Flogging a dead green horse. Source ChatGPT.com

Can “The Silent Majority” and Media Intervention Drag Climate Action Back onto the Global Agenda?

Essay by Eric Worrall

Although media interest in climate change is crashing, apparently lots of people still want governments to act.

The Silent Majority Paradox: Why Climate Change Has Faded from the Public Debate

Kinga Debisso — 

Over the past decade, climate change has been one of the defining topics on the political agenda and in the media. Today, however, it is increasingly pushed to the background … What is driving this shift, and what does a weakening public climate discourse mean for global action?

‘This trend is all the more striking because the underlying climate indicators continue to deteriorate’

Interest in climate issues has not disappeared, but it has become harder to sustain. A 2025 Reuters Institute study covering eight countries found that climate news consumption is strongly linked to social background, political orientation, and how much people feel overwhelmed by a constant stream of negative news. The report emphasizes that many avoid climate news not because they are indifferent, but because they are repeatedly exposed to discouraging narratives that offer no clear avenues for action. …

According to a 2025 Gallup survey, Americans still worry about global warming, but the topic has slipped to the very bottom of the list of environmental issues. A similar shift can be observed in Europe: while the societal relevance of climate change did not vanish overnight, public priorities have visibly changed. The 2024 Eurobarometer survey found that living costs and inflation remain among the top concerns, while environmental and climate issues have dropped compared to previous years—now ranking only fifth among day-to-day concerns.

The media can play a key role in making the majority position visible and thereby restoring momentum for collective action. Climate change can be brought back to the centre of attention if abstract reporting is replaced by practical analyses connected to everyday life. Positive framing and showcasing examples that actually work can help transform uncertainty into a sense of agency—and passivity into participation.

Read more: https://www.hungarianconservative.com/articles/green/climate-change-faded-public-debate/

Sorry Kinga Debisso, but you are wrong.

Media cannot prevent the collapse of interest in climate change, because media companies which focus on covering the bottom of the list of people’s priorities go broke, as US mainstream media companies are discovering the hard way.

In addition, “living costs and inflation”, which you flag as the highest priorities, are largely being caused by climate action. Politicians who want to keep their jobs have to focus on issues people care about, which increasingly means discarding climate action.

Climate concern is a luxury issue for comfortably wealthy people who don’t have anything else to worry about. Until politicians address rising high priority concerns such as cost of living, the addressing of which will require abandoning net zero and energy transition efforts, there is no chance luxury issues like climate change will regain their former dominant position in global politics.

Skeptic groups like WUWT have won the infowar on climate change, with lots of help from the sheer stupidity of engineering dyslexic greens who near broke the global economy by pushing unworkable climate solutions.

The big Covid lie helped people wake up – after people discovered how wildly Covid had been exaggerated, large numbers of people started questioning other establishment fear narratives, including the fake climate crisis.

While there is no room for complacency, the path to victory for climate focussed groups has all but disappeared.

But don’t be too quick to pop those champagne corks, those who would exploit and rule us through our fears aren’t about to pack up and go away. There is a new fake fear story is brewing, which will need every bit as much attention from people who care about liberty as the fake climate crisis did.

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
5 4 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
15 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
mleskovarsocalrrcom
February 28, 2026 2:43 pm

The AGW scammers bought the MSM to carry their narrative and no one trusts it anymore. Too many tipping points, polar bear die off, flooded coastal cities, snow extinction, etc. came and went without being realized and they’ve had decades to get it right but instead they double down on fear of the unknown to carry their message. Add the failure and cost of wind and solar renewables and you have a losing proposition. There’s no turning back and reinventing the AGW scam.

Scissor
Reply to  mleskovarsocalrrcom
February 28, 2026 5:14 pm

Safe and effective.

William Howard
Reply to  mleskovarsocalrrcom
February 28, 2026 6:21 pm

they didn’t have to buy them – they are willing anti-capitalist co-conspirators

YallaYPoora Kid
February 28, 2026 2:47 pm

As an Australian skeptic of the climate change narrative and actions enforced by governments I am very thankful for the scientific support from websites such as JoNova and WUWT. They have reinforced my own thoughts on the claims of pushers of climate doom and the end of mankind.
Doomsayers who swallowed the climate change catastrophe will never admit they were wrong and so they will likely skulk in the shadows while the Trump admin clear the bureaucracies of CC believers while waiting for a chance to regroup.

Bryan A
February 28, 2026 3:53 pm

For the umpteenth time, they t isn’t Governments that need to act,
It’s individuals that control what powers their transportation…(Petrol, Diesel, Electricity)
It’s individuals that control what powers their cooking…(Gas, Electricity)
It’s individuals that control what powers their heating…(Natural Gas, Heat Pump)
It’s individuals that decide what cools their homes…(Central A/C, Heat Pump)
It’s individuals that control what generates their Electricity…(Rooftop Solar+Battery, Grid)
Government has no place in telling individuals “What to Choose” or what options should be available.
If greater than 50% of “The People” chose to drive EVs then oil would become uneconomical to extract and refine. EVs would win the day. BUT no-one prefers EVs over ICVs certainly not >50% or in 30 years EVs would already have won.

Mac
February 28, 2026 3:54 pm

What was his name again? It sounds like:
King of BS.

February 28, 2026 3:55 pm

It may take a while, but the average guy or gal with little math, science, physics, climate education, etc. will eventually begin to smell a rat. Or begin to realize something smells rotten in Denmark. It’s a gut level reaction to being endlessly fear mongered and lied to. May not be able to put it into words, but they know something is very wrong.

ResourceGuy
February 28, 2026 3:58 pm

Anthony Watts and the team deserve a Presidential Medal of Freedom.

Zeke
February 28, 2026 4:10 pm

The really interesting a i critics on the left are raising issues about

  • monopolies (meaning the Techbros, who btw have not been very nice through either crisis the article mentioned, AGW and C19)
  • municipal power usage (a few companies need more than double-the-country’s power generation)
  • municipal water usage (millions of gallons for cooling, even in dry states like AZ)
  • circular financing and burning hundreds of billions in inference and datacenter costs to make a few billion
  • quadrupalling costs of RAM for home computers
  • offering a i for below-cost prices is fooling people; forcing people to use it on windoz is showing fake customers

Like you all, I don’t Feel the Bern, but these are good points of agreements with the left.

February 28, 2026 4:30 pm

The person in that top cartoon whipping the dead horse should be a woman.
And isn’t it telling that when people have real things to worry about, Interest in ‘climate change’ suddenly melts away.

jack rodwell
February 28, 2026 5:45 pm

Trump might not see his term out through ill health but if he does his legacy of being an emotional maniac shooting from the hip rather than considered thought will leave an open goal for his opponents.

Many decisions will be over turned on day one of a Democrat administration and “climate change” restoration will be front and centre, in fact I see it will be a major point of attack pre election.

To drive a stake through the heart of the beast it was ESSENTIAL to say “where is the definitive cause and effect evidence for the claim of dangerous man made climate change as per the scientific method?” but he didn’t.

Ensuing obfuscation, indignation and frothing insults in response – anything but “here is the evidence you requested” – would confirm to the public the scowling beast has been exposed now burn the carcass

Trump was right but as ever his method lacking ….. “climate change” will definitely return.

conrad ziefle
February 28, 2026 6:12 pm

By burning fossil fuels, we only return atmospheric CO2 to levels that once existed in the past, and provide for the continuation of life in the distant future.