Libs Promise to Cut £600 Energy Bills by £800!

From NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT

By Paul Homewood

We are used to seeing broken promises from politicians. But this new campaign promise from the Lib Dems is simply fraudulent:

Families and pensioners are being clobbered with energy bills that are still more than £50 a month higher than they were five years ago. And businesses are suffering too.

Generating electricity from solar or wind is now much cheaper than gas. But people aren’t seeing the benefit of cheap renewable power, because electricity prices are still tied to the price of gas.

Years of terrible energy policies under the Conservatives pushed up everyone’s bills, and this Labour Government has failed to prioritise cutting them.

The Lib Dem plan would break the link between gas prices and energy costs, so people can enjoy the benefits of cheap, clean power. This would halve bills and save families £870 a year on average.

https://www.libdems.org.uk/energy

Let’s start with the easy bit:

This would halve bills and save families £870 a year on average.”

According to OFGEM, a typical 2-3 bedroom house uses 2700 kWh a year, which at the new cap of 24.67p/kWh works out at an annual cost of £666. So how can electricity bills be cut by £870?

Although they talk of “energy costs”, their proposals will obviously not cut gas bills.

They also lie about “Generating electricity from solar or wind is now much cheaper than gas”.

This is simply not true.

In the last financial year, 74.1 million ROCs were handed out to wind and solar generators. Each is worth around £70, meaning that these generators are subsidised to the tune of £5.2 billion a year, equivalent to £98/MWh.

https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/energy-trends-section-6-renewables

They each receive subsidies on top of the market price they receive from sales, which has been around the £80/MWh mark for most of the past year:

This is why our electricity prices are so high.

It is the same story with newer generators covered by CfDs. Last year, we paid out £2.02 billion in subsidies to offshore wind farms alone, as their guaranteed strike prices were much higher than market ones.

https://www.lowcarboncontracts.uk/resources/scheme-dashboards/cfd-historical-data-dashboard

The Lib Dems are of course right to draw attention to the link between gas prices and wholesale electricity prices, but not for the reason they claim.

Their ploy is to mislead the public into believing that the pricing system stops people from benefitting from “cheap renewables”. The problem is the diametric opposite.

When gas prices increase, renewable generators make windfall profits, benefitting from higher market prices in addition to the obscene subsidies they receive on top.

That is why the link needs to be abolished. This, of course, is easier said than done, but I am sure it is not beyond the wit of even Lib Dem politicians!

A fixed market price needs to be established for all intermittent generators, at a much lower level which reflects their inherent lack of value.

A separate market needs to be established for dispatchable generators, who can supply power as and when needed. This would work in the same way as the current system.

About a quarter of electricity generation is covered by ROCs, around 75 TWh a year. Given they receive subsidies of about £100/MWh already, I would suggest a fixed price of, say, £20/MWh. This would save about £5 billion a year, about £180 per household.

Secondly, bearing in mind the current spike in energy costs triggered by the Iran crisis, the Government should IMMEDIATELY suspend the Emission Trading Scheme until further notice.

According to EMBER, carbon costs accounted for a third of wholesale electricity prices last month. Suspension would lead to an immediate saving of £7 billion a year.

image

https://ember-energy.org/data/european-electricity-prices-and-costs/

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
5 4 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
25 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
StephenP
March 6, 2026 2:05 am

Oh dear, the advert for ‘an unforgettable holiday in Dubai’.

Reply to  StephenP
March 6, 2026 6:19 am

Well, it’s not wrong!

KevinM
Reply to  StephenP
March 6, 2026 8:06 am

Better than weight control products and tribal foot fungus cures.

Bill Toland
March 6, 2026 2:16 am

Ed Davey is the leader of the Liberal Democrats. He served in the Cameron-Clegg coalition as Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change from 2012 to 2015. He was the worst possible appointment and he actually boasts that he killed fracking in Britain. He makes Ed Miliband seem intelligent and reasonable by comparison. Under his leadership, the Liberal Democrats have moved to the left and adopted every fashionable woke policy imaginable. He is probably the stupidest leader of a political party ever in Britain. He is notorious for his innumeracy which helps to explain the above article.

strativarius
Reply to  Bill Toland
March 6, 2026 2:38 am

Former sub-postmaster slams ‘buffoonery’ of Ed Davey’s stunt-laden election campaign as Lib-Dem leader faces questions over lack of help during Horizon scandal when he was a minister – Daily Mail
comment image

strativarius
March 6, 2026 2:27 am

The Limp Dums are something else. Their leader is corrupt and a would be stunt man.

Ed Davey has said he remains proud that he was the person who “basically stopped” fracking in the UKTelegraph

And is he green?

Davey has himself been a longstanding recipient of donations from a couple who run a business renting out thousands of private jet flights a year.
As political website Guido Fawkes reports, “In 2020 alone, Chris and Tina Leach, owners of the private jet rental company Air Charter, put £16,500 into Davey’s coffers ahead of his leadership campaign.”  – Lib Dem Watch

Not when it comes to money, no.

The last time when the Lib Dems had their fingers on the levers of power…

Victims of the Horizon Post Office scandal have demanded Ed Davey resign as fresh revelations emerge over his role in the saga. Davey, who is now the leader of the Liberal Democrats, served as Minister for the Post Office between 2010 and 2012 in the coalition government.

He is being accused of having turned down a meeting with campaigner and former sub-postmaster Alan Bates while he fought for justice for postal workers.

It has since emerged that Davey, along with several other ministers, faced repeated warnings about the accounting problems and issues with the software.

[Somebody else’s fault, naturally…]
A spokesperson for the Lib Dem politician said he “bitterly regrets” that the Post Office was not honest with him.GB News

What was important to Davey in the House on Wednesday last?

Ed Davey used a Commons exchange on the Middle East crisis to argue that British nationals living in Dubai tax-free, including Isabel Oakeshott, should contribute to UK taxes if they expect military protection. – MSN


The only people who take the Lib Dems seriously are usually the seriously mentally challenged.

March 6, 2026 2:54 am

 “but I am sure it is not beyond the wit of even Lib Dem politicians!”

I wouldn’t put money on that. In many ways they are left of Labour and not far off the Greens. I despair at the lack of common sense in our parliament.

March 6, 2026 3:23 am

Wind and PV are cheaper, until you add in all the costs of adding them to the grid and providing backup for when they do not work. Which for PV is overnight and the Winter, for wind its during wind famines which are increasing in frequency and length.

Reply to  kommando828
March 6, 2026 6:06 am

Apart from the fact that you need a couple of hundred windmills to generate as much power as one gas plant, compare the cost of maintaining a thermal power plant with a wind farm. A thermal plant takes up just a few acres of land, and engineers, tools and spare parts are all on site. A gantry for lifting and moving heavy equipment is part of the structure of the plant. Routine servicing can easily be scheduled, and component failures dealt with immediately. Apart from the initial costs of building windmills, a wind farm takes up hundreds of acres. Tools, spare parts and personnel need to be transported to the site, so now you need to add vehicles. Cranes need to be hired. If it’s offshore, you’re going to need at least one boat and if it’s a blade you’re replacing it will need to be a big one. Routine servicing becomes dependant on weather conditions, as does component failure. ‘Renewables’ can NEVER be ‘cheaper’.

Dave Andrews
Reply to  Right-Handed Shark
March 6, 2026 8:00 am

Excellent comparison of the materials and minerals needed to build a new natural gas fired turbine capable of providing electricity for 75,000 homes compared to a similarly rated wind or solar development at ‘The Hard Math of Minerals’ by Mark P Mills.

https://issues.org/environmental-economic-costs-minerals-solar-wind-batteries-mills/

KevinM
Reply to  kommando828
March 6, 2026 8:09 am

All good until “which are increasing in frequency and length“.
Says who?

Reply to  KevinM
March 6, 2026 10:53 am

A climate scientist, the ones that started this fiasco and belief in Unicorn farts.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589004226004505

Widespread increase in frequency and duration of European wind droughts based on CMIP6 projections

March 6, 2026 3:32 am

From the article: “obscene subsidies”

That is the reason for higher electricity prices.

Get rid of the windmills and industrial solar and there will be no need for obscene subsidies.

First, you have to get rid of the politicians who favor obscene subsidies.

KevinM
Reply to  Tom Abbott
March 6, 2026 8:12 am

Google is very reluctant to find the Obama quote:
“Under my plan of a cap and trade system, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket.”
USA not UK, but the cause and effect were the same.
Less supply plus more demand equals higher price.

Editor
March 6, 2026 3:52 am

The UK could quite easily have reduced electricity costs over the last few years, or even decades, but they have not and will not until they stop prioritising Net Zero in their forward planning, and start prioritising consumer cost reduction.

Dave Andrews
Reply to  Mike Jonas
March 6, 2026 8:10 am

Unfortunately Mad Ed, Chris Stark and the Climate Change Committee fervently believe, with zero evidence, that their ridiculous Net Zero targets will do just that and bring consumer costs down!

john cheshire
March 6, 2026 4:29 am

Why do we not have a procedure to get rid of a rogue, treasonous and incompetent government. When we have a government that is as bad as this one we shouldn’t have to wait 5 years to vote them out. We need a fast and forceful process that enables we the people to act swiftly in our own interests.

Bill Toland
Reply to  john cheshire
March 6, 2026 5:15 am

We are virtually certain to have this government until 2029. After all, there is no incentive for the government to call an early general election which they will probably lose catastrophically. The additional damage which will be done to the British economy over the next three years is quite depressing to contemplate.

strativarius
Reply to  john cheshire
March 6, 2026 5:44 am

Why?

Because it is a Parliamentary (elected) dictatorship. No recalls, no voice whatsoever. Just a stroll to a poll every 5 years.

Reply to  john cheshire
March 6, 2026 8:09 am

November 5th?

KevinM
Reply to  john cheshire
March 6, 2026 8:19 am

Sudden changes of government are not always good.
One might even design a government to resist suddenly changing leadership.
(another example of “what happens when the other team is in this position”)

Victor
March 6, 2026 5:18 am

When energy prices rise, people have to return to old cheap fuels for heating homes.
In 19th century Britain, coal tiled stoves were the universal fuel for heating homes.

Tom Johnson
March 6, 2026 6:07 am

Generating electricity from solar or wind is now much cheaper than gas. But people aren’t seeing the benefit of cheap renewable power, because electricity prices are still tied to the price of gas.”

This is the BIG LIE of the Climate Cult. Wind, Sun, gas, oil, Coal, Hydro, are ALL free. No one gets a bill from Mother Earth for any of them. The price is determined from the cost of harvesting them, processing them, storing them, and delivering them to the customer whenever they are needed, in a form they can use. When the wind doesn’t blow or the sun doesn’t shine, their price is infinite, a division by zero. That can’t even be factored into the calculation.”

At least, for now, it’s the old reliable fossil fuels that keep the lights and heat on. They are not the problem; they are the solution.

March 6, 2026 7:56 am

A fixed market price needs to be established for all intermittent generators, at a much lower level which reflects their inherent lack of value.

That is not the only solution. How about using smart meters tied to individual power generating companies. Like your mobile phone is tied to your provider. You contract with a power provider and they install a smart reader that only works when the provider is meeting their contracts. A third party can track smart meter serial numbers and the power being sent into the grid from a generator. Smart meters are disabled at random until they match.

Lost cost providers that are also reliable will become the dominate providers. If a PV farm wants to contract with a fossil fuel provider for backup power, so be it. The cost will be added to what the customer pays and may make the provider unmarketable.

Heck, customers could even have multiple smart meters and wire their distribution boxes to obtain the least cost power.