Now it’s quite possible that people who claim to at one time have been associated with the navy are saying a lot. But there is no reason for others to believe them.

strativarius
March 8, 2026 9:17 am

Iran Nearly Crippled Global Energy,

Miliband went one better

UK has ‘just two days of gas supplies left’ as flows dry up amid Iran war https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/2179719/uk-gas-energy-supply-less-than-two-days

George Thompson
Reply to  strativarius
March 8, 2026 11:13 am

Oooops…chickens coming home to roost?

Tony Cole
Reply to  strativarius
March 8, 2026 12:23 pm

the UK is praying for global warming! There is a god!

James Snook
Reply to  strativarius
March 8, 2026 1:52 pm

For the last 72hrs the percentage of UK electricity demand met by wind and solar has struggled to stay In double figures. Gas has taken the bulk of the load, helped by imports in excess of 20%.

What a ludicrous situation in which an advanced economy has put itself, all in the name of net zero.

Bryan A
March 8, 2026 9:36 am

Perhaps the UAE should consider creating a New Canal between Sharjah and Khor Fakkan, bypassing the Strait of Hormuz all together. They are rather Big on building things.

rayswadling
Reply to  Bryan A
March 9, 2026 3:31 am

Yes, I have often wondered why the straits haven’t been bypassed given the repeated issues there.

Reply to  rayswadling
March 9, 2026 3:55 am

Have a look at a map which shows heights above sea level. The peninsula at the entrance to Hormuz is high. You could go west until the mountains stop but that canal would be about 300 miles long.

John Endicott
Reply to  Oldseadog
March 9, 2026 11:46 am

There have been various canal and pipeline proposals to bypass the strait (including a 600+ mile canal) Such projects have never gone past the concept stage due to financial, technical and/or political challenges.

John Hultquist
March 8, 2026 9:57 am

” consumers could fork over nearly $4/gallon at the gas station.”
Pardon!? Here in the Great Left State of Washington we are already over $4. About $4.50 on the west side. A bit less east of the Cascades. This a result of the State’s climate hysteria, not the Iran thing.

Michael C. Roberts
Reply to  John Hultquist
March 8, 2026 11:00 am

John, feeling your pain as well. I’m retired now, wife works 3 days brick & mortar, 2 at home so petrol /gasoline demand has dropped considerably. I’ll be filling her Mustang later this afternoon and expect to see a huge jump in pump prices. Even accessing store incentive cents-off price reductions in the 60-80 cent-per-gallon range, us Wershingtonians (a dig at local pronunciation) still pay the extra legacy fee from the carbon taxation scheme imposed upon us by the past efforts of Old Jay ‘I’ll Pass a Carbon Tax on my Watch’ Inslee and our majority Dem State Legislature. Still paying nearly $1.00 USD more than national average after incentives. Beautiful state, suck-_ss politics.
Best regards,
MCR

Jeff Alberts
Reply to  John Hultquist
March 8, 2026 10:12 pm

It’s a little of both, John.

March 8, 2026 11:38 am

And all the forever Trumpers here supporting the price hikes because everything their man does is Great, capital G. It’s hilarious..if it wasnt so sad and pathetic.
Trump policy= we’ll act and do shit and then see what happens, then do some more. Declare ‘victory’, shit happens and…so on.
The danger now is: no offramp without humiliation.
We will see what happens in the next 2 weeks. If the iranian regime is still standing ( and it likely will) watch the climbdown.
Has anyone noticed the gulf states are talking to..Russia?
Probably doesnt make the western headlines.

MarkW
Reply to  ballynally
March 8, 2026 6:01 pm

Your hatred of Trump is so great that it requires you to hate everything he does no matter how right it is.

Reply to  MarkW
March 9, 2026 12:38 am

He brought that one himself by completely betraying his base and believing in his own ego to steer the american ship. He even said so.
But he is stupid, really stupid and surrounds himself by thoroughly bad people who polish that ego.
I thought his win over Biden was a good thing. Turns out Trump is the swamp king in disguise. He NEVER talks to his former base now like he did in his previous admin. He avoids them. He is clearly rapidly ageing, inflexible and is coming near to what happened to Biden. It is dangerous for the world AND for the US.
But you lot don’t want to see that.
It is YOU that have TDS..

MarkW
Reply to  ballynally
March 9, 2026 6:21 am

Man, you really do see only what the party tells you to see.

Reply to  MarkW
March 9, 2026 10:35 am

No, i am NOT w the Party. Any Party but certainly not the Forever Trump party..

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  ballynally
March 9, 2026 6:04 am

“Probably doesnt make the western headlines.”

That tells us everything we need to know about your sources.

MarkW
Reply to  Sparta Nova 4
March 9, 2026 6:22 am

Anyone who believes that western news sources would deliberately pass up anything that would make Trump look bad, is not living in the real world.

Reply to  MarkW
March 9, 2026 10:44 am

Anybody still supporting Trump is an idiot. A deliberate, blinkered and thoroughly corrupted one.
I dont believe ‘ western sources’ whatever that means. I used to be a pro trumper because it offered at least the possibility of change but it turned out he is just another con artist. It is THAT clear that anyone blind to that is an idiot in my book. The Deep State rules. Mafia rules. Not sustainable but there you are lashing out. It will fail…again. Because we are not in the 1950s anymore.
It clearly underpins the idea of the Stupid American who seems to be trained in NOT seeing things. It is not a coincidence. You’ve been fed stuff from a young age. A shit sandwich. Trunp is just the extreme end..

MarkW
Reply to  ballynally
March 9, 2026 2:08 pm

The standard party line. Anyone who doesn’t agree with us is stupid.
The next step is usually, anyone who still disagrees with us after we call them stupid, deserves to die.

Reply to  MarkW
March 11, 2026 12:29 am

Thank you for underpinning my point.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  MarkW
March 9, 2026 10:57 am

You understand. 🙂

Stephen Heins
March 8, 2026 12:29 pm

A large tanker successfully passed through the Strait of Hormuz without incident on March 8, 2026,

Robertvd
Reply to  Stephen Heins
March 9, 2026 4:18 am

All Iranian’s 32 VLCC (very large crude carriers) are still free to sail all over the planet and the Strait of Hormuz and Persian Gulf . Seizing them would be an enormous economic setback for Iran. You can also sell the oil they are carrying.

March 8, 2026 3:45 pm

It is really great that Trump is the anti-war President. It is unthinkable if he were not.

MarkW
Reply to  whsmith@wustl.edu
March 8, 2026 6:02 pm

For some, no war means always surrender at the first opportunity.

Reply to  MarkW
March 8, 2026 6:27 pm

If that is how you feel, go ahead and surrender.
I’ll never give up my or America’s sovereignty to ANYONE.
The USA was the best country ever. We almost made it thru 250 years.

MarkW
Reply to  whsmith@wustl.edu
March 9, 2026 6:23 am

Fighting back when attacked means you are giving up US sovereignty?

John Endicott
Reply to  MarkW
March 9, 2026 11:53 am

AKA the French military strategy

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  whsmith@wustl.edu
March 9, 2026 6:06 am

It is unclear the point you are trying to make.

Robertvd
Reply to  whsmith@wustl.edu
March 9, 2026 7:46 am

Trump was never against war. He is against useless wars.

Reply to  Robertvd
March 9, 2026 1:04 pm

Aside from the rubbish about Iran being on the verge of a nuclear weapon for the past 40 years, this war is useless and a degradation to the USA. Our ‘president’ is a slave, doing the bidding of Israel! Much of Congress supports this war.
WHY? You and I know why. Epsteined! Trump is compromised, weak, controlled.

How many lives have we given for Israel we do not yet know

We have already lost many $ billions in facilities. We have lost all the trust of regional countries and S. Korea – abandoning our treaty obligations for Israel! 
That is a foreign policy disaster for the US, but Israel controls Trump. Why and How is that?
We could rebuild our country for the money we are blowing on Israel and Israel’s war. 
This is only the beginning. A losing Israel will use a few nuclear weapons, made from stolen American uranium, and get a real Armageddon going. Stay tuned.

MarkW
Reply to  whsmith@wustl.edu
March 9, 2026 2:09 pm

Ah yes, another fool who believes Jews run the world.

March 8, 2026 4:07 pm

Iran has Hypersonic missiles which they can use to sink the escorts, keep in mind Iran has been using their older stocks while keeping some of their best missiles for later down the road.

It would take only one big attack to quickly shut down the traffic again while it cost a lot of money to keep running the destroyers in the straits…..

MarkW
Reply to  Sunsettommy
March 8, 2026 6:04 pm

Do you have any evidence that Russia has been giving Iran the hypersonic missiles that they just recently developed? Or is it the US that gave these missiles to Iran?

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Sunsettommy
March 9, 2026 6:08 am

You obviously do not realize that just adding hypersonic to something does not endow it with magical properties.

Patriot batteries consistently shoot down Russian hypersonic missiles.

Furthermore, the USA has deployed hypersonic intercepters.

Leon de Boer
Reply to  Sunsettommy
March 10, 2026 4:01 am

Iran has confirmed losses of 70% of it’s missile launchers and has no control of it’s airspace. The chances of getting missiles up now is very low given the setup time for a launcher. If they have hypersonic missiles there chances of using them is a diminishing window.

March 9, 2026 11:21 pm

idiocy at work…risking to loose the midterms and with that everything.

Well cheer on in your ignorance if you so choose.

Honestly, if you want MAGA to happen let the rest of the world alone and deal with your own problems at home.

Downvoters welcome, sincerely I couldn’t care less.

Reply to  varg
March 10, 2026 5:46 am

It doesnt really matter. Trump has shown to be super weak standing up to the deep state actors, Wall Street and the financiers.
He continued to support the proxy war against the world, specifically China.
Project Deprive China from energy continues. They have been doing this for at least the last 20 years. And they will sacrifice EVERYTHING, including the welfare of americans. They are international bloodthirsty vultures sold as ‘defending Democracy’ and by highlighting brutal regimes. That is not their aim. And while you and i and everyone else is fighting a culture war and taking sides the machine keeps eating bodies. Focus on Israel and you keep everyone occupied, for or against.
This war against Iran is not about Iran or Israel. The ( proxy) war against Russia is not even strictly against Russia. It is to weaken China in any way possible and to keep the europeans onside.
Trump clearly never intended to try and end the Ukraine/ Russia conflict. Acting like a ‘mediator’ is nothing but a smokescreen.
It’s money and power that rule.
The world will suffer. The system will halt. Then the takeover starts…and YOU are the fuel.

And yes, the forever Trumpers here will downvote anything not glorifying their hero. Theyve got their heads so far up their arse there is no way out. Some of them seemingly very smart people who can follow a line of logic in regards to climate. Yet, when it concerns Trump they go to the dark and stupid side where no air is allowed. It is TDS in reverse. You can bet money on it..

Reply to  ballynally
March 10, 2026 6:38 am

I had hoped Trump would make a difference, put that leftardy eco BS for good where it belongs. Well, with his latest nonsense he’s just proving that he is not different from all his predecessors….sadly.

Blind followingship is for idiots. But hey, enjoy your increased deficit spending, the inevitable inflation and rest assure: MAGA so will never happen, you just fell for another silly slogan comparable to climate change and other scams.

Maybe people should use their brains and dig a little deeper than just burst in laughters while watching
Team America world police…great and excellent movie, dolling it out on both idiocies that infest and still dominate the USA.

Reply to  varg
March 10, 2026 2:21 pm

For me the really interesting thing is that the same people who can put forward complex system mechanisms and proper science can spout the most insane simplistic and flawed geopolitical nonsense. They skip the fast middle bit and don’t seem to have a proper understanding of the countries involved or their history, or even american history. Poorly educated and emotional driven crackpot idiocy. Cherrypicking whatever suits their narrative, ironically the same exact thing they accuse the climate alarmists of and it flies right over their head.

TBeholder
March 11, 2026 1:30 am

That prices have only risen modestly so far is partially attributable to the U.S.’ reduced reliance on foreign oil.

Well, that and Iran not breaking things really thoroughly… yet. Unless it escalates, the reserves may hold, after all.
The real question is — will all the vassals of USA who did not reduce reliance on foreign oil lately just sit quietly and babble about Net Zero, or will they try to find another supplier? Hmm.

Murphy noted that the U.S. Navy “has a long and glorious history of keeping sea lanes open.”

So, did he volunteer back on active service, or?..