£2.7 Billion Bill for Floating Wind

From NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT

By Paul Homewood

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/record-breaking-auction-for-offshore-wind-secured-to-take-back-control-of-britains-energy

I briefly touched on floating offshore wind in the new AR7 auction, but it is worth a closer look.

At a strike price of £216.49/MWh at 2024 prices, or £226/MWh at today’s the technology remains ridiculously expensive, at more than four times the cost of gas power.

It is supposed be a new, developing technology, demanding investment. Yet the Hywind project off the coast of Peterhead has been operational since 2018.

Worse still, the current AR7 prices are even higher than the £201.97/MWh current strike price for Green Volt’s floating wind farm set in last year’s AR6.

Prices are going up, not down. So why are we still wasting money on what appears to be a white elephant?

The two new projects for floating wind agreed at AR7 have a budgeted subsidy of £133 million a year. This may sound insignificant, given that their electricity output will also be tiny, with capacity of just 192 MW.

But these CfDs give guaranteed, index linked strike prices for twenty years. Over the full period of the contract, a subsidy of £2.7 billion will be paid at current prices. Remember this is on top of the revenue from the electricity produced.

It still pales into insignificance when the whole of AR7 is added up. We have so far concentrated on costs per MWh, but in total over twenty years, we will be paying out a subsidy of £38 billion.

I can think of no other branch of government that could, or ever has, signed away £38 billion of taxpayers’ money on a white elephant that has zero value at all to the country.

5 2 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Subscribe
Notify of
5 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Bill Toland
January 16, 2026 2:16 am

We are being governed by innumerates. They complain that money is tight but they are willing to waste an infinite amount of money on the net zero insanity.

strativarius
January 16, 2026 2:28 am

Net Zero Secretary Ed Miliband pledged that average household energy bills will be £300 lower by 2030 as Britain shifts to a greener economy. 

Labour made the promise during the general election campaign – The Standard

If the UK has more renewable energy, why aren’t bills coming down?

Responding to the 6% price cap rise, Energy Secretary Ed Miliband said it was due to “our reliance on the fossil fuel markets” – BBC

Everybody knows mad Ed’s utterly ludicrous rationale for his net zero zealotry; and he really thinks simply saying renewables are cheaper enough times will, magically, make it so.

Meanwhile in the real world…

latest accounts from the Climate Change Committee – a taxpayer-funded body which tracks and advocates for measures to push Britain closer to Net Zero – show its chief executives have been handed a plum pay increase. Guido Fawkes

Saving democracy…

Labour is set to allow at least 23 councils to cancel their local elections this coming May, according the BBC. That’s around 4 million people denied the vote…. – Guido Fawkes

From the Voters.

In Labour world £2.7 billion is a drop in the bucket.

johnn635
January 16, 2026 2:39 am

When reports contained estimated values displayed to the penny you know they are the result of an innumerate using AI and a spreadsheet, not someone who comprehends the real world

January 16, 2026 3:20 am

white elephant that has zero value at all to the country.

“Yeah, well, you know, that’s just, like, your opinion, man.”
― Jeff Lebowski

IEA: Renewables have cut fossil-fuel imports for more than 100 countries
And it’s still a better deal than Hinkley Point C.

Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
January 16, 2026 3:46 am

Shouldn’t that be “CO2Brief”?

Do they not know the difference?