Richard Betts Fake Heatwave Deaths Claim

From NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT

By Paul Homewood

https://www.channel4.com/news/uk-already-seeing-impact-of-climate-change-says-met-office-scientist

Richard Betts, Head of Climate Impacts Research at the Met Office, was wheeled out on Channel 4 News yesterday to promote their dubious “hottest year evah in UK” claim. His rather pathetic attempts to scare the public included ludicrous claims about plants and insects being confused and glaciers melting! Yes, Richard, glaciers have been melting for 200 years – were our SUVs the cause in 1800 as well?

But I cannot let him get away with one particularly outrageous claim, at about 1 min in:

.

“We had a run of three major heatwaves in the UK, which caused a lot of people to die sadly. Over 1500 people died from heat related causes alone in the summer and about three-quarters of those probably would not have died without extra supercharging of the heatwave due to climate change”

There is absolutely no evidence to back any of this up. Similar claims in previous years have always originated from fraudulent computer models, completely disproven by the actual data.

The Office for National Statistics, ONS, carried out a full analysis after the 2022 heatwave, which found that the heatwave did not increase death rates at all. What they said was that deaths may have been brought forward by a few days on the hottest days, but quickly dipped below average on the days after. Over the period as a whole death rates were normal.

In short, people who were dying anyway may have died a couple of days or so prematurely. The heatwave did not kill them any more than an April shower or a cold winter’s day could have done.

I have been keeping tabs on this topic since the Guardian claimed in June that 600 would die from the heat that month. The table below is compiled from ONS weekly registration of deaths data. (Bear in mind that registration is around a week after the date of death). As weekly registrations are affected by bank holidays, I have calculated averages per working day, ie excluding bank holidays:

https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/datasets/weeklyprovisionalfiguresondeathsregisteredinenglandandwales

There is a little blip upwards in Week 18, w/e May 2nd, which almost certainly is a catching up of the backlog that built up over Easter, Also another blip up in Week 35, which included August Bank Holiday, probably extra registrations crammed into the 4-day week.

But the overall trend is unmistakeable. From winter onwards, there is a steady uninterrupted decline in daily deaths, until they resume their upward trend autumn.

There is no sign at all of Betts’ fake “1500 deaths” during the summer. On the contrary, as temperatures rose, deaths declined. To pretend otherwise is immoral and dishonest. In summer, many fewer die than in spring and autumn, never mind winter. Heat does not kill, Richard – cold does.

We are now very familiar with the politicisation of the Met Office But this latest contribution from one of their most senior “scientists” goes beyond the pale.

What Betts said was not only unsubstantiated and unscientific. It was an abuse of the trust that for years we have all put in the Met Office, which has for so long stood for scientific integrity, honesty and public service. It is a stain on the reputation of all those who once made the Met Office the envy of the world and a beacon of science.

If anybody needs any further convincing about this perversion of science, just listen to Richard Betts’ words. Twice he tells us we must give up fossil fuels.

Sorry, Richard, but it is not your job, or the Met Office’s, to tell us what we can and cannot do.

You have thoroughly demeaned your self and destroyed your reputation.

5 32 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Subscribe
Notify of
41 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
mleskovarsocalrrcom
January 4, 2026 10:14 am

Throw out a fake claim, match the narrative, get support from the MSM, and Bob’s your uncle.

James Snook
Reply to  mleskovarsocalrrcom
January 4, 2026 10:34 am

………and Bob Ward’s your uncle 🤡

bobclose
Reply to  James Snook
January 4, 2026 2:26 pm

Well, this Bob doesn’t believe any of this MET propaganda or Bob Ward’s rubbish.
It’s unbelievable that these people are still given credence, no matter what trash they output. It’s past time the public woke up to their outright lies about climate change and future predictions based on false models.

January 4, 2026 10:20 am

Yes, Richard, glaciers have been melting for 200 years – were our SUVs the cause in 1800 as well?

Short search only finds photo from 1917 vs 2005.
Which photo is more desirable for life on Earth?

GlacierThenAndNow-II
Ddwieland
Reply to  Steve Case
January 4, 2026 10:27 am

As ever, we can see how warmth favours life.

Reply to  Steve Case
January 4, 2026 10:46 am

If you click on the image, it will expand and become clear. Click on “X” in the circle to contact the image and return to Comments.

I noticed the snow blackened with most likely with soot and dust from the air.

Reply to  Harold Pierce
January 4, 2026 11:12 am

Somewhere here at WUWT there’s a statement that says any URL that links to an image will display as an image. Worked once for me a few days weeks? ago but, the other day it didn’t. So I’ve returned to using the lower right button to post images from my files.

I’m pretty sure that people know how to handle those less than optimal sized images from private files.

Oh yeah, the run-out from glaciers is loaded with what ever the ice ground up as it slowly slides down the valley. Rivers that are predominately glacial melt water don’t have any fish in them. So say the park rangers in Denali National Park.

Bryan A
Reply to  Steve Case
January 4, 2026 12:49 pm

Could this be because, while the glacial melt contains many minerals, it doesn’t contain any potential vegetative food material for fish to consume.

Reply to  Steve Case
January 4, 2026 10:50 am

Also, hasn’t evidence of early human presence has been found as glaciers have retreated?

Reply to  JohnC
January 4, 2026 2:47 pm

And at times the stumps from ancient forest have been revealed.
(I guess they must have been Christmas trees?)

Reply to  Steve Case
January 4, 2026 4:42 pm

I hiked the trail to Exit Glacier on the Kenai Peninsula. Along the way are signs marking the retreat of the terminal moraine. That retreat began before humans had much to do with CO2 levels.

The linked image shows the recession back to 1815.

exit glacier trail terminal moraine markers – Search Images

Richard Rude
Reply to  Mark Whitney
January 4, 2026 10:33 pm

The retreat goes back to end of the last ice age.

Ddwieland
January 4, 2026 10:33 am

Once again we get the “due to climate change” absurdity, completely ignoring the fact that change is a result, not a cause. But who cares about reality when the goal is to scare people about an imaginary threat?

SxyxS
Reply to  Ddwieland
January 4, 2026 10:49 am

While I don’t know this English Methead,
I wonder if he came out crying when the excess death rate in UK increased significantly way after Peak Covid and way into MRNA Vaccines.

I’m pretty sure he didn’t gave a shit back then that people were forced to take an experimental medicine though there was real data available.
But now he pulled out his crystal ball a hockeystick and a treering to pull some numbers out of his butt because he is suddenly worried about significantly lower and fake numbers.

January 4, 2026 10:48 am

What they neglect to mention is that more people die from cold than from hot weather. A comparison of death rates in the period January to March 1963 and July to September 1976 might be revealing.

SxyxS
Reply to  JohnC
January 4, 2026 12:39 pm

If they’d kept the ice age scare
the cold weather bodycount would be used 10* a day as proof of global cooling.

Fran
January 4, 2026 11:10 am

“Mad dogs and Englishmen go out in the midday sun”

Mann years ago (~ 1960) an English physiologist in India looked at metabolic rates of Indians and “Englishmen” coming from Britain to South India. She claimed that those born in India did not reduce their metabolic rate going from a cold to a hot country; the English born did. This fits in with much later data that cold exposure during infancy improves heat tolerance in adulthood.

(can’t find the reference now, but this is consistent:
The effect of birthplace on heat tolerance and mortality in Milan, Italy, 1980–1989

  • Original Article
  • Published: 29 June 2006
  • Volume 50, pages 335–341, (2006)
  • Cite this article
A. O. Gilmore
January 4, 2026 11:12 am

At first I thought this was about the great guitarist Dickey Betts… naw say it ain’t so!! 😂

January 4, 2026 11:16 am

Over 1500 people died from heat related causes alone in the summer

Name them.

Chris Hanley
January 4, 2026 11:43 am

Heat does not kill, Richard – cold does.

The Central England record from 1650 indicates summer temperatures have been fairly constant, it’s winter temperatures that account for any overall warming.
It follows that there are now fewer winter deaths than would have occurred in the counter-factual case of no overall warming.

Neil Lock
January 4, 2026 11:53 am

When will Mr. Betts be telling us how many people have died because of the current UK cold spell?

AleaJactaEst
January 4, 2026 12:39 pm

@Paul Home Wood….

raise a complaint to OFCOM

Reply to  AleaJactaEst
January 4, 2026 10:04 pm

OFCOM are a waste of space.

I know because I complained about the BBC headline stating EVs had a £3750 discount.

It was a government subsidy i.e. the UK taxpayer, not a discount.

OFCOM said it was ok for the BBC to use the word discount, because climate (they didn’t say that, they just said computer says no).

Bryan A
January 4, 2026 12:45 pm

I can’t download the excel files at the source of your graph. But I did notice their excel data goes back to 2010. What does a typical chart look like on other years that weren’t noted for increased death rates?

Bob
January 4, 2026 1:09 pm

He should be fired immediately, lying and cheating isn’t okay especially on the government dime.

Reply to  Bob
January 4, 2026 2:30 pm

lying and cheating isn’t is okay especially on the government dime.

FIFY…

Edward Katz
January 4, 2026 2:22 pm

Maybe this clown could tell us where else on the planet heat caused premature deaths, or more likely he doesn’t know or have any evidence that heat was responsible, just as he has none concerning the 1500 that he cites. It’s alarm-peddlers like this guy that undermine what little credibility the climate crisis narrative has in the first place and that’s the reason fewer and fewer people pay any attention to them.

KevinM
Reply to  Edward Katz
January 4, 2026 6:06 pm

Argument breaks down the same way as the “heat makes you dumber” argument – wahat about life expectancy in Singapore?

Richard Mott
January 4, 2026 3:03 pm

Dickey Betts?? Great guitarist, but I thought he died in 2024. And what on earth happened to his hair?

johnn635
January 4, 2026 3:24 pm

Just to point out that the BBC own or control Channel 4 and the Met Office is funded by the government.

As always, follow be money

johnn635
Reply to  johnn635
January 4, 2026 3:25 pm

how I hate predictive typing. ….follow THE money

Edward Katz
Reply to  johnn635
January 4, 2026 5:42 pm

In Canada we hear similar fairy tales regularly from the CBC which is unwillingly funded by skeptical taxpayers. Whenever there’s one weather anomaly or another, the network promptly dives in the tell us that manmade climate change is responsible; therefore ,we had better adopt carbon reduction lifestyles before we ruin the entire planet. Yet trying to find anything disputing their its would be like trying to find orange groves on the shores of Hudson Bay in mid-January.

Reply to  johnn635
January 4, 2026 10:06 pm

The BBC doesn’t own or control Channel 4.

Unlike the BBC, which is funded by the television licence fee, Channel 4 is commercially self-funded through advertising and other commercial activities.

The channel is still full of idiots.

sherro01
January 4, 2026 3:42 pm

Do not trust that graph.
Annual graphs like this weekly count of deaths require that the count in week 52 is similar to that in week 1. Otherwise, as seen here, an explanation is required because the difference between weeks 52 and 1 is the largest feature on the graph. This analysis assumes, of course, that week 1 of this year will be similar to week 1 of the previous and following years, ditto for weeks 52.
Geoff S

KevinM
Reply to  sherro01
January 4, 2026 6:11 pm

Agree- implies randomness.

Bryan A
Reply to  sherro01
January 4, 2026 10:48 pm

Does the UK have a 500 count increase in deaths over New Years?
Perhaps New Years brings about a temporary increase in suicides?
It could make more sense if the three prior years data (2022, 2023, 2024) were graphed out from the source excel data and displayed both separately and contiguous. There simply could be a dramatic jump in the dead of winter between Dec and Jan.

Michael Flynn
January 4, 2026 5:56 pm

Richard Betts, Head of Climate Impacts Research at the Met Office . . .

Says it all, really. He obviously doesn’t know the difference between weather and climate.

As Mark Twain said “Climate is what we expect, weather is what we get”.

Mr Betts is obviously ignorant and gullible.

George Kaplan
January 4, 2026 6:07 pm

Strictly speaking the claim ‘heat does not kill’, is false – hyperthermia is a real cause of death, but Homewood’s basic contention, that UK heat is so low that it causes next to no deaths compared to cold, and most of those heat deaths are simply hastening the already dying, is fair.

Hypothermia, aka overheating, requires either adverse reactions to drugs, physical exertion which pushes a body beyond cooling abilities, or situational factor e.g. PPE trapping heat, or concrete jungles where heat absorption, high humidity, and\or inability to access ACC, ice packs, or other cooling, results in a death valley effect.

The solution would seem to be fairly simple – don’t build urban heat sinks i.e. large concrete cities, and do supply reliable and affordable energy. But those pushing the agenda want ever larger, ever denser, heat sinks, and while they talk about cheap, reliable, energy, the visible result of their efforts is rising prices – except where taxpayer subsidies artificially reduce things temporarily!

Richard Rude
January 4, 2026 10:32 pm

This is a good companion piece to the Church of England’s dismantling of gas boilers in favor of much more expensive heating.

January 5, 2026 12:43 am

What is a heatwave?
The World Meteorological Organization defines it as five or more consecutive days during which the daily maximum temperature surpasses the average maximum temperature by 5 °C (9 °F) or more.

https://www.iipa.org.in/cms/public/uploads/222841610370027.pdf

UK met office no longer use the WMO definition, in 2018 they changed it to:

“A UK heatwave threshold is met when a location records a period of at least three consecutive days with daily maximum temperatures meeting or exceeding the heatwave temperature threshold, dependant on location.” (currently that is just 28ºC max, and no minimum duration)

https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/weather/learn-about/weather/types-of-weather/temperature/heatwave

Clearly this is so they can claim that heatwaves occur more frequently, which is an obvious lie if they have to change the definition to make that claim. Of course, this also means they can claim “hottest since records began”, as a new record started with the definition change. The Met office are all in on the globalist’s “climate crisis” scam, designed to rob you of your freedoms and tax you based on the vagaries of the weather. I’m reasonably sure the UK has not seen a heatwave meeting the WMO definition for many years, maybe decades and CERTAINLY NOT this year.